I’m using three.js inside an experimental augmented-reality web browser. (The browser is called Argon. Essentially, Argon uses Qualcomm’s Vuforia AR SDK to track images and objects in the phone camera. Argon sends the tracking information into Javascript, where it uses transparent web pages with three.js to create 3D graphics on top of the phone video feed.) My question is about three.js, however.
The data Argon sends into the web page allows me to align the 3D camera with the physical phone camera and draw 3D graphics such that they appear to align with the real world as expected. I would also like to have some of the things in the physical world occlude the 3D graphics (I have 3D models of the physical objects, because I’ve set the scene up or because they are prepared objects like boxes that are being tracked by Vuforia).
I’m wondering if folks have suggestions on the best way to accomplish this occlusion with three.js. Thanks.
EDIT: it appears that the next version of three.js (R71) will have a simpler way to do this, so if you can use the dev branch (or just wait), you can do this much more easily. See this post: three.js transparent object occlusion
MY ORIGINAL ANSWER (without using the new features in R71):
I think the best way to do this is (to avoid extra work by creating new rendering passes for example) to modify the WebGL renderer (src/renderers/WebGLRenderer.js) and add support for a new kind of object, perhaps call them “occlusionObjects”.
If you look in the renderer, you will see two current object lists, opaqueObjects and transparentObjects. The renderer sorts the renderable objects into these two lists, so that it can render the opaque objects first, and then the transparent objects after them. What you need to do is store all of your new objects into the occlusionObjects list rather than those two. You will see that the opaque and transparent objects are sorted based on their material properties. I think here, you may want to add a property to an object you want to be an occluder (“myObject.occluder = true”, perhaps), and just pull those objects out.
Once you have the three lists, look what the render() function does with these object lists. You’ll see a couple of places with rendering calls like this:
renderObjects( opaqueObjects, camera, lights, fog, true, material );
Add something like this before that line, to turn off writing into the color buffers, render the occlusion objects into the depth buffer only, and then turn color buffer writes back on before you render the remaining objects.
context.colorMask( false, false, false, false);
renderObjects( occluderObjects, camera, lights, fog, true, material );
context.colorMask(true, true, true, true);
You’ll need to do this in a couple of places, but it should work.
Now you can just mark any objects in your scene as “occluder = true” and they will only render into the depth buffer, allowing the video to show through and occluding any opaque or transparent objects rendered behind them.
Related
I'm playing about with three.js and webGL with an attempt to get html objects overlaid on a webGL model.
I intend to use three.js object loaders to render a 3D model, where I can then allow users to overlay HTML DOM objects in 3D space via a custom UI.
I've mainly been using the various different examples in the three.js docs (https://threejs.org/examples/ and https://codepen.io/AdamEDGE/pen/RRjEwz).
In order to allow the user to move the overlaid HTML objects via the UI, I've added the transform controls (https://threejs.org/examples/misc_controls_transform.html).
Things seemed to be going relatively well up to this point, but now I see that the controls are not hoverable or clickable to move the element.
I suspect I'm either missing code or an issue with the camera not aligning correctly, but I'm very new to this so I'm guessing.
I have also experimented with Jerome Etienne's blending tutorials, but on testing that caused other issues and I think may not be worth the trouble for what I'm going for (http://learningthreejs.com/blog/2013/04/30/closing-the-gap-between-html-and-webgl/index.html).
I have created an example that shows the problem (click on an object and the controls should show).
Its a simple webGL torus with two HTML images overlaid and mapped to a Mesh so I can link the controls to the HTML elements which are on a different scene.
https://jsfiddle.net/mattscotty/h5wuq86y/
control = new THREE.TransformControls(camera, glRenderer.domElement);
control.addEventListener('change', render);
The controls show on all the correct places when clicked as expected and I can use the keyboard to change the transform type (again see https://threejs.org/examples/misc_controls_transform.html for how it should work).
As I can't click or hover, I can't hook up to the relevant events.
I'm brand new to this and I'm quite sure I'm missing something obvious, so any help is appreciated.
I use EffectComposer and BloomPass to make my scene overbright. However, I need to disable it for whole scene and use for selected objects only. I came up with something like that:
Render scene without selected objects.
Save colorbuffer
Clear color buffer, but not depth buffer
Render selected objects only.
Do bloom pass
Blend saved colorbuffer over with some kinky mode
Is it worth to twist my so called "engine" this way, or there is some easier way?
I've a working 360 video viewer built using Rajawali/Google VR. I'm trying to modify it to display a texture which is the output of a non Rajawali GL program, rather than displaying the StreamingTexture from the video directly (i.e. within onDrawEye I'm using a separate GL program and passing it a texture ID, it's rendering to a framebuffer with an attachment which'll be used as the texture on the sphere).
The problem I am having is that however I manage the textures (either directly with OpenGL, or using Rajawali's texture classes), they are empty within my inner GL program (i.e. black/no output when embedding into a sampler). The only thing that works is if I add the texture to a material on some dummy object visible within the scene - then the texture is available within my separate program - but that's not what I want. I've tried just adding the texture to the TextureManager, but it's insufficient to keep it around. What I'm trying to do is extremely simple and works fine without Rajawali or the GVR machinery.
What's causing even textures I'm generating and managing myself to be compromised? I don't have a minimum failing example, but could put one together with some effort.
It appears that THREE.js sends mesh (geometry and material) information to the card only when an object is first rendered. Unfortunately this can cause noticeable hiccups in frame rate when a new object comes on the scene.
Is there a way to utilize the three.js framework (or is there a parameter I'm missing) to send the mesh data down to the card immediately after the associated resources are loaded, rather than on first render? I've considered creating a temporary / off-screen scene that I could put each object into on load, render once, and the discard. I've also tried calling the low-level renderer functions directly with mock data to force the write. It works, but both are hacks.
Any suggestions?
Three.js r67.
I want to generate the top and perspective view of an object.
Input: A 3d object, maybe .obj or .dae file.
Output: the image files presenting the top and front view of the loaded object.
Here is some expected output:
The perspective view of a chair
The top view of a chair:
Can anyone give me some suggestions to solve this problem? Demo may be preferred
You could create a small three.js scene with your obj or collada-file loaded using the appropriate loaders. (see examples of the specific loaders). Then create the necessary cameras you want to have in the scene. See examples for orthographic and perspective cameras that come with three.js, too.
To produce the images you want, you could use the toDataURL function, see this thread here and use google
Three.js and HTML5 Canvas toDataURL
in essence, after the objects are loaded, you could do something like:
renderer.render(scene, topViewCamera);
dataurl = canvas.toDataURL();
renderer.render(scene, perspectiveCamera);
dataurl2 = canvas.toDataURL();
I think you could also use 2 renderTargets and then use those for output, too, but maybe if you are new to three.js, start with the toDataURL() method from HTML5.