I'm currently trying to use ExecJS to run Handlebars for one of the product I work on (note: I know the handlebars.rb gem which is really cool and I used it for some times but there is issues to get it installed on Windows, so I try another homemade solution).
One of the problem I'm having is that the Javascript context is not kept between each "call" to ExecJS.
Here the code where I instantiate the #js attribute:
class Context
attr_reader :js, :partials, :helpers
def initialize
src = File.open(::Handlebars::Source.bundled_path, 'r').read
#js = ExecJS.compile(src)
end
end
And here's a test showing the issue:
let(:ctx) { Hiptest::Handlebars::Context.new }
it "does not keep context properly (or I'm using the tool wrong" do
ctx.js.eval('my_variable = 42')
expect(ctx.js.eval('my_variable')).to eq(42)
end
And now when I run it:
rspec spec/handlebars_spec.rb:10 1 ↵
I, [2015-02-21T16:57:30.485774 #35939] INFO -- : Not reporting to Code Climate because ENV['CODECLIMATE_REPO_TOKEN'] is not set.
Run options: include {:locations=>{"./spec/handlebars_spec.rb"=>[10]}}
F
Failures:
1) Hiptest::Handlebars Context does not keep context properly (or I'm using the tool wrong
Failure/Error: expect(ctx.js.eval('my_variable')).to eq(42)
ExecJS::ProgramError:
ReferenceError: Can't find variable: my_variable
Note: I got the same issue with "exec" instead of "eval".
That is a silly example. What I really want to do it to run "Handlebars.registerPartial" and later on "Handlebars.compile". But when trying to use the partials in the template it fails because the one registered previously is lost.
Note that I've found a workaround but I find it pretty ugly :/
def register_partial(name, content)
#partials[name] = content
end
def call(*args)
#context.js.call([
"(function (partials, helpers, tmpl, args) {",
" Object.keys(partials).forEach(function (key) {",
" Handlebars.registerPartial(key, partials[key]);",
" })",
" return Handlebars.compile(tmpl).apply(null, args);",
"})"].join("\n"), #partials, #template, args)
end
Any idea on how to fix the issue ?
Only the context you create when you call ExecJS.compile is preserved between evals. Anything you want preserved needs to be part of the initial compile.
Related
I need to programatically modify feature files of cucumber.
I have parsed a feature file using gherkin's gem 'gherkin/parser'.
The problem I find is that after parsing, I end up with a hash with the following data as example:
{:type=>:GherkinDocument, :feature=>{:type=>:Feature, :tags=>[], :location=>{:line=>1, :column=>1}, :language=>"en", :keyword=>"Feature", :name=>"MyFeature", :description=>" As an user\n I want to test a feature", :children=>[{:type=>:Scenario, :tags=>[{:type=>:Tag, :location=>{:line=>5, :column=>3}, :name=>"#MyTag"}], :location=>{:line=>6, :column=>3}, :keyword=>"Scenario", :name=>"My scenario", :steps=>[{:type=>:Step, :location=>{:line=>7, :column=>5}, :keyword=>"Given ", :text=>"I start the app"}, {:type=>:Step, :location=>{:line=>8, :column=>5}, :keyword=>"And ", :text=>"I generate a test user"}, {:type=>:Step, :location=>{:line=>9, :column=>5}, :keyword=>"And ", :text=>"I finish the flow"}]}]}, :comments=>[]}
is it possible to convert this GherkinDocument generated by the parser to a plain text feature file to save it? What method or gem should I use to get
According to the docs, you would use the Ruby Gherkin::Pickles::Compiler:
require 'gherkin/parser'
require 'gherkin/pickles/compiler'
parser = Gherkin::Parser.new
gherkin_document = parser.parse("Feature: ...")
