Is there a hint to generate execution plan ignoring the existing one from the shared pool?
There is not a hint to create an execution plan that ignores plans in the shared pool. A more common way of phrasing this question is: how do I get Oracle to always perform a hard parse?
There are a few weird situations where this behavior is required. It would be helpful to fully explain your reason for needing this, as the solution varies depending why you need it.
Strange performance problem. Oracle performs some dynamic re-optimization of SQL statements after the first run, like adaptive cursor sharing and cardinality feedback. In the rare case when those features backfire you might want to disable them.
Dynamic query. You have a dynamic query that used Oracle data cartridge to fetch data in the parse step, but Oracle won't execute the parse step because the query looks static to Oracle.
Misunderstanding. Something has gone wrong and this is an XY problem.
Solutions
The simplest way to solve this problem are by using Thorsten Kettner's solution of changing the query each time.
If that's not an option, the second simplest solution is to flush the query from the shared pool, like this:
--This only works one node at a time.
begin
for statements in
(
select distinct address, hash_value
from gv$sql
where sql_id = '33t9pk44udr4x'
order by 1,2
) loop
sys.dbms_shared_pool.purge(statements.address||','||statements.hash_value, 'C');
end loop;
end;
/
If you have no control over the SQL, and need to fix the problem using a side-effect style solution, Jonathan Lewis and Randolf Geist have a solution using Virtual Private Database, that adds a unique predicate to each SQL statement on a specific table. You asked for something weird, here's a weird solution. Buckle up.
-- Create a random predicate for each query on a specific table.
create table hard_parse_test_rand as
select * from all_objects
where rownum <= 1000;
begin
dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(null, 'hard_parse_test_rand');
end;
/
create or replace package pkg_rls_force_hard_parse_rand is
function force_hard_parse (in_schema varchar2, in_object varchar2) return varchar2;
end pkg_rls_force_hard_parse_rand;
/
create or replace package body pkg_rls_force_hard_parse_rand is
function force_hard_parse (in_schema varchar2, in_object varchar2) return varchar2
is
s_predicate varchar2(100);
n_random pls_integer;
begin
n_random := round(dbms_random.value(1, 1000000));
-- s_predicate := '1 = 1';
s_predicate := to_char(n_random, 'TM') || ' = ' || to_char(n_random, 'TM');
-- s_predicate := 'object_type = ''TABLE''';
return s_predicate;
end force_hard_parse;
end pkg_rls_force_hard_parse_rand;
/
begin
DBMS_RLS.ADD_POLICY (USER, 'hard_parse_test_rand', 'hard_parse_policy', USER, 'pkg_rls_force_hard_parse_rand.force_hard_parse', 'select');
end;
/
alter system flush shared_pool;
You can see the hard-parsing in action by running the same query multiple times:
select * from hard_parse_test_rand;
select * from hard_parse_test_rand;
select * from hard_parse_test_rand;
select * from hard_parse_test_rand;
Now there are three entries in GV$SQL for each execution. There's some odd behavior in Virtual Private Database that parses the query multiple times, even though the final text looks the same.
select *
from gv$sql
where sql_text like '%hard_parse_test_rand%'
and sql_text not like '%quine%'
order by 1;
I think there is no hint indicating that Oracle shall find a new execution plan everytime it runs the query.
This is something we'd want for select * from mytable where is_active = :active, with is_active being 1 for very few rows and 0 for maybe billions of other rows. We'd want an index access for :active = 1 and a full table scan for :active = 0 then. Two different plans.
As far as I know, Oracle uses bind variable peeking in later versions, so with a look at the statistics it really comes up with different execution plans for different bind varibale content. But in older versions it did not, and thus we'd want some hint saying "make a new plan" there.
