I need to generate a constant high signal pulse_out to output to an oscilloscope.
I tried letting the output signal pulse_out <='1' and this didnt work either. I believe due to my knowledge that an output port signal needs to be driven by a clock.
I also tried using combinational logic and letting a two signals that were opposite of each other make a new signal by using AND,OR and this did not work either.
I know it is a stupid question, but I am stumped.
Any sample code of showing how to output a constant high value of '1' would be great.
I agree with Josh's comment on checking your pin numbers and pin report to make sure you are driving the pin you think you are. Setting a signal to '1' should drive the pin high.
You can double check it too by driving a divided clock out and give yourself an edge to trigger a scope on.
LIBRARY ieee;
USE ieee.std_logic_1164.ALL;
USE ieee.std_logic_arith.ALL;
ENTITY test IS
PORT (i_clk : IN std_logic;
i_reset : IN std_logic;
o_scope : OUT std_logic
);
END test;
ARCHITECTURE behv OF test IS
SIGNAL scope : std_logic;
BEGIN
p1 : PROCESS (i_clk, i_reset)
BEGIN
IF i_reset = RESET_LEVEL THEN
scope <= '0';
ELSIF clk'event AND clk = '1' THEN
scope <= NOT scope;
END IF;
END PROCESS p1;
o_scope <= scope;
END behv;
Related
I'm using a CMOD A7 (Artix 7) and I need to trigger a process based on a pulse of around 10ns duration (blue line):
Normally I'd do triggering like this by having a process constantly compare the current value of the input line with the last value using a temporary register to hold the last value. However, I believe the oscillator on this board has a period of around 83ns which is far too slow for this approach.
If I was using pure digital electronics, this would be easy, connect a flipflop to the trigger, poll the output of that flipflop (which would change and latch with the input) and then reset it once I've read it and started my actions. So I would imagine there's a way to do this in VHDL but I'm led to believe using if rising_edge() on non-clock signals is a no-go.
Where do I start with this?
So the solution here is twofold:
Firstly, I can derive a 100MHz clock using the onboard MCCM and Vivado's ClockWiz IP.
I can also use the FDCE component provided by Vivado to utilise one of the onboard flipflops to extend the pulses and reset it after passing it through a few flipflops for synchronisation.
I've not tested this yet but I believe it should work:
library IEEE;
use IEEE.STD_LOGIC_1164.ALL;
library unisim;
use unisim.vcomponents.all;
entity input_syncroniser is
generic
(
in_pipe_len: in positive := 5
);
port
(
clk : in STD_LOGIC;
rst : in STD_LOGIC;
din : in STD_LOGIC;
dfo : out STD_LOGIC
);
end input_syncroniser;
architecture behavioural of input_syncroniser is
signal delayed_pulse: std_logic := '0';
signal in_pipe: std_logic_vector(in_pipe_len - 1 downto 0) := (others => '0');
signal pipe_head: std_logic := '0';
begin
FDCE_inst : FDCE
generic map
(
INIT => '0'
)
port map
(
Q => delayed_pulse,
C => din,
CE => '1',
CLR => pipe_head,
D => '1'
);
input_synchroniser: process(clk)
begin
if (rising_edge(clk)) then
in_pipe <= in_pipe(in_pipe'high downto in_pipe'low) & delayed_pulse;
end if;
end process;
pipe_head <= in_pipe(in_pipe'high);
dfo <= pipe_head;
end behavioural;
I'd like to be able to continuously force a signal down in my testbench hierarchy. Here is a simple example illustrating how I've been doing this in my test benches.
library ieee;
use ieee.std_logic_1164.all;
use ieee.numeric_std.all;
entity double_inverter is
port(
a : in std_logic;
z : out std_logic
);
end double_inverter;
architecture x of double_inverter is
signal b : std_logic;
begin
b <= not a;
z <= not b;
end architecture x;
library ieee;
use ieee.std_logic_1164.all;
use ieee.numeric_std.all;
entity inverter_tb is
end inverter_tb;
architecture y of inverter_tb is
signal z : std_logic;
signal clk : std_logic := '0';
begin
clk <= not clk after 5 ns;
dut : entity work.double_inverter
port map(
a => '0',
z => z
);
continuous_stim : process(clk)
begin
<< signal dut.b : std_logic >> <= force clk;
end process;
end architecture y;
This works in Modelsim 10.4b i.e. signal b in the double_inverter instance will be set by clk and not signal a, but is there a better way to control external name signals?
Thanks for your help.
