I am currently trying to build and conplie a code for my game inb UDK but i keep getting this error Parser: missing RPAREN at '{'
I have a copy of the code that is creating the problem located below.
{
if (Stamina - StamJumpPenalty > 0 && super.DoJump(bUpdating)
{
Stamina -= StamJumpPenalty;
return true;
}
return false;
}
can some one please help me out, and maybe explain why this is happening please?
thanks guys
You're missing a closing parenthesis in the condition of the if statement.
Related
I have code that worked well in Visual C++ 6.0. Now I need to get it working in VS 2017. I have some error messages when I compile, and I'm really not sure how to fix it. Here's the code:
class CTagDB : public CObject
{
...
bool SameTag (const CTagDB *TagDB) { return TagDB && *this == *TagDB; }
...
}
class CTagsDB : public CObject
{
...
std::vector<CTagDB*> m_Tags;
...
}
bool CTagsDB::IsDup(const CTagDB *TagDB) const
{
return std::find_if(m_Tags.begin(), m_Tags.end(),
std::bind2nd(std::mem_fun1(CTagDB::SameTag),
TagDB)) != m_Tags.end();
}
For this code I get the following errors:
error C2039: 'mem_fun1': is not a member of 'std' C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2017\Community\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.11.25503\include\map(16):
note: see declaration of 'std'
error C3867: 'CTagDB::SameTag': non-standard syntax; use '&' to create a pointer to member
error C3861: 'mem_fun1': identifier not found
error C2672: 'std::find_if': no matching overloaded function found
error C2780: '_InIt std::find_if(_InIt,_InIt,_Pr)': expects 3 arguments - 2 provided
Seeing the methods begin() & end(), I suspect that there is a problem with the way the vectors are being used, because originally the code was written without iterators. But this fragment of code is so clever as to be very difficult to decipher, let alone maintain (by me).
Can anyone help me figure out what is going on here and how to fix it?
this is a simple recursion function
func recursion(parameter : Double)
{
if parameter < 12
{
recursion(parameter + 1)
}
print(parameter)
}
when i am trying to put a simple value for example 0 or 1
recursion(0)
i get a compile error saying Missing argument for #1 in call any idea why this is happening?
btw if i change the function to
func recursion(parameter : Double)
{
if parameter > 1
{
recursion(parameter - 1)
}
print(parameter)
}
everything works fine
any ideas? i am using Xcode 7 beta
Your code works fine, just make a Clean & Build and then try it again and the initial compile error should disappear. Remember that Xcode 7 is still in Beta, Apple is working to fix this kind of false compile errors properly.
I hope this help you.
My problem is
-(IBAction)setAction:(id)sender{
if ([labelOne.text isEqual: #"One"] && [labelTwo.text isEqual: #"Two"]) {
labelShow.text = #"Yes it works :)";
}
}
And if i build it. It show me the error code: Thread 1: signal SIGBART
but it works if i do it like this
-(IBAction)setAction:(id)sender{
if ([labelOne.text isEqual: #"One"]) {
labelShow.text = #"Yes it works :)";
}
}
What can I do, that the First one works?:)
The SIBABRT implies that either labelTwo or labelTwo.text is pointing to bad memory.
First figure out which pointer is bad, and then debug to see why. Also, provide a crash log when possible. There should be an error message associated in your debug output pane.
Check out this debugging tutorial.
I have some razor code and I am having a problem with getting the syntax working. The code is as follows:
else
{
#(x.RowKey.Substring(0, 2).TrimStart('0') + "." + x.RowKey.Substring(2, 2).TrimStart('0').PadLeft(1, '0')) - #Html.Raw(x.Title)<br>
}
This is giving me the following error:
Compiler Error Message: CS1002: ; expected
When you start your #(x.RowKey...., Razor still thinks that it's still in C# mode, not HTML mode (to use the totally non-technical terms). Nick Bork's suggestion about wrapping that stuff in the <text> tags gets the page back into HTML mode so you can go back to using your normal Razor syntax.
Try this:
else
{
var st = x.RowKey.Substring(0, 2).TrimStart('0') + "." + x.RowKey.Substring(2, 2).TrimStart('0').PadLeft(1, '0'));
#st - #Html.Raw(x.Title)<br/>
}
I have been writing a GCC inter procedural plugin where I have to insert GIMPLE statements
at certain points in the program. After this I perform a data flow analysis on the complete
program. When I am done with my analysis I am removing those newly inserted GIMPLE statements.
My analysis is getting completed but just before exiting from it the following message is generated:
internal compiler error: in execute_ipa_pass_list, at passes.c:1817
This is surely because of the insertion of GIMPLE statements, if I don't do that I won't get this error message.
Could anyone help me out and explain what is the problem and how to fix it?
This usually happens when GCC code contains an assertion which turns out to be false.
The line 1817 in passes.c (which is part of the GCC sources, in the gcc sub-directory of the GCC source tree) has a piece of code which looks like:
gcc_assert (some_condition);
In your case, some_condition was false, but the compiler expects it to be always true (this is why the author of the code wrote the assertion in the first place).
You did something in your plugin which made it false, and you need to fix it.
What did you do wrong? It really depends. Open up passes.c and find that line, and see what it is checking. In my copy of GCC, the relevant function reads:
void
execute_ipa_pass_list (struct opt_pass *pass)
{
do
{
/* An assertion. */
gcc_assert (!current_function_decl);
/* Another assertion. */
gcc_assert (!cfun);
/* Another assertion. */
gcc_assert (pass->type == SIMPLE_IPA_PASS || pass->type == IPA_PASS);
if (execute_one_pass (pass) && pass->sub)
{
if (pass->sub->type == GIMPLE_PASS)
{
invoke_plugin_callbacks (PLUGIN_EARLY_GIMPLE_PASSES_START, NULL);
do_per_function_toporder ((void (*)(void *))execute_pass_list,
pass->sub);
invoke_plugin_callbacks (PLUGIN_EARLY_GIMPLE_PASSES_END, NULL);
}
else if (pass->sub->type == SIMPLE_IPA_PASS
|| pass->sub->type == IPA_PASS)
execute_ipa_pass_list (pass->sub);
else
gcc_unreachable ();
}
/* Another assertion. */
gcc_assert (!current_function_decl);
cgraph_process_new_functions ();
pass = pass->next;
}
while (pass);
}
There are four gcc_assert statements. Your plugin caused one of them to become false. i.e. you messed with one of the variables:
current_function_decl
cfun
pass->type
This is probably what's wrong.