I have created couple of DB links. Some are shared and some are not.
I created shared DB Link:
CREATE SHARED DATABASE LINK dblink_name CONNECT TO username IDENTIFIED BY password AUTHENTICATED BY schema_name IDENTIFIED BY password USING 'service_name';
I created Normal DBlink as:
create database link dblink_name connect to username identified by password using service_name;
Is there a way where i can identify if the dblink created is shared mode or not.
There's no simple way to check the data dictionary to determine if a link is shared or not. Below are two workarounds, using SYS.LINK$ and DBMS_METADATA, but they each have problems.
SYS.LINK$
The undocumented table SYS.LINK$ contains this information in a bitmap, as explained by Solomon Yakobson in this thread:
select name from sys.link$ where bitand(flag,1) = 1;
But that table contains password hashes and is only viewable by SYS. You could perhaps grant permission to that table, which could raise some security concerns. Or create a view on top of it and then grant that view, although you're typically not supposed to create objects in the SYS schema.
DBMS_METADATA
The package DBMS_METADATA recreates the link DDL and can be used to check for the "SHARED" keyword.
select owner, db_link
from dba_db_links
where lower(dbms_metadata.get_ddl('DB_LINK', db_link, owner)) like '%create shared%';
This solution can be slow, especially if the system has a large number of database links. And searching for text strings in source code may not be reliable. According to the syntax diagrams in the manual there are no other keywords that could come between CREATE and SHARED, but that may change or there may be undocumented features or behavior.
I installed Oracle on my system, so now orcl is the SID, which is the unique identifier of my database instance.
Now starter db was created as part of the installation. I created 2 users user1 and user2 using the system account.
Using SQL developer I am accessing the users, this shows me 2 different connections with all the database objects like tables, stored procedures views etc.
so
When using these 2 users, am I accessing the same database? I am giving all the ddl commands by logging into the user1 or user 2, does all this data goes into the same .dbf file?
The database instance can be connected to only one database, then does this essentially mean that everytime I create a new database, to make a database instance to point to that, I need to do a configuration change?
In my experience with Oracle, the typical unit of division is a schema. Schemas in Oracle are used more like you would use databases in SQL Server or PostgreSQL. They represent both users and a logical separation of objects. Physical separation would usually be done using tablespaces. Tablespaces are a group of physical files where data is stored. Schemas can share or use different tablespaces. Having one tablespace per schema is uncommon; they usually share a few tablespaces or often even just one.
With that in mind, to answer your questions more directly,
1) Like in any other database, you can specify the schema the object belongs to:
CREATE TABLE MY_SCHEMA.TABLE_X ( X NUMBER )
If the schemas on two CREATE statements are different, then it will create different objects. What's different in Oracle is that the default schema changes for every user. The default schema is always the currently connected schema/user. So if you omit the schema like so:
CREATE TABLE TABLE_X ( X NUMBER )
then the implied schema is the currently connected schema/user. So if I'm logged in as MY_SCHEMA, then the above is equivalent to the first example. When connecting as two different users, then the implied schema will be different and the DDL is not equivalent between the two users. So running the same statement would create two different objects if you do not specify a schema.
The two objects may be stored in the same physical file if they are in the same tablespace. (They are most likely in the USERS tablespace if you did not create one explicitly and did not specify a different default tablespace when creating the schemas.) Regardless, they are still two completely separate objects.
If you specify the schema explicitly like in the first example, then the DDL is equivalent regardless of who executes it (although permissions may prevent some users from executing it). So it would result in creating the object once, and attempting to create it a second time would result in an error unless you're using CREATE OR REPLACE or something similar.
2) I don't know the answer to this question, but as I said, in Oracle, the basic unit of separation is usually the schema, not a database. I believe the question you're asking is a large part of the reason why the schemas are used in the way they are. Having multiple actual databases on the same machine/instance is far more difficult in Oracle than in other databases (if not impossible), so it's much simpler to have a single database with many schemas.
I make a privileges to user on one schema at Oracle, when accessing oracle database using SSIS I saw all tables and schema. When I use SQL Plus show me only one schema.
What is the problem here?
What query are you running to see tables in SQL*Plus? If you are querying USER_TABLES, you will only see the tables that the current user owns. If you are querying ALL_TABLES, you will see all the tables that you have permission to query regardless of the owner. If you are querying DBA_TABLES, you will see all the tables in the database (though you need additional privileges to query the DBA% objects.
There is another question on how to get a list of all the tables in a database that goes into more detail about this.
