I have been trying to do a specific operation once I receive the submitAdapterAuthentication from the challenge handler and I could not do any operation because my code it does not even compile through it. I am using the submitAdapterAuthentication in one method of my angular service. The method looks like this:
login: function (user, pass) {
//promise
var deferred = $q.defer();
//tempuser
tempUser = {username: user, password: pass};
userObj.user = user;
checkOnline().then(function (onl) {
if (onl) { //online
console.log("attempting online login");
var auth = "Basic " + window.btoa(user + ":" + pass);
var invocationData = {
parameters: [auth, user],
adapter: "SingleStepAuthAdapter",
procedure: "submitLogin"
};
ch.submitAdapterAuthentication(invocationData, {
onFailure: function (error) {
console.log("ERROR ON FAIL: ", error);
},
onConnectionFailure: function (error) {
console.log("BAD CONNECTION - OMAR", error);
},
timeout: 10000,
fromChallengeRequest: true,
onSuccess: function () {
console.log("-> submitAdapterAuthentication onSuccess!");
//update user info, as somehow isUserAuthenticated return false without it
WL.Client.updateUserInfo({
onSuccess: function () {
//return promise
deferred.resolve(true);
}
});
}
});
} else { //offline
console.log("attempting offline login");
deferred.resolve(offlineLogin());
}
uiService.hideBusyIndicator();
});
uiService.hideBusyIndicator();
return deferred.promise;
}
where ch is
var ch = WL.Client.createChallengeHandler(securityTest);
and checkOnline is this function that checks whether the user is online or not:
function checkOnline() {
var deferred = $q.defer();
WL.Client.connect({
onSuccess: function () {
console.log("** User is online!");
deferred.resolve(true);
},
onFailure: function () {
console.log("** User is offline!");
deferred.resolve(false);
},
timeout: 1000
});
return deferred.promise;
}
Finally this is the "submitLogin" procedure that I have in my SingleStepAuthAdapter.js. SingleStepAuthAdapter is the name of the adapter.
//-- exposed methods --//
function submitLogin(auth, username){
WL.Server.setActiveUser("SingleStepAuthAdapter", null);
var input = {
method : 'get',
headers: {Authorization: auth},
path : "/",
returnedContentType : 'plain'
};
var response = "No response";
response = WL.Server.invokeHttp(input);
WL.Logger.info('Response: ' + response.isSuccessful);
WL.Logger.info('response.responseHeader: ' + response.responseHeader);
WL.Logger.info('response.statusCode: ' + response.statusCode);
if (response.isSuccessful === true && (response.statusCode === 200)){
var userIdentity = {
userId: username,
displayName: username,
attributes: {
foo: "bar"
}
};
WL.Server.setActiveUser("SingleStepAuthAdapter", userIdentity);
return {
authRequired: false
};
}
WL.Logger.error('Auth unsuccessful');
return onAuthRequired(null, "Invalid login credentials");
}
So I am trying to send a promise to my controller in order to redirect the user to another page but the promise is not being returned as the challenge handler is not even working.
And by the way, I have followed this tutorial: https://medium.com/#papasimons/worklight-authentication-done-right-with-angularjs-768aa933329c
Does anyone know what this is happening?
Your understanding of the Challenge Handler and mine are considerably different.
Although the
ch.submitAdapterAuthentication()
is similar in structure to the standard adapter invocation methods I have never used any callbacks with it.
I work from the IBM AdapteBasedAuthentication tutorial materials
The basic idea is that your challenge handler should have two callback methods:
isCustomResponse()
handleChallenge()
You will see these functions invoked in response to your submission.
I suggest that start by looking at those methods. I can't comment on the ionic example you reference, but I have myself used angular/ionic with the authentication framework and challenge handlers. My starting point was the IBM material I reference above.
Related
I've overridden an action in the controller that was generated from a blueprint API in Sails.JS.
