Spring autowire trouble with generic parameter - spring

I try to use generic parameter in autowire but it doesn't work. My goal is to create a generic JSON controller with Spring 4.1.3 and Hibernate
I have a generic abstract class , and I use it to create service via a model objec(the same as my DAO) as generic parameter.
The code of my AbstractService
public interface IGenericService<T extends Serializable> extends IOperations <T>{}
public interface IOperations<T extends Serializable> {
T findOne(final long id);
List<T> findAll();
void create(final T entity);
T update(final T entity);
void delete(final T entity);
void deleteById(final long entityId);
List<T> findByField(String field, String value);
T save(final T entity);
}
//MyAbstractService (generic service)
public abstract class AbstractService<T extends Serializable> implements
IGenericService<T> {
public static final Logger logger = LoggerFactory
.getLogger(AbstractService.class);
public AbstractService(){}
...
#Override
#Transactional
public T update( T entity) {
logger.debug("public T update( T entity)");
return getDao().update(entity);
}
...
}
Now I create a SecuredUserService with this abstract service
#Transactional
#Component //(value = "userService")
#Qualifier("userService")
public class UserService extends AbstractService<SecuredUser> implements
IUserService {
// I override the method upate of the abstract service
#Override
#Transactional
public SecuredUser update(SecuredUser user){
... // password encoding for example
}
}
public interface IUserService extends IGenericService<SecuredUser> {
T findOne(final long id);
...
}
In my JUnit test I made autowire with this code :
#Autowire
IGenericService<SecuredUser> userGenericService;
Or
#Autowire
IUserService userService;
At this point every thing is ok, I use the overrided method of userService and not those of abstractService. I pass my Junit Test. An I create a package.
Now I want to make generic spring mvc controller to handle common Json request GET/PUT/DELETE/POST :
//Generic Controller
public abstract class GenericSecuredController <MODEL extends Serializable> extends CommonSecuredController {
/**
* spring generic service retrieve by MODEL class type
*/
#Autowired
private IGenericService <MODEL> genericService;
/**
* Spring generic URI retrieve by MODEL class type
*/
#Autowired
private IGenericURI<MODEL> genericURI ;
...
}
// interface to manage URI in a generic way
public interface IGenericURI<MODEL extends Serializable> {
// root for the controller
public static String CONTROLLER_MAPPING="" ;
// path to the file system
public static String PATH_MAPPING = "";
// key to retrieve data in path
public static String PATH="{id}";
// Json REST SERVICE MappedUri
public static String JSON_DUMMY = "/dummy";
public static String JSON_GET = "/" + PATH;
public static String JSON_GET_ALL = "";
public static String JSON_CREATE = "";
public static String JSON_DELETE = "/" + PATH;
public static String JSON_UPDATE = "/" + PATH;
public static String HTML_VIEW = "/{view}.view.html";
public String getControllerMapping() ;
public String getPathMapping() ;
}
// The specific URI for the SecuredUser model object
#Component
public class SecuredUserURI implements Serializable, IGenericURI<SecuredUser> {
public static final String CONTROLLER_MAPPING = "/user";
public static final String PATH_MAPPING = "user";
public String getControllerMapping() {
return CONTROLLER_MAPPING;
}
public String getPathMapping() {
return PATH_MAPPING;
}
}
Now I could create a specific controller for SecuredUser like this :
public class UserController extends GenericSecuredController<SecuredUser> {
/**
* creator to set Class type for the GenericSecuredController<MODEL>
*/
public UserController() {
super(SecuredUser.class);
}
}
The problem appear at this point. The autowire of the
IGenericURI<MODEL>
work fine, but the autowiring with
IGenericService <MODEL> genericService;
doesn't use the overrided specific method of the userService but the abstract method with common behaviour!!!
So my question is :
Is it possible to autowire bean with generic parameter like in my example.
Maybe there is to many level for Spring autowiring .
Other information :
As workaround, I try to pass the userService as parameter of the contoller but, the same behaviour: the generic service use the abstract method.
UPDATE : If I autowire IGenericService genericService in the UserController and create a new handler, the specific service is call.
Thanks

