I am using foxpro apps under Windows 7. During the compilation one of my program it suddenly became freezing until I move the mouse or press any key. And this happens all the time while I am working with prog.
This happens when I move only the data to a mapped directory on the host. If my application, foxpro and the data are in the same directory on the virtual machine there are no problem with it.
This happens when my data is not on the virtual machine.
Can it be a caching issue?
Change the registry:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\WOW]
Save export as backup. Then change value "DefaultSeparateVDM" to "yes"
If you have 64bit then you need to create a file for 16bit applications that use the internal start command in separate memory space as follows:
Start /separate command
Also have a look at this article. http://www.reddit.com/r/Database/comments/2kz0x5/dbf_file_getting_corrupt/
There kind of similar problem, who knows, maybe it would be helpful for you
I have run into similar in the past, and it doesn't have to do with VFP application and data residing in the same folder. What has happened to me is the debugger. You mention "...while I am working with the prog." tells me you are in the VFP development mode, and not run-time from the app itself. If you have issues where your debugger has breakpoints, or other flags that have become corrupted somehow, I have done
CLEAR DEBUGGER
But that is something going back several years and MIGHT be what you are encountering.
Related
I hope the question is not too vague and someone can add some light to my problem.
I created a Windows application (makefile) with the chromium project (already asked about this problem in the chromium forum) and Visual Studio 2019.
The application starts some processes and each of them used around 20 KB memory but strangely this same application uses over 200 KB per process is some PCs with same Windows version.
(Memory usage after starting the application, nothing else done)
I have been fighting a couple of days with the compiler/linker options with no success. Still huge memory usage.
Chromium examples did not show this problem using my makefile which made me even more crazy.
At the end I ended up changing the name of the exe file, instead of app.exe just app1.exe and...problem gone, normal memory usage in all PCs which shown this problem.
I changed the name in the makefile to generate same executable but with different name and also changed in Windows Explorer the name of the original and problematic exe file with same positive result.
I renamed in Windows Explorer the good app1.exe application back to app.exe and the problem appeared again...
I am searching now for some kind of Windows configuration or program which could generate this problem but no luck so far. Windows Firewall already disabled.
or could this be some kind of virus?
Problem solved...thanks to ProcessHacker tool I found out that the library "verifier.dll" was loaded in the bad case.
This dll is part of the Windows Application Verifier tool. I do not remember to have used this tool before, it is even not activated.
I then found out that there is a registry entry:
Computer\HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\WOW6432Node\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Image File Execution Options\
where I could find the name of my application. After renaming this entry everything works as expected.
I will now investigate what the variables inside this entry mean:
GlobalFlag = 0x02000000 and PageHeapFlags = 0x2
When my Windows 10 app runs, it causes a process called Runtime Broker to execute, which takes up a lot of Memory space.
I know my app isn't "Memory-hungry" and it hardly takes 80 MB of RAM to execute. But from the time it starts, the Memory used by Runtime Broker keeps in increasing until the PC gets stuck.
Upon killing that process, the app is force closed by Windows.
I would have posted my source code here, if only I knew which part of the code is causing this to happen.
What are the possible technical reasons for this problem to happen, and what are the possible fixes in my code to prevent this?
Is there something wrong with my code, or is it some API that I am calling?
You can easily delete RuntimeBroker.exe and any other file. I deleted RuntimeBroker.exe and Livecomm.exe by booting a live Linux Dvd and after loading go and mount the c: drive then simply navigate to the file and delete it. Done!
Runtimebroker seems to hold about 60k per file held via StorageFile objects. It's still a bad problem and the only solution is to not hold on to very many of these.
Microsoft just never does anything about this.
Update: Microsoft seems to have quietly ditched UWP. The replacement has "WinUI" and is probably called the Windows App SDK at the moment. No more runtimebroker.exe.
I have a VB6 application that I provide support for. This application works on both Windows XP and Windows 7. Some users were migrated from Windows XP to Windows 7 using the User State Migration tool. These users now receive a generic "Application has crashed" Windows error message when they open certain screens (forms) in the application. My assumption is that there is a missing dll/ocx reference, but I'm having trouble tracking it down.