Oracle only re-used an execution plan for exactly the same query. It sufficed to add a mere blank to get a new plan. Hence a solution might be to generate the query everytime you want to run it with a random number included in a comment:
select /* 1234567 */ * from mytable where is_active = :active;
Or just don't use bind variables, if this is the problem you want to address:
select * from mytable where is_active = 0;
select * from mytable where is_active = 1;
I am currently using apex 19.1. I have this problem where I can't (or don't know how to) select certain columns from checkbox meaning I have this checkbox
which gives me the ability to check the columns names I want to use that output (:P3_COLUMN) from the check box to select a specific columns in a table. My solution was :
select :P3_COLUMN
from INPUT_TABLE$
I also tried :
select case :P3_COLUMN when 'currency' then currency when 'nationality' then nationality end as test from input_table
which gave me this output
and
DECLARE
str varchar2(100);
BEGIN
str := 'select ' || replace(:P3_COLUMN, ':', ',') || ' from input_table';
execute immediate str;
END;
which gave me this error
I don't know what to do, any help will be really appreciated.
Here's a walkthrough (my page is #51). Suppose that we want to display some column from Scott's DEPT table.
create a region whose type is classic report
create a page item (let's call it P51_COLS which is a select list item; its source is a query which looks like this:
select column_name d,
column_name r
from user_Tab_columns
where table_name = 'DEPT'
Page action on selection should be "Submit page"
region's source should be a PL/SQL function body that returns a SQL query and look like this:
return 'select case when :P51_COLS = ''DEPTNO'' then to_char(deptno )
when :P51_COLS = ''DNAME'' then dname
when :P51_COLS = ''LOC'' then loc
end as result
from dept';
Its "Page items to submit" should be set to P51_COLS
That's it ... run the page; select any column from the select list item and the result should be displayed.
Yes, I know - the query itself looks stupid as you have to name all cases. For some reason, Apex expects literally return 'select ...' statement. Concatenation, replace function, ... won't work. Perhaps someone knows why or - even better - can demonstrate how to workaround it. Meanwhile, try what's been written above.
first option use server side condition on the columns.
second option use dynamic sql> create function returns sql statement> call the function in your region source.
Thanks for looking...
I've spent hours researching this and I can't believe it's that difficult to do something in PL/SQL that is simple in TSQL.
I have a simple query that joins 2 tables:
Select DISTINCT
to_char(TO_DATE('1899123000', 'yymmddhh24')+ seg.NOM_DATE, 'mm/dd/yyyy') AS "Record Date"
, cd.CODE
, EMP.ID
, EMP.SHORT_NAME
FROM
EWFM.GEN_SEG seg join EWFM.SEG_CODE cd ON seg.SEG_CODE_SK = cd.SEG_CODE_SK
join EMP on seg.EMP_SK = EMP.EMP_SK
where NOM_DATE = vMyDate;
I use Toad Date Point and I'm querying against an Oracle Exadata source. The resulting query will be dropped into a visualization tool like QlikView or Tableau. I'd like to create a simple variable to use the the WHERE clause as you can see in the code.
In this example, NOM_DATE is an integer such as 42793 (2/27/2017) as you can see in the first row "Record Date". Nothing new here, not very exciting... Until... I tried to create a variable to make the query more dynamic.
I've tried a surprising variety of examples found here, all have failed. Such as:
declare
myDate number(8);
Begin
myDate := 42793;
--Fail ORA-06550 INTO Clause is expected
variable nomDate NUMBER
DEFINE nomDate = 42793
EXEC : nomDate := ' & nomDate'
...where NOM_DATE = ( & nomDate) ;
--ORA-00900: invalid SQL statement
and
variable nomDate NUMBER;
EXEC nomDate := 42793;
select count(DET_SEG_SK) from DET_SEG
where NOM_DATE = :nomDate;
--ORA-00900: invalid SQL statement
and several more.. hopefully you get the idea. I've spent a few hours researching stackoverflow for a correct answer but as you can see, I'm asking you. From simple declarations like "Var" to more complex " DECLARE, BEGIN, SELECT INTO...." to actually creating Functions, using cursors to iterate the output.... I still can't make a simple variable to use in a Where clause.