Related

How to autowire a method of a generic service

I have a Service class that has a generic type and a setController method that is based on the same generic type. the generic type of the servic object is only known at the time of declaration.
The problem is now when i define a ControllerImpl where the generic type is defined the #Autowired method of setController does not use that component.
Has somebody an idea how to fix it and keep the ServiceImpl generic. (it would work when i define the typ in ServiceImpl as well).
The following example show the problem i'm facing with:
#SpringBootTest
#ActiveProfiles("local")
public class AccessTest {
#Autowired
private ServiceA<BeanA> service;
#Test
void test(){
Assertions.assertNotNull(service.controller);
}
interface ValueGetter{
}
static class BeanA implements ValueGetter{
}
static class AbstractService<B extends ValueGetter>{
Controller<B> controller;
#Autowired
void setController(#Nullable Controller<B> controller){
this.controller = controller;
}
}
interface Controller<B extends ValueGetter>{
void doSomething(B value);
}
//not inner class
#Service
public class ServiceA<B extends AccessTest.ValueGetter> extends AccessTest.AbstractService<B> {
}
//not inner class
#Component
public class ControllerImpl implements AccessTest.Controller<AccessTest.BeanA> {
#Override
public void doSomething(final AccessTest.BeanA value) {
}
}
}

Spring boot autowiring an interface with multiple implementations

In normal Spring, when we want to autowire an interface, we define it's implementation in Spring context file.
What about Spring boot?
how can we achieve this?
currently we only autowire classes that are not interfaces.
Another part of this question is about using a class in a Junit class inside a Spring boot project.
If we want to use a CalendarUtil for example, if we autowire CalendarUtil, it will throw a null pointer exception. What can we do in this case? I just initialized using "new" for now...
Use #Qualifier annotation is used to differentiate beans of the same interface
Take look at Spring Boot documentation
Also, to inject all beans of the same interface, just autowire List of interface
(The same way in Spring / Spring Boot / SpringBootTest)
Example below:
#SpringBootApplication
public class DemoApplication {
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(DemoApplication.class, args);
}
public interface MyService {
void doWork();
}
#Service
#Qualifier("firstService")
public static class FirstServiceImpl implements MyService {
#Override
public void doWork() {
System.out.println("firstService work");
}
}
#Service
#Qualifier("secondService")
public static class SecondServiceImpl implements MyService {
#Override
public void doWork() {
System.out.println("secondService work");
}
}
#Component
public static class FirstManager {
private final MyService myService;
#Autowired // inject FirstServiceImpl
public FirstManager(#Qualifier("firstService") MyService myService) {
this.myService = myService;
}
#PostConstruct
public void startWork() {
System.out.println("firstManager start work");
myService.doWork();
}
}
#Component
public static class SecondManager {
private final List<MyService> myServices;
#Autowired // inject MyService all implementations
public SecondManager(List<MyService> myServices) {
this.myServices = myServices;
}
#PostConstruct
public void startWork() {
System.out.println("secondManager start work");
myServices.forEach(MyService::doWork);
}
}
}
For the second part of your question, take look at this useful answers first / second
You can also make it work by giving it the name of the implementation.
Eg:
#Autowired
MyService firstService;
#Autowired
MyService secondService;
Assume that you have a GreetingService
public interface GreetingService {
void doGreetings();
}
And you have 2 implementations HelloService
#Service
#Slf4j
public class HelloService implements GreetingService{
#Override
public void doGreetings() {
log.info("Hello world!");
}
}
and HiService
#Slf4j
#Service
public class HiService implements GreetingService{
#Override
public void doGreetings() {
log.info("Hi world!");
}
}
Then you have another interface, which is BusinessService to call some business
public interface BusinessService {
void doGreetings();
}
There are some ways to do that
#1. Use #Autowired
#Component
public class BusinessServiceImpl implements BusinessService{
#Autowired
private GreetingService hiService; // Spring automatically maps the name for you, if you don't want to change it.
#Autowired
private GreetingService helloService;
#Override
public void doGreetings() {
hiService.doGreetings();
helloService.doGreetings();
}
}
In case you need to change your implementation bean name, refer to other answers, by setting the name to your bean, for example #Service("myCustomName") and applying #Qualifier("myCustomName")
#2. You can also use constructor injection
#Component
public class BusinessServiceImpl implements BusinessService {
private final GreetingService hiService;
private final GreetingService helloService;
public BusinessServiceImpl(GreetingService hiService, GreetingService helloService) {
this.hiService = hiService;
this.helloService = helloService;
}
#Override
public void doGreetings() {
hiService.doGreetings();
helloService.doGreetings();
}
}
This can be
public BusinessServiceImpl(#Qualifier("hiService") GreetingService hiService, #Qualifier("helloService") GreetingService helloService)
But I am using Spring Boot 2.6.5 and
public BusinessServiceImpl(GreetingService hiService, GreetingService helloService)
is working fine, since Spring automatically get the names for us.
#3. You can also use Map for this
#Component
