Can someone tell me how I can get the number of rows in each table in my oracle database? I have found several queries, but none of them worked because I am using oracle 7 and sqlplus 3.2 and basically all what I found didn't work on it. I just need something that would work on sqlplus 3.2.
Required:
Table Name Rows
Table 1 0
Table 2 5
...
Is it possible to do it with something like a loop? Or what exactly should I do?
if SELECT table_name, num_rows from all_tables doesn't give you what you need.
You could use dynamic SQL and counts as Rahul selected.
Run the below to get results which dynamically build a union on all tables, then run the results as it's own query to get final results.
SELECT 'SELECT ' ||t.name || ' as tName, count(*) as Row_Cnt
FROM ' || t.name || ' UNION ALL '
FROM ALL_TABLES t
Just be sure to remove the last union statement on the last query.
Also note: if you don't have access to see the table, it will not come out in this list!
---Updated ------
So if all_tables doesn't exist none of this will work. Since I don't have a oracle 7 instance handy... could you see if SELECT * FROM dictionary returns anything that might produce a list of all the tables? If you find a view or table object use it in place of all_tables above.
I'm reading the docs for oracle 7 now but finding little easily searchable. thus a guess and check method may go faster.
Related
I'm trying to merge x number of identical tables into one table. The reason we did this is because we want to have, for example 50 columns per table in the database. Tables are created externally via SCADA software called Ignition.
Every time table is created in the database, we want to view the data as one regardless of how many tables the data came from provided that all tables will have the same first three letters for example, Table_1, Table_2, Table_3....so on.
The query/procedure we want to have is like:
step 1: since the tables are unknown we can't do it by simple union, merge insert etc., so we must find all table_name with 'Table' prefix.
SELECT table_name FROM all_tables where table_name like 'Table%'
step 2: this is where the magic begins, it should query one by one each listed table_name in first step, then collect all the data and merge into one table or view.
I tried many ways using PL/SQL but don't know how to proceed with step 2. Is there any way to get what we want to achieve? any possible solutions would be great! :)
Thanks!
Assuming that you are selecting only the common columns from all the tables, you could create a dynamic view, which does a UNION ALL of all the tables starting with "Table" prefix.
DECLARE
v_select CLOB;
BEGIN
SELECT
LISTAGG('SELECT col1,col2,col3 FROM ' || table_name,
' UNION ALL ' || CHR(10) ) WITHIN GROUP
(
ORDER BY table_name
)
INTO v_select
FROM user_tables WHERE table_name LIKE 'TABLE_%';
IF
v_select IS NOT NULL
THEN
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE ' CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW v_all_tabs as ' || v_select;
END IF;
END;
/
Then select from the view by executing the above block(or put it into a procedure ) each time there's a new table added.
select * from v_all_tabs;
If there's a chance of your SQL string exceeding 4000 characters, instead of a single LISTAGG, you could append each select through a simple assignment in PL/SQL in a cursor loop.
I created a table in oracle like
CREATE TABLE suppliers AS (SELECT * FROM companies WHERE id > 1000);
I would like to know the complete select statement which was used to create this table.
I have already tried get_ddl but it is not giving the select statement. Can you please let me know how to get the select statement?
If you're lucky one of these statements will show the DDL used to generate the table:
select *
from gv$sql
where lower(sql_fulltext) like '%create table suppliers%';
select *
from dba_hist_sqltext
where lower(sql_text) like '%create table%';
I used the word lucky because GV$SQL will usually only have results for a few hours or days, until the data is purged from the shared pool. DBA_HIST_SQLTEXT will only help if you have AWR enabled, the statement was run in the last X days that AWR is configured to hold data (the default is 8), the statement was run after the last snapshot collection (by default it happens every hour), and the statement ran long enough for AWR to think it's worth saving.
And for each table Oracle does not always store the full SQL. For security reasons, DDL statements are often truncated in the data dictionary. Don't be surprised if the text suddenly cuts off after the first N characters.