# Make changes to gherkin_document
pickles = Gherkin::Pickles::Compiler.new.compile(gherkin_document)
I have code that reads in a pom.xml file then attempts to re-serialize and write it back out:
// Get the file raw text
def pomXMLText = readFile(pomFile)
// Parse the pom.xml file
def project = new XmlSlurper(false, false).parseText(pomXMLText)
... do some useful stuff ...
def pomFileOut = "$WORKSPACE/pomtest.xml"
def pomXMLTextOut = groovy.xml.XmlUtil.serialize(project)
println "pomXMLTextOut = $pomXMLTextOut" // <-- This line prints to updated XML
writeFile file: pomFileOut, text: pomXMLTextOut // <-- This line crashes with the error listed in the posting title: java.io.NotSerializableException: groovy.util.slurpersupport.NodeChild
I've tried casting the pomXMLTextOut variable to a String. I tried applying the .text() method, which gets a jenkins sandbox security error. Has anyone else been able to successfully write an XML file from a groovy script running in a Jenkins pipeline?
BTW, I've also tried using a File object, but that isn't remotable across jenkins nodes. It works as long as the job always runs on master.
You could try a #NonCPS annotation and close those non-serializable objects in a funcation like this
#NonCPS
def writeToFile(String text) {
...
}
Here's the explanation from Pipeline groovy plugin
#NonCPS methods may safely use non-Serializable objects as local
variables
I am trying to increment the value and use in another resource dynamically in recipe but still failing to do that.
Chef::Log.info("I am in #{cookbook_name}::#{recipe_name} and current disk count #{node[:oracle][:asm][:test]}")
bash "beforeTest" do
code lazy{ echo #{node[:oracle][:asm][:test]} }
end
ruby_block "test current disk count" do
block do
node.set[:oracle][:asm][:test] = "#{node[:oracle][:asm][:test]}".to_i+1
end
end
bash "test" do
code lazy{ echo #{node[:oracle][:asm][:test]} }
end
However I'm still getting the error bellow:
NoMethodError ------------- undefined method echo' for Chef::Resource::Bash
Cookbook Trace: ---------------
/var/chef/cache/cookbooks/Oracle11G/recipes/testSplit.rb:3:in block (2 levels) in from_file'
Resource Declaration: ---------------------
# In /var/chef/cache/cookbooks/Oracle11G/recipes/testSplit.rb
1: bash "beforeTest" do
2: code lazy{
3: echo "#{node[:oracle][:asm][:test]}"
4: }
5: end
Please can you help how lazy should be used in bash? If not lazy is there any other option?
bash "beforeTest" do
code lazy { "echo #{node[:oracle][:asm][:test]}" }
end
You should quote the command for the interpolation to work; if not, ruby would search for an echo command, which is unknown in ruby context (thus the error you get in log).
Warning: lazy has to be for the whole resource attribute; something like this WON'T work:
bash "beforeTest" do
code "echo node asm test is: #{lazy { node[:oracle][:asm][:test]} }"
end
The lazy evaluation takes a block of ruby code, as decribed here
You may have a better result with the log resource like this:
log "print before" do
message lazy { "node asm test is #{node[:oracle][:asm][:test]}" }
end
I've been drilling my head solving this problem until I came up with lambda expressions. But yet just using lambda didn't help me at all. So I thought of using both lambda and lazy evaluation. Though lambda is already lazy loading, when compiling chef recipe's, the resource where you call the lambda expression is still being evaluated. So to prevent it to being evaluated (somehow), I've put it inside a lazy evaluation string.
The lambda expression
app_version = lambda{`cat version`}
then the resource block
file 'tmp/validate.version' do
user 'user'
group 'user_group'
content lazy { app_version.call }
mode '0755'
end
Hope this can help others too :) or if you have some better solution please do let me know :)
I am using the msutter DSC module for puppet. While reading through the source code, I come across code like this (in dsc_configuration_provider.rb):
def create
Puppet.debug "\n" + ps_script_content('set')
output = powershell(ps_script_content('set'))
Puppet.debug output
end
What file defines the powershell function or method? Is it a ruby builtin? A puppet builtin? Inherited from a class? I know that it is being used to send text to powershell as a command and gathering results, but I need to see the source code to understand how to improve its error logging for my purposes, because certain powershell errors are being swallowed and no warnings are being printed to the Puppet log.
