I have this hash:
response = '{"librairies":[{"id":1,"books":[{"id":1,"qty":1},{"id":2,"qty":3}]},{"id":2,"books":[{"id":1,"qty":0},{"id":2,"qty":3}]}]}'
in which I'd like to delete every librairies where, at least, one of the book quantity is null.
For instance, with this given response, I'd expect this return:
'{"librairies":[{"id":1,"books":[{"id":1,"qty":1},{"id":2,"qty":3}]}]}'
I've tried this:
parsed = JSON.parse(response)
parsed["librairies"].each do |library|
library["books"].each do |book|
parsed.delete(library) if book["qty"] == 0
end
end
but this returns the exact same response hash, without having deleted the second library (the one with id => 2).
You can use Array#delete_if and Enumerable#any? for this
# Move through each array element with delete_if
parsed["librairies"].delete_if do |library|
# evaluates to true if any book hash in the library
# has a "qty" value of 0
library["books"].any? { |book| book["qty"] == 0 }
end
Hope this helps
To avoid changing the hash parsed, you could do the following.
Firstly, let's format parsed so we can see what we're dealing with:
parsed = { "libraries"=>[ { "id"=>1,
"books"=>[ { "id"=>1, "qty"=>1 },
{ "id"=>2, "qty"=>3 } ]
},
{ "id"=>2,
"books"=>[ { "id"=>1, "qty"=>0 },
{ "id"=>2, "qty"=>3 } ]
}
]
}
Later I want to show that parsed has not been changed when we create the new hash. An easy way of doing that is to compute a hash code on parsed before and after, and see if it changes. (While it's not 100% certain that different hashes won't have the same hash code, here it's not something to lose sleep over.)
parsed.hash
#=> 852445412783960729
We first need to make a "deep copy" of parsed so that changes to the copy will not affect parsed. One way of doing that is to use the Marshal module:
new_parsed = Marshal.load(Marshal.dump(parsed))
We can now modify the copy as required:
new_parsed["libraries"].reject! { |h| h["books"].any? { |g| g["qty"].zero? } }
#=> [ { "id"=>1,
# "books"=>[ { "id"=>1, "qty"=>1 },
# { "id"=>2, "qty"=>3 }
# ]
# }
# ]
new_parsed # => { "libraries"=>[ { "id"=>1,
"books"=>[ { "id"=>1, "qty"=>1},
{ "id"=>2, "qty"=>3}
]
}
]
}
And we confirm the original hash was not changed:
parsed.hash
#=> 852445412783960729
Related
How do I print the group_id from the returned object?
The following is returned from a function. I want to print the group_id or maybe return the group_id
{
:security_groups=>[
{
:description=>"Created By ManageIQ",
:group_name=>"MIQ_019",
:ip_permissions=>[
{
:from_port=>22,
:ip_protocol=>"tcp",
:ip_ranges=>[
{
:cidr_ip=>"0.0.0.0/0",
:description=>nil
}
],
:ipv_6_ranges=>[],
:prefix_list_ids=>[],
:to_port=>22,
:user_id_group_pairs=>[]
}
],
:owner_id=>"943755119718",
:group_id=>"sg-0c2c5f219f1bafc1a",
:ip_permissions_egress=>[
{
:from_port=>nil,
:ip_protocol=>"-1",
:ip_ranges=>[
{
:cidr_ip=>"0.0.0.0/0",
:description=>nil
}
],
:ipv_6_ranges=>[],
:prefix_list_ids=>[],
:to_port=>nil,
:user_id_group_pairs=>[]
}
],
:tags=>[],
:vpc_id=>"vpc-d817c1b3"
}
],
:next_token=>nil
}
This is the function: I want to return security_group.group_id
def describe_security_group (
group_name
)
ec2 = get_aws_client
security_group = ec2.describe_security_groups(
filters: [
{name: 'group-name', values: [ group_name ]}]
)
puts "Describing security group '#{group_name}' with ID " \
"'#{security_group}'"
return security_group
rescue StandardError => e
puts "Error describing security group: #{e.message}"
return
end
So, returning value seems like a hash, or you can make it hash exactly.