And depending on how the SQL is called the case and space may be different. Use lower and lots of wildcards to increase the chance of finding the statement.
TRY THIS:
select distinct table_name
from
all_tab_columns where column_name in
(
select column_name from
all_tab_columns
where table_name ='SUPPLIERS'
)
you can find table which created from table
I want a query that selects the number of rows in each table
but they are NOT updated statistically .So such query will not be accurate:
select table_name, num_rows from user_tables
i want to select several schema and each schema has minimum 500 table some of them contain a lot of columns . it will took for me days if i want to update them .
from the site ask tom he suggest a function includes this query
'select count(*)
from ' || p_tname INTO l_columnValue;
such query with count(*) is really slow and it will not give me fast results.
Is there a query that can give me how many rows are in table in a fast way ?
You said in a comment that you want to delete (drop?) empty tables. If you don't want an exact count but only want to know if a table is empty you can do a shortcut count:
select count(*) from table_name where rownum < 2;
The optimiser will stop when it reaches the first row - the execution plan shows a 'count stopkey' operation - so it will be fast. It will return zero for an empty table, and one for a table with any data - you have no idea how much data, but you don't seem to care.
You still have a slight race condition between the count and the drop, of course.
This seems like a very odd thing to want to do - either your application uses the table, in which case dropping it will break something even if it's empty; or it doesn't, in which case it shouldn't matter whether it has (presumably redundant) and it can be dropped regardless. If you think there might be confusion, that sounds like your source (including DDL) control needs some work, maybe?
To check if either table in two schemas have a row, just count from both of them; either with a union:
select max(c) from (
select count(*) as c from schema1.table_name where rownum < 2
union all
select count(*) as c from schema2.table_name where rownum < 2
);
... or with greatest and two sub-selects, e.g.:
select greatest(
(select count(*) from schema1.table_name where rownum < 2),
(select count(*) from schema2.table_name where rownum < 2)
) from dual;
Either would return one if either table has any rows, and would only return zero f they were both empty.
Full Disclosure: I had originally suggested a query that specifically counts a column that's (a) indexed and (b) not null. #AlexPoole and #JustinCave pointed out (please see their comments below) that Oracle will optimize a COUNT(*) to do this anyway. As such, this answer has been altered significantly.
There's a good explanation here for why User_Tables shouldn't be used for accurate row counts, even when statistics are up to date.
If your tables have indexes which can be used to speed up the count by doing an index scan rather than a table scan, Oracle will use them. This will make the counts faster, though not by any means instantaneous. That said, this is the only way I know to get an accurate count.
To check for empty (zero row) tables, please use the answer posted by Alex Poole.
You could make a table to hold the counts of each table. Then, set a trigger to run on INSERT for each of the tables you're counting that updates the main table.
You'd also need to include a trigger for DELETE.
I am trying to execute a query like
select * from tableName where rownum=1
This query is basically to fetch the column names of the table.There are more than million records in the table.When I put the above condition its taking so much time to fetch the first row.Is there any alternate to get the first row.
This question has already been answered, I will just provide an explanation as to why sometimes a filter ROWNUM=1 or ROWNUM <= 1 may result in a long response time.
When encountering a ROWNUM filter (on a single table), the optimizer will produce a FULL SCAN with COUNT STOPKEY. This means that Oracle will start to read rows until it encounters the first N rows (here N=1). A full scan reads blocks from the first extent to the high water mark. Oracle has no way to determine which blocks contain rows and which don't beforehand, all blocks will therefore be read until N rows are found. If the first blocks are empty, it could result in many reads.
Consider the following:
SQL> /* rows will take a lot of space because of the CHAR column */
SQL> create table example (id number, fill char(2000));
Table created
SQL> insert into example
2 select rownum, 'x' from all_objects where rownum <= 100000;
100000 rows inserted
SQL> commit;
Commit complete
SQL> delete from example where id <= 99000;
99000 rows deleted
SQL> set timing on
SQL> set autotrace traceonly
SQL> select * from example where rownum = 1;
Elapsed: 00:00:05.01
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=ALL_ROWS (Cost=7 Card=1 Bytes=2015)
1 0 COUNT (STOPKEY)
2 1 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'EXAMPLE' (TABLE) (Cost=7 Card=1588 [..])