I've tried many/varied troubleshooting techniques:
Full uninstall and reinstall of my application
Manually re-registering all dll's and ocx's that I know are used
Running Process Monitor on a broken computer and a working computer to compare what dll's and ocx's are accessed. The answer might be here but even after filtering out most of the background noise the amount of data is overwhelming. At a minimum I reviewed all of the calls right before it crashes and all of the calls that were not successful. All of the non-successful calls match between working and non-working.
Installed the Windows Debugger Tools and captured a crash dump. Analyzed the crash dump with DebugDiag. DebugDiag says the exception is in msvbvm60.dll. I tried building a PDB file for my exe and loading it in DebugDiag to get more detail about where the exception is occuring but DebugDiag doesn't want to accept the PDB (might be doing something wrong here, but it just seems to ignore it. This same PDB file works fine when I do remote debugging, however.)
I recompiled my VB6 program without any optimizations in PCode. I've read online that sometimes building in PCode, while bad for performance, will tell you the real exception.
Used the above created PDB file to remote debug the VB6 application. The debugger says that the application crashes after the new window has been created, on a line that sets MousePointer = vbHourGlass... To me it seems unlikely that this is the real cause of the error. There are at least 20 other locations in the program where this same line is called and all work fine.
(Forgot about this one)
Used Dependency Walker and profiled the application on both a working and non-working computer. All errors found by dependency walker were the same between the two computers. There were no additional dependencies found on a working computer, and all missing dependencies on the non-working computer were also missing on the working one.
None of these actions changed my error message or showed me what the error is (unless it really is the mouse cursor issue)... There are no entries in the Windows Event Log related to the app crash.
The non-working and working computers all have the same base Windows 7 image, the only difference is whatever is being changed by USMT, which further convinces me that this is some kind of quirky configuration change or a missing dll/ocx or perhaps an unregistered dll/ocx.
Any ideas or thoughts on how I can track down the root cause of the issue would be greatly appreciated.
Update 1 - Response to questions
#MarkHall I have tried running it as admin, though not with UAC off. The application runs fine on a Windows 7 box as a non-admin with full UAC. Windows XP was 32-bit, Windows 7 is 64-bit, but again it works just fine on a like for like box where the user was not migrated from Windows XP.
#Beaner It's possible that it stores settings somewhere that have been corrupted, but the remote debugging leads me to think that it's more likely something else since it seems to die on a step related to the UI, which then makes me think it's probably a missing dll/ocx reference.
#Bob77 The application is installed into Program Files (x86). While many of the libraries do reside in the same folder, they are all registered.
Peter, often I've noticed that the debugger will indicate a line of code that is actually incorrect, depending on WHERE in the actual assembly language the fault occurs. You should look REAL close around your statement that sets the cursor to vbHourGlass. Your exception is PROBABLY happening BEFORE that line of code, but that line is what the debugger thinks is the actual faulted line of code.
Since you said it happens when a window OPENS, I'd look real close at any ocx's you may have referenced on the form, but perhaps NOT actually being used, or called. You might have one there that you don't intend to be there, that could be causing security issues, or something on Win7? Edit the .frm file by hand if you have to, and look at all the GUIDs the form references.
It is possible that one machine is using PER-USER registration, and the other is using PER-SYSTEM registration?? I don't know...
I would take a much closer look at the form that you are trying to open, and be VERY cautious of everything you are doing in the form load events, and so on. This sounds like it could be something as stupid as Windows Aero being enabled on one system, and not another, or some other sort of "Theme" setting that is throwing the VB Form Rendering routine into a hissyfit... Perhaps even something as stupid as a transparent color index in the icon you selected for that from?
