Middleman - Unknown Extension: livereload - ruby

Trying to just get started building a site with Middleman, and I'm following the tutorial to a t, but when I start the server I always get "Unknown Extension: livereload"
I already have
group :development do
gem 'middleman-livereload'
end
and
configure : development do
activate :livereload
end
Any ideas?

I had the exact same problem. For some reason LiveReload isn't recognized when you include it in a group in your Gemfile. My fix:
gem 'middleman-livereload' # NOTE: breaks if placed inside a group!
group :middleman do
gem 'middleman'
end
I'm using middleman 3.3.12 and middleman-livereload 3.4.2

I started with the blog flag out of the box.
middleman init MY_BLOG_PROJECT --template=blog
So, for me, the gem was never part of the original GEMFILE. My solution was to add the gem.
# Gemfile
gem 'middleman-livereload'
Ruby Static Sites FTW!

Related

RubyMine 6.0.2 with "debugger" gem without modifying Gemfile.lock?

I am using RubyMine (v6.0.2), but my teammates are not, so they need the "debugger" gem in the gemfile. I can conditionally un-require the Gemfile when running RubyMine (so the Gemfile can be shared and identical), but since the 'debugger' gem is not included, the Gemfile.lock file changes depending on whether the project was last run with RubyMine or not. This creates a lot of noise in redundant Gemfile.lock changes.
I've tried using 'debugger-xml' gem; that doesn't solve the issue.
So -- how can I run RubyMine 6.0.2, with the 'debugger' gem in the Gemfile, without having Gemfile.lock change?
I've been working on this issue from the other side of the table. I use the debugger gem, but have team mates that use RubyMine.
We discussed several potential solutions but they all involved conditional checks in the Gemfile that would result in a modified Gemfile.lock.
I googled around for a better solution and found this SO post: How to use gems not in a Gemfile when working with bundler?
Combining a few of the answers in there, I came up with this solution:
Remove the debugger gem from the Gemfile.
Create a Gemfile.local with the contents below.
Add Gemfile.local to the .gitignore file if using git.
Create a function and shell alias.
Start rails with $ be rails s
How it all works!
Bundler will use the file named Gemfile by default, but this behavior can be overridden by specifying a BUNDLE_GEMFILE environment variable. Bundler will use/create the lock file with the same name as the BUNDLE_GEMFILE.
The shell function __bundle_exec_custom will check to see if there is a Gemfile.local file in the CWD. If there is, then the BUNDLE_GEMFILE variable is set and used. Otherwise, the default Gemfile is used.
This will allow a developer to use any gems that they want for local development without having to impact the application as a whole.
Gemfile.local:
source "https://rubygems.org"
gemfile = File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), 'Gemfile')
if File.readable?(gemfile)
puts "Loading #{gemfile}..." if $DEBUG
instance_eval(File.read(gemfile))
end
gem 'debugger'
Function and shell alias:
__bundle_exec_custom () {
if [ -f Gemfile.local ]
then
BUNDLE_GEMFILE="Gemfile.local" bundle exec $#
else
bundle exec $#
fi
}
# Rails aliases
alias be='__bundle_exec_custom'
I think I found it. Apparently, RubyMine does not deal well with the debugger gem being required into the Rails app, but has no issue with the gem just being installed.
The solution then is to include the gem in the Gemfile (and Gemfile.lock) but only require it outside RubyMine.
gem 'debugger', {group: [:test, :development]}.
merge(ENV['RM_INFO'] ? {require: false} : {})
The above code is from this comment on the JetBrains bug tracker, through this comment on a similar question.
It checks for the presence of the RM_INFO environment variable, which is set by RubyMine. The important thing is that it only affects whether the gem is required and thus should not change Gemfile.lock between installs.
I may have an even better solution that seems to be working for me in my Rails 4 app...
In your Gemfile, move all your debugging-related gems to their own group, as such:
group :pry do
gem 'pry', '>= 0.10.0'
gem 'pry-debugger', '>= 0.2.3'
gem 'pry-highlight', '>= 0.0.1'
end
In config/application.rb you will a find something like the following:
# Require the gems listed in Gemfile, including any gems
# you've limited to :test, :development, or :production.
Bundler.require(*Rails.groups)
Add the following just below that:
Bundler.require(:pry) unless ENV['RM_INFO'] || Rails.env.production?
You may wish to modify the unless condition to suit your needs, but the important part is that RubyMine will set RM_INFO, which you can use to detect and therefore exclude gems from being required.
This will eliminate the ping-pong effect of bundling in RubyMine vs. command line, so this should work well in a mixed-IDE team.
One last note, if you're deploying to Heroku, you might want to exclude the :pry group from being installed on deploy:
$ heroku config:set BUNDLE_WITHOUT="development:test:pry"