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
33211 consistent gets
25901 physical reads
0 redo size
2237 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
278 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processed
As you can see the number of consistent gets is extremely high (for a single row). This situation could be encountered in some cases where for example, you insert rows with the /*+APPEND*/ hint (thus above high water mark), and you also delete the oldest rows periodically, resulting in a lot of empty space at the beginning of the segment.
Try this:
select * from tableName where rownum<=1
There are some weird ROWNUM bugs, sometimes changing the query very slightly will fix it. I've seen this happen before, but I can't reproduce it.
Here are some discussions of similar issues: http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2008/03/09/cursor_sharing/ and http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=946740&tstart=1
Surely Oracle has meta-data tables that you can use to get column names, like the sysibm.syscolumns table in DB2?
And, after a quick web search, that appears to be the case: see ALL_TAB_COLUMNS.
I'd use those rather than go to the actual table, something like (untested):
SELECT COLUMN_NAME
FROM ALL_TAB_COLUMNS
WHERE TABLE_NAME = "MYTABLE"
ORDER BY COLUMN_NAME;
If you are hell-bent on finding out why your query is slow, you should revert to the standard method: asking your DBMS to explain the execution plan of the query for you. For Oracle, see section 9 of this document.
There's a conversation over at Ask Tom - Oracle that seems to suggest the row numbers are created after the select phase, which may mean the query is retrieving all rows anyway. The explain will probably help establish that. If it contains FULL without COUNT STOPKEY, then that may explain the performance.
Beyond that, my knowledge of Oracle specifics diminishes and you will have to analyse the explain further.
Your query is doing a full table scan and then returning the first row.
Try
SELECT * FROM table WHERE primary_key = primary_key_value;
The first row, particularly as it pertains to ROWNUM, is arbitrarily decided by Oracle. It may not be the same from query to query, unless you provide an ORDER BY clause.
So, picking a primary key value to filter by is as good a method as any to get a single row.
I think you're slightly missing the concept of ROWNUM - according to Oracle docs: "ROWNUM is a pseudo-column that returns a row's position in a result set. ROWNUM is evaluated AFTER records are selected from the database and BEFORE the execution of ORDER BY clause."
So it returns ANY row that it consideres #1 in the result set which in your case will contain 1M rows.
You may want to check out a ROWID pseudo-column: http://psoug.org/reference/pseudocols.html
I've recently had the same problem you're describing: I want one row from the very large table as a quick, dirty, simple introspection, and "where rownum=1" alone behaves very poorly. Below is a remedy which worked for me.
Select the max() of the first term of some index, and then use it to choose some small fraction of all rows with "rownum=1". Suppose my table has some index on numerical "group-id", and compare this:
select * from my_table where rownum = 1;
-- Elapsed: 00:00:23.69
with this:
select * from my_table where rownum = 1
and group_id = (select max(group_id) from my_table);
-- Elapsed: 00:00:00.01
I've heard people referring to this table and was not sure what it was about.
It's a sort of dummy table with a single record used for selecting when you're not actually interested in the data, but instead want the results of some system function in a select statement:
e.g. select sysdate from dual;
See http://www.adp-gmbh.ch/ora/misc/dual.html
As of 23c, Oracle supports select sysdate /* or other value */, without from dual, as has been supported in MySQL for some time already.
It is a dummy table with one element in it. It is useful because Oracle doesn't allow statements like
SELECT 3+4
You can work around this restriction by writing
SELECT 3+4 FROM DUAL
instead.
