Related
New to Ruby (coming from Python) and try to experiment this exercise:
(mixed the array items by taking first, last in rotating fashion)
Expected Output to be - [1, 7, 2, 6, 3, 5, 4]. But I did not expect 'nil' at the end... The orig. array can contain even or odd size of numbers.
Can someone shed the light of this unexpected? Thanks in advance.
[Updates - re-write the example from Ruby Cookbook p.162 Array ]
nums = (1..7).to_a # [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
mixed = []
#middle = nums.length / 2
#index = 0
until nums.empty?
mixed << nums.shift(). #get 1st element out
mixed << nums.pop() #get last element out
#index += 1
end
print mixed # Got [1, 7, 2, 6, 3, 5, 4, nil]
What's happening is that the total num of elements in the array is odd so the last value is put into mixed on 'shift' and then there is no element left in the array. This will solve your issue:
nums = (1..7).to_a # [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
mixed = []
#middle = nums.length / 2
#index = 0
until nums.empty?
mixed << nums.shift()
mixed << nums.pop() unless nums.empty?
#index += 1
end
print mixed # Got [1, 7, 2, 6, 3, 5, 4]
Another way is: If the num of elements is odd then run the loop till n-1 and then get the last element out using shift/pop (doesn't matter if you use shift or pop at the end, you will get the same element.)
The Cookbook method can be made non-destructive (avoid modifying nums) as follows.
def doit(nums)
nums.size.times.map { |i| i.even? ? nums[i/2] : nums[-i/2] }
end
doit [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
#=> [1, 7, 2, 6, 3, 5, 4]
doit [1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7]
#=> [1, 7, 2, 6, 3, 5]
Here is another (non-destructive) way to do that.
def doit(nums)
n = nums.size/2
nums.first(n).zip(nums.last(n).reverse).flatten.tap do |a|
a << nums[n] if nums.size.odd?
end
end
doit [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
#=> [1, 7, 2, 6, 3, 5, 4]
doit [1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7]
#=> [1, 7, 2, 6, 3, 5]
I’m getting some weird results implementing cyclic permutation on the children of a multidimensional array.
When I manually define the array e.g.
arr = [
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
]
the output is different from when I obtain that same array by calling a method that builds it.
I’ve compared the manual array to the generated version and they’re exactly the same (class and values, etc).
I tried writing the same algorithm in JS and encountered the same issue.
Any idea what might be going on?
def Build_array(child_arr, n)
#Creates larger array with arr as element, n times over. For example Build_array([1,2,3], 3) returns [[1,2,3], [1,2,3], [1,2,3]]
parent_arr = Array.new(4)
0.upto(n) do |i|
parent_arr[i] = child_arr
end
return parent_arr
end
def Cylce_child(arr, steps_tocycle)
# example: Cylce_child([1, 2, 3, 4, 5], 2) returns [4, 5, 1, 2, 3]
0.upto(steps_tocycle - 1) do |i|
x = arr.pop()
arr.unshift(x)
end
return arr
end
def Permute_array(parent_array, x, y, z)
#x, y, z = number of steps to cycle each child array
parent_array[0] = Cylce_child(parent_array[0], x)
parent_array[1] = Cylce_child(parent_array[1], y)
parent_array[2] = Cylce_child(parent_array[2], z)
return parent_array
end
arr = Build_array([1, 2, 3, 4, 5], 4)
# arr = [[1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]]
puts "#{Permute_array(arr, 1, 2, 3)}"
# Line 34: When arr = Build_array([1, 2, 3, 4, 5], 4)
# Result (WRONG):
# [[5, 1, 2, 3, 4], [5, 1, 2, 3, 4], [5, 1, 2, 3, 4], [5, 1, 2, 3, 4]]
#
# Line 5: When arr = [[1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [1, # 2, 3, 4, 5]]
# Result (CORRECT):
# [[5, 1, 2, 3, 4], [4, 5, 1, 2, 3], [3, 4, 5, 1, 2], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]]
#
The problem is in the way you build the array.
This line:
parent_arr[i] = child_arr
does not put in parent_arr[i] a copy of child_arr but a reference to it.