How to use gem from GitHub on Heroku?

I've forked the redis depository on github to https://github.com/lmirosevic/redis-rb
I added it to my Gemfile:
gem 'redis', :github => 'lmirosevic/redis-rb'
And I require the gem inside my Sinatra app:
require 'redis'
However it fails with the following error:
/app/vendor/ruby-2.0.0/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.0.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:45:in `require': cannot load such file -- redis (LoadError)
Any suggestions on what could be wrong? It seems like it should work!
EDIT
I should note that the bundler phase is fine. The problem seems to be in the require step.
Bundler gives me this output:
Using redis (3.0.4) from git://github.com/lmirosevic/redis-rb (at master)
I should also say that my directory structure is something like this. Not sure if this makes a difference.
/
.env
Gemfile
Gemfile.lock
Procfile
/lib
my_sinatra_app.rb
/config
...
You must have
require 'bundler/setup'
in your app or else you're not really using bundler: this is what ensures that the gem versions loaded are the ones in your gemfile and sets up load paths for anything not installed globally.
Calling Bunder.setup allows you to control what groups are used, but if just using the default group is fine then you don't need to do this.
If you aren't setting up bundler then your gemfile is used to install the required versions of the gems but then bundler is no longer used - your app will used whatever gems are installed, whether the versions match or not and you won't be able to use gems that aren't installed in the default gem load paths.

How to install and use Slim template engine with Middleman

I'm new to Middleman and ruby in general.
I've installed Ruby
I've installed Middleman and the gems to get it running.
I need to use slim instead of the default template system.
So I installed the Slim gem. Slim's website only says that I need to require 'slim' in order to get it to work.
The middleman website says I only need add the template engine to the config.rb file, but it gives no examples...
For someone with no ruby background, this is no help.
I looked for several config.rb on git and they all have:
require 'slim'
And
# Set slim-lang output style
Slim::Engine.set_default_options :pretty => true
# Set template languages
set :slim, :layout_engine => :slim
I added that to my config.rb file and created the layout.slim and the index.html.slim
When I refresh my local server I get:
Not Found
`/' not found.
I have middleman installed with Boilerplace. I'm not sure if there are more files that I need to change, but I can't find any good resources online, which is odd.
Could anyone give me some direction as to what I'm missing?
So here we go... after much reading and searching google for examples I think I figured it out.
To get Slim working with Middleman
Add gem "slim" to your project's gemfile
go to command line, in your project folder and gem install bundler
In the config.rb file add require 'slim'
Start the middleman server to test it
The middleman-slim project by yterajima is helpful in this regard.
Install is very easy.
$ gem install middleman
$ gem install middleman-slim
$ middleman init PROJECT_NAME --template slim
Bundler tip: you can also include multiple gems at once using Bundler.require. If you have gems in groups, you can include them as such: Bundler.require :group1, :group2 ...

