I have html structure like this:
<a>
<c>
</c>
</a>
<b>
<d>
</d>
</b>
<a>
<c>
</c>
</a>
<b>
<d>
</d>
</b>
How do I group node 'a' and node 'b' together?
The xpath should be able to select the pairs of node 'a' and 'b'.
The nodes have auto generated id's and name's so I can't use them in xpath.
You can use the | operator for two unrelated XPath Expressions:
(//a | //b)
Related
I have an xml file in linux that I want to process.
I need to get all ids of a parent nodes based on its children.
Here I want to get all id of 'a' that have 'c' without key "f.g".
<a id="11111">
<b>
<c key="d.e">stuff1</c>
<c key="f.g">stuff2</c>
<c key="j.k">stuff4</c>
</b>
</a>
<a id="22222">
<b>
<c key="d.e">stuff1</c>
<c key="h.i">stuff3</c>
<c key="j.k">stuff4</c>
<c key="l.m">stuff5</c>
</b>
</a>
<a id="33333">
<b>
<c key="c.d">stuff0</c>
<c key="d.e">stuff1</c>
<c key="h.i">stuff3</c>
<c key="j.k">stuff4</c>
<c key="l.m">stuff5</c>
</b>
</a>
In this case I should be getting 22222 and 33333.
I'm not really sure how to write the xpath for this.
I think you are looking for something like:
//a[not(.//c[#key="f.g"])]/#id
which can be translated as: find any node <a> which does NOT have a child node <c> which itself has an attribute called key which itself has an attribute value of "f.g".
You can filter by (not):
//a[[not(#key = 'f.g')]]
It will return you needed 'a' elements, but I don't know how to get their ids.
#Jack Fleeting's answer is probably the best solution. As an alternative (more consuming) :
//c[not(#key="f.g" or preceding-sibling::c[#key="f.g"] or following-sibling::c[#key="f.g"])]/ancestor::a
Look for c elements where itself, and preceding or following siblings contain an attribute different from #key="f.g". Then select their a ancestors.
i want to search for a specific element <B> if <B>'s child <C> equals the string s1 i want to search from that element on to the next element <X> that is NOT a child of <B> and return its value (s2).
The tree would look something like this:
<A>
<B>
<C>s1</C>
</B>
<D>
<X>s2</X>
</D>
</A>
The following works for me in xsh
//X[preceding::B[C='s1']][not(parent::A)]/text()
I am trying to understand the following example
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<c>
<a>
<b att1="5">
<c/>
</b>
<d/>
</a>
<a att1="10">
<d>
<c/>
</d>
<b/>
</a>
</c>
Now I run the XPath query
//*[c]
which I take to mean "All nodes that have a child that is a c". However, this returns only the <b> and <d> nodes that have a <c> child without returning the Document node as I expected. Can anyone explain why?
Because //* equivalent to /descendant-or-self::node()/*. Notice that the document node referenced by self::node() in the previous XPath, so the outer most node selected by that XPath would be the child of the document node (due to /*), which is the root element c, which doesn't have direct child c, hence didn't get selected.
You want /descendant-or-self::node()[c] to include the document node, which is equivalent to //.[c], see the demo.
I need select a specific node name closest to (not needly on) root.
Example:
<root>
<a>
<b id="1"></b>
<b id="2">
<b id="3"></b>
</b>
<c>
<b id="4"></b>
</c>
</a>
</root>
It should select b#1, b#2 and b#4, but not b#2, because it is included inside of another b node.
Currently I'm doing that: select all b, so check if some of parents is b, if yes, discard that. But I do it hardcoded, maybe xpath can solve that alone?
I found the solution, just using not + ancestor, like:
//table[not(ancestor::table)]
I would try below expression-
//b[not(.//ancestor::b)]
It selects-
<b id="1"/>
<b id="4"/>
See live at here.
I have a transform that looks like this
<configuration xmlns:xdt="http://schemas.microsoft.com/XML-Document-Transform">
<a>
<b>
<c>
<d>
<e name="UpdateLanguageProfile">
<f xdt:Transform="Replace" xdt:Locator="Condition(/..#name='UpdateLanguageProfile')">
stuff here
</f>
</e>
</d>
</c>
</b>
</a>
So I want the xdt:Locator to select the f node only if the parent node has an attribute with the specified value.
The xdt:Locator gets translated into the following xpath expression:
/a/b/c/d/e/f[/..#name='UpdateLanguageProfile']
Which is invalid.
So the question is, what could I put in the Condition, that is the XPath square brackets, in order to select the f node based on an attribute in the parent node.
The answer is that the xdt:Locator and the xdt:Transform do not need to be on the same node. They just happen to be on the same node in every example I've ever seen.
You can do this:
<configuration xmlns:xdt="http://schemas.microsoft.com/XML-Document-Transform">
<a>
<b>
<c>
<d>
<e name="UpdateLanguageProfile" xdt:Locator="Match(name)">
<f xdt:Transform="Replace">
stuff here
</f>
</e>
</d>
</c>
</b>
</a>