For case with one-element array you can simple use ruby dig method.
And according to your datum and comment below we can access needed element like this:
# from your ec2 api call
security_group = ec2.describe_security_groups(...)
# Result value is stored in `security_group` variable,
# and looks exactly like hash below
{
:security_groups=>[
{
:description=>"Created By ManageIQ",
:group_name=>"MIQ_019",
:ip_permissions=>[
{
:from_port=>22,
:ip_protocol=>"tcp",
:ip_ranges=>[
{
:cidr_ip=>"0.0.0.0/0",
:description=>nil
}
],
:ipv_6_ranges=>[],
:prefix_list_ids=>[],
:to_port=>22,
:user_id_group_pairs=>[]
}
],
:owner_id=>"943755119718",
:group_id=>"sg-0c2c5f219f1bafc1a",
:ip_permissions_egress=>[
{
:from_port=>nil,
:ip_protocol=>"-1",
:ip_ranges=>[
{
:cidr_ip=>"0.0.0.0/0",
:description=>nil
}
],
:ipv_6_ranges=>[],
:prefix_list_ids=>[],
:to_port=>nil,
:user_id_group_pairs=>[]
}
],
:tags=>[],
:vpc_id=>"vpc-d817c1b3"
}
],
:next_token=>nil
}
# And this is a target value, that you can store in another one,
# return from method or simply print to output
security_group.dig(:security_groups)
.try(:[], 0)
.dig(:group_id)
=> "sg-0c2c5f219f1bafc1a"
But if you need to search in array with multiple elements, methods from Ruby's Enumerable module could be helpful (like select or reject).
UPDATE with OpenStruct, if you prefer such method calls with dot notation:
json = security_group.to_json
os = JSON.parse(json, object_class: OpenStruct)
os.security_groups.first.group_id
=> "sg-0c2c5f219f1bafc1a"
I have quite an extensive Logstash pipeline ending in a Json as such:
{
"keyA": 1,
"keyB": "sample",
"arrayKey": [
{
"key": "data"
},
{
"key": null
}
]
}
What I want to achieve is to filter "arrayKey" and remove objects within with value for "key" is null.
Tried this to no luck:
filter {
ruby {
code => "
event.get('arrayKey').each do |key|
[key].delete_if do |keyCandidate|
if [keyCandidate][key] != nil
true
end
end
end
"
}
}
This gives no implicit converter found from |hash|:|Int| error. How do I achieve this? Is there and easier way to do this?
As Aleksei pointed out, you can create a copy of the array that does not contain entries where [key] is null using reject. You have to use event.set to overwrite the inital value of [arrayKey]
ruby {
code => '
a = event.get("arrayKey")
if a
event.set("arrayKey", a.reject { |x| x["key"] == nil })
end
'
}
I have a ruby code block, as follows:
require "elasticsearch"
require "json"
search_term = "big data"
city = "Hong Kong"
client = Elasticsearch::Client.new log: true
r = client.search index: 'candidates', body:
{
query: {
bool: {
must: [
{
match: {
tags: search_term
}
},
{
match: {
city: city
}
}
]
}
}
}
It produces multiple returns like this one:
{"_index":"candidates","_type":"data",
"_id":"AU3DyAmvtewNSFHuYn88",
"_score":3.889237,
"_source":{"first":"Kota","last":"Okayama","city":"Tokyo","designation":"Systems Engineer","email":"user#hotmail.co.jp","phone":"phone","country":"Japan","industry":"Technology","tags":["remarks","virtualization big data"]}}
I want to iterate through it and extract various elements. I have tried
data = JSON.parse(r)
data.each do |row|
puts row["_source"]["first"]
end
and the error is:
no implicit conversion of Hash into String (TypeError)
What's the best way forward on this chaps?