In some situations you can use is an alias to the external name:
alias dut_b is <<signal dut.b : std_logic >> ;
Since we think of signals being declared in an architecture, our instinct is to put the alias in the architecture. However, in this situation, it is not allowed because the DUT has not been elaborated yet.
You may be allowed to put it in the process - I would have to do some research to check if the language allows this. My concern is that processes do not allow signal declarations, so I am not confident that it will allow aliases to signals in a process - no harm in trying it and letting us know if it worked.
Generally when I am using something like this, I put it in a architecture declarative region of a component that creates the test cases and is instanced by the testbench. To avoid issues with elaboration order, I make sure to instance my DUT first in the testbench and typically the component that generates the test cases last (with the transaction based models in the middle) - VHDL elaborates designs in the order they are instantiated.
I want to make a simple vhdl code which makes a delay of 20 sec before a led will be ON. i used a signal counter to make the delay of the 20 sec, but i've noticed to very strange thing, if i am not declare that the led is OFF before the delay, the led will be always ON.
look at the two codes (the clock is 50MHz):
in this code the led is always ON.
library ieee;
use ieee.std_logic_1164.all;
entity check is
port(clk : in std_logic;
led : out std_logic);
end check;
architecture arc of check is
signal counter : integer range 0 to 100e6;
begin
process(clk)
begin
if rising_edge(clk) then
if counter<500e6 then
counter<=counter+1;
else
led<='1';
end if;
end if;
end process;
end arc;
in this code the led is ON only after 20 seconds.
library ieee;
use ieee.std_logic_1164.all;
entity check is
port(clk : in std_logic;
led : out std_logic);
end check;
architecture arc of check is
signal counter : integer range 0 to 100e6;
begin
process(clk)
begin
if rising_edge(clk) then
if counter<500e6 then
counter<=counter+1;
led<='0';
else
led<='1';
end if;
end if;
end process;
end arc;
You should initialize both counter and led. In simulation, when you don't do this, value of each uninitialized signal will be 'U', which means you simply cannot be sure what value it will have in real system. Can be both 0 or 1.
You can use := '0' in port declaration.
Probably led is always on, because according to this code, if counter<500e6, the value of 'led' doesn't matter and else it's 1, so compiler simplified it, because the only one value the program sets to 'led' is '1'.
I am currently in the middle of a project where I am attempting to design a single cycle cpu. I am doing this without any pipe-lining, since that would greatly add to the complexity of the design. I am simply taking baby steps as I learn this. I find myself stuck at this portion where I am simply attempting to code a Program Counter(PC) using previously made components.
The model of my design looks like this picture here. Sorry, no idea why it came out dark, but if you click on it it shows correctly. The PC and theMUX are both 32 bit components, so I assume the adder is as well.
Here is the code I have been given, my implementation begins at the begin statement on line 41.
Pay no attention to it for now, its just a bunch of random gibberish I was attempting.
library ieee;
use ieee.std_logic_1164.all;
use ieee.std_logic_arith.all;
use ieee.std_logic_unsigned.all;
---------------------------------------------------
entity pc_update is
port( clk: in std_logic; -- clock
incH_ldL: in std_logic; -- increment PC = PC + 4 when high,
-- load PCInput when low
PCInput: in std_logic_vector(31 downto 0); -- external input for PC
InstrAddr: out std_logic_vector(31 downto 0) ); -- instruction address
end entity pc_update;
----------------------------------------------------
architecture pc_update_arch of pc_update is
component register32 is
port( clr: in std_logic; -- async. clear
clk: in std_logic; -- clock
ld: in std_logic; -- load
D: in std_logic_vector(31 downto 0); -- data input
Q: out std_logic_vector(31 downto 0) ); -- data output
end component register32;
component mux2to1_32 is
port( sel: in std_logic; -- selection bit input
X0: in std_logic_vector(31 downto 0); -- first input
X1: in std_logic_vector(31 downto 0); -- second input
Y: out std_logic_vector(31 downto 0)); -- output
end component mux2to1_32;
signal PC_current: std_logic_vector(31 downto 0); -- the current state of PC reg
signal PC_add_4: std_logic_vector(31 downto 0); -- output from the adder
signal PC_next: std_logic_vector(31 downto 0); -- output from the MUX
begin
PC: register32 Port Map(
clk, Q, clr, D);
MUX: mux2to1_32 Port Map(
X0,sel,X1,Y);
process (incH_ldL)
begin
wait until (clk = '1');
if incH_1dL = '0' then
InstrAddr <= X0;
else InstrAddr <= X1;
end if;
end process;
end architecture pc_update_arch;
I am fairly new to this so I have only a faint idea of how signals work, and no idea how I am supposed to implement the components into the design. I am also confused that I wasnt asked to build the adder ahead of time. Is it now necessary to use it as a component im guessing?
