I'm grabbing data from the server and pushing them into an observable array.
I'm pushing observables into an observable array.
As I push the data into the observables, the observables contain the data.
However as soon as I push the observables into the observable Array, a few of the observables are missing data.
self.mealFoods([]);
$.ajax({
url: "/mealsurl/1",
async: false,
dataType: 'json',
success: function(datad) {
for(var lia = 0; lia < datad.length; lia++){
var cats_url = "/catsurl/" + datad[lia].category_id;
var units_by_food_url = "/unitsurl/" + datad[lia].ndb_no;
var foodThing = new NewFood();
foodThing.foodId(parseInt(datad[lia].id)); //works
foodThing.category(parseInt(datad[lia].category_id)); //works
$.ajax({
url: cats_url,
dataType: 'json',
success: function(dat) {
foodThing.category_foods(dat); //works
}
});
foodThing.food(datad[lia].ndb_no); //works
$.ajax({
url: units_by_food_url,
dataType: 'json',
success: function(dat) {
foodThing.food.units(dat); //works
}
});
foodThing.unit(parseInt(datad[lia].seq)); //works
foodThing.number_of_unit(datad[lia].this_much); //works
self.mealFoods.push(foodThing);
// At this point when looking inside the mealFoods array: self.mealFoods()[0].food(), self.mealFoods()[0].unit(), self.mealFoods()[0].food.units(), self.mealFoods()[0].category_Foods() ALL ARE EMPTY
}
}
});
You, sir, are having a classic case of async-brain-melt. It is a common sympton in beginners but never fear for the recovery rate is nearly 100%. :)
I would wager your experience is with synchronous languages, that is, where if one line is written after the other, the lines written before are executed before, always.
A normal JavaScript function is synchronous. For example:
console.log(1);
console.log(2);
As expected, this prints 1 and then 2.
However, asynchronous code is not necessarily executed in the order it was declared. Consider this example using a setTimeout function, which schedules a function for later execution:
setTimeout(function(){ console.log(1); }, 1000);
console.log(2);
Now, the output will be 2 and 1, because 1 only ran 1000 millis after the setTimeout call.
So, I imagine you are beginning to understand how this applies to your problem.
Your calls to cats_url and units_by_food_url are asynchronous. Therefore, the following code does not wait for them to finish. So, when you access self.mealFoods()[0].food.units(), the success function has not yet grabbed the data!
What you need to do is to coordinate your asynchronous calls appropriately. There are many ways to achieve that. First, I'll teach you the most simple strategy, using only functions:
Grab the list from the server
When you have the list, iterate over each meal and start two ajax calls (up to here, you are already doing everything right)
Now comes the magic: when you have the results for either ajax call, you call an "itemComplete" function. This function will sync the two calls - it will only proceed if the two calls finished.
Finally, call a "listComplete" function each time any item is complete. This function must also check if all items are complete before proceeding.
So, it would look something like this:
$.ajax({
url: "/meals/1",
dataType: 'json',
success: function(list) {
var observableArray = ko.observableArray([]); // this will hold your list
var length = list.length;
var tries = 0;
var listComplete = function () {
tries++;
if (tries == length) {
// Hooray!
// All your items are complete.
console.log(observableArray());
}
};
list.forEach(function(item){
var propertyOneUrl = item.propertyOneUrl;
var propertyTwoUrl = item.propertyTwoUrl;
var propertyOneComplete = false;
var propertyTwoComplete = false;
var food = new Food(item.id);
var itemComplete = function () {
if (propertyOneComplete && propertyTwoComplete) {
// This item is complete.
observableArray.push(food);
// Let's warn list complete so it can count us in.
listComplete();
}
};
// Start your ajax calls
$.ajax({
url: propertyOneUrl,
dataType: 'json',
success: function (propertyOne) {
food.propertyOne(propertyOne);
// Declare that your first property is ready
propertyOneComplete = true;
// We can't know which property finishes first, so we must call this in both
itemComplete();
}
});
$.ajax({
url: propertyTwoUrl,
dataType: 'json',
success: function (propertyTwo) {
food.propertyTwo(propertyTwo);
// Declare that your second property is ready
propertyTwoComplete = true;
// We can't know which property finishes first, so we must call this in both
itemComplete();
}
});
}); //for each
} // success
});
Now, you probably realize how tiresome that pattern can be. That's why there are other ways to better solve this problem. One of these is a pattern called "Promises". You can learn more about them in these links:
https://www.promisejs.org/
http://blog.gadr.me/promises-are-not-optional/
And you'll be happy to know that jQuery.ajax() returns a Promise! So, now you can try and solve that problem using Promises. You'll end up with a much cleaner code.
Hope you make it!
