I have what should be a simple problem, but my lack of awk knowledge is holding me back.
I would like to clean up the headers of a fasta file that is in this format:
>HWGG454_Clocus2_Locus3443_allele1
ATTCTACTACTACTCT
>GHW757_clocus37_Locus555662_allele2
CTTCCCTACGATG
>TY45_clocus23_Locus800_allele0
TTCTACTTCATCT
I would like to clean up each header (line starting with ">") to retain only the informative part, which is the second "_Locus*" with or without the allele part.
I thought awk would be the easy way to do this, but I cant quite get it to work.
If I wanted to retain just the first column of text up to the "_" delimiter for the header, and the sequences below, I run this (assuming this toy example is in the file test.fasta):
cat test.fasta | awk -F '_' '{print $1}'
>HWGG454
ATTCTACTACTACTCT
>GHW757
CTTCCCTACGATG
>TY45
TTCTACTTCATCT
But, what I want is to retain just the "Locus*" text, which is after the 3rd delimiter, but, using this code I get this:
cat test.fasta | awk -F '_' '{print $3}'
Locus3443
Locus555662
Locus800
What am I doing wrong here?
thanks.
I understand this to mean that you want to pick the Locus field from the header lines and leave the others unchanged. Then:
awk -F _ '/^>/ { print $3; next } 1' filename
is perhaps the easiest way. This works as follows:
/^>/ { # in lines that begin with >
print $3 # print the third field
next # and go to the next line.
}
1 # print other lines unchanged. Here 1 means true, and the
# default action (unchanged printing) is performed.
The thing to understand here is awk's control flow: awk code consists of conditions with associated actions, and the actions are performed if the condition evaluates to true.
/^>/ is a regex match over the whole record (line by default); it is true if the line begins with > (because ^ matches the beginning), so
/^>/ { print $3; next }
will make awk execute print $3; next in lines that begin with >. The less straightforward part is
1
which prints lines unchanged. We only get here if the first action was not executed (because of the next in it), and this 1 is to be read as a condition that is always true -- nonzero values being true in awk.
Now, if either the condition or the action in an awk statement are omitted, a default is used. The default action is printing the line unchanged, and this takes advantage of it. It would be equally possible to write
1 { print }
or
{ print }
In the latter case, the condition is omitted and the default condition "true" is used. 1 is the shortest variant of this and idiomatic because of it.
$ awk -F_ '{print (/^>/ ? $3 : $0)}' file
Locus3443
ATTCTACTACTACTCT
Locus555662
CTTCCCTACGATG
Locus800
TTCTACTTCATCT
You need a second awk match for the row below. e.g.
cat test.fasta | awk -F _ '/^>/ { print $3"_"$4 } /^[A-Z]/ {print $1}'
Output:
Locus3443_allele1
ATTCTACTACTACTCT
Locus555662_allele2
CTTCCCTACGATG
Locus800_allele0
TTCTACTTCATCT
If you don't want the _allele1 bit remove "_"$4 from the awk script.
You can just do a regex on each line:
$ awk '{ sub(/^.*_L/,"L"); print $0}' /tmp/fasta.txt
Locus3443_allele1
ATTCTACTACTACTCT
Locus555662_allele2
CTTCCCTACGATG
Locus800_allele0
TTCTACTTCATCT
Related
One of my script will return output as below,
NameComponent=Apache
Fixed=False
NameComponent=MySQL
Fixed=True
So in the above output, I am trying to ignore the below output using grep grep -vB1 'False' which seems not working,
NameComponent=Apache
Fixed=False
Is it possible to perform this using grep or is any better way with awk..
<some-command> |tac |sed -e '/False/ { N; d}' |tac
NameComponent=MySQL
Fixed=True
For every line that matches "False", the code in the {} gets executed. N takes the next line into the pattern space as well, and then d deletes the whole thing before moving on to the next line. Note: using multiple pipes is not considered as good practice.
#Karthi1234: If your Input_file is same as provided samples then try:
awk -F' |=' '($2 != "Apache" && $2 != "False")' Input_file
First making field separator as a space or = then checking here if field 2nd's value is not equal to sting Apache and False and mentioned no action to be performed so default print action will be done by awk.
EDIT: as per OP's request following is the code changed one, try:
awk '!/Apache/ && !/False/' Input_file
You could change strings too in case if these are not the ones which you want, logic should be same.
EDIT2: eg--> You could change values of string1 and string2 and increase the conditions if needed as per your requirement.
awk '!/string1/ && !/string2/' Input_file
If I understand the question correctly you will always have a line before "Fixed=..." and you want to print both lines if and only if "Fixed=True"
The following awk should do the trick:
< command > | awk 'BEGIN {prev='NA'} {if ($0=="Fixed=True") {print prev; print $0;} prev=$0;}'
Note that if the first line is "Fixed=True" it will print the string "NA" as the first line.
IE:
File:
1234:abcd
1234:930
1234:999999
194:keee
194:284
194:222222
Result:
1234:abcd:930:999999
194:kee:284:222222
I have exhausted my brain to the best of my knowledge and can't come up with a way. Sorry to bother you guys!