This means your initial array contains four references to the same child array. Later on, when the code changes parent_arr[0], it changes the same array that child_arr was referring to in the build method. And that array is also parent_arr[1] and parrent_arr[2] and so on.
A simple solution to the problem is to put in parent_arr[i] a copy of child_arr:
parent_arr[i] = Array.new(child_arr)
I see where the bug was. Added the clone method to line 8 so that it now reads:
parent_arr[i] = child_arr.clone
#Old: parent_arr[i] = child_arr
Thanks Robin, for pointing me in the right direction.
This is a fairly common mistake to make in Ruby since arrays do not contain objects per-se, but object references, which are effectively pointers to a dynamically allocated object, not the object itself.
That means this code:
Array.new(4, [ ])
Will yield an array containing four identical references to the same object, that object being the second argument.
To see what happens:
Array.new(4, [ ]).map(&:object_id)
# => => [70127689565700, 70127689565700, 70127689565700, 70127689565700]
Notice four identical object IDs. All the more obvious if you call uniq on that.
To fix this you must supply a block that yields a different object each time:
Array.new(4) { [ ] }.map(&:object_id)
# => => [70127689538260, 70127689538240, 70127689538220, 70127689538200]
Now adding to one element does not impact the others.
That being said, there's a lot of issues in your code that can be resolved by employing Ruby as it was intended (e.g. more "idiomatic" code):
def build_array(child_arr, n)
# Duplicate the object given each time to avoid referencing the same thing
# N times. Each `dup` object is independent.
Array.new(4) do
child_arr.dup
end
end
def cycle_child(arr, steps_tocycle)
# Ruby has a rotate method built-in
arr.rotate(steps_tocycle)
end
# Using varargs (*args) you can just loop over how many positions were given dynamically
def permute_array(parent_array, *args)
# Zip is great for working with two arrays in parallel, they get "zippered" together.
# Also map is what you use for transforming one array into another in a 1:1 mapping
args.zip(parent_array).map do |a, p|
# Rotate each element the right number of positions
cycle_child(p, -a)
end
end
arr = build_array([1, 2, 3, 4, 5], 4)
# => [[1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]]
puts "#{permute_array(arr, 1, 2, 3)}"
# => [[5, 1, 2, 3, 4], [4, 5, 1, 2, 3], [3, 4, 5, 1, 2]]
A lot of these methods boil down to some very simple Ruby so they're not especially useful now, but this adapts the code as directly as possible for educational purposes.
Simple question, but somehow I can't think of a solution. How can I delete a single smallest element in an array of random integers?
a = [7, 5, 3, 2, 1, 4]
b = [2, 2, 1, 1, 2]
This is what I come up with:
def remove_it(num)
num.delete(num.sort[0])
end
Code works with a, but not b. It deletes both 1's in b. I only need to delete one 1.
How can I delete one smallest number in an array and keep the order?
Easy-peasy. Use .delete_at + .index:
def remove_it(num)
num.delete_at(num.index(num.min))
num
end
a = [7, 5, 3, 2, 1, 4]
b = [2, 2, 1, 1, 2]
remove_it(a) # => [7, 5, 3, 2, 4]
remove_it(b) # => [2, 2, 1, 2]
nums1 = Array[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
nums2 = Array[5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
def mergeArrays (ar1, ar2)
result = (ar1 << ar2).flatten!
require 'pp'
pp %w(result)
end
As simple as this. I am trying to merge these two arrays and display the result. I am also brand-brand new to Ruby. This is the first function I am writing in this language. Trying to learn here. Also how can I remove the duplicates?
It would help if you give example inputs and outputs so we know exactly what you want. When you use the word "merge", I think you actually just want to add the arrays together:
ar1 = [1, 2, 3]
ar2 = [3, 4, 5]
ar3 = ar1 + ar2 # => [1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 5]
Now if you want to remove duplicates, use Array#uniq:
ar4 = ar3.uniq # => [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
There is no need to write a method to do any of this since the Ruby Array class already supports it. You should skim through the documentation of the Array class to learn more things you can do with arrays.
What do you mean 'not working'?
Similar questions have been asked here:
Array Merge (Union)
You have two options: the pipe operator (a1 | a2) or concatenate-and-uniq ((a1 + a2).uniq).
