How can i measure the coverage of the manual tests?
Are there tools to measure the coverage of the manual tests?
I have searched but all the articles refer to unit tests
Thank you
The tools for measuring coverage of manual tests are also manual. You need to count the possible execution branches of the code and those which you covered. Coverage would be this ration of covered/all
Related
I know how to check coverage of Unit test cases, we can see coverage for each .swift file in Xcode coverage report. but what about UI test cases?
As per my understanding, In unit test cases the subject being tested is a .swift file. if a file has class with 4 methods/functions. The unit test coverage of that file would be 100% only if all the 4 methods are being called from unit test cases.
In UI test cases the subject is the View, Does interacting with all the UI elements leads to 100% coverage? How does coverage report for UI test work?
Edit:
In Unit tests - I know that when few lines of function are not covered I see red overlay, here I know that I have to write unit tests for screenshot class method, line 56 in above attached image. Is there any similar mechanism in UI tests?
In UI tests - How can we find which UI element is left uncovered?
The code coverage report can be generated for both unit and UI tests in Xcode. In your testing scheme choose Gather coverage for required targets. You can only get coverage for targets in your workspace.
The way coverage report is collected for UI tests is the same as for unit tests.
Even if you interact with all UI elements in your app, some code might be uncovered by tests. If you aim to increase your coverage, add additional tests to execute previously uncovered code.
Does SonarQube always require an external code coverage tool like jacoco (Java), Coverage (python), gcov (c/c++), in order to show coverage on a sonar server?
SonarQube by itself doesn't do any coverage. Its the job for other tools like jacoco and others.
However SonarQube can gather the "results" relevant to the project quality (of course including coverage as an important code quality metric) of the build and allows tracking of the quality over time.
Usually you run coverage tool first, it "adjusts" the code, then you run the tests in the build. Coverage tool creates some results, and only after that you run sonar plugin that processes the results and sends to the sonar qube server.
So, to answer your question: Yes, without an external code coverage tool, sonar won't produce any coverage results, and no, it doesn't have a "default, built-in" coverage tool
I'm running a Maven multi-module project, and using Sonar Runner to analyze the project for SonarQube 6.3. This project contains both unit and integration tests in every modules. I succeeded generating reports for UT and IT in target/jacoco-ut.exec and target/jacoco-it.exec.
I think analysis parameters for Sonar Runner are good, as I can see both reports are processed and merged during analysis.
From SonarQube 6.3, there's no difference anymore between unit tests and integration tests, though the only measure reported is "Unit tests", which suggests integration tests are ignored.
When I look at the coverage measures in SonarQube, I'm surprised because the number of tests reported is not the sum of the number of unit tests and the number of integration tests. Integration tests are not listed in the measures. To me, if both unit tests and integration tests were merged in SonarQube, I understand there shall both appear in measures, but that's not the case.
I can't find anything in SonarQube documentation about integration tests inclusion in measures. There are only notes that they are merged during analysis, though I don't see anything about my integration tests in the coverage measures.
How can I see integration tests and unit tests in coverage measures?
All tests are now merged into "Coverage", so those numbers include the sum of UT and IT coverage. However prior to the merger there were no metrics about integrations tests themselves (test count, duration, errors, &etc) so there was nothing there to merge.
In fact, metrics about tests (count, errors...) really aren't seen as relevant in general and remain in the system only because they've been grandfathered.
I am using SonarQube 4.3 version to show Unit tests and other code metrics analysis results. Now I am looking for incremental preview or mode for my analysis results as described here.
I am looking to see whether the last code checked-in has a 100% unit test coverage, no security violations and has other quality gates passed.
Currently sonar gives overall combined report for all the files within project. Can we have one for the changed files in the last build as well?
When using Cobertura I am able to display unit and integration test coverage separately in Sonar however I can't find a way to display the overall test coverage..
The Sonar documentation implies this is possible using Jacoco but I wondered if it was also possible using Cobertura?
Many thanks
It is not possible, at least not with sonarqube 4.3.
You could however, combine unit-test-coverage generated with cobertura with integration-test-coverage generated with jacoco.
The documentation sais clearly:
"If coverage by unit tests is not computed with JaCoCo, overall coverage = integration test coverage."
You can find the documentation here:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/SONAR/Code+Coverage+by+Integration+Tests+for+Java+Project
Sorry and good luck with yout further configuration!