I am trying to compile "xz-5.2.1" in MinGW/MSYS environment. I see the following errors:
#error UINT32_C is not defined and unsigned int is not 32-bit.
error: #error size_t is not 32-bit or 64-bit
I am not familiar with MinGW, could anyone shed some light on this? It looks like some macro definition are missing. Some header file missing?
ADD 1
The commands I used to compile the xz-5.2.1 are:
./configure
./make
The error screenshot:
Some background, I am following this link to compile the Tesseract-OCR library. And this is just one of the steps.
ADD 2
Based on the error message, I checked the sysdefs.h file. It contains the following content:
#ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
# include <config.h>
#endif
The above make output contains the -DHAVE_CONFIG_H, so I think the system header file <config.h> should be included.
But strange enough, I searched the C:\MinGW\include, there's no such file. So I GUESS this may have caused the undefined UINT_MAX warning at line 57. And then the UINT32_C is not defined error at line 58.
But I don't know why the system header file config.h is missing and where to get it.
ADD 3
I dig a bit about the GNU autotools. And luckily enough I find that the following commands can carry on my build process: (Though I am still not very sure why it works. All I know is that it may be related to portability.)
autoheader (this generates the config.h.in file)
./Configure (this generates the config.h file from the config.h.in file)
And now, my build process is blocked by another issue as below:
It seems this is a known issue. And another thread has addressed it.
(I will continue update with my progress.)
If you care for an easier way to handle this kind of dependency management or a general update on toolchain functionality, I strongly suggest switching to MSYS2 with MinGW-w64.
Both projects aim (and succeed) in bringing a better version of the original. MSYS2 comes with a large number of 3rd party libraries that you can easily install. MinGW-w64 allows for GCC with full C++11/14/... support and extended Windows API availability, along with some useful extensions and more up to date headers. You'll notice that most problems originating from system headers will have already been solved, either by the MinGW-Packages scripts below, or upstream (of either MinGW-w64 or the projects themselves).
For you specifically, I suggest the following steps:
Install and update MSYS2.
Open an MSYS2 command prompt (or the 32-bit or 64-bit command prompts if you plan on building 32-bit or 64-bit things) from the start menu entries. Install {32-bit,64-bit} MinGW-w64 GCC:
pacman -S mingw-w64-{i686,x86_64}-gcc
Install tesseract-OCR:
pacman -S mingw-w64-{i686,x86_64}-tesseract-ocr
and optionally the data files:
pacman -S mingw-w64-tesseract-ocr-osd mingw-w64-{i686,x86_64}-tesseract-ocr-eng
And you're done. Of course, you can still compile the various dependencies yourself, but why bother? If you really want to, you can start from the build scripts for the packages you can install in MSYS2, which are located here:
https://github.com/Alexpux/MINGW-packages
Just open the PKGBUILD files and you can see the build steps required. Note that all these scripts assume the dependencies have been installed within MSYS2.
Also note that the installed packages and compilers are all independent of MSYS2 as you'd expect: you can use it only as a tool to keep your development tree up to date, and build from any other Windows environment.
Related
I've been trying to install hmatrix on my (64-bit) Windows 10 computer; after searching through and trying many possible solutions (including the instructions under "Windows" and "Alternative Windows Build" given here), I decided to pursue the course of action given on this Reddit thread.
However, when I type in the command
cabal install hmatrix -fopenblas --extra-lib-dir=${c:\msys64\mingw64\bin} --extra-include-dir=${c:\msys64\mingw64\include}
into the MSYS2 shell, the following log is given:
Resolving dependencies...
Configuring hmatrix-0.17.0.2...
Failed to install hmatrix-0.17.0.2
Build log ( C:\Users\Christian\AppData\Roaming\cabal\logs\hmatrix-0.17.0.2.log ):
Configuring hmatrix-0.17.0.2...
cabal.exe: Missing dependency on a foreign library:
* Missing C library: libopenblas
This problem can usually be solved by installing the system package that
provides this library (you may need the "-dev" version). If the library is
already installed but in a non-standard location then you can use the flags
--extra-include-dirs= and --extra-lib-dirs= to specify where it is.
cabal: Leaving directory 'C:\msys64\tmp\cabal-tmp-4244\hmatrix-0.17.0.2'
cabal.exe: Error: some packages failed to install:
hmatrix-0.17.0.2 failed during the configure step. The exception was:
ExitFailure 1
However, when I check the directory c:\msys64\mingw64\bin, I see that libopenblas.dll is right there; I don't know why cabal can't seem to find it.