From Wikipedia
History
The DUAL table was created by Chuck Weiss of Oracle corporation to provide a table for joining in internal views:
I created the DUAL table as an underlying object in the Oracle Data Dictionary. It was never meant to be seen itself, but instead used
inside a view that was expected to be queried. The idea was that you
could do a JOIN to the DUAL table and create two rows in the result
for every one row in your table. Then, by using GROUP BY, the
resulting join could be summarized to show the amount of storage for
the DATA extent and for the INDEX extent(s). The name, DUAL, seemed
apt for the process of creating a pair of rows from just one. 1
It may not be obvious from the above, but the original DUAL table had two rows in it (hence its name). Nowadays it only has one row.
Optimization
DUAL was originally a table and the database engine would perform disk IO on the table when selecting from DUAL. This disk IO was usually logical IO (not involving physical disk access) as the disk blocks were usually already cached in memory. This resulted in a large amount of logical IO against the DUAL table.
Later versions of the Oracle database have been optimized and the database no longer performs physical or logical IO on the DUAL table even though the DUAL table still actually exists.
I think this wikipedia article may help clarify.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DUAL_table
The DUAL table is a special one-row
table present by default in all Oracle
database installations. It is suitable
for use in selecting a pseudocolumn
such as SYSDATE or USER The table has
a single VARCHAR2(1) column called
DUMMY that has a value of "X"
It's the special table in Oracle. I often use it for calculations or checking system variables. For example:
Select 2*4 from dual prints out the result of the calculation
Select sysdate from dual prints the server current date.
A utility table in Oracle with only 1 row and 1 column. It is used to perform a number of arithmetic operations and can be used generally where one needs to generate a known output.
SELECT * FROM dual;
will give a single row, with a single column named "DUMMY" and a value of "X" as shown here:
DUMMY
-----
X
Kind of a pseudo table you can run commands against and get back results, such as sysdate. Also helps you to check if Oracle is up and check sql syntax, etc.
The DUAL table is a special one-row table present by default in all Oracle database installations. It is suitable for use in selecting a pseudocolumn such as SYSDATE or USER
The table has a single VARCHAR2(1) column called DUMMY that has a value of "X"
You can read all about it in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DUAL_table
DUAL is necessary in PL/SQL development for using functions that are only available in SQL
e.g.
DECLARE
x XMLTYPE;
BEGIN
SELECT xmlelement("hhh", 'stuff')
INTO x
FROM dual;
END;
More Facts about the DUAL....
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:1562813956388
Thrilling experiments done here, and more thrilling explanations by Tom
DUAL we mainly used for getting the next number from the sequences.
Syntax : SELECT 'sequence_name'.NEXTVAL FROM DUAL
This will return the one row one column value(NEXTVAL column name).
another situation which requires select ... from dual is when we want to retrieve the code (data definition) for different database objects (like TABLE, FUNCTION, TRIGGER, PACKAGE), using the built in DBMS_METADATA.GET_DDL function:
select DBMS_METADATA.GET_DDL('TABLE','<table_name>') from DUAL;
select DBMS_METADATA.GET_DDL('FUNCTION','<function_name>') from DUAL;
in is true that nowadays the IDEs do offer the capability to view the DDL of a table, but in simpler environments like SQL Plus this can be really handy.
EDIT
a more general situation: basically, when we need to use any PL/SQL procedure inside a standard SQL statement, or when we want to call a procedure from the command line:
select my_function(<input_params>) from dual;
both recipes are taken from the book 'Oracle PL/SQL Recipes' by Josh Juneau and Matt Arena
The DUAL is special one row, one column table present by default in all Oracle databases. The owner of DUAL is SYS.
DUAL is a table automatically created by Oracle Database along with the data functions. It is always used to get the operating systems functions(like date, time, arithmetic expression., etc.)
SELECT SYSDATE from dual;
It's a object to put in the from that return 1 empty row. For example:
select 1 from dual;
returns 1
select 21+44 from dual;
returns 65
select [sequence].nextval from dual;
returns the next value from the sequence.