I am currently trying to figure out analysis schemes for my ElasticSearch cluster. I am using ES to index pdf, word, powerpoint and excel documents. I am using Apache Tika to extract the text.
My problem is that I do not know before hand what languages to expect the file contents to be. They could be written in any language.
My question is, is there a way to make ES analyze text regardless of the language? Or should I have a pre-defined field for each language with its own tokenizer, analyzer and stopwords?
I suggest taking a look at the ElasticSearch plugin elasticsearch-mapper-attachments. I used it to build document search functionality.
When it comes to supporting multiple languages, we have had the best experience with one index per language. If you can identify the language before indexing you can insert the document into the appropriate index. This makes it easier to add new languages vs. a field per language approach.
One thing to remember is the Don't use Types for Languages note at the bottom of one language per document page. Doing that can mess up search in a very difficult to debug way.
If you need to detect the language, there are two options mentioned at the bottom of the Pitfalls of Mixing Languages page.
Related
How to index mixed language contents in Elasticsearch. Let's say that we have a system where people submit contents from various parts of the world. Countries ranges from US, Canada, Europe, Japan, Korea, India, China, Kenya, Arabs, Russia to all other parts of the world.
Contents can be in any language that we can't know beforehand and can even be in mixed language. We don't want to guess the language of the contents and create multiple language specific indexes for each of the inputted language, we believe this is unmanageable.
We need an easy solution to index those contents efficiently in Elasticsearch with full text search capability as well as fuzzy string searching. Can anyone help in this regard?
What is the target you want to achieve? Do you want to have hits only in the language used at query time? Or would you also accept hits in any other language?
One approach would be to run all of elasticsearch's different language analyzers on the input and store the result in separate fields, for instance suffixed by the language of the current analyzer.
Then, at query time, you would have to search in all of these fields if you have no method to guess the most relevant ones.
However, this is likely to explode since you create a multitude of unused duplicates. This is IMHO also less elegant than having separate indices.
I would strongly recommend to evaluate if you really do not know the number of languages you will see during production. Having a distinct index per language would give you much more control over the input/output and enable you to fine tune your engine to the actual use case.
Alternatively, you may start with a simple whitespace tokenizer and evaluate the quality of the search results (per use case).
You will not have language specific stemming but at least token streams for most languages.
I have a ruby project where part of the operation is to select entities given user-specified constraints. So far, I've been hacking my own filter language, using regular expressions and specifying inclusion/exclusion based on the fields in the entities.
If you are interested in my current approach, here's an example: For instance, given this list of entities:
[{"type":"dog", "name":"joe"}, {"type":"dog", "name":"fuzz"}, {"type":"cat", "name":"meow"}]
A user could specify a filter like so:
{"filter":{
"type":{"included":["dog"] },
"name":{"excluded":["^f.*"] }
}}
Would match all dogs but exclude fuzz.
This is sort of working now. However, I am starting to require more sophisticated selection parameters. I am thinking that rather than continuing to hack on my own filter language, there might be a more general-purpose filter language I can just embed in my application? For instance, is there a parser that can in-app filter using a SQL where clause? Or are there some other general, simple filter languages that I'm not aware of? I would especially like to move away from regexps since I want to do range querying on numbers (like is entity["size"] < 50 ?)
It is a little bit of an extrapolation, but I think you may be looking for a search engine, or at least enough of one that you may as well use one just for the query language.
If so you might want to look at elasticsearch which does have Ruby client bindings, and could be a good fit for what you are trying to do. Especially if you want or need to express the data you want to search as JSON for use by client code, as that format is natively supported by the search engine.
The query language is quite expressive, and there are a variety of built-in and plugin tools available to explore and use it.
in the end, i ended up implementing a ruby dsl. it's easy, fun, and powerful.
Let's say I have a big corpus (for example in english or an arbitrary language), and I want to perform some semantic search on it.
For example I have the query:
"Be careful: [art] armada of [sg] is coming to [do sg]!"