I used the create action. Now I can't get a Sails.JS socket event from that action anymore, however, other actions are working fine.
io.socket.on('posts', function gotHelloMessage(data) {
console.log('Post!', data);
});
io.socket.get('/posts', function gotResponse(body, response) {
console.log('Posts: ', body);
})
What's the way to implement so that the create action also generates the event with my newly implemented actions?
create: function(req, res) {
if (
!_.has(req.body, "title") ||
!_.has(req.body, "body") ||
!_.has(req.body, "category")
) {
return res.serverError("No field should be empty.");
}
var uploadPath = "../../assets/posts";
return req
.file("thumbnail")
.upload({ dirname: uploadPath }, async function(err, uploadedFiles) {
if (err) return res.serverError(err);
let post;
try {
post = await Posts.create({
title: req.body.title,
body: req.body.body,
category: req.body.category,
thumbnail:
uploadedFiles.length === 0
? ""
: uploadedFiles[0].fd.split("/").reverse()[0]
}).fetch();
return res.json({ result: post });
} catch (err) {
return res.json({ error: err });
}
});
}
Hopefully someone can point out my error here.
In my app a user clicks on a button to insert a doc into the database. When they click on another button, a timestamp is added to an array.
Here's the code to create the doc (it works):
// Add User
function addUser(event) {
event.preventDefault();
ident = makeWords(2);
var newUser = {
'ident' : ident,
'group': '',
'timestamps': [],
'date_created': Date()
}
// Use AJAX to post the object to our adduser service
$.ajax({
type: 'POST',
data: newUser,
url: '/users/adduser',
dataType: 'JSON'
}).done(function( response ) {
if (response.msg === '') {
console.log('user added');
} else {
alert('Error');
}
});
};
And here's the route which handles it:
/*
* POST to adduser.
*/
router.post('/adduser', function(req, res) {
var db = req.db;
var collection = db.get('testcol'); //'testcol' is the name of my collection
collection.insert(req.body, function(err, result){
res.send(
(err === null) ? { msg: '' } : { msg: err }
);
});
});
I kind of thought that updating a doc would be just as easy. I'm grabbing the doc by the ident field, which will be unique to each user. However, I can't seem to make the client-side stuff pass to the server. Here's my client-side update:
function addError(event) {
event.preventDefault();
// If it is, compile all user info into one object
var errorUpdate = {
'$push': {'error_button': Date()}
}
// Use AJAX to post the object to our adduser service
$.ajax({
type: 'PUT',
data: errorUpdate,
url: '/users/errorUpdate',
dataType: 'JSON'
}).done(function( response ) {
if (response.msg === '') {
console.log("update sent, didn't receive an error");
}
else {
alert('Error');
}
});
};
This code executes, but the server-side just throws 500s. Here's that function:
/*
* update mongo doc
*/
router.put('/errorUpdate', function(req, res) {
var db = req.db;
var collection = db.get('testcol');
collection.update({'ident': ident},req.body, function(err, result){
if (err) {
console.log('Error updating menu: ' + err);
res.send({'users.js: error':'An error has occurred'});
} else {
console.log('doc has been updated');
res.send(item);
}
});
});
Any idea where I'm going wrong?
I solved this and it was a really really stupid mistake.
You might notice in my server-side code I use a variable called ident:
router.put('/errorUpdate', function(req, res) {
var db = req.db;
var collection = db.get('testcol');
collection.update({'ident': ident},req.body, function(err, result)...
ident is a global variable from my client-side stuff (global.js, which makes the ajax call), and it never made it to the server.
Further, I tried to send the Mongo update statement with the ident variable, which is totally unnecessary and just caused headaches.
Here's how I fixed it. This is client-side (where I only send the ident variable):
function addError(event) {
event.preventDefault();
// If it is, compile all user info into one object
var identifyMe = {
'ident': ident
}
// Use AJAX to post the object to our adduser service
$.ajax({
type: 'POST',
url: '/users/errors',
data: identifyMe,
dataType: 'JSON'
}).done(function( response ) {
// Check for successful (blank) response
if (response.msg === '') {
console.log('update sent, no errors received');
}
else {
console.log('Error detected. Response was: ' + response);
}
});
};
... and this is server-side, where I take that identifier and do the update (this works because all I'm doing is inserting a time stamp):
router.post('/errors', function(req, res) {
console.log(req.body);
var identifier = req.body.ident;
var db = req.db;
var collection = db.get('testcol');
collection.update({'ident': identifier}, {$push: {'error_button': Date()}}, function(err, result){
res.send(
(err === null) ? { msg: '' } : { msg: err }
);
});
});
You might notice that I'm pulling out that ident variable from the JSON that's being passed, with req.body.ident.