It's because you are doing async ajax calls in a loop. Because whenever an ajax call is made it the loop continues it means that by the time the response comes back the object assigned to foodThing is now no longer what it was set to before the ajax call. Because a for loop is so quick is most likely that only the last object created in the loop is updated.
If you have a look at this simple loop it has the same problem:
for (var i = 0; i < 10; i++){
var a = new NewFood(i);
$.ajax({
url: "/catsurl/1",
dataType: 'json',
success: function(dat) {
console.debug(a.id);
}
});
}
By the time the ajax call comes back a has changed and what ends up happening is only 9 gets written out 10 times: http://jsfiddle.net/r6rwbtb9/
To fix this we would use a closure which is essentially wrapping the ajax call in a function in which we self contain the item we want to do something with:
for (var i = 0; i < 10; i++){
var a = new NewFood(i);
(function (a) {
$.ajax({
url: "/catsurl/1",
dataType: 'json',
success: function(dat) {
console.debug(a.id);
}
});
})(a);
}
And then you can see that the numbers 0-9 are output to the console: http://jsfiddle.net/r6rwbtb9/1/. It's also interesting to note that you can't ensure that each request will necessarily come back in the the same order. That is why sometimes the numbers could come back in a different order to 0-9 because some requests are quicker than others.
SO back to your code. In order to make sure you are updating the correct item for each callback you need to use a closure for each ajax call. There was also a problem with foodThing.food.units(dat) which needed to be foodThing.food().units(dat) as foodThing.food() is an observable.
So to wrap in closures we need to change the two ajax calls to this:
(function(category_foods){
$.ajax({
url: cats_url,
dataType: 'json',
success: function(dat) {
category_foods(dat);
}
});
})(foodThing.category_foods);
(function(units){
$.ajax({
url: units_by_food_url,
dataType: 'json',
success: function(dat) {
units(dat);
}
});
})(foodThing.food().units);
Related
I have an ajax call inside a .each loop wrapped in a setInterval function.
This handles updating of many divs on a dashboard with just a few lines of code on the html page.
I am worried about server lag vs client side speed. What will happen if the server has not responded with the data before the loop moves on to the next iteration?
So, my question is, can the loop be paused until the success is executed?
Ajax call:
setInterval(function() {
$(".ajax_update").each(function(){
$.ajax({
type: "POST",
dataType: "json",
url: "ajax/automated_update/confirmed_appointments.php",
data: "clinic_id=<? echo $clinic_id ?>&tomorrow=<? echo $tomorrow ?>&"+$(this).data('stored'), // serializes the form's elements.
success: function(data)
{
$(data[0]).html(data[1]);
}
});
});
}, 5000); //5 seconds*
</script>
I have looked into .ajaxComplete() but I dont see how to apply this as a solution.
I have also looked at turning the loop into something that calls itself like:
function doLoop() {
if (i >= options.length) {
return;
}
$.ajax({
success: function(data) {
i++;
doLoop();
}
});
}
But would that not interfere with .each? I dont understand how that would play nice with .each and looping based on my div class.
I just cant figure it out! Any help would be appreciated.
I was able to get .when working with the ajax call, but I dont understand how to make .when do what I need (stop the loop until the ajax call is done).
$(".ajax_update").each(function(){
$.ajax({
type: "POST",
dataType: "json",
url: "ajax/automated_update/confirmed_appointments.php",
data: "clinic_id=<? echo $clinic_id ?>&tomorrow=<? echo $tomorrow ?>&"+$(this).data('stored'), // serializes the form's elements.
success: function(data)
{
$(data[0]).html(data[1]);
}
});
$.when( $.ajax() ).done(function() {
alert("Finished it");
});
});
After thinking about your question a bit, perhaps a good solution would be to put an event in place that would trigger a new set of updates with a minimum time between your dashboard updates. This would ensure that all your updates process, that we do wait a minimum time between updates and then trigger the update cycle once again. Thus if you DO encounter any delayed ajax responses you do not try another until the previous one has all completed.
I have not fully tested this code but is should do what I describe:
//create a dashboard object to handle the update deferred
var dashboard = {
update: function (myquery) {
var dfr = $.Deferred();
$.ajax({
type: "POST",
dataType: "json",
url: "ajax/automated_update/confirmed_appointments.php",
data: "clinic_id=<? echo $clinic_id ?>&tomorrow=<? echo $tomorrow ?>&" + myquery,
success: dfr.resolve
});
return dfr.promise();
}
};
//create a simple deferred wait timer
$.wait = function (time) {
return $.Deferred(function (dfd) {
setTimeout(dfd.resolve, time);
});
};
// use map instead of your .each to better manage the deferreds
var mydeferred = $(".ajax_update").map(function (i, elem) {
return dashboard.update($(this).data('stored')).then(function (data, textStatus, jqXHR) {
$(data[0]).html(data[1]);
});
});
//where I hang my dashboardupdate event on and then trigger it
var mydiv = $('#mydiv');
var minimumDashboardUpdate = 5000;
$('#mydiv').on('dashboardupdate', function () {
$.when.apply($, mydeferred.get())
.then(function () {
$.when($.wait(minimumDashboardUpdate)).then(function () {
mydiv.trigger('dashboardupdate');
});
});
});
mydiv.trigger('dashboardupdate');
I have a key_gen.php file that contains a function to generate a random key. When executed, the php file gives back one key (tested and it works).