#RequiredArgsConstructor
public class BusinessServiceImpl implements BusinessService {
private final Map<String, GreetingService> servicesMap; // Spring automatically get the bean name as key
#Override
public void doGreetings() {
servicesMap.get("hiService").doGreetings();
servicesMap.get("helloService").doGreetings();
}
}
List also works fine if you run all the services. But there is a case that you want to get some specific implementation, you need to define a name for it or something like that. My reference is here
For this one, I use #RequiredArgsConstructor from Lombok.
As mentioned in the comments, by using the #Qualifier annotation, you can distinguish different implementations as described in the docs.
For testing, you can use also do the same. For example:
#RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
#SpringBootTest
public class MyClassTests {
#Autowired
private MyClass testClass;
#MockBean
#Qualifier("default")
private MyImplementation defaultImpl;
#Test
public void givenMultipleImpl_whenAutowiring_thenReturnDefaultImpl() {
// your test here....
}
}
There are 2 approaches when we have autowiring of an interface with multiple implementations:
Spring #Primary annotation
In short it tells to our Spring application whenever we try to autowire our interface to use that specific implementation which is marked with the #Primary annotation. It is like a default autowiring setting. It can be used only once per cluster of implementations of an interface. → #Primary Docs
Spring #Qualifier annotation
This Spring annotation is giving us more control to select the exact implementation wherever we define a reference to our interface choosing among its options. → #Qualifier Docs
For more details follow the links to their documentation.
public interface SomeInterfaces {
void send(String message);
String getType();
}
kafka-service
#Component
public class SomeInterfacesKafkaImpl implements SomeInterfaces {
private final String type = "kafka";
#Override
public void send(String message) {
System.out.println(message + "through Kafka");
}
#Override
public String getType() {
return this.type;
}
}
redis-service
#Component
public class SomeInterfacesRedisImpl implements SomeInterfaces {
private final String type = "redis";
#Override
public void send(String message) {
System.out.println(message + "through Redis");
}
#Override
public String getType() {
return this.type;
}
}
master
#Component
public class SomeInterfacesMaster {
private final Set<SomeInterfaces> someInterfaces;
public SomeInterfacesMaster(Set<SomeInterfaces> someInterfaces) {
this.someInterfaces = someInterfaces;
}
public void sendMaster(String type){
Optional<SomeInterfaces> service =
someInterfaces
.stream()
.filter(service ->
service.getType().equals(type)
)
.findFirst();
SomeInterfaces someService =
service
.orElseThrow(() -> new RuntimeException("There is not such way for sending messages."));
someService .send(" Hello. It is a letter to ....");
}
}
test
#SpringBootTest
public class MultiImplementation {
}
#TestInstance(TestInstance.Lifecycle.PER_CLASS)
class SomeInterfacesMasterTest extends MultiImplementation {
#Autowired
private SomeInterfacesMaster someInterfacesMaster;
#Test
void sendMaster() {
someInterfacesMaster.sendMaster("kafka");
}
}
Thus, according to the Open/Closed principle, we only need to add an implementation without breaking existing code.
#Component
public class SomeInterfacesRabbitImpl implements SomeInterfaces {
private final String type = "rabbit";
#Override
public void send(String message) {
System.out.println(message + "through Rabbit");
}
#Override
public String getType() {
return this.type;
}
}
test-v2
#TestInstance(TestInstance.Lifecycle.PER_CLASS)
class SomeInterfacesMasterTestV2 extends MultiImplementation {
#Autowired
private SomeInterfacesMaster someInterfacesMaster;
#Test
void sendMasterV2() {
someInterfacesMaster.sendMaster("rabbit");
}
}
If we have multiple implementations of the same interface, Spring needs to know which one it should be autowired into a class. Here is a simple example of validator for mobile number and email address of Employee:-
Employee Class:
public class Employee {
private String mobileNumber;
private String emailAddress;
...
/** Getters & Setters omitted **/
}
Interface EmployeeValidator:
public interface EmployeeValidator {
public Employee validate(Employee employee);
}
First implementation class for Mobile Number Validator:
#Component(value="EmployeeMobileValidator")
public class EmployeeMobileValidator implements EmployeeValidator {
#Override
public Employee validate(Employee employee) {
//Mobile number Validation logic goes here.
}
}
Second implementation class for Email address Validator:
#Component(value="EmployeeEmailValidator")
public class EmployeeEmailValidator implements EmployeeValidator {
#Override
public Employee validate(Employee employee) {
//Email address validation logic goes here.
}
}
We can now autowired these above validators individually into a class.
Employee Service Interface:
public interface EmployeeService {
public void handleEmployee(Employee employee);
}
Employee Service Implementation Class
#Service
public class EmployeeServiceImpl implements EmployeeService {
/** Autowire validators individually **/
#Autowired
#Qualifier("EmployeeMobileValidator") // Autowired using qualifier for mobile validator
private EmployeeValidator mobileValidator;
#Autowired
#Qualifier("EmployeeEmailValidator") // Autowired using qualifier for email valodator
private EmployeeValidator emailValidator;
#Override
public void handleEmployee(Employee employee) {
/**You can use just one instance if you need**/
employee = mobileValidator.validate(employee);
}
}