Please explain the error of my ways.
--Forlorn SQL Dev
Since you are using an implicit cursor, you have to select then INTO variables. Now I d not know the data types of you variables, so I have just guessed in this example below, but hopefully you get the point.
Two other things I should mention
Why are you TO_CHARing you DATE. Just use a DATE datatype. Also, I think your format mask is wrong too 1899123000 does not match yymmddhh24.
In explicit cursor expects exactly one row; no rows and you get NO_DATA_FOUND; more than one and you get TOO_MANY_ROWS
Declare
myDate number(8) := 42793;
/* These 4 variable data types are a guess */
v_record_date varchar2(8);
v_cd_code varchar2(10);
v_emp_id number(4);
v_emp_short_name varchar2(100);
BEGIN
Select DISTINCT to_char(TO_DATE('1899123000', 'yymmddhh24')
+ eg.NOM_DATE, 'mm/dd/yyyy') AS "Record Date"
, cd.CODE
, EMP.ID
, EMP.SHORT_NAME
INTO v_record_date, v_cd_code, v_emp_id, v_emp_short_name
FROM EWFM.GEN_SEG seg
join EWFM.SEG_CODE cd
ON seg.SEG_CODE_SK = cd.SEG_CODE_SK
join EMP
on seg.EMP_SK = EMP.EMP_SK
where NOM_DATE = myDate;
END;
/
VARIABLE vMyDate NUMBER;
BEGIN
:vMyDate := 42793;
END;
/
-- or
-- EXEC :vMyDate := 42793;
SELECT DISTINCT
TO_CHAR( DATE '1899-12-30' + seg.NOM_DATE, 'mm/dd/yyyy') AS "Record Date"
, cd.CODE
, EMP.ID
, EMP.SHORT_NAME
FROM EWFM.GEN_SEG seg
join EWFM.SEG_CODE cd
ON seg.SEG_CODE_SK = cd.SEG_CODE_SK
join EMP
on seg.EMP_SK = EMP.EMP_SK
WHERE NOM_DATE = :vMyDate;
You put the variables with getter and setter in a package.
Then use a view that uses the package getter
Personally I prefer to use a collection that way I can do a select * from table (packagage.func(myparam))
A weird request maybe but. My boss wants me to create an admin version of a page we have that displays data from an oracle query in a table.
The admin page, instead of displaying the data (query returns 1 row), needs to return the table name and column name
Ex: Instead of:
Name Initial
==================
Bob A
I want:
Name Initial
============================
Users.FirstName Users.MiddleInitial
I realize I can do this in code but would rather just modify the query to return the data I want so I can leave the report generation code mostly alone.
I don't want to do it in a stored procedure.
So when I spit out the data in the report using something like:
blah blah = MyDataRow("FirstName")
I can leave that as is but instead of it displaying "BOB" it would display "Users.FirstName"
And I want to do the query using select * if possible instead of listing all the columns
So for each of the columns I am querying in the * , I want to get (instead of the column value) the tablename.ColumnName or tablename|columnName
hope you are following- I am confusing myself...
pseudo:
select tablename + '.' + Columnname as WhateverTheColumnNameIs
from Table1
left join Table2 on whatever...
Join Table_Names on blah blah
Whew- after writing all this I think I will just do it on the code side.
But if you are up for it maybe a fun challenge
Oracle does not provide an authentic way(there is no pseudocolumn) to get the column name of a table as a result of a query against that table. But you might consider these two approaches:
Extract column name from an xmltype, formed by passing cursor expression(your query) in the xmltable() function:
-- your table
with t1(first_name, middle_name) as(
select 1,2 from dual
), -- your query
t2 as(
select * -- col1 as "t1.col1"
--, col2 as "t1.col2"
--, col3 as "t1.col3"
from hr.t1
)
select *
from ( select q.object_value.getrootelement() as col_name
, rownum as rn
from xmltable('//*'
passing xmltype(cursor(select * from t2 where rownum = 1))
) q
where q.object_value.getrootelement() not in ('ROWSET', 'ROW')
)
pivot(
max(col_name) for rn in (1 as "name", 2 as "initial")
)
Result:
name initial
--------------- ---------------
FIRST_NAME MIDDLE_NAME
Note: In order for column names to be prefixed with table name, you need to list them
explicitly in the select list of a query and supply an alias, manually.