I have the solution, I hope it helps somebody else. It took me hours of fiddling and experimentation. Here it is:
require "elasticsearch"
require "json"
search_term = "big data"
city = "Tokyo"
client = Elasticsearch::Client.new log: true
h = client.search index: 'swiss_candidates', body:
{
query: {
bool: {
must: [
{
match: {
tags: search_term
}
},
{
match: {
city: city
}
}
]
}
}
}
data = JSON.parse(h.to_json)
data["hits"]["hits"].each do |r|
puts r["_id"]
puts r["_source"]["first"]
puts r["_source"]["tags"][1]
puts r["_source"]["screened"][0]
end
The important thing seems to be to convert the elasticsearch result into something ruby friendly.
JSON.parse expects a String containing a JSON document, but you are passing it the Hash which was returned from client.search.
I'm not entirely sure what you are trying to achieve with that, why you want to parse something which is already a Ruby Hash into a Ruby Hash.
I am doing an mongodb aggregation using mongoid, using ModleName.collection.aggregate(pipeline) . The value returned is an array and not a Mongoid::Criteria, so if a do a first on the array, I get the first element which is of the type BSON::Document instead of ModelName. As a result, I am unable to use it as a model.
Is there a method to return a criteria instead of an array from the aggregation, or convert a bson document to a model instance?
Using mongoid (4.0.0)
I've been struggling with this on my own too. I'm afraid you have to build your "models" on your own. Let's take an example from my code:
class Searcher
# ...
def results(page: 1, per_page: 50)
pipeline = []
pipeline <<
"$match" => {
title: /#{#params['query']}/i
}
}
geoNear = {
"near" => coordinates,
"distanceField" => "distance",
"distanceMultiplier" => 3959,
"num" => 500,
"spherical" => true,
}
pipeline << {
"$geoNear" => geoNear
}
count = aggregate(pipeline).count
pipeline << { "$skip" => ((page.to_i - 1) * per_page) }
pipeline << { "$limit" => per_page }
places_hash = aggregate(pipeline)
places = places_hash.map { |attrs| Offer.new(attrs) { |o| o.new_record = false } }
# ...
places
end
def aggregate(pipeline)
Offer.collection.aggregate(pipeline)
end
end
I've omitted a lot of code from original project, just to present the way what I've been doing.
The most important thing here was the line:
places_hash.map { |attrs| Offer.new(attrs) { |o| o.new_record = false } }
Where both I'm creating an array of Offers, but additionally, manually I'm setting their new_record attribute to false, so they behave like any other documents get by simple Offer.where(...).
It's not beautiful, but it worked for me, and I could take the best of whole Aggregation Framework!
Hope that helps!
I currently have some Ruby code that creates output like this (after conversion to JSON):
"days": [
{
"Jul-22": ""
},
{
"Aug-19": ""
}
],
What I want is output like this:
"days": {
"Jul-22": "",
"Aug-19": ""
},
Here is my code:
CalendarDay.in_the_past_30_days(patient).select(&:noteworthy?).collect do |noteworthy_day|
{ noteworthy_day.date.to_s(:trends_id) => "" }
end
In other words I want a hash instead of an array of hashes. Here's my ugly solution:
days = {}
CalendarDay.in_the_past_30_days(patient).select(&:noteworthy?).each do |noteworthy_day|
days[noteworthy_day.date.to_s(:trends_id)] = ""
end
days
That seems very unrubylike, though. Can someone help me do this more efficiently?
Hash[
CalendarDay.in_the_past_30_days(patient).select(&:noteworthy?).collect { |noteworthy_day|
[noteworthy_day.date.to_s(:trends_id), ""]
}
]
Or...
CalendarDay.in_the_past_30_days(patient).select(&:noteworthy?).each_with_object(Hash.new) { |noteworthy_day, ndays|
ndays[noteworthy_day] = ""
}
This is a problem tailor made for Enumerable#inject
CalendarDay.in_the_past_30_days(patient).select(&:noteworthy?).inject({}) do |hash, noteworthy_day|
hash[noteworthy_day.date.to_s(:trends_id)] = ''
hash
end