$ awk -F: '$1==last {printf ":%s",$2; next} NR>1 {print "";} {last=$1; printf "%s",$0;} END{print "";}' file
1234:abcd:930:999999
194:keee:284:222222
How it works
-F:
This tells awk to use a : as the field separator.
$1==last {printf ":%s",$2; next}
If the first field of this line is the same as the first field of the last line, print a colon followed by field 2. Then, skip the rest of the commands and start over with the next line.
NR>1 {print "";}
If we get here, that means that this line has a new not-seen-before value of the first field. If this not the first line, we finish the last line by printing a newline character.
{last=$1; printf "%s",$0;}
Update the variable last with the new value of field 1. Then, print this line.
END{print "";}
After we reach the end of the file, print one last newline character.
Combining non-consecutive lines
Consider this test file:
$ cat testfile2
3:abcd
4:abcd
10:123
3:999
4:999
10:123
Apply this awk script:
$ awk -F: '{a[$1]=a[$1]":"$2;} END{for (x in a) print x ":" substr(a[x],2);}' testfile2
3:abcd:999
4:abcd:999
10:123:123
In this approach, the lines will not necessarily come out in any particular order. If order is important, you may want to pipe this output to sort.
I have the following script in bash.
awk -F ":" '{if($1 ~ "^fall")
{ NR==1
{{printf "\t<course id=\"%s\">\n",$1} } } }' file1.txt > container.xml
So what I have a small file. If ANY line starts with fall, then I want the first field of the VERY first line.
So I did that in the code and set NR==1. However, it does not do the job!!!
Try this:
awk -F: 'NR==1 {id=$1} $1~/^fall/ {printf "\t<course id=\"%s\">\n",id}' file1.txt > container.xml
Notes:
NR==1 {id=$1}
This saves the course ID from the first line
$1~/^fall/ {printf "\t<course id=\"%s\">\n",id}
If any line begins with fall, then the course ID is printed.
The above code illustrates that awk commands can be preceded by conditions. Thus, id=$1 is executed only if we are on the first line: NR==1. If this way, it is often unnecessary to have explicit if statements.
In awk, assignment with done with = while tests for equality are done with ==.
If this doesn't do what you want, then please add sample input and corresponding desired output to the question.
awk -F: 'NR==1{x=$1}/^fail/{printf "\t<course id=\"%s\">\n",x;exit}' file
Note:
if the file has any line beginning with fail, print the 1st field in very first line in certain format (xml tag).
no matter how many lines with fail as start, it outputs the xml tag only once.
if the file has no line starts with fail, it outputs nothing.
#!awk -f
BEGIN {
FS = ":"
}
NR==1 {
foo = $1
}
/^fall/ {
printf "\t<course id=\"%s\">\n", foo
}
Also note
BUGS
The -F option is not necessary given the command line variable assignment
feature; it remains only for backwards compatibility.
awk man page
I have a line like:
one:two:three:four:five:six seven:eight
and I want to use awk to get $1 to be one and $2 to be two:three:four:five:six seven:eight
I know I can get it by doing sed before. That is to change the first occurrence of : with sed then awk it using the new delimiter.
However replacing the delimiter with a new one would not help me since I can not guarantee that the new delimiter will not already be somewhere in the text.
I want to know if there is an option to get awk to behave this way
So something like:
awk -F: '{print $1,$2}'
will print:
one two:three:four:five:six seven:eight
I will also want to do some manipulations on $1 and $2 so I don't want just to substitute the first occurrence of :.
Without any substitutions
echo "one:two:three:four:five" | awk -F: '{ st = index($0,":");print $1 " " substr($0,st+1)}'
The index command finds the first occurance of the ":" in the whole string, so in this case the variable st would be set to 4. I then use substr function to grab all the rest of the string from starting from position st+1, if no end number supplied it'll go to the end of the string. The output being
one two:three:four:five
If you want to do further processing you could always set the string to a variable for further processing.
rem = substr($0,st+1)
Note this was tested on Solaris AWK but I can't see any reason why this shouldn't work on other flavours.
Some like this?
echo "one:two:three:four:five:six" | awk '{sub(/:/," ")}1'
one two:three:four:five:six
This replaces the first : to space.