Also be careful about using <<, this will modify the original variable, concatenating ar2 onto the end of the original ar1.
nums1 = Array[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
nums2 = Array[5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
result = (nums1<< nums2).flatten!
nums1
=> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
nums2
=> [5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
result
=> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
Additionally- just another Ruby tip, you do not need the destructive flatten! with ! versus the regular flatten. The regular flatten method will return a new Array, which you assign to result in your case. flatten! will flatten self in place, altering whatever Array it's called upon, rather than returning a new array.
You can merge Arrays using '+' operator and you can ignore the duplicated values using .uniq
>> nums1 = Array[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
=> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
>> nums2 = Array[5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
=> [5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
>> def mergeArrays (nums1, nums2)
>> result = (nums1 + nums2).uniq
>> end
=> :mergeArrays
>> mergeArrays(nums1,nums2)
=> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
nums1 = Array[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
nums2 = Array[5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
p nums1.concat(nums2).uniq
I have a range of numbers R = (1..n). I also have another character 'a'. I want to generate strings of length L (L > n + 2) that have all the numbers in the same order, but go through every repeated permutation of 'a' to fill the length L. For example, if n = 3, and L = 7, then some valid strings would be :
"123aaaa",
"1a23aaa",
"1aa2a3a",
"aaaa123"
while the following strings would be invalid:
"213aaaa", # invalid, because 1,2,3 are not in order
"123a", #invalid, because length < L
"1123aaa", # invalid because a number is repeated
I am currently doing this, which is way too inefficient:
n = 3
L = 7
all_terms = (1..n).to_a + Array.new(L - n, 'a')
all_terms.permutation.each do |permut|
if(valid_permut? permut) # checks if numbers are in their natural order
puts permut.join
end
end
How do I directly generate valid strings more efficiently?
The problem is equivalent to: select n elements from index 0 to L - 1, fill these with 1 to n accordingly, and fill the rest with some constant character.
In your example, it's taking 3 elements from 0..6:
(0..6).to_a.combination(3).to_a
=> [[0, 1, 2], [0, 1, 3], [0, 1, 4], [0, 1, 5], [0, 1, 6], [0, 2, 3], [0, 2, 4],
[0, 2, 5], [0, 2, 6], [0, 3, 4], [0, 3, 5], [0, 3, 6], [0, 4, 5], [0, 4, 6], [0, 5, 6],
[1, 2, 3], [1, 2, 4], [1, 2, 5], [1, 2, 6], [1, 3, 4], [1, 3, 5], [1, 3, 6], [1, 4, 5],
[1, 4, 6], [1, 5, 6], [2, 3, 4], [2, 3, 5], [2, 3, 6], [2, 4, 5], [2, 4, 6], [2, 5, 6],
[3, 4, 5], [3, 4, 6], [3, 5, 6], [4, 5, 6]]
Every subarray here represents a possible result. For example, [0, 2, 3] corresponds to '0a12aaa', [3, 5, 6] corresponds to 'aaa0a12', etc. The code for this conversion is straight-forward.
You can model this as all possible interleavings of two strings, where relative order of the input elements is preserved. Here's a recursive solution. It works by choosing an element from one list, and prepending it to all possible subproblems, then doing it again where an element is chosen from the second list instead, and combining the two solution sets at the end.
# Returns an array of all possible interleaving of two strings
# Maintains relative order of each character of the input strings
def interleave_strings_all(a1, a2)
# Handle base case where at least one input string is empty
return [a1 + a2] if a1.empty? || a2.empty?
# Place element of first string, and prepend to all subproblems
set1 = interleave_strings_all(a1[1..-1], a2).map{|x| a1[0] + x}
# Place element of second string and prepend to all subproblems
set2 = interleave_strings_all(a1, a2[1..-1]).map{|x| a2[0] + x}
# Combine solutions of subproblems into overall problem
return set1.concat(set2)
end
if __FILE__ == $0 then
l = 5
n = 3
a1 = (1..n).to_a.map{|x| x.to_s}.join()
a2 = 'a' * (l - n)
puts interleave_strings_all(a1, a2)
end
The output is:
123aa
12a3a
12aa3
1a23a
1a2a3
1aa23
a123a
a12a3
a1a23
aa123