If you are still developing this app, (or at least maintaining it), create an entirely NEW form, and re-create all the controls, etc, on the form (resist the temptation to copy/paste them from the old one...), and then see if THAT does the trick. Then, copy all the event code to the new form one event at a time, with at LEAST enough event code to make the form function, even if it's just a "dead form", that loads no data, or whatever the form is supposed to do. Check and debug after each change, and you WILL find it eventually. Of course, make sure you isolate one of the defunct systems to have a platform that you can duplicate the issue on, or then it's just guessing. I find that using something like Acronis w/ Universal Restore is a great option to then take the image file into a good HV, like VirtualBox, and then restore that image as a VM, so you can debug without interfering with your actual users. This sounds like a lot of work, but then again, so is re-writing an application that already exists, right? :)
Failing THAT... /* and */ are your friends!! (Well, we're dealing with VB, so ' would be your best friend! heh... But I'd start commenting out all the code on the form until that sucker opens. Then once it opens, start putting one line back at a time, and re-running it... That's called "VooDoo Debugging", but sometimes, you gotta do what you gotta do...
THANKS A LOT PETER! :) Now you got ME so involved in this, I feel like I'M the one debugging this sucker! Like if it was MY code I was trying to fix! :)
Let me know if any of this helps... I am actually quite interested in what you discover.
I have a program that I run on multiple network PCs. When I compiled the most recent version, it runs extremely slowly on 2 PCs on the network, but runs fine for everyone else.
This used to happen with my old dev PC when I had an additional 2gb RAM installed. When I would remove the additional 2gb and recompile, it would then work fine for everyone.
Now, I am on a completely new machine and am having the same issue. I've tried to rebuild the project after rebooting, but still have the same issue.
For all other PCs, the program loads in about 3-5 seconds. On these 2 PCs, it takes anywhere from 45 seconds to 1.5 mins to load...
One of the PCs is an older Dell Dimension 8200, but the other is a newer OptiPlex that is identical to several other PCs on the network, so this is what is really making it so confusing.
For now, I've had to revert to the old version so it will run correctly for everyone.
Does anyone have any idea of anything to try?
Thanks in advance!!!
Edit:
Ok, it was an exhausting day yesterday trying various things to solve this issue. Here is what I tried and where the problem begins:
Using the new program
Went back to old versions of all updated components, but still had the same issue
Using the old program
I decided to go back to the drawing board and start from the old version of the application and incrementally add the new features a small piece at a time.
Recompiled the old version using the old components - program works fine
Updated to new DevExpress components - program works fine
Updated to new ESBPCS components - program works fine
Updated to new DeepSoftware components - program works fine
Ok, so now we know there is nothing with the component sets I've updated...
Added 1 image to each of 2 image lists - program works fine
Added new database table - program works fine
Added code to open and close the new table - program works fine
Added new action to action list and added a menu item and toolbar button to new action (action does nothing at this point) - program works fine
Added a new BLANK form to the application and added code to open the new form - BAM!!!
So, adding just one form to the application is what's causing the issue! I removed all the code for the opening of the form, commented out the uses clauses and removed the uses entry from the project source and everything is back to normal!
Anybody have any idea about this?
Thanks!
Edit 2:
For #Warren P - here is my .DPR source:
program Scheduler;
uses
ExceptionLog,
Forms,
SchedulerMainUnit in 'SchedulerMainUnit.pas' {FrmMain},
SchedulerDBInfoUnit in 'SchedulerDBInfoUnit.pas' {FrmDBInfo},
SchedulerHistoryUnit in 'SchedulerHistoryUnit.pas' {FrmHistory},
SchedulerOptionsUnit in 'SchedulerOptionsUnit.pas' {FrmOptions},
SchedulerExtVersionUnit in 'SchedulerExtVersionUnit.pas' {FrmExtVersion},
SchedulerSplashUnit in 'SchedulerSplashUnit.pas' {FrmSplash},
SchedulerInfoUnit in 'SchedulerInfoUnit.pas' {FrmInfo},
SchedulerShippedUnit in 'SchedulerShippedUnit.pas' {FrmShipped}; {<-- This is the new form with the issue}
{$R *.res}
begin
Application.Initialize;
Application.Title := 'SmartWool WIP Scheduling Assistant';
Application.CreateForm(TFrmMain, FrmMain);
Application.CreateForm(TFrmDBInfo, FrmDBInfo);
Application.CreateForm(TFrmHistory, FrmHistory);
Application.CreateForm(TFrmOptions, FrmOptions);
Application.CreateForm(TFrmExtVersion, FrmExtVersion);
Application.Run;
end.