In my javascript file I have a click event on a button (that works), something like this:
$('#kg_btn').click(function(){});
Then, inside my click event I have a functions:
var get_key = function(){
for(var i = 0; i < kg_quantity; i++) {
$.ajax ({
url: "../keygen/gen_rkey.php",
type: "GET",
datatype: "json",
success: function(data) {
var j_obj = JSON.parse(data);
//alert("Success!");
prs = j_obj.test;
console.log(prs);
//add_key();
},
error: function(error) {
alert("Error! Can't send the data");
}
}); //ajax call ends
}
}
When I run this function once (by setting up the "Kg_quantity" variable to 1), every time I click my button I get a correct behavior. The result is a different key on the console.log per click.
If I set up the "kg_quantity" to any other number than 1 (for example: 3,9,10), I do get the console.log messages back, but the number generated is the same.
I was hoping that by inserting the ajax object into a for-loop would execute the ajax call several times. I tried to put the ajax call within a prototype function, as well, but I get the same result.
Edit: I tried adding a closure (as Ross suggested), but I get the exact same result.
Thanks.
AJAX is asynchronous. Your loop will finish before the first AJAX response most likely.
I would restructure that so the success response from the AJAX call will trigger the next iteration. Or if you're lazy you can just set async:false:
$.ajax ({
url: "../keygen/gen_rkey.php",
type: "GET",
async: false,
....
Or even better, put the strain on the server and reduce the back-and-forth so you get all your keys in one response:
url: "../keygen/gen_rkey.php?qty=" + kg_quantity,
UPDATE: Async design method:
function getKeys(max,cur) {
cur = cur || 1;
if (cur == max) {
return;
}
$.ajax({
....
success(function(data) {
// do stuff....
// recursive iteration
getKeys(max,cur + 1);
}
});
}
getKeys(5);
I've got a dashboard page, and am using jQuery to update each graph with a single ajax call.
If it run AJAX with async:false then everything works, but it's obviously slow as the calls are made one after another.
When I run async:true, the queries execute but they all output to the same element and overwrite each other.
How can I ensure that the jQuery selector in the success and error functions remain pointed to their original desintation and do not all point to the final box?
My code:
//update sparklines on dashboard page
$(".convobox7").each(function() {
id = $(this).attr('id');
$("#convobox-7-"+id).prepend("<img src='img/ajax_loader.gif'/>");
$.ajaxQueue({
url: '_ajax/getFunnelReport',
type: "POST",
dataType: "json",
async: true,
data: {funnel:$(this).attr('id'), dimension:'date'},
timeout: 50000,
success: function(json) {
var data = json;
if (data.success=='true') {
$("#convobox-7-"+id).html(data.htmlconv+"<br/><small>Past week</small>");
gebo_peity.init();
}
},
error: function(x, t, m) {
$("#convobox-7-"+id).html("");
}
})
});
Note I'm using the ajaxQueue plugin here but the same thing happens without it.
You need to localise id :
var id = $(this).attr('id');
There may be other things to fix but that one is a certainty.
EDIT
Try this :
$(".convobox7").each(function() {
var id = $(this).attr('id');
var $el = $("#convobox-7-"+id).prepend("<img src='img/ajax_loader.gif'/>");
$.ajaxQueue({
url: '_ajax/getFunnelReport',
type: "POST",
dataType: "json",
data: {funnel:id, dimension:'date'},
timeout: 50000,
success: function(data) {
if (data.success == 'true') {
$el.html(data.htmlconv+"<br/><small>Past week</small>");
gebo_peity.init();
}
},
error: function(x, t, m) {
$el.html("");
}
});
});
This has to do with function closures because you declared the variable outside the success/error function. A better approach is to use the $(this) reference in the error/success functions instead of assigning it outside the handlers.
Edit: In the context of the error/success handler for ajaxQueue, I'm not absolutely certain what $(this) refers to, you may need to navigate to a parent element. I didn't see any definitive documentation offhand. This is one of my biggest pet peeves with javascript documentation, $(this) is sometimes not what you would think it'd be and isn't documented :/
silly question, but since you already send the element id to the service, is there a reason it cannot send it back? then you can simply use that as a selector, ensuring that you have the item you need.