Spring MVC instantiate object on request attribute

Assume I am creating a PrinterService class that has a AbstractPrinter object. AbstractPrinter is subclassed by classes such as HPPrinter, FilePrinter etc.
The exact kind of printer object to be used is mentioned in the RequestParam object passed to my Controller (it is a request attribute).
Is there any way I can inject the right kind of concrete printer class using Spring?
All the other dependencies are injected using #Autowired annotation. How to inject this one?
You can create and load a factory of AbstractPrinter objects during container startup as shown below and dynamically call the respective the AbstractPrinter's print() (or your own method) based on the input parameter (comes from controller) to the service.
In the below code for PrinterServiceImpl class, the main point is that all of the List<AbstractPrinter> will be injected by Spring container (depends upon how many implementation classes you provide like HPPrinter, etc..). Then you will load those beans into a Map during container startup with printerType as key.
#Controller
public class YourController {
#Autowired
private PrinterService printerService;
public X myMethod(#RequestParam("input") String input) {
printerService.myServiceMethod(input);
//return X
}
}
PrinterServiceImpl class:
public class PrinterServiceImpl implements PrinterService {
#Autowired
private List<AbstractPrinter> abstractPrinters;
private static final Map<String,AbstractPrinter> myPrinters = new HashMap<>();
#PostConstruct
public void loadPrinters() {
for(AbstractPrinter printer : abstractPrinters) {
myPrinters.put(printer.getPrinterType(), printer);
}
}
//Add your other Autowired dependencies here
#Override
public void myServiceMethod(String input){//get input from controller
AbstractPrinter abstractPrinter= myPrinters.get(input);
abstractPrinter.print();//dynamically calls print() depending on input
}
}
HPPrinter class:
#Component
public class HPPrinter implements AbstractPrinter {
#Override
public String getPrinterType() {
return "HP";
}
#Override
public void print() {
// Your print code
}
}
FilePrinter class:
#Component
public class FilePrinter implements AbstractPrinter {
#Override
public String getPrinterType() {
return "FILE";
}
#Override
public void print() {
// Your print code
}
}
You could create a dedicated PrinterService instance per AbstractPrinter concrete class. For example you could achieve this using Spring configuration which follow the factory pattern:
#Configuration
public class PrinterServiceConfiguration {
#Autowired
private HPPrinter hpPrinter;
#Autowired
private FilePrinter filePrinter;
#Bean
public PrinterService hpPrinterService() {
return new PrinterService(hpPrinter);
}
#Bean
public PrinterService filePrinterService() {
return new PrinterService(filePrinter);
}
public PrinterService findPrinterService(PrinterType type){
if (type == HP)
return hpPrinterService();
....
}
}
Then in your controller, inject PrinterServiceConfiguration then call findPrinterService with the right printer type.
Don't forget to add PrinterServiceConfiguration at your configuration #Import.
If the list of printer is dynamic you could switch to prototype bean :
#Configuration
public class PrinterServiceConfiguration {
#Autowired
private List<AbstractPrinter> printers;
#Bean
#Scope(ConfigurableBeanFactory.SCOPE_PROTOTYPE)
public PrinterService createPrinterService(PrinterType type){
return new PrinterService(findPrinterByType(type));
}
private Printer findPrinterByType(PrinterType type) {
// iterate over printers then return the printer that match type
// throw exception if no printer found
}
}