Hope this helps someone else struggling with updating a Mongo doc by posting to Express routes via Ajax with Node! :)
I wrote two Ajax calls that request data from stored procedures (in SQL Server), sp_ahtreatmentselect and sp_inventoryselect. Here is how the functions look like in the Breeze controller.
[HttpPost]
[ActionName("getinventories")]
public object GetInventories(HttpRequestMessage request)
{
var data = request.Content.ReadAsFormDataAsync().Result;
var opId = data["operationid"];
string query = "sp_inventoryselect #operationId";
SqlParameter operationId = new SqlParameter("#operationId", opId);
return UnitOfWork.Context().ExecuteStoreQuery<GetInventories>(query, operationId);
}
[HttpPost]
[ActionName("gettreatments")]
public object GetTreatments(HttpRequestMessage request)
{
var data = request.Content.ReadAsFormDataAsync().Result;
var opId = data["operationid"];
string query = "sp_ahtreatmentselect #operationId";
SqlParameter operationId = new SqlParameter("#operationId", opId);
return UnitOfWork.Context().ExecuteStoreQuery<GetTreatments>(query, operationId);
}
Now, on client-side, the Ajax calls look like this:
var ajaxImpl = breeze.config.getAdapterInstance('ajax');
function treatments(id) {
return ajaxImpl.ajax({
type: 'POST',
url: serviceName + '/gettreatments',
data: { operationid: id },
success: function(data) {
console.log('Success!');
},
error: function(error) {
console.log('Error!');
}
});
}
function inventories(id) {
return ajaxImpl.ajax({
type: 'POST',
url: serviceName + '/getinventories',
data: { operationid: id },
success: function (data) {
console.log('Success!');
},
error: function(error) {
console.log('Error!');
}
});
}
return inventories(id).then(treatments(id))
.then(function() {
// Do something
})
.fail(function(error) {
// Display error
});
Both Ajax calls work fine, BUT problem is, // Do something is run BEFORE inventories(id) and treatments(id) are run. I would like it to work the other way around instead. I also tried $.when(inventories(id), treatments(id)).then(...) and $.when(ajaxImpl.ajax(...), ajaxImpl.ajax(...)).then(...), but same problem occurs. How do I solve this?
Thanks in advance.
I realized that the issue lay on synchronous calls, not Breeze. I used queue.js to make Ajax calls and // Do something and the calls are completed. Here is how.
var ajaxImpl = breeze.config.getAdapterInstance('ajax'),
serviceName = 'some/service',
id = 1; // Could be any number
return queue()
.defer(function(callback) {
ajaxImpl.ajax({
type: 'POST',
url: serviceName + '/getinventories',
data: { operationid: id },
success: function (data) {
console.log('Success!');
callback(null, data);
});
})
.defer(function(callback) {
ajaxImpl.ajax({
type: 'POST',
url: serviceName + '/gettreatments',
data: { operationid: id },
success: function (data) {
console.log('Success!');
callback(null, data);
});
})
.awaitAll(function(error, results) {
if (error) {
console.log('Error! ' + error);
} else {
// Do something, given that:
// results[0] are inventories, and
// results[1] are treatments
}
});
I don't know what this has to do with Breeze. Did you get your ajaxImpl from a Breeze ajax adapter? I've looked at both ajax adapters shipped with Breeze and neither of them returns anything from a call to the ajax method!
Accordingly, you're expression should have died immediately with a reference error when it got to the .then in return inventories(id).then(.... I don't see how it could have gotten to \\ do something at all.
Something isn't right with the way you've posed this question.
Once you get beyond this I still don't see how this involves Breeze. Breeze won't do anything with the results of your service requests.
I'm completely flummoxed by your question.
How do you properly delete a subdoc (a task in this case) with AJAX in Mongoose?
Everything seems to be working up until the ajax in the file that's loaded into the page. Or could the problem be in the controller? I have read that you can't perform a .remove on a child element and I'm unclear on how to handle a delete.