Anyhow, I have attempted different things that stumbled upon searching, such as the port mapping you see. But I always get some sort of error, currently the error im receiving is that objects Q, clr, and D are used but not declared. How do I declare them?
If I get rid of those statements, the error simply repeats for objects X0, X1, and Y.
Any help in the right direction would be greatly appreciated. Thanks guys!
Also, just in case you need them,
The register
library ieee ;
use ieee.std_logic_1164.all;
use ieee.std_logic_unsigned.all;
---------------------------------------------------
entity register32 is port(
clr: in std_logic; -- async. clear
clk: in std_logic; -- clock
ld: in std_logic; -- load
D: in std_logic_vector(31 downto 0); -- data input
Q: out std_logic_vector(31 downto 0) ); -- data output
end entity register32;
----------------------------------------------------
architecture register32_arch of register32 is
begin
process(clk, clr)
begin
if clr = '1' then
q <= x"00000000";
elsif rising_edge(clk) then
if ld = '1' then
q <= d;
end if;
end if;
end process;
END register32_arch;
and the MUX
library ieee ;
use ieee.std_logic_1164.all;
use ieee.std_logic_unsigned.all;
---------------------------------------------------
entity mux2to1_32 is
port( sel: in std_logic; -- selection bit input
X0: in std_logic_vector(31 downto 0); -- first input
X1: in std_logic_vector(31 downto 0); -- second input
Y: out std_logic_vector(31 downto 0)); -- output
end entity mux2to1_32;
----------------------------------------------------
architecture mux2to1_32_arch of mux2to1_32 is
begin
Y <= X1 when (SEL = '1') else X0;
end architecture mux2to1_32_arch;
EDIT
Ok, NO idea if I did this correctly, but I rewrote the portmaps. I was having errors of port names (sel, clk, X0, X1..etc) being "used but not initialized. So that is why clr, clk and ld have initial values. Once again, no idea if that is correct, but it made the errors go away. I also realized I never added the register32 and mux2to1_32 VHDL files to my project, and after doing so got rid of the other errors I was having.
So as stands, the code compiles, I have included in the project a VWF simulation file for testing, but I KNOW the results are gonna be incorrect.
I dont know everything that is wrong yet, but I know I need to do something with PC_add_4. THis value needs to basically be (PC_current + 4), but Im not sure how to do this.
Here is the updated portion of code(everything else is the same)
PC: register32 Port Map(
clr => '0',
clk => '0',
ld => '1',
Q => PC_current,
D => PC_next
);
MUX: mux2to1_32 Port Map(
sel => incH_ldL,
X0 => PCInput ,
X1 => PC_add_4,
Y => PC_next
);
process (incH_ldL)
begin
if (rising_edge(clk)) then
if incH_ldL = '0' then
InstrAddr <= PC_current;
else InstrAddr <= PC_add_4;
end if;
end if;
end process;
And, in case they help, my list of errors..im guessing the pin related errors are because I dont have any hardware assignments made yet.
Warning (10541): VHDL Signal Declaration warning at pc_update.vhd(38): used implicit default value for signal "PC_add_4" because signal was never assigned a value or an explicit default value. Use of implicit default value may introduce unintended design optimizations.
Warning (10492): VHDL Process Statement warning at pc_update.vhd(61): signal "clk" is read inside the Process Statement but isn't in the Process Statement's sensitivity list
Warning: Output pins are stuck at VCC or GND
Warning: Design contains 34 input pin(s) that do not drive logic
Warning: Found 32 output pins without output pin load capacitance assignment
Warning: The Reserve All Unused Pins setting has not been specified, and will default to 'As output driving ground'.
Warning: Can't generate programming files because you are currently using the Quartus II software in Evaluation Mode
Warning: No paths found for timing analysis
Critical Warning: No exact pin location assignment(s) for 66 pins of 66 total pins
SECOND EDIT
So yeah I fixed up my code by adding
PC_add_4 <= (PC_current + 4 );
after the port mappings, and adding "clk" to the process sensitivity list.
However my waveforms in my simulation are still wrong I believe, as shown here.