The database user has got two schemas. I need to read the data from a specific schema using ado.net. I am using OleDbConnection object to create the connection to database. Appreciate your answers.
Use SCHEMA_NAME.TABLE_NAME in your queries.
If you don't specify a schema, Oracle will look into the current schema. The schema is by default the connexion user (so if you connect with USER1 and query TABLE1, Oracle will look for the table USER1.TABLE1). You can change your current schema at any time during a session with:
ALTER SESSION SET CURRENT_SCHEMA=SCHEMA2;
You can also use synonyms to point to the correct table.
What is the difference between a user and a schema in Oracle?
From Ask Tom
You should consider a schema to be the user account and collection of all objects therein
as a schema for all intents and purposes.
SCOTT is a schema that includes the EMP, DEPT and BONUS tables with various grants, and
other stuff.
SYS is a schema that includes tons of tables, views, grants, etc etc etc.
SYSTEM is a schema.....
Technically -- A schema is the set of metadata (data dictionary) used by the database,
typically generated using DDL. A schema defines attributes of the database, such as
tables, columns, and properties. A database schema is a description of the data in a
database.
I believe the problem is that Oracle uses the term schema slightly differently from what it generally means.
Oracle's schema (as explained in Nebakanezer's answer): basically the set of all tables and other objects owned by a user account, so roughly equivalent to a user account
Schema in general: The set of all tables, sprocs etc. that make up the database for a given system / application (as in "Developers should discuss with the DBAs about the schema for our new application.")
Schema in sense 2. is similar, but not the same as schema in sense 1. E.g. for an application that uses several DB accounts, a schema in sense 2 might consist of several Oracle schemas :-).
Plus schema can also mean a bunch of other, fairly unrelated things in other contexts (e.g. in mathematics).
Oracle should just have used a term like "userarea" or "accountobjects", instead of overloadin "schema"...
From WikiAnswers:
A schema is collection of database objects, including logical structures such as tables, views, sequences, stored procedures, synonyms, indexes, clusters, and database links.
A user owns a schema.
A user and a schema have the same name.
The CREATE USER command creates a user. It also automatically creates a schema for that user.
The CREATE SCHEMA command does not create a "schema" as it implies, it just allows you to create multiple tables and views and perform multiple grants in your own schema in a single transaction.
For all intents and purposes you can consider a user to be a schema and a schema to be a user.
Furthermore, a user can access objects in schemas other than their own, if they have permission to do so.
Think of a user as you normally do (username/password with access to log in and access some objects in the system) and a schema as the database version of a user's home directory. User "foo" generally creates things under schema "foo" for example, if user "foo" creates or refers to table "bar" then Oracle will assume that the user means "foo.bar".
This answer does not define the difference between an owner and schema but I think it adds to the discussion.
In my little world of thinking:
I have struggled with the idea that I create N number of users where I want each of these users to "consume" (aka, use) a single schema.
Tim at oracle-base.com shows how to do this (have N number of users and each of these users will be "redirected" to a single schema.
He has a second "synonym" approach (not listed here). I am only quoting the CURRENT_SCHEMA version (one of his approaches) here:
CURRENT_SCHEMA Approach
This method uses the CURRENT_SCHEMA session attribute to automatically
point application users to the correct schema.
First, we create the schema owner and an application user.
CONN sys/password AS SYSDBA
-- Remove existing users and roles with the same names.
DROP USER schema_owner CASCADE;
DROP USER app_user CASCADE;
DROP ROLE schema_rw_role;
DROP ROLE schema_ro_role;
-- Schema owner.
CREATE USER schema_owner IDENTIFIED BY password
DEFAULT TABLESPACE users
TEMPORARY TABLESPACE temp
QUOTA UNLIMITED ON users;
GRANT CONNECT, CREATE TABLE TO schema_owner;
-- Application user.
CREATE USER app_user IDENTIFIED BY password
DEFAULT TABLESPACE users
TEMPORARY TABLESPACE temp;
GRANT CONNECT TO app_user;
Notice that the application user can connect, but does not have any
tablespace quotas or privileges to create objects.
Next, we create some roles to allow read-write and read-only access.
CREATE ROLE schema_rw_role;
CREATE ROLE schema_ro_role;
We want to give our application user read-write access to the schema
objects, so we grant the relevant role.
GRANT schema_rw_role TO app_user;
We need to make sure the application user has its default schema
pointing to the schema owner, so we create an AFTER LOGON trigger to
do this for us.