Spring 4 bean autowiring with generics

I am using Spring 4 via Spring Boot 1.1.8 and have created a class to cache some data. The class relies on generics to work but I'm having trouble with Spring and autowiring this class as a bean in another service.
I get errors like this:
Caused by: org.springframework.beans.factory.NoUniqueBeanDefinitionException: No qualifying bean of type [orm.repository.BaseRepository] is defined: expected single matching bean but found 2: dataTypeRepository,propertyNameRepository
The class in question:
/**
* The purpose of this class is to get data from a cache backed by a database
* and if it does not exist to create it and insert into the database.
*/
#Service
public class CacheByName<TRepo extends BaseRepository, TItem extends BaseWithName> {
private final TRepo repo;
private final Class<TItem> itemClass;
private final Map<String, TItem> itemsCache; // TODO: change to better caching strategy
#Autowired
public CacheByName(TRepo repo, Class<TItem> itemClass) {
this.repo = repo;
this.itemClass = itemClass;
itemsCache = new HashMap();
}
public TItem getCreateItem(String name) {
TItem item = null;
if(itemsCache.containsKey(name)) {
item = itemsCache.get(name);
} else {
// try and load from db
item = (TItem) repo.findByName(name);
if(item == null) {
try {
item = itemClass.newInstance();
item.setName(name);
repo.saveAndFlush(item);
} catch (InstantiationException | IllegalAccessException ex) {
// TODO: log and handle better
return null;
}
}
itemsCache.put(name, item);
}
return item;
}
}
The class BaseRepository extends JpaRepository as follows. Other actual repositories extend this one.
#NoRepositoryBean
public interface BaseRepository<T extends Object, ID extends Serializable> extends JpaRepository<T, ID> {
public T findByName(String name);
}
The class BaseWithName is a MappedSuperclass that defines a name property and getters/setters for it. Other more concrete entity classes extend this.
I am trying to inject the CacheByName class into another service like the following. Note that I am defining the actual repository and entity class as generics in the constructor:
#Service
public class DataImporter extends BaseImporter {
private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(PropertyImporter.class);
private final PropertyNameRepository propertyNameRepo;
private final CacheByName<DataTypeRepository, DataType> dataTypeCache;
#Autowired
public PropertyImporter(RestTemplate restTemplateD5,
CacheByName<DataTypeRepository, DataType> dataTypeCache) {
super(restTemplateD5);
this.dataTypeCache = dataTypeCache;
}
.
.
.
}
My AppConfig.java looks like the following:
#Configuration
#ComponentScan
#EnableAutoConfiguration
public class AppConfig {
#Value("${username}")
private String username;
#Value("${password}")
private String password;
#Bean
public RestTemplate restTemplateD5() {
return RestTemplateFactory.createWithHttpBasicAuth(username, password);
}
}
I haven't been able to find much information about creating beans that use generics. I suspect I need to create another #Bean definition in my AppConfig but I wasn't able to implement anything that worked.
As BaseRepository is also a generic type, I think you missed to add the generic type there. That should help Spring to find a proper bean to inject:
public class CacheByName<TRepo extends BaseRepository<TItem, ? extends Serializable>, TItem extends BaseWithName>
This should also make the cast no longer needed:
item = repo.findByName(name);