Gemfile - separating Production gems from Development gems

So I know that in a Gemfile I can do something like this:
group :development, :test do
gem 'gem1'
gem 'gem2'
end
What I am looking to accomplish is something like this:
group :production do
gem 'gem1'
gem 'gem2'
end
group :development, :test do
gem 'gem1', :path => '/Documents/Code/gem1/'
gem 'gem2', :path => '/Documents/Code/gem2/'
end
So our application uses 2 gems that we also develop locally. In order to improve time while developing on our local machines, we want to be able to point our dev environments to the local copies of the gems - this way it picks up all changes without needing to restart our rails server. Otherwise we would have to rebuild the gem, re-install the gem, and restart rails with every development change in the gem.
However, doing this gives me the following error:
You cannot specify the same gem twice coming from different sources. You specified that gem1 (>= 0) should come from an unspecfied source and source at /Documents/Code/gem1
I have tried even running something like bundle install --without production and I get the same error.
Does anyone know if it IS possible to do what I would like to do?
Thanks!
i think that there is a supported way to do it and some hacks to work around it.
supported way:
use bundle config with the local option as described here: http://bundler.io/v1.3/man/bundle-config.1.html
hacky way:
use env vars and execute bundler before using in production: http://www.cowboycoded.com/2010/08/10/using-2-sources-for-a-gem-in-different-environments-with-bundler/
there is a feature-request for this problem on github with several related issues and lots of comments: https://github.com/carlhuda/bundler/issues/396
the github issue phoet linked to is resolved, and is consistent with the supported way.
I dug around through the docs, you'll need to set the config variable and updated your gemfile to reference the branch as well.
e.g.
edit your Gemfile:
gem <gem_name>, git: <git_url>, branch: <branch>
on command line:
bundle config local.<gem_name> <local_path_to_gem>
I solved this by creating a new Gemfile that's identical to the original except for the target gem's source. Then, in config/boot.rb, I used:
require 'rails'
if Rails.env.development?
ENV['BUNDLE_GEMFILE'] ||= File.expand_path('../../DevGemfile', __FILE__)
else
ENV['BUNDLE_GEMFILE'] ||= File.expand_path('../../ProdGemfile', __FILE__)
end

Bundle install to development

For some reason when I run bundle install it installs to production:
Your bundle is complete! It was installed into ./RAILS_ENV=production
Arrrghh, how do I switch back to development??
Notes:
I haven't modified any environment files
When I run Rails.env from the console I get "development"
Gem file:
source 'http://rubygems.org'
gem 'rails', '3.0.3'
gem 'sqlite3-ruby', '1.3.2', :require => 'sqlite3'
group :development do
gem 'rspec-rails'
gem 'nokogiri'
gem 'will_paginate'
end
group :test do
gem 'rspec'
end
Also worth noting, it creates a folder in my app called RAILS_ENV=production which I posted a question about here which now I guess is linked to this issue.
Update
When I run bundle config I get the following information, you can clearly see the Path is set to the culprit! Any ideas how I change this? I tried re-installing the bundler gem but to no avail, maybe this is a bug within Bundler?
$ bundle config
Settings are listed in order of priority. The top value will be used.
disable_shared_gems
Set for your local app (/Users/zinc/ror/site/.bundle/config): "1"
path
Set for your local app (/Users/zinc/ror/site/.bundle/config): "RAILS_ENV=production"
The explanation to that is in in the bundler manual. Read the heading Grouping Your Dependencies. Specifically
Bundler will remember that you installed the gems using --without production. For curious readers, bundler stores the flag in APP_ROOT/.bundle/config. You can see all of the settings that bundler saved there by running bundle config, which will also print out global settings (stored in ~/.bundle/config), and settings set via environment variables. For more information on configuring bundler, please see Advanced Usage: Configuring Bundler.
And the solution is to pass a different value for the property or remove the file APP_ROOT/.bundle/config.
Ok I fixed this.
I simply removed the path from my bundle config file and it seems to default back to my original path. I somehow set this accidentally I guess.
Your bundle config file is located in:
APP_ROOT/.bundle/config

Resources