And the corpus contains the following sentence:
"Be careful: an armada of alien ships is coming to destroy our planet!"
It can be seen that my query string could contain "semantic placeholders", such as:
[art] - some placeholder for articles (for example a / an in English)
[sg], [do sg] - some placeholders for NPs and VPs (subjects and predicates)
I would like to develop a library which would be capable to handle these queries efficiently.
I suspect that some kind of POS-tagging would be necessary for parsing the text, but because I don't want to fully reimplement an already existing full-text search engine to make it work, I'm considering that how could I integrate this behaviour into a search engine like Lucene?
I know there are SpanQueries which could behave similarly in some cases, but as I can see, Lucene doesn't do any semantic stuff with stored texts.
It is possible to implement a behavior like this? Or do I have to write an own search engine?
With Lucene, you could add additional tokens to a single item in a TokenStream, but I wouldn't know how to deal with tags that span more than one word.
What is a good full-text search library (free/licensed) that works well with multilingual data?
Lucene has analyzers for a wide variety of languages. That only works, of course, if you know which language each document is in: either give them a language tag or use a language guesser.
(Though if you want to do cross-lingual retrieval with machine translation in the pipeline, you're on your own, I'm afraid.)
Can you suggest some light weight fuzzy text search library?
What I want to do is to allow users to find correct data for search terms with typos.
I could use full-text search engines like Lucene, but I think it's an overkill.
Edit:
To make question more clear here is a main scenario for that library:
I have a large list of strings. I want to be able to search in this list (something like MSVS' intellisense) but it should be possible to filter this list by string which is not present in it but close enough to some string which is in the list.
Example:
Red
Green
Blue
When I type 'Gren' or 'Geen' in a text box, I want to see 'Green' in the result set.
Main language for indexed data will be English.
I think that Lucene is to heavy for that task.
Update:
I found one product matching my requirements. It's ShuffleText.
Do you know any alternatives?
Lucene is very scalable—which means its good for little applications too. You can create an index in memory very quickly if that's all you need.
For fuzzy searching, you really need to decide what algorithm you'd like to use. With information retrieval, I use an n-gram technique with Lucene successfully. But that's a special indexing technique, not a "library" in itself.
Without knowing more about your application, it won't be easy to recommend a suitable library. How much data are you searching? What format is the data? How often is the data updated?
I'm not sure how well Lucene is suited for fuzzy searching, the custom library would be better choice. For example, this search is done in Java and works pretty fast, but it is custom made for such task:
http://www.softcorporation.com/products/people/
Soundex is very 'English' in it's encoding - Daitch-Mokotoff works better for many names, especially European (Germanic) and Jewish names. In my UK-centric world, it's what I use.
Wiki here.
You didn't specify your development platform, but if its PHP then suggest you look at the ZEND Lucene lubrary :
http://ifacethoughts.net/2008/02/07/zend-brings-lucene-to-php/
http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.search.lucene.html
As it LAMP its far lighter than Lucene on Java, and can easily be extended for other filetypes, provided you can find a conversion library or cmd line converter - there are lots of OSS solutions around to do this.
Try Walnutil - based on Lucene API - integrated to SQL Server and Oracle DBs . You can create any type of index and then use it. For simple search you can use some methods from walnutilsoft, for more complicated search cases you can use Lucene API. See web based example where was used indexes created from Walnutil Tools. Also you can see some code example written on Java and C# which you can use it for creating different type of search.
This tools is free.
http://www.walnutilsoft.com/
If you can choose to use a database, I recommend using PostgreSQL and its fuzzy string matching functions.
If you can use Ruby, I suggest looking into the amatch library.
#aku - links to working soundex libraries are right there at the bottom of the page.
As for Levenshtein distance, the Wikipedia article on that also has implementations listed at the bottom.
A powerful, lightweight solution is sphinx.
It's smaller then Lucene and it supports disambiguation.
It's written in c++, it's fast, battle-tested, has libraries for every env and it's used by large companies, like craigslists.org