You can then later get it into $1, $2
echo "one:two:three:four:five:six" | awk '{sub(/:/," ")}1' | awk '{print $1,$2}'
one two:three:four:five:six
Or in same awk, so even with substitution, you get $1 and $2 the way you like
echo "one:two:three:four:five:six" | awk '{sub(/:/," ");$1=$1;print $1,$2}'
one two:three:four:five:six
EDIT:
Using a different separator you can get first one as filed $1 and rest in $2 like this:
echo "one:two:three:four:five:six seven:eight" | awk -F\| '{sub(/:/,"|");$1=$1;print "$1="$1 "\n$2="$2}'
$1=one
$2=two:three:four:five:six seven:eight
Unique separator
echo "one:two:three:four:five:six seven:eight" | awk -F"#;#." '{sub(/:/,"#;#.");$1=$1;print "$1="$1 "\n$2="$2}'
$1=one
$2=two:three:four:five:six seven:eight
The closest you can get with is with GNU awk's FPAT:
$ awk '{print $1}' FPAT='(^[^:]+)|(:.*)' file
one
$ awk '{print $2}' FPAT='(^[^:]+)|(:.*)' file
:two:three:four:five:six seven:eight
But $2 will include the leading delimiter but you could use substr to fix that:
$ awk '{print substr($2,2)}' FPAT='(^[^:]+)|(:.*)' file
two:three:four:five:six seven:eight
So putting it all together:
$ awk '{print $1, substr($2,2)}' FPAT='(^[^:]+)|(:.*)' file
one two:three:four:five:six seven:eight
Storing the results of the substr back in $2 will allow further processing on $2 without the leading delimiter:
$ awk '{$2=substr($2,2); print $1,$2}' FPAT='(^[^:]+)|(:.*)' file
one two:three:four:five:six seven:eight
A solution that should work with mawk 1.3.3:
awk '{n=index($0,":");s=$0;$1=substr(s,1,n-1);$2=substr(s,n+1);print $1}' FS='\0'
one
awk '{n=index($0,":");s=$0;$1=substr(s,1,n-1);$2=substr(s,n+1);print $2}' FS='\0'
two:three:four five:six:seven
awk '{n=index($0,":");s=$0;$1=substr(s,1,n-1);$2=substr(s,n+1);print $1,$2}' FS='\0'
one two:three:four five:six:seven
Just throwing this on here as a solution I came up with where I wanted to split the first two columns on : but keep the rest of the line intact.
Comments inline.
echo "a:b:c:d::e" | \
awk '{
split($0,f,":"); # split $0 into array of fields `f`
sub(/^([^:]+:){2}/,"",$0); # remove first two "fields" from `$0`
print f[1],f[2],$0 # print first two elements of `f` and edited `$0`
}'
Returns:
a b c:d::e
In my input I didn't have to worry about the first two fields containing escaped :, if that was a requirement, this solution wouldn't work as expected.
Amended to match the original requirements:
echo "a:b:c:d::e" | \
awk '{
split($0,f,":");
sub(/^([^:]+:)/,"",$0);
print f[1],$0
}'
Returns:
a b:c:d::e
I have the following script
awk '{printf "%s", $1"-"$2", "}' $a >> positions;
where $a stores the name of the file. I am actually writing multiple column values into one row. However, I would like to print a comma only if I am not on the last line.
Single pass approach:
cat "$a" | # look, I can use this in a pipeline!
awk 'NR > 1 { printf(", ") } { printf("%s-%s", $1, $2) }'
Note that I've also simplified the string formatting.
Enjoy this one:
awk '{printf t $1"-"$2} {t=", "}' $a >> positions
Yeh, looks a bit tricky at first sight. So I'll explain, first of all let's change printf onto print for clarity:
awk '{print t $1"-"$2} {t=", "}' file
and have a look what it does, for example, for file with this simple content:
1 A
2 B
3 C
4 D
so it will produce the following:
1-A
, 2-B
, 3-C
, 4-D
The trick is the preceding t variable which is empty at the beginning. The variable will be set {t=...} only on the next step of processing after it was shown {print t ...}. So if we (awk) continue iterating we will got the desired sequence.
I would do it by finding the number of lines before running the script, e.g. with coreutils and bash:
awk -v nlines=$(wc -l < $a) '{printf "%s", $1"-"$2} NR != nlines { printf ", " }' $a >>positions
If your file only has 2 columns, the following coreutils alternative also works. Example data:
paste <(seq 5) <(seq 5 -1 1) | tee testfile
Output:
1 5
2 4
3 3
4 2
5 1
Now replacing tabs with newlines, paste easily assembles the date into the desired format:
<testfile tr '\t' '\n' | paste -sd-,
Output:
1-5,2-4,3-3,4-2,5-1
You might think that awk's ORS and OFS would be a reasonable way to handle this:
$ awk '{print $1,$2}' OFS="-" ORS=", " input.txt
But this results in a final ORS because the input contains a newline on the last line. The newline is a record separator, so from awk's perspective there is an empty last record in the input. You can work around this with a bit of hackery, but the resultant complexity eliminates the elegance of the one-liner.
So here's my take on this. Since you say you're "writing multiple column values", it's possible that mucking with ORS and OFS would cause problems. So we can achieve the desired output entirely with formatting.
$ cat input.txt
3 2
5 4
1 8
$ awk '{printf "%s%d-%d",t,$1,$2; t=", "} END{print ""}' input.txt
3-2, 5-4, 1-8
This is similar to Michael's and rook's single-pass approaches, but it uses a single printf and correctly uses the format string for formatting.
This will likely perform negligibly better than Michael's solution because an assignment should take less CPU than a test, and noticeably better than any of the multi-pass solutions because the file only needs to be read once.
Here's a better way, without resorting to coreutils:
awk 'FNR==NR { c++; next } { ORS = (FNR==c ? "\n" : ", "); print $1, $2 }' OFS="-" file file
awk '{a[NR]=$1"-"$2;next}END{for(i=1;i<NR;i++){print a[i]", " }}' $a > positions