I'm making a call to an app to fetch data (routes), then looping through that data to fetch additional data about each individual route. The final data will show up in console.log without a problem, but I can't get it into an array.
$.getJSON('http://example-app/api/routes/?callback=?', function(data) {
var routes = [];
$(data).each(function(i){
routes.push(data[i]._id);
});
function getRouteData(route, callback) {
$.ajax({
url: 'http://example-app/api/routes/'+route+'?callback=?',
dataType: 'json',
success: function(data) {
callback(data);
}
});
}
var route_data = [];
$(routes).each(function(i) {
getRouteData(routes[i], function(data) {
console.log(data); // this shows me the 13 objects
route_data.push(data);
});
});
console.log(route_data); // this is empty
});
nnnnnn's right, you have to use Deferreds/promises to ensure that route_data is populated before sending it to the console.
It's not immediately obvious how to do this, with particular regard to the fact that $.when() accepts a series of discrete arguments, not an array.
Another issue is that any individual ajax failure should not scupper the whole enterprise. It is maybe less than obvious how to overcome this.
I'm not 100% certain but something along the following lines should work :
$.getJSON('http://example-app/api/routes/?callback=?', function(data) {
var route_promises = [];
var route_data = [];
function getRouteData(route) {
var dfrd = $.Deferred();
$.ajax({
url: 'http://example-app/api/routes/'+route+'?callback=?',
dataType: 'json'
}).done(function(data) {
//console.log(data); // this shows me the 13 objects
route_data.push(data);
}).fail(function() {
route_data.push("ajax error");
}).then(function() {
dfrd.resolve();
});
return dfrd.promise();//By returning a promise derived from a Deferred that is fully under our control (as opposed to the $.ajax method's jqXHR object), we can guarantee resolution even if the ajax fails. Thus any number of ajax failures will not cause the whole route_promises collection to fail.
}
$(data).each(function(i, route) {
route_promises.push( getRouteData(route) );
});
//$.when doesn't accept an array, but we should be able to use $.when.apply($, ...), where the first parameter, `$`, is arbitrary.
$.when.apply($, route_promises).done(function() {
console.log(route_data);
});
});
untested
See comments in code.
Hey. I need some help with jQuery Ajax calls. In javascript I have to generste ajax calls to the controller, which retrieves a value from the model. I am then checking the value that is returned and making further ajax calls if necessary, say if the value reaches a particular threshold I can stop the ajax calls.
This requires ajax calls that need to be processes one after the other. I tried using async:false, but it freezes up the browser and any jQuery changes i make at the frontend are not reflected. Is there any way around this??
Thanks in advance.
You should make the next ajax call after the first one has finished like this for example:
function getResult(value) {
$.ajax({
url: 'server/url',
data: { value: value },
success: function(data) {
getResult(data.newValue);
}
});
}
I used array of steps and callback function to continue executing where async started. Works perfect for me.
var tasks = [];
for(i=0;i<20;i++){
tasks.push(i); //can be replaced with list of steps, url and so on
}
var current = 0;
function doAjax(callback) {
//check to make sure there are more requests to make
if (current < tasks.length -1 ) {
var uploadURL ="http://localhost/someSequentialToDo";
//and
var myData = tasks[current];
current++;
//make the AJAX request with the given data
$.ajax({
type: 'GET',
url : uploadURL,
data: {index: current},
dataType : 'json',
success : function (serverResponse) {
doAjax(callback);
}
});
}
else
{
callback();
console.log("this is end");
}
}
function sth(){
var datum = Date();
doAjax( function(){
console.log(datum); //displays time when ajax started
console.log(Date()); //when ajax finished
});
}
console.log("start");
sth();
In the success callback function, just make another $.ajax request if necessary. (Setting async: false causes the browser to run the request as the same thread as everything else; that's why it freezes up.)
Use a callback function, there are two: success and error.
From the jQuery ajax page:
$.ajax({
url: "test.html",
context: document.body,
success: function(){
// Do processing, call function for next ajax
}
});
A (very) simplified example:
function doAjax() {
// get url and parameters
var myurl = /* somethingsomething */;
$.ajax({
url: myurl,
context: document.body,
success: function(data){
if(data < threshold) {
doAjax();
}
}
});
}
Try using $.when() (available since 1.5) you can have a single callback that triggers once all calls are made, its cleaner and much more elegant. It ends up looking something like this:
$.when($.ajax("/page1.php"), $.ajax("/page2.php")).done(function(a1, a2){
// a1 and a2 are arguments resolved for the page1 and page2 ajax requests, respectively
var jqXHR = a1[2]; /* arguments are [ "success", statusText, jqXHR ] */
alert( jqXHR.responseText )
});