Every tree is a directed, acyclic graph (DAG), but there exist DAGs that are not trees.
a) How can we tell whether a given DAG is a tree?
b) Devise an algorithm to test whether a given DAG is a tree??
Check that there are exactly n - 1 edges(where n is the number of vertices).
Check that there is a vertex with zero indegree.
Run depth first search from this vertex and check that all vertices are reachable from it.
If at least one of this condition does not hold true, it is not a tree. Otherwise, it is a tree.
Related
Under what kind of constraints, will two BFS (could start from different vertex) on a simple undirected graph produce the same set of edges?
If the graph is a minimum spanning tree, then it will produce all the edges in the breadth-first search which can start from any vertex.
Reason:
In BFS, all nodes are going to be visited.
The minimum spanning tree contains a minimal number of edges to connect all the nodes. So, the BFS traversal will traverse all the edges in order to visit all the nodes.
So, all the edges of the graph are in the set. That means if you start BFS from any vertex, all the edges are going to be included in the set. Thus, the same set of edges for any node.
Say you run BFS on graph G with starting vertex v (BFS(G, v)) and there is some edge e = (u,w) that isn't traversed. Running BFS(G, u) guarantees that (u,w) is traversed. Thus BFS will only produce a unique set of edges when it produces all edges. I.e. in acyclic graphs.
I got this question from a data structure and algorithm textbook saying
A simple undirected graph is complete if it contains an edge between every pair of distinct vertices. A star graph is a tree of n nodes with one node having vertex degree n-1 and the other n-1 having vertex degree 1.
(a) Draw a complete undirected graph with 6 vertices.
(b) Show that applying breath-first algorithm on the undirected graph in (a) will produce a star graph.
I know how the BFS works using queues and I can provide a result of the traversal. What I'm confused about is on part (b) how can I show that applying BFS on an undirected graph will produce a star graph?
In a, there is n * (n - 1) / 2 edges in total.
It means that for every two nodes, there is an edge between them.
if applying BFS on (a) using a queue, Steps as follow:
1.) you pick up a random node, which is the root of the graph.
2.) you travel from the root node, and put all the nodes having edges with it to the queue. In addition, you have a boolean array to mark who is already processed.
in 2.), all the nodes except the root will be put into the queue.
At last, the root node have N - 1 edges, others have only one edge, and this edge is with the root
I currently studying about graphs and their algorithms, and i noticed a question which i don't know to to exactly prove:
If we have a connected, undirected graph G=(V,E), and every edge is with weight=1,is it true to say that every spanning tree that built from the shortest paths from the root, is a minimum spanning tree?
I ran some examples in http://visualgo.net/sssp.html and is seems for me that the answer for this question is true, but someone can show me how can i prove this?
and another question that crossed my mind, does the other direction is also true?
Every tree has exactly n - 1 edges. Since all weights are equal to 1, every spanning tree of G has a total weight of n - 1. It is also true for the minimal spanning tree. So the answer is yes.
TLDR: Not Necessarily
Consider the triangle graph with unit weights - it has three vertices x,y,z, and all three edges {x,y},{x,z},{y,z} have unit weight. The shortest path between any two vertices is the direct path. Agree?However, to satisfy the condition of a MST in the graph, you have to put together a set of 2 edges connecting the 3 vertices. Say {x,y}, {y,z} for example. This does not represent the shortest path between any pair of vertices.
Hence, your proposition is false :)
I would like to know of a fast algorithm to determine if a directed or undirected graph is a tree.
This post seems to deal with it, but it is not very clear; according to this link, if the graph is acyclic, then it is a tree. But if you consider the directed and undirected graphs below: in my opinion, only graphs 1 and 4 are trees. I suppose 3 is neither cyclic, nor a tree.
What needs to be checked to see if a directed or undirected graph is a tree or not, in an efficient way? And taking it one step ahead: if a tree exists then is it a binary tree or not?
For a directed graph:
Find the vertex with no incoming edges (if there is more than one or no such vertex, fail).
Do a breadth-first or depth-first search from that vertex. If you encounter an already visited vertex, it's not a tree.
If you're done and there are unexplored vertices, it's not a tree - the graph is not connected.
Otherwise, it's a tree.
To check for a binary tree, additionally check if each vertex has at most 2 outgoing edges.
For an undirected graph:
Check for a cycle with a simple depth-first search (starting from any vertex) - "If an unexplored edge leads to a node visited before, then the graph contains a cycle." If there's a cycle, it's not a tree.
If the above process leaves some vertices unexplored, it's not a tree, because it's not connected.
Otherwise, it's a tree.
To check for a binary tree, if the graph has more than one vertex, additionally check that all vertices have 1-3 edges (1 to the parent and 2 to the children).
Checking for the root, i.e. whether one vertex contains 1-2 edges, is not necessary as there has to be vertices with 1-2 edges in an acyclic connected undirected graph.
Note that identifying the root is not generically possible (it may be possible in special cases) as, in many undirected graphs, more than one of the nodes can be made the root if we were to make it a binary tree.
If an undirected given graph is a tree:
the graph is connected
the number of edges equals the number of nodes - 1.
An undirected graph is a tree when the following two conditions are true:
The graph is a connected graph.
The graph does not have a cycle.
A directed graph is a tree when the following three conditions are true:
The graph is a connected graph.
The graph does not have a cycle.
Each node except root should have exactly one parent.
This is a question from Algorithm Design by Steven Skiena (for interview prep):
An articulation vertex of a graph G is a vertex whose deletion disconnects G. Let G be a graph with n vertices and m edges. Give a simple O(n + m) that finds a deletion order for the n vertices such that no deletion disconnects the graph.
This is what I thought:
Run DFS on the graph and keep updating each node's oldest reachable ancestor (based on which we decide if it's a bridge cut node, parent cute node or root cut node)
If we find a leaf node(vertex) or a node which is not an articulation vertex delete it.
At the end of DFS, we'd be left with all those nodes in graph which were found to be articulation vertices
The graph will remain connected as the articulation vertices are intact. I've tried it on a couple of graphs and it seems to work but it feels too simple for the book.
in 2 steps:
make the graph DAG using any traversal algorithm
do topology sort
each step finishes without going beyond O(m+n)
Assuming the graph is connected, then any random node reaches a subgraph whose spanning tree may be deleted in post-order without breaking the connectedness of the graph. Repeat in this manner until the graph is all gone.
Utilize DFS to track the exit time of each vertex;
Delete vertices in the order of recorded exit time;
If we always delete leaves of a tree one by one, rest of the tree remain connected. One particular way of doing this is to assign a pre-order number to each vertex as the graph is traversed using DFS or BFS. Sort the vertices in descending order (based on pre-order numbers). Remove vertices in that order from graph. Note that the leaves are always deleted first.