These lines in file dsc_provider_helpers.rb may be relevant:
provider.commands :powershell =>
if File.exists?("#{ENV['SYSTEMROOT']}\\sysnative\\WindowsPowershell\\v1.0\\powershell.exe")
"#{ENV['SYSTEMROOT']}\\sysnative\\WindowsPowershell\\v1.0\\powershell.exe"
elsif File.exists?("#{ENV['SYSTEMROOT']}\\system32\\WindowsPowershell\\v1.0\\powershell.exe")
"#{ENV['SYSTEMROOT']}\\system32\\WindowsPowershell\\v1.0\\powershell.exe"
else
'powershell.exe'
end
Surely this defines where the Powershell executable is located, but gives no indication how it is called and how its return value is derived. Are stdout and stderr combined? Am I given the text output or just the error code? etc.
This is core Puppet logic. When a provider has a command, like
commands :powershell => some binary
That is hooked up as a function powershell(*args).
You can see it with other providers like Chocolatey:
commands :chocolatey => chocolatey_command
def self.chocolatey_command
if Puppet::Util::Platform.windows?
# must determine how to get to params in ruby
#default_location = $chocolatey::params::install_location || ENV['ALLUSERSPROFILE'] + '\chocolatey'
chocopath = ENV['ChocolateyInstall'] ||
('C:\Chocolatey' if File.directory?('C:\Chocolatey')) ||
('C:\ProgramData\chocolatey' if File.directory?('C:\ProgramData\chocolatey')) ||
"#{ENV['ALLUSERSPROFILE']}\chocolatey"
chocopath += '\bin\choco.exe'
else
chocopath = 'choco.exe'
end
chocopath
end
Then other locations can just call chocolatey like a function with args:
chocolatey(*args)
Environment : Rails 3.1.1 and Rspec 2.10.1
I am loading all my application configuration through an external YAML file. My initializer (config/initializers/load_config.rb) looks like this
AppConfig = YAML.load_file("#{RAILS_ROOT}/config/config.yml")[RAILS_ENV]
And my YAML file sits under config/config.yml
development:
client_system: SWN
b2c_agent_number: '10500'
advocacy_agent_number: 16202
motorcycle_agent_number: '10400'
tso_agent_number: '39160'
feesecure_eligible_months_for_monthly_payments: 1..12
test:
client_system: SWN
b2c_agent_number: '10500'
advocacy_agent_number: 16202
motorcycle_agent_number: '10400'
tso_agent_number: '39160'
feesecure_eligible_months_for_monthly_payments: 1..11
And I access these values as, For example AppConfig['feesecure_eligible_months_for_monthly_payments']
In one of my tests I need AppConfig['feesecure_eligible_months_for_monthly_payments'] to return a different value but am not sure how to accomplish this. I tried the following approach with no luck
describe 'monthly_option_available?' do
before :each do
#policy = FeeSecure::Policy.new
#settlement_breakdown = SettlementBreakdown.new
#policy.stub(:settlement_breakdown).and_return(#settlement_breakdown)
#date = Date.today
Date.should_receive(:today).and_return(#date)
#config = mock(AppConfig)
AppConfig.stub(:feesecure_eligible_months_for_monthly_payments).and_return('1..7')
end
.....
end
In my respective class I am doing something like this
class Policy
def eligible_month?
eval(AppConfig['feesecure_eligible_months_for_monthly_payments']).include?(Date.today.month)
end
....
end
Can someone please point me in the right direction!!
The method that is being called when you do AppConfig['foo'] is the [] method, which takes one argument (the key to retrieve)
Therefore what you could do in your test is
AppConfig.stub(:[]).and_return('1..11')
You can use with to setup different expectations based on the value of the argument, ie
AppConfig.stub(:[]).with('foo').and_return('1..11')
AppConfig.stub(:[]).with('bar').and_return(3)
You don't need to setup a mock AppConfig object - you can stick your stub straight on the 'real' one.