My web app is helping small businesses create content for their business pages.
I want to add the ability for my users to promote their posts.
most of my users don't have an ads account.
I can think of two options:
ask them to create an ads account
ask them to give my user an advertiser privilege for their page and use my own ads account
is there a better, more automated solution than these two options? if not, which one is preferred?
You should ask them to create their own ad account.
Shared ad account owned by you woud make it impossible for your customers to choose different payment methods, currency, contact info and other. They also wouldn't be able to generate invoices, which may be crucial for business customers.
Also you won't need to handle your customers' expenses. On a shared account I can easily imagine a case where a customer is boosting posts using your app, but doesn't pay for it. In that case you would be the one to pay the Facebook, since you'd own a shared account and you couldn't leave it without money because of other customers using it.
Related
As a freelancer, I used opencart for my clients, one table called users, another table called customers.
I tried wordpress + woocommerce, that's only one user system. I haven't really used this, just test.
If we use only one user system, I have a question. What/how account should the employee/staff use? Use the private email, like peter#gmail.com? This maybe not easy to manage. Any characters could be the email. like haha123#gmail.com. then we don't know who is who.
Or create a company's account like peter#nike.com, force the staff to use the real name.
But when a staff have two accounts, he login as staff at work time. And he buys things for himself. Then he resigned, leave the company. His work email is canceled, frozen, inactivated. Which means that he cannot access his own order records. And maybe the private order is still ongoing, haven't received, not paid yet. This caused problems.
What solution should we use?
WordPress is based on the Roles and Capabilities system. Users will have a role while Each role will have different capabilities assigned.
Whenever WordPress code performs an action as a logged-in user, it basically checks if the user has the capabilities to perform that action or not.
As you explained in your use case, in that case, a staff member will be assigned a role(let's call it manager) that will allow them to do some staff-related things and he can also use that account to make orders and buy things.
If he resigns then the site manager/admin will change his role as a customer and will allow him to use the website and buy things but he won't be able to staff related things, because the custom role will not have those capabilities.
And in some cases, his connection with any data that should be only assigned to staff will be removed and assigned to someone else.
In short, capabilities do all the magic here and instead of assigning multiple capabilities to each user, WordPress creates a role with a set of capabilities to make it simple, and we can assign that role to a user and change it anytime, to revoke or grant more capabilities.
I have implemented a login feature in my app where a user can pay for subscription and have that subscription tied to their in-app login account by using the setObfuscatedAccoundId() method. However, in a scenario where the current user(user_A) makes a purchase, logs out of the app and a different user_B logs in, user_B is unable to purchase the same subscription as it has already been bought by user_A (as they share the same underlying Google Play account) even though I DON'T want these in-app accounts to be related at all. Currently, what happens is user_B gets a responses that states "You already own this item". So that makes me wonder:
Can we actually possibly use a single/the same underlying Play Store account to purchase the same subscription while logging in to an app with different user accounts?
Also, what would be an ideal design approach for a problem like this considering the limitation?
I am still a beginner at this and would really appreciate your inputs!
I'm beginner at this like you and may I was wrong but I think you can not do that because the subscriptions are saved in your google account and you can not buy same subscription you owned already.
I’m new to google classroom api. I want to create a process that will query all classes, students, assignments etc. It will run unattended.
So, my questions are:
will offline scope allow the process to query the api unattended?
can only an admin user see all classes, students, assignments?
or, can a g-suite user be created with limited read-only permissions to certain resources?
Thanks
Since this is an unattended batch process and Google OAuth access tokens expire after 1 hour, you will likely need offline access. You can do this by adding the parameter access_type=offline in the authorization URL.
In terms of actually acquiring all classes, students, assignments, etc., here are a few things to note:
If you're a domain administrator, you can retrieve courses, students, assignments, invitations, etc. in their domain and will not need each teacher to authorize these requests.
If you don't have domain administrator access and want to retrieve all these items, you will have to have each teacher authorize your request(s).
As for your last question, I'm not entirely sure what you mean -- could you clarify? Are you asking is if one workaround would be to create a G Suite user that has read access to all these resources and then use that account to make all the requests?
You can create a service account and use it to query all data on behalf of users-
https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/OAuth2ServiceAccount#delegatingauthority
I'm using Google Sign-in to register and login users to my web app.
We are an edtech product, so I would like to make sure users are registering with a google account that is tied to a school and not using their personal google accounts.
Is this possible?
I don't see a field in user that would indicate this. I also can't find confirmation as to whether or not school google accounts can have an #gmail.com email or if they must use a custom domain.
Note that these account may or may not be using Google Classroom, so I can't rely on that.
Unless you have a List of the "school" accounts and can test against that there is no way for you to know.
Google is not going to tell you if its a school google account. They may know if its a google classroom account but that kind of information is not shared at login time. Probably due to user privacy.
I need to design a model for CRM by which all cases be centralized for the company as well as its partners. It's a particular need that the company prepare service for its partners, also for the customers of each partner. Therefore, individuals in partners can be contact (because its account and entitlement is needed) and user (because they should have access to CRM similar to the company's supporters) at the same time.
Have you ever faced this need, and do you know a design model which cover it?
The most general case would be to design your CRM-system around Contacts. You could then create a lookup from User to Contact, and create a workflow or plugin to ensure that a User always has a corresponding Contact created.
This way everyone is a Contact in the system, while some people also have User records.