PL/SQL approach. Starting from Oracle 11g you could use dbms_sql() package and describe_columns() procedure specifically to get the name of columns in the cursor(your select).
This might be what you are looking for, try selecting from system views USER_TAB_COLS or ALL_TAB_COLS.
This question already has answers here:
SQL IN Clause 1000 item limit
(5 answers)
Closed 8 years ago.
Is there any way to get around the Oracle 10g limitation of 1000 items in a static IN clause? I have a comma delimited list of many of IDs that I want to use in an IN clause, Sometimes this list can exceed 1000 items, at which point Oracle throws an error. The query is similar to this...
select * from table1 where ID in (1,2,3,4,...,1001,1002,...)
Put the values in a temporary table and then do a select where id in (select id from temptable)
select column_X, ... from my_table
where ('magic', column_X ) in (
('magic', 1),
('magic', 2),
('magic', 3),
('magic', 4),
...
('magic', 99999)
) ...
I am almost sure you can split values across multiple INs using OR:
select * from table1 where ID in (1,2,3,4,...,1000) or
ID in (1001,1002,...,2000)
You may try to use the following form:
select * from table1 where ID in (1,2,3,4,...,1000)
union all
select * from table1 where ID in (1001,1002,...)
Where do you get the list of ids from in the first place? Since they are IDs in your database, did they come from some previous query?
When I have seen this in the past it has been because:-
a reference table is missing and the correct way would be to add the new table, put an attribute on that table and join to it
a list of ids is extracted from the database, and then used in a subsequent SQL statement (perhaps later or on another server or whatever). In this case, the answer is to never extract it from the database. Either store in a temporary table or just write one query.
I think there may be better ways to rework this code that just getting this SQL statement to work. If you provide more details you might get some ideas.
Use ...from table(... :
create or replace type numbertype
as object
(nr number(20,10) )
/
create or replace type number_table
as table of numbertype
/
create or replace procedure tableselect
( p_numbers in number_table
, p_ref_result out sys_refcursor)
is
begin
open p_ref_result for
select *
from employees , (select /*+ cardinality(tab 10) */ tab.nr from table(p_numbers) tab) tbnrs
where id = tbnrs.nr;
end;
/
This is one of the rare cases where you need a hint, else Oracle will not use the index on column id. One of the advantages of this approach is that Oracle doesn't need to hard parse the query again and again. Using a temporary table is most of the times slower.
edit 1 simplified the procedure (thanks to jimmyorr) + example
create or replace procedure tableselect
( p_numbers in number_table
, p_ref_result out sys_refcursor)
is
begin
open p_ref_result for
select /*+ cardinality(tab 10) */ emp.*
from employees emp
, table(p_numbers) tab
where tab.nr = id;
end;
/
Example:
set serveroutput on
create table employees ( id number(10),name varchar2(100));
insert into employees values (3,'Raymond');
insert into employees values (4,'Hans');
commit;
declare
l_number number_table := number_table();
l_sys_refcursor sys_refcursor;
l_employee employees%rowtype;
begin
l_number.extend;
l_number(1) := numbertype(3);
l_number.extend;
l_number(2) := numbertype(4);
tableselect(l_number, l_sys_refcursor);
loop
fetch l_sys_refcursor into l_employee;
exit when l_sys_refcursor%notfound;
dbms_output.put_line(l_employee.name);
end loop;
close l_sys_refcursor;
end;
/
This will output:
Raymond
Hans
I wound up here looking for a solution as well.