requestfactory complain about find method

I have a spring (3.1) application with a service and dao layer.
I try to use requestfactory (gwt 2.4) withi this spring layer.
Here some of my class
My domain class
public class Account {
Long id;
String username;
// get, set
}
The bridge between spring and gwt
public class SpringServiceLocator implements ServiceLocator {
#Override
public Object getInstance(Class<?> clazz) {
HttpServletRequest request = RequestFactoryServlet.getThreadLocalRequest();
ServletContext servletContext = request.getSession().getServletContext();
ApplicationContext context = WebApplicationContextUtils.getWebApplicationContext(servletContext);
return context.getBean(clazz);
}
}
My account proxy
#ProxyFor(value=Account.class, locator = AccountLocator.class)
public interface AccountProxy extends EntityProxy{
public Long getId();
public String getUsername();
public void setUsername(String userName);
public void setId(Long id);
}
RequestContext class
#Service(locator = SpringServiceLocator.class, value =AccountService.class)
public interface AccountRequest extends RequestContext {
Request<List<AccountProxy>> loadAllAccounts();
}
My requestFactory class
public interface AccountRequestFactory extends RequestFactory {
AccountRequest accountRequest();
}
My spring service
public interface AccountService {
public List<Account> loadAllAccounts();
}
#Service
public class AccountServiceImpl implements AccountService{
#Autowired
private AccountDAO accountDAO;
}
Account locator to avoid to put method in the entity
public class AccountLocator extends Locator<Account, Long> {
#Autowired
private AccountDAO accountDAO;
#Override
public Account create(Class<? extends Account> clazz) {
return new Account();
}
}
applicationContext.xml
<context:annotation-config />
<context:component-scan base-package="com.calibra" />
<bean id="accountService" class="org.calibra.server.service.AccountServiceImpl"/>
<bean id="accountDAO" class="org.calibra.server.dao.AccountDAOImpl"/>
The demo work but i get this error:
com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.server.UnexpectedException: Could not find static method with a single parameter of a key type
Also on my AccountProxy i get this complain (a warning)
The domain type org.calibra.domain.Account has no Account findAccount(java.lang.Long) method. Attempting to send a AccountProxy to the server will result in a server error.
I don't want to add a find methond in my domain class.
I tried to put this method in my spring service, but i get the same warning.
Edit with the Locator that work fine
Just strange i need to put bean in the applicationContext, context:annotation and context:component-scan seem useless
Any idea?
The domain type org.calibra.domain.Account has no Account findAccount(java.lang.Long) method.
If you don't provide a find method of some kind, RequestFactory has no way of reconstituting objects when they get to the server - it can only create brand new ones, which prevents it from merging with existing data. Take this away, and you might as well have RPC again.
If you don't want static methods, provide a Locator instance which is able to find objects. From https://developers.google.com/web-toolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideRequestFactory#locators:
What if you don't want to implement persistence code in an entity itself? To implement the required entity locator methods, create an entity locator class that extends Locator:
public class EmployeeLocator extends Locator<Employee, Long> {
#Override
public Employee create(Class<? extends Employee> clazz)
{
return new Employee();
}
...
}
Then associate it with the entity in the #ProxyFor annotation:
#ProxyFor(value = Employee.class, locator = EmployeeLocator.class)
public interface EmployeeProxy extends EntityProxy {
...
}
You'll need to implement all of the methods, not just create - and the main one you are interested in is find(Class, Long). It may be possible to use one single Locator type for all proxies - as of 2.4.0 and 2.5.0-rc1 it is safe to fail to implement getDomainType(), and all of the other methods that need to know the exact type are provided with it as an argument.
Here is an example of what this can look like with JPA and Guice, but I think the idea is clear enough that it can be implemented with Spring and whatever persistence mechanism you are using. Here, all entities are expected to implement HasVersionAndId, allowing the locator to generalize on how to invoke getVersion and getId - you might have your own base class for all persisted entities.
(from https://github.com/niloc132/tvguide-sample-parent/blob/master/tvguide-client/src/main/java/com/acme/gwt/server/InjectingLocator.java)
public class InjectingLocator<T extends HasVersionAndId> extends Locator<T, Long> {
#Inject
Provider<EntityManager> data;
#Inject
Injector injector;
#Override
public T create(Class<? extends T> clazz) {
return injector.getInstance(clazz);
}
#Override
public T find(Class<? extends T> clazz, Long id) {
return data.get().find(clazz, id);
}
#Override
public Class<T> getDomainType() {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException();//unused
}
#Override
public Long getId(T domainObject) {
return domainObject.getId();
}
#Override
public Class<Long> getIdType() {
return Long.class;
}
#Override
public Object getVersion(T domainObject) {
return domainObject.getVersion();
}
}

Resources