And here is the intialization section of the main form to create the splash:
initialization
FrmSplash:=TFrmSplash.Create(Application);
FrmSplash.Show;
FrmSplash.Refresh;
Edit 3:
Anybody??? Please?
It could be that the program is waiting for timeouts when trying to access resources that are not available on that machine such as network drives or Internet hosts.
Try running Process Monitor when starting up your program and look for file open calls. Filter the output so it only shows your process.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896645
Performance problems initially can seem very daunting at first.
I have been on many teams where people have tried to guess at a reason for performance problems. This sometimes works, but is far less effective than actually measuring the code.
When reproducible on a development machine, I would recommend a profiler.
There was a previous question that asked about
Delphi Profiling tools which has several possible tools you could use.
When you can't reproduce the problem on your development machine, then it becomes a bit more difficult, but not impossible. Typically I have found that problems are related to an application dependency that is different, and not performing well. Understanding the external influences on your application can help pinpoint the problem.
Specifically common external problems in some of my applications.
Network
Database
Application Servers
Installation or Data File Location (i.e. Disk Performance)
Virus and Malware Scanners
Other application interring with yours such as a virus.
To monitor for items related to the network (i.e. Database, web services, etc...)
I typically use Wireshark which allows me to see if resources are responding in expected times. My most common problem is poor performing DNS and can found using Wireshark.
You can use the AutoRuns program to determine everything that starts up when your computer does, it's useful in determine differences between machines.
But most of all I have logging that can be turned on in my applications and this allows me to isolate the problem to a specific area of code. This narrowing down to a specific section of code reduces the guessing, and allows you to focus on a few possible problems.
I created a log function for this that I call at specific places (in your case especially during startup). It adds a timestamp to each log text and stores them in a TMemo that is regularly saved. Not only very helpful when debugging, but may also shed some light on your problem.
Are you using code signing - ie Microsoft Authenticode? If so, then outdated certificate authorities on the computers can cause significant delays to startup.
First, I would try to defragment the hard disk. If still slow, I would check the power supply. Maybe your hard disk are getting insufficient energy.
Check if there is the same antivirus software on those 2 problematic computers. If so, then your Delphi application may match byte pattern used in some virus made in Delphi. Update virus definitions to solve it, or report false alarm to antivirus company, or change antivirus software.
Check if there isn't any printer installed on those 2 problematic computers. If it is so, then add any printer and try again.
Idea 1:
One reason I have seen for very slow application load time, is when printing or reporting system components like Developer Express Express Print, are in your application.
The problem I saw when using Developer Express Printing components, is that I had an offline or non-responsive network printer in my list of printers (check the control panel printer icon) that was not responding. Some of those Developer Express components seem to read some information from each printer you have installed, and the solution was to go to those clients, and delete old printers from their control panel, that were no longer being used. Each not-responding network printer added up to 60 seconds for a TCP Timeout, to the startup time of my application.
Update - Idea 2:
Download MS DebugView and install it on the machine that runs slowly. Now go back to your main development PC, open the IDE, open your main project file (right click on the project, view project source in project viewer), this will show you the contents of your main project source file (.dpr). go to the main begin....end. block. Now set a breakpoint on the main begin statement, and single step INTO (not OVER) and you will see all the module initialization sections. In each one add this: OutputDebugString('ModuleName').
Now when you run this inside the Delphi Ide you will see messages, and see how far apart they come in, and understand what is taking a long time to initialize. Instead of installing the delphi ide onto the machine that runs slowly, Debug View (which is less than 400kb single executable) will be run, and it will show you these debug messages, along with a nice time display (##.# seconds) for each message.
MS Debug view is here.