Here is the schema:
//new user model
var mongoose = require('mongoose');
var Schema = mongoose.Schema;
var ObjectId = Schema.ObjectId;
// Task schema
var taskSchema = mongoose.Schema({
clientEasyTask : { type: String },
clientHardTask : { type: String },
clientStupidTask : { type: String }
});
var userSchema = new mongoose.Schema({
email: { type: String, unique: true, lowercase: true },
password: String,
task : [taskSchema]
});
module.exports = mongoose.model('Task', taskSchema);
module.exports = mongoose.model('User', userSchema);
The JS loaded into the page:
// Delete
$(document).ready(function() {
console.log('called del function');
var $alert = $('.alert');
$alert.hide();
$alert.on('error', function(event, data){
$alert.html(data)
$alert.addClass('alert-danger');
$alert.show();
});
$alert.on('success', function(event, data) {
$alert.html(data);
$alert.addClass('alert-info');
$alert.show();
})
$('.task-delete').click(function(event) {
console.log('click event occurred');
$target = $(event.target)
$.ajax({
type: 'DELETE',
url: apiDeleteTask + $target.attr('data-task-id'),
success: function(response) {
$target.parent.children.id(id).remove();
$alert.trigger('success', 'Task was removed.');
},
error: function(error) {
$alert.trigger('error', error);
}
})
});
})
Routes, which matches the working update route:
var tasks = require('./controllers/tasks-controller'),
var User = require('./models/user');
var Task = require('./models/user');
module.exports = function (app, passport) {
// Delete Task
app.delete('/api/tasks/:id', tasks.del);
};
And the tasks-controller.js
var User = require('../models/user');
var Task = require('../models/user');
exports.del = function(req, res, next) {
return User.update({ 'task._id': req.params.id }, { $set: { 'task.$.clientEasyTask': req.body.clientEasyTask }},
(function(err, user) {
if(!user) {
res.statusCode = 404;
return res.send({ error: 'Not phound' });
}
if(!err) {
console.log("Updated Existing Task with ID: " + req.params.id + " to read: " + req.body.clientEasyTask ),
res.redirect('/dashboard');
} else {
res.statusCode = 500;
console.log('Internal error(%d): %s', res.statusCode, err.message);
return res.send({ error: 'Server error' });
}
})
);
};
And last but not least I'm getting this error, that gives the task_id string & line 0:
[Error] Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Not Found) (54c55ac0443873db1eb8c00c, line 0)
In order to remove an entire field from the child array (tasks) the solution is to use $unset. I was wanting to use $set to update the field with a null value, but this is exactly what $unset does.
Here is the line in question that now works:
return User.update({ 'task._id': req.params.id }, { $unset: { 'task.$.clientEasyTask': req.body.clientEasyTask }},
Read more about field operators here: http://docs.mongodb.org/manual/reference/operator/update-field/
$pull would work if you want to remove the array elements without leaving behind a null value, but you must have a specific, matching query. Read about $pull and other array update options here:
http://docs.mongodb.org/manual/reference/operator/update-array/
Also, if you are struggling with a problem I can't stress how important it is to read the documentation. I can guarantee you that everyone on here that is answering problems is doing this, or has learned from someone who does.
Do the work. You'll figure it out. Don't give up.
I encountered a strange problem. In my app I have the following code
WinJS.xhr({
url: 'http://bdzservice.apphb.com/api/Route?fromStation=София&toStation=Варна&date=30/08/2013&startTime=00:00&endTime=24:00'
}).then(function (success)
{
console.log(success);
},
function (error)
{
console.log(error);
}
);
The problem is I get an empty response text (with status 200). The Url I provided returns data through the browser and other rest clients, but in the app I get no data. Where might be the problem?
You need to encode query string parameters via encodeURIComponent (browser does this for you automatically when pasting url).
Following code will do the trick:
function serialize (obj) {
var str = [];
for (var p in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(p)) {
str.push(encodeURIComponent(p) + "=" + encodeURIComponent(obj[p]));
}
}
return str.join("&");
};
var request = {
fromStation: 'София',
toStation: 'Варна',
date: '30/08/2013',
startTime: '00:00',
endTime: '24:00'
};
WinJS.xhr({
url: 'http://bdzservice.apphb.com/api/Route?' + serialize(request)
}).then(function(success) {
console.log(success);
},
function(error) {
console.log(error);
}
);