Any insight into why this is not working or what to do?
UPDATE:
The files libopenblas.dll.a and libopenblas.a are in the directory c:\msys64\mingw64\lib. Is it possible I need to somehow include this directory as well? (If I do, how would I do that?)
I also downloaded the files in Alex Vorobiev's comment below and put them in c:\msys64\mingw64\bin if they are .dlls or c:\msys64\mingw64\lib if they are .libs. The header files were already contained in c:\msys64\include\openblas.
I tried several variations on the command in the original post after making these changes, including switching \bin with \lib and switching \include with \include\openblas, but all of them still give the same error.
I'm a bit suspicious about the
if os(windows)
if flag(openblas)
extra-libraries: libopenblas
in the cabal file, could you unpack it and remove the "lib" part? If that doesn't work please post a log with -v3 output. I've seen quite a few people with troubles installing this package. So could you also open a ticket on the GHC bug tracker if this doesn't work (and CC me "Phyx-")?
Secondly, you never said which version of GHC you're using. 8.0.1 should have far less trouble (and won't need the hack to get it working in GHCi) since the runtime linker has been overhauled and should be much better on Windows. 8.0.2 will likely include the new import libraries support as well.
I've been trying this for over 5 days and I have no idea how to get this to work. I had successfully installed boost once, then I got my computer re-imaged and now it's just not happening. I have Windows 7 Enterprise, and 64-bit operating system.
I downloaded boost from here sourceforge
unzipped it into program files.
I then went to the VS 2013 Native Command prompt. Changed directory to boost tools/build
Ran bootstrap.bat
I then ran ./b2 address-model=64
but it did not give me directories for the compiler and the linker like last time.
I then ran ./b2 --prefix=C:\ProgramFiles\boost_1_58_0
but again nothing happens. I get the following errors:
Warning: No Toolsets were configured.
Warning: Configuring default toolset ""msvc"
Warning: If the default is wrong, your build may not work correctly
warning: Use the "toolset=xxxxx" option to overrride out guess
warning: for more configuration please consult
I have no idea why this worked the first time I had done this and why this isn't working now. Can someone please help me out. I know nothing about Unix but I need to install this so I can use the libraries.
I compile boost with both mingw (64 bit) and msvc 2013 pro. I have never in my life used the vs command prompt to build boost with msvc. Here are my commands to build 64 bit binaries on both toolchains.
First go into the boost folder and just double click bootstrap.bat. This should run and build bjam/b2. Nothing special required and doesn't matter what compiler this gets built with.
Then simply run, in a normal command prompt:
bjam.exe -a -j8 --toolset=msvc --layout=system optimization=speed link=shared threading=multi address-model=64 --stagedir=stage\MSVC-X64 release stage
Where -a forces rebuild all, -j8 means for the build to use 8 cores (adjust this based on your processor capabilities), toolset is obvious, layout means how to structure the naming of the output files, address-model is obvious, stagedir is where to output the built binaries (either relative or absolute path) and release stage is the type of build the system. See more here.
Same thing but using 64 bit mingw.
bjam.exe -j8 --toolset=gcc --layout=system optimization=speed link=shared threading=multi address-model=64 --stagedir=stage\x64 release stage
You can even go on to build additional libraries with a second pass tweaking your arguments. For example, after I've built the core libs with the above command, I run the following command to build in zlib and gzip support.
bjam.exe -a -j8 --toolset=msvc --layout=system optimization=speed link=shared threading=multi address-model=64 --stagedir=stage\MSVC-X64 --with-iostreams -s BZIP2_SOURCE=C:\dev\libraries\cpp\bzip2-1.0.6 -s ZLIB_SOURCE=C:\dev\libraries\cpp\zlib-1.2.8 release stage
Anyway that's just as an example. I linked to the full docs for the build system. Try building using these commands NOT inside a vs command prompt. If you still have problems then please post specific errors.
A note about MSVC
So, msvc compiler + boost supports a type of linking where it will automatically include additional libraries that it knows it needs. I believe boost does this by using the #pragma directive in headers. For example you might use boost::asio configured in such a way that it needs boost::system (for error codes and such). Even if you don't explicitly add boost::system library to the linker options, msvc will "figure out" that it needs this library and automatically try to link against it.