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER app_user.after_logon_trg
AFTER LOGON ON app_user.SCHEMA
BEGIN
DBMS_APPLICATION_INFO.set_module(USER, 'Initialized');
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'ALTER SESSION SET current_schema=SCHEMA_OWNER';
END;
/
Now we are ready to create an object in the schema owner.
CONN schema_owner/password
CREATE TABLE test_tab (
id NUMBER,
description VARCHAR2(50),
CONSTRAINT test_tab_pk PRIMARY KEY (id)
);
GRANT SELECT ON test_tab TO schema_ro_role;
GRANT SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE ON test_tab TO schema_rw_role;
Notice how the privileges are granted to the relevant roles. Without
this, the objects would not be visible to the application user. We now
have a functioning schema owner and application user.
SQL> CONN app_user/password
Connected.
SQL> DESC test_tab
Name Null? Type
----------------------------------------------------- -------- ------------------------------------
ID NOT NULL NUMBER
DESCRIPTION VARCHAR2(50)
SQL>
This method is ideal where the application user is simply an
alternative entry point to the main schema, requiring no objects of
its own.
It's very simple.
If USER has OBJECTS
then call it SCHEMA
else
call it USER
end if;
A user may be given access to schema objects owned by different Users.
Schema is an encapsulation of DB.objects about an idea/domain of intrest, and owned by ONE user. It then will be shared by other users/applications with suppressed roles. So users need not own a schema, but a schema needs to have an owner.
--USER and SCHEMA
The both words user and schema are interchangeble,thats why most people get confusion on this words below i explained the difference between them
--User User is a account to connect database(Server). we can create user by using CREATE USER user_name IDENTIFIED BY password .
--Schema
Actually Oracle Database contain logical and physical strucutre to process the data.The Schema Also Logical Structure to process the data in Database(Memory Component). Its Created automatically by oracle when user created.It Contains All Objects created by the user associated to that schema.For Example if i created a user with name santhosh then oracle createts a schema called santhosh,oracle stores all objects created by user santhosh in santhosh schema.
We can create schema by CREATE SCHEMA statement ,but Oracle Automatically create a user for that schema.
We can Drop the schema by using DROP SCHEMA schama_name RESTRICT statement but it can not delete scehema contains objects,so to drop schema it must be empty.here the restrict word forcely specify that schema with out objects.
If we try to drop a user contain objects in his schema we must specify CASCADE word because oracle does not allow you to delete user contain objects.
DROP USER user_name CASCADE
so oracle deletes the objects in schema and then it drops the user automatically,Objects refered to this schema objects from other schema like views and private synonyms goes to invalid state.
I hope now you got the difference between them,if you have any doubts on this topic,please feel free to ask.
Thank you.
A user account is like relatives who holds a key to your home, but does not own anything i.e. a user account does not own any database object...no data dictionary...
Whereas a schema is an encapsulation of database objects. It's like the owner of the house who owns everything in your house and a user account will be able to access the goods at the home only when the owner i.e. schema gives needed grants to it.
A schema and database users are same but if schema has owned database objects and they can do anything their object but user just access the objects, They can't DO any DDL operations until schema user give you the proper privileges.
Based on my little knowledge of Oracle... a USER and a SCHEMA are somewhat similar. But there is also a major difference. A USER can be called a SCHEMA if the "USER" owns any object, otherwise ... it will only remain a "USER". Once the USER owns at least one object then by virtue of all of your definitions above.... the USER can now be called a SCHEMA.
User: Access to resource of the database. Like a key to enter a house.
Schema: Collection of information about database objects. Like Index in your book which contains the short information about the chapter.
Look here for details
For most of the people who are more familiar with MariaDB or MySQL this seems little confusing because in MariaDB or MySQL they have different schemas (which includes different tables, view , PLSQL blocks and DB objects etc) and USERS are the accounts which can access those schema. Therefore no specific user can belong to any particular schema. The permission has be to given to that Schema then the user can access it. The Users and Schema is separated in databases like MySQL and MariaDB.
In Oracle schema and users are almost treated as same. To work with that schema you need to have the permission which is where you will feel that the schema name is nothing but user name. Permissions can be given across schemas to access different database objects from different schema. In oracle we can say that a user owns a schema because when you create a user you create DB objects for it and vice a versa.
Schema is a container of objects.
It is owned by a user.
Well, I read somewhere that if your database user has the DDL privileges then it's a schema, else it's a user.