It appears to be treating incH_lDL as a clear signal, rather than simply passing PCInput to InstrAddr. This is most likely due to my setting of it to a default '0' in the port map. I did this earlier because it was giving me "used but not declared" errors. Ill try messing with it and post my findings.
Third EDIT
I have edited my code as such:
process (incH_ldL, clk)
begin
if rising_edge(clk) then
if (incH_ldL = '0') then
InstrAddr <= PCInput ;
else InstrAddr <= PC_add_4;
end if;
end if;
end process;
My simulation now shows that when incH_lDL = 0, PCInput is loaded into InstrAddr, however, when incH_lDL = 1, it simply loads the value '4', and doesnt increment at the start of every clock cycle like its supposed to...I need to make use of PC_current, but I am not sure how....sicne you cant assign one signal to another like "PC_current <= PCInput". I will try some more things,in the mean time, any pointers would be greatly appreciated.
FOURTH EDIT
THanks to anyone still reading this, and bearing through all the reading.
I have attempted to use PC_next and PC_current in my implementation, but have run into "multiple constant drivers for net "PC_next" errors.
MY process code:
process (incH_ldL, clk, PC_next, PC_current)
begin
if rising_edge(clk) then
if (incH_ldL = '0') then
PC_next <= PCInput;
else PC_next <= PC_add_4;
end if;
end if;
InstrAddr <= PC_current;
end process;
I am aware that this error comes when these assignments are made within loops? I am truly at a loss here at what to try next.
Your port maps in the first code need to be ported to signals. You are placing the port names of the components in the port map, which is incorrect. What you would like to do is create signals that can connect those components, and place them in the port map fields instead (to match the connections in your image).
I have a problem with my vhdl code . In active-hdl it works perfectly , but when i tried to implement it on the FPGA board using ise design xilinx i have a problem with one component . The error i found is:
ERROR:Xst:827 - "E:/proiect_final/dispozitiv_impartitor/src/generator_square_wave.vhd" line 16: Signal numar_intermediar<0> cannot be synthesized, bad synchronous description. The description style you are using to describe a synchronous element (register, memory, etc.) is not supported in the current software release.
library ieee;
use ieee.std_logic_1164.all;
use ieee.std_logic_arith.all;
use ieee.std_logic_unsigned.all;
entity generator_square_wave is
port(clock,reset :in bit;
controler:std_logic_vector(2 downto 0);
numar:out std_logic_vector(7 downto 0);
data_clock:out bit);
end generator_square_wave ;
architecture descriere of generator_square_wave is
signal reset1:std_logic;
begin
process (clock,reset) -- here it shows me the error
variable numar_intermediar:bit_vector(3 downto 0 ):="0000";
variable numar_intermediar2:std_logic_vector(3 downto 0);
variable bitul:bit;
begin
reset1<=to_stdulogic(reset);
if rising_edge(reset1) then
numar_intermediar:="0001";
numar_intermediar2:=To_StdLogicVector(numar_intermediar);
numar(0)<=numar_intermediar2(0);
numar(1)<=numar_intermediar2(1);
numar(2)<=numar_intermediar2(2);
numar(3)<=numar_intermediar2(3);
numar(4)<='0';
numar(5)<='0';
numar(6)<='0';
numar(7)<='0';
else if( clock'event and clock ='1' and controler="001")then
bitul:=numar_intermediar(0);
numar_intermediar:=numar_intermediar srl 1;
numar_intermediar(3):=bitul;
numar_intermediar2:=To_StdLogicVector(numar_intermediar);
numar(0)<=numar_intermediar2(0);
numar(1)<=numar_intermediar2(1);
numar(2)<=numar_intermediar2(2);
numar(3)<=numar_intermediar2(3);
numar(4)<='0';
numar(5)<='0';
numar(6)<='0';
numar(7)<='0';
if(reset/='1' and controler/="001")then
numar<="00000000";
end if;
end if;
end if;
data_clock<=clock;
end process;
end descriere;
You have a few problems. First, you shouldn't be treating reset as a clock (i.e. using rising_edge()). If it's asynchronous, you should just write:
if reset1 = '1' then
...
The following line also has a problem (not sure if this is strictly illegal, but it's not recommended):
if( clock'event and clock ='1' and controler="001")then
This should be:
if clock'event and clock = '1' then
if controler = "001" then
(with additional end if to match.)
That should at least allow it to synthesize.
You may also want to make the statement reset1<=to_stdulogic(reset) concurrent instead of including it in the process, and there are a couple other possible changes you could make, but they're not as critical (unless I've missed something).