Now an issue arises here because you're using layout=system. The libraries are named simply "boost_" + the lib name, like "boost_system.dll". However, unless you specify a preprocessor define, this auto linking will try and link to a name like "boost_system_msvc_mt_1_58.lib". That's not exact as I can't recall the exact name, but you get the idea. You specifically told boost to name your libraries with the system layout (boost_thread, boost_system) etc instead of the default, which includes the boost version, "MT" if multithreaded, the compiler version, and lots of other stuff in the name. So that's why the auto linking feature goes looking for such a crazy weird name and fails. To fix this, add "BOOST_AUTO_LINK_NOMANGLE" in the Preprocessor section of your C++ settings in visual studio.
More on that here. Note that the answer here gives you a different preprocessor definition to solve this problem. I believe I ended up using BOOST_AUTO_LINK_NOMANGLE instead (which ended up working for me) because the ALL_DYN_LINK macro turned out to be designed as an "internal" define that boost controls and sets itself. Not sure as it's been some time since I had this issue, but the define I provide seems to solve the same root issue anyway.
I am using msys2 Mingw (gcc 4.8.2 for i686 32-bit) for building Ghostscript 9.10. After running make, gs.exe was created successfully. Followed by that I ran "make so" for creating libgs library. Libgs.so, Libgs.so.9.10 were created which are of the same file size. But I found both of them to be PE executables. After renaming extension to .exe, they produced the same output as done by gs.exe. What I require is libgs.dll, libgs.a to be created, but instead "make so" creates libgs.so which is in fact a PE executable. I also tried using patch found on site:https://github.com/Alexpux/MINGW-packages/blob/master/mingw-w64-ghostscript/mingw-build.patch, but still the output remains the same. Has anyone been successful in this? Kindly help me.
I presume if you follow the steps taken in the build script connected to the patch you linked, everything will work out fine. I think most of it is just to make it use the "system"'s 3rd party libraries instead of those in the GS source. I'd guess running the configure command would do.
Alternatively, you could just download the MSYS2 base system from here, and do a pacman -Syu mingw-w64-i686-ghostscript. It should download and install the binary package without you having to build it yourself.
If you really want to build it yourself, download the PKGBUILD and patch, and run makepkg from the aforementioned MSYS2 shell and have that build it for you.
Have just completed testing of gs 9.15 built executables using the a patch
MINGW-packages-master.zip from https://github.com/Alexpux/MINGW-packages
Without implementing the zlib patch and PKGBUILD and using a MINGW 4.7.3 32/64
without by ghostscript used libs installed.
They did not work as is while using msys1 pathe'd up ahead of Windoze.
I simply edited the the MINGW Build and 32/64 bit type in makefile in
and set them to =1 there. and as i built without GTK defined in ./configure
SOC_LOADER_PLAIN manually to gs.c
Check the makefile after ./configure ahead of make or make so though , , .
All went well except for the COMPILE_INITS
mkromfs build that failed so I had to set that to =0 and build without that
feature. For me personally preferred as one can patch the gs fonts and libs
much easier.
The builds run as charm with full cpu optimisers implemented
only disabling gcse and guess-branch-probability, easily outperforming
the binaries provided by http://www.ghostscript.com/ by all means.
HPC !
I'm trying to build a cross-compiler (x86->64) on my windows system, with the aim of targetting windows 64, however my software currently relies on open source libraries which also have open source dependencies for which there are no prebuilt binaries available with which I can compile. This means that if I want the 64 bit versions I need to compile them.
I've installed MSYS and mingw, I'm also in the process of adding mingw-w64 to the mix so that I can finally compile the libraries in 64 bit form for use with my software. I'm following the steps as closely as I can using these instructions and in the order listed on that page, I'm currently at the step titled "Building the GCC core cross-compiler(s)", but when I try to compile with the line:
$ ../gcc-4.6.1/configure --target=x86_64-w64-mingw32 --enable-targets=all && make -j 6 all-gcc && make -j 6 install-gcc
I get the output pasted here. I should note that I of course snipped the previously executed commands and that last command was the last one listed before all the errors were displayed. Also, I have no idea if it's the cause of all the errors due to the '-j 6' argument, but everything prior to it at least looked successful.
What's the problem and how can I fix it?
Oh, in anticipation of one potential suggestion; no I can't just switch to cygwin.
Edit: Okay after executing them individually, here's the output of the configure command, the output produced by make all-gcc (no -j argument), and config.log. Note, I didn't run a make clean beforehand which may explain the different ending, I didn't do it in the interest of time to write this update, but I suppose I'll just make a different compile folder and re-execute it cleanly to hopefully see the same error as before while I wait for a response.