Depending on the high-end number of items you need to query against, and assuming your items are unique, you could split your query into batches queries of 1000 items, and combine the results on your end instead (pseudocode here):
//remove dupes
items = items.RemoveDuplicates();
//how to break the items into 1000 item batches
batches = new batch list;
batch = new batch;
for (int i = 0; i < items.Count; i++)
{
if (batch.Count == 1000)
{
batches.Add(batch);
batch.Clear()
}
batch.Add(items[i]);
if (i == items.Count - 1)
{
//add the final batch (it has < 1000 items).
batches.Add(batch);
}
}
// now go query the db for each batch
results = new results;
foreach(batch in batches)
{
results.Add(query(batch));
}
This may be a good trade-off in the scenario where you don't typically have over 1000 items - as having over 1000 items would be your "high end" edge-case scenario. For example, in the event that you have 1500 items, two queries of (1000, 500) wouldn't be so bad. This also assumes that each query isn't particularly expensive in of its own right.
This wouldn't be appropriate if your typical number of expected items got to be much larger - say, in the 100000 range - requiring 100 queries. If so, then you should probably look more seriously into using the global temporary tables solution provided above as the most "correct" solution. Furthermore, if your items are not unique, you would need to resolve duplicate results in your batches as well.
Yes, very weird situation for oracle.
if you specify 2000 ids inside the IN clause, it will fail.
this fails:
select ...
where id in (1,2,....2000)
but if you simply put the 2000 ids in another table (temp table for example), it will works
below query:
select ...
where id in (select userId
from temptable_with_2000_ids )
what you can do, actually could split the records into a lot of 1000 records and execute them group by group.
Here is some Perl code that tries to work around the limit by creating an inline view and then selecting from it. The statement text is compressed by using rows of twelve items each instead of selecting each item from DUAL individually, then uncompressed by unioning together all columns. UNION or UNION ALL in decompression should make no difference here as it all goes inside an IN which will impose uniqueness before joining against it anyway, but in the compression, UNION ALL is used to prevent a lot of unnecessary comparing. As the data I'm filtering on are all whole numbers, quoting is not an issue.
#
# generate the innards of an IN expression with more than a thousand items
#
use English '-no_match_vars';
sub big_IN_list{
#_ < 13 and return join ', ',#_;
my $padding_required = (12 - (#_ % 12)) % 12;
# get first dozen and make length of #_ an even multiple of 12
my ($a,$b,$c,$d,$e,$f,$g,$h,$i,$j,$k,$l) = splice #_,0,12, ( ('NULL') x $padding_required );
my #dozens;
local $LIST_SEPARATOR = ', '; # how to join elements within each dozen
while(#_){
push #dozens, "SELECT #{[ splice #_,0,12 ]} FROM DUAL"
};
$LIST_SEPARATOR = "\n union all\n "; # how to join #dozens
return <<"EXP";
WITH t AS (
select $a A, $b B, $c C, $d D, $e E, $f F, $g G, $h H, $i I, $j J, $k K, $l L FROM DUAL
union all
#dozens
)
select A from t union select B from t union select C from t union
select D from t union select E from t union select F from t union
select G from t union select H from t union select I from t union
select J from t union select K from t union select L from t
EXP
}
One would use that like so:
my $bases_list_expr = big_IN_list(list_your_bases());
$dbh->do(<<"UPDATE");
update bases_table set belong_to = 'us'
where id in ($bases_list_expr)
UPDATE
Instead of using IN clause, can you try using JOIN with the other table, which is fetching the id. that way we don't need to worry about limit. just a thought from my side.
Instead of SELECT * FROM table1 WHERE ID IN (1,2,3,4,...,1000);
Use this :
SELECT * FROM table1 WHERE ID IN (SELECT rownum AS ID FROM dual connect BY level <= 1000);
*Note that you need to be sure the ID does not refer any other foreign IDS if this is a dependency. To ensure only existing ids are available then :
SELECT * FROM table1 WHERE ID IN (SELECT distinct(ID) FROM tablewhereidsareavailable);
Cheers