Are you allowing the forms to be constructed on initialization within the DPR source? If so, you may do well to consider whether or not you want those forms sucking up memory the entire time, more-over if you want those forms to be wasting the application's time on load.
A rule of thumb: If the form is used a LOT during the application's execution, allow it to be constructed when the application loads (this will work out faster over-all than constructing the instance "on-demand").
If the form is not used very often at all (for example, a Dialog or an About Box), delete the "Application.CreateForm" line from the DPR source, and instead construct your instance on request...
var
LForm: TfrmAbout;
begin
Application.CreateForm(LForm, TfrmAbout);
try
LForm.ShowModal;
finally
LForm.Free;
end;
end;
Now that form (which may not even be displayed during the program's execution) is not sucking up system resources, and will not slow down the application's load time.
It may not solve your problem 100%, but it should certainly help!
I've recently started seeing this line in my Visual Studio 2005 output window when launching my application:
FTH: (7156): *** Fault tolerant heap shim applied to current process. This is usually due to previous crashes. ***
I've tried turning off the fault tolerant heap using the instructions here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd744764(VS.85).aspx
I'm running Windows 7 64-bit edition, so I have made the changes to both the 32-bit and 64-bit registries, and run the "Rundll32.exe fthsvc.dll,FthSysprepSpecialize" command using both the 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Rundll32.exe.
However, after rebooting I am still getting the fault tolerant heap when trying to debug my application!
This is a real problem since it masks the bug I am trying to reproduce, and it also kills performance.
Does anyone have any other suggestions how to disable the fault tolerant heap?
To disable it for a single application
Go to the HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE and HKEY_CURRENT_USER versions of
Software\Microsoft\Windows
NT\CurrentVersion\AppCompatFlags\Layers\your_application.exe and
delete the FaultTolerantHeap entry.
From here (actually here)
Set this registry value to 0:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\FTH\Enabled
You can add the name of your executable to the ExclusionList.
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\FTH\ExclusionList
Works for me.
You can edit the application manifest to excluding your program from PCA
see also:How to reset Program Compatibility Assistant for testing
you can clear the list of applications tracked by FTH without stopping this service by following these steps:
Click the Start menu.
Right-click Computer and click Manage.
Click Event Viewer -> Applications and Services Logs -> Microsoft ->
Windows -> Fault-Tolerant-Heap.
View FTH Events.
you will find file named operational by right click and choose clear log,
then you can run you program again and warning message will disappear,
it worked with me without restarting operating system.
On Windows 10 the registry location is:
Computer\HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\FTH
You can remove you executable from the list in:
Computer\HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\FTH\State
or you can run this command from an elevated command prompt
Rundll32.exe fthsvc.dll,FthSysprepSpecialize
You may need to reboot your machine
"Rundll32.exe fthsvc.dll,FthSysprepSpecialize" looks to only clear the list of currently flagged applications. if your application still causes oddities, the FTH should still step in and take over.
as already mentioned:
Set this registry value to 0: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\FTH\Enabled
this should disable FTH for the whole system.
I had to rename the file as well because the registry entries associated with this key were empty of applicable data. I expect that they populate if you have a misbehaving application. But in my case I was debugging my own application within Visual Studio. So in that case, it was my process that was somehow loading the FTH whether the FTH Service was running or not. And in fact I had no applications listed that were previously tagged as misbehaving.
But I had to follow these instructions:
http://billroper.livejournal.com/960825.html
because it wouldn't let me rename the file until I took ownership and made sure I had full control.
I had similar issue when running a Unit test using (Microsoft::VisualStudio::CppUnitTestFramework).
Somehow I had violated some heap allocation, and next time I tried to debug I received the message : "Fault tolerant heap shim applied to current process. This is usually due to previous crashes. " and the debug environment froze.
To get it to work again, I had to remove test case, recompile and add it again and recompile, then I could set breakpoint and step into the test.
Also ran into this. Renaming/deleting AcXtrnal.dll inside Windows\AppPatch seems to work for me. I like how this Microsoft recommended action (which I did first) does nothing.