Edit 2: The make all-gcc failed again as expected, this time the output should help a little more I hope.
Thanks very much for your help.
Your config.log shows that the build process will use the binaries in x86_64-w64-mingw32/bin for stuff like ar, as etc... These are for internal compiler use only, and they should all be available in your /mingw/bin directory. I would strongly suggest asking on the mingw-w64-public mailing list for help.
I spent the whole day setting up GCC as per
http://cygwin.wikia.com/wiki/How_to_install_GCC_4.3.0
On the gcc make step, it told me it needed a c++ compiler to continue for whatever reason,
So I updated Cygwin in the usual fashion and got gcc-c++.
After that, cgywin did me the courtesy of deleting the 3 prereq libraries that I had installed previously,
So I went about remaking them. GMP worked fine, and then I got to MPFR. For whatever reason MPFR is throwing this error:
configure: error: libgmp not found or uses a different ABI.
The resources mention this error here.
I’m pretty sure its finding GMP alright as cygcheck shows it up no problem, and the config even mentions it finds it.
When I try:
./configure --with-gmp-build=/gmp/,
it throws:
error: header files gmp-impl.h and longlong.h not found
So far I have not been able to get MPFR working, despite googling and trying for hours.
MPC also fails to find GMP in the usual manner.
I've also tried just handing the libraries to GCC in a subdirectory and letting it compile them.
When I try that, it gets to the make step, then throws a stage1-bubble error and fails. No description of the error or anything.
I have no idea what else to try.
After compiling and installing gmp, I had the same problem building mpfr until I set correctly the library search path:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib
export LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib
export CPATH=/usr/local/include
as it is explained in the http://cygwin.wikia.com/wiki/How_to_install_GCC_4.3.0
Instead of this:
./configure --with-gmp-build=/gmp/
USE THIS:
./configure --with-gmp-build=/gmp
It doesn't like having the "/" at the end.
I know this post is a bit dated, but I was looking for an answer or results to a similar situation but with much more current versions of the same libraries. While reading this post as for some suggestions as well as other online material I was able to piece everything together. So for anyone who may be working with the newest releases here it goes:
First you will probably want to configure, make and install GMP first for both C and C++ as static libs; also make note of the architecture x86 or x64. Once you run make, make check, make install; and you are confidant that you have no errors, then when you go to configure MPFR you will want to run it as such:
./configure --with-gmp-build=/path/to/gmp --enable-static --disable-shared
and if the paths are set properly this should give you the needed generated make file.
I'm brand new to Unix-Posix environments and commands and new to Cygwin. I've mostly used Windows platforms and very few Macs or Apples. Matter of fact I've only been working at this for a little less than a week as I'm trying to do the same thing. So now I'm venturing into a whole new world of Unix... but it's sort of simulated through Cygwin as I'm still running windows.
I'm trying to build GMP, MPIR, MPFR & MPFRC++ all from the latest original distributions and eventually will try to integrate them into Visual Studio 2017.
I had actually found this post because I was able to build MPIR through visual studio with the help of python and vyasm, but as for GMP I needed Cygwin with GCC. It took me a little while to figure out how to get GMP to build properly but once I did and ran the tests I was able to have all pass with 0 failures. I then started to work with MPFR the same as you.
My similar issue was after I ran ./configure as default, it was giving me the message that the libgmp wasn't found. Also if I tried to call make, it would do nothing as the make file didn't exist. This led me back to doing google searches... While searching for tips, suggestions etc. I came across this Q/A. While I was reading this Q/A, the install files, some other FAQ and even another website, I was kind of able to piece everything together and what I have found that works is what I suggested above.
Not only do you need to set the flag --with-gmp-build but you also need to set the appropriate library types that gmp was built as and you need to make sure that the architecture types match too. They need to have the same matching ABIs.
Ah, just as I was about to finish up typing this answer, make check just finished running through Cygwin and I have a result of:
Testsuite summary for MPFR 4.0.1
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 180
# PASS: 180
# SKIP: 0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL: 0
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0
============================================================================
I hope this helps you out. The only thing is for myself; I'll have to go back and probably run all of this again from the beginning including GMP only because I believe I only did GCC and not G++ and my next step is to try and build MPFRC++.
Then I might try to do some related libraries from here afterwards. My first phase is to try to build them all through Cygwin and GCC/G++. The next step will be to try and port them over to Visual Studio 2017.
You might want to use --with-gmp-lib=/path/to/gmp/lib/dir