I want to send data to a server from a client. Only the last message is important to the server. If the server comes up after a failure I only want the server to get the last message from the client.
While the server is down I want the client to keep processing and send messages or atlest put them in a queue(with the length of one message).
I try to use NetMQ/ZeroMQ for this. How can it be done?
Thanks!
First use PubSub where the client is the publisher, with PubSub you will only get messages while you online, if the subscriber (server in your case) was down it missed all the messages (like a radio)
ZeroMQ also has a feature called Conflate (NetMQ doesn't have it yet, you might want to port it), take a look at the following question:
ZeroMQ: I want Publish–Subscribe to drop older messages in favor of newer ones
Also description of conflate from ZeroMQ documentation:
ZMQ_CONFLATE: Keep only last message If set, a socket shall keep only one message in its inbound/outbound queue, this message being the last message received/the last message to be sent. Ignores 'ZMQ_RCVHWM' and 'ZMQ_SNDHWM' options. Does not support multi-part messages, in particular, only one part of it is kept in the socket internal queue.
Related
I'm new to NSQ and was wondering whether it is possible to acknowledge that a message was consumed (just like in Google PubSub). I'm using Golang, and while going through the NSQ documentation (https://github.com/nsqio/nsq/blob/v1.2.1/nsqd/channel.go#L350) I've found the method FinishMessage which according to its comment, it's supposed to successfully discards an in-flight message. Would that be considered the same as acknowledged? If a message is not acknowledged in NSQ, how is it ensured it's gone once consumed so it won't be consumed over again?
Thanks
NSQ automatically removes a message from the queue after sending it to a consumer. And automatically re-queues the message if there is no response from the consumer after a set timeout.
And yes, depending on which programming language client you are using you have to send 'finish'.
Here are the docs for Golang
https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/nsqio/go-nsq#Finish
But because of the way NSQ is designed you have to re-queue a message from your app if the intended action was not successful.
Here is an excerpt from their website
NSQ guarantees that a message will be delivered at least once, though duplicate messages are possible. Consumers should expect this and de-dupe or perform idempotent operations.
This guarantee is enforced as part of the protocol and works as follows (assume the client has successfully connected and subscribed to a topic):
client indicates they are ready to receive messages
NSQ sends a message and temporarily stores the data locally (in the event of re-queue or timeout)
client replies FIN (finish) or REQ (re-queue) indicating success or failure respectively. If client does not reply NSQ will timeout after
a configurable duration and automatically re-queue the message)
You can read more here: https://nsq.io/overview/design.html
Hope my answer helps you.
I'm evaluating NATS for migrating an existing msg based software
I did not find documentation about msg timeout exception and overload.
For Example:
After Subscriber has been chosen , Is it aware of timeout settings posted by Publisher ? Is it possible to notify an additional time extension ?
If the elected subscriber is aware that some DBMS connection is missing and cannot complete It could be possible to bounce the message
NATS server will pickup another subscriber and will re-post the same message ?
Ciao
Diego
For your first question: It seems to me that you are trying to publish a request message with a timeout (using the nc.Request). If so, the timeout is managed by the client. Effectively the client publishes the request message and creates a subscription on the reply subject. If the subscription doesn't get any messages within the timeout it will notify you of the timeout condition and unsubscribe from the reply subject.
On your second question - are you using a queue group? A queue group in NATS is a subscription that specifies a queue group name. All subscriptions having the same queue group name are treated specially by the server. The server will select one of the queue group subscriptions to send the message to rotating between them as messages arrive. However the responsibility of the server is simply to deliver the message.
To do what you describe, implement your functionality using request/reply using a timeout and a max number of messages equal to 1. If no responses are received after the timeout your client can then resend the request message after some delay or perform some other type of recovery logic. The reply message should be your 'protocol' to know that the message was handled properly. Note that this gets into the design of your messaging architecture. For example, it is possible for the timeout to trigger after the request recipient received the message and handled it but before the client or server was able to publish the response. In that case the request sender wouldn't be able to tell the difference and would eventually republish. This hints that such type of interactions need to make the requests idempotent to prevent duplicate side effects.
I using a pub-sub pattern with tcp. When one of my subscriber dies (kill -9 for example) et been restarted with the same IDENTITY it does not get the previous messages.
What are the solutions so when it restart it gets the messages sent? (I understand 0mq does not handle that)
run publisher
run sub0 (subscribe to socket)
run sub1 (subscribe to socket)
pkill -9 sub0 (simulate daemon dying)
publisher send message
run sub0 again (same ZMQ_IDENTITY)
sub0 does not receive the lost message.
This is entirely the responsibility of your application. Take a look at The Guide... particularly Chapter 5 on advanced pub/sub patterns, and even more specifically Getting an out of band snapshot.
The upshot is that your publishing server actually has two sockets, one for publishing, and one for other system-level communication. Anytime it publishes a new messages, it also adds that message to a local cache... it never forgets the messages it sends. Anytime your subscribing client re-connects to the server, it's 2nd socket sends a request to the server to get all messages it missed (or, as in the case of the linked example, the entire current state of the data), which are sent back over that 2nd socket pair. In this way the subscriber is up to date with all messages when it starts to get new ones over the normal subscriber channel.
Is it possible to configure the topic to store a copy of just the last message and send this to new connections without knowing client identifiers or other info?
Update:
From the info provided by Shashi I found this two pages where they describe a use case similar to mine (applied over stock prices) by using retroactive consumer and a subscription recovery policy. How ever I'm not getting the desired behaviour. What I currently do is:
Include in the activemq the folowing lines in the policyEntry for topic=">"
<subscriptionRecoveryPolicy>
<fixedCountSubscriptionRecoveryPolicy maximumSize="1"/>
</subscriptionRecoveryPolicy>
Add to the URL used to connect to the brocker (using activemq-cpp) consumer.retroactive=true.
Set the consumer has durable. (But I strongly think this is not want since I only need the last one, but without it I didn't get any message when starting the consumer for the second time)
Start up the broker.
Start the consumer.
Send a message to the topic using the activemq web admin console. (I receive it in the consumer, as expected)
Stop consumer.
Send another message to the topic.
Start consumer. I receive the message, also as expected.
However, if the consumer receives a message, then it goes offline (stop process) and then I restart it, it doesn't get the last message back.
The goal is to whenever the consumer starts get the last message, no mater what (obviously, except when there weren't messages sent to the topic).
Any ideas on what I'm missing?
Background:
I have a device which publishes his data to a topic when ever its data changes. A variable number of consumer may be connected to this topic, from 0 to less than 10. There is only one publisher in the topic and always publish all of his data as a single message (little data, just a couple of fields of a sensor reading). The publication rate of this information is variable, not necessarily time based, when something changes a new updated message is sent to the broker.
The problem is that when a new consumer connects to the topic it has no data of the device readings until a new message is send to the topic by the device. This could be solve by creating an additional queue so new connections can subscribe to the topic and then request the device for the current reading through the queue (the device would consume the queue message which would be a request for data, and then response in the same queue).
But Since the messages send to the topic are always information complete I was wondering if is it possible to configure the topic to store a copy of just the last message and send this to new connections without know client identifiers or other info?
Current broker in use is ActiveMQ.
What you want is to have retroactive consumers and to set the lastImageSubscriptionRecoveryPolicy subscription recovery policy on the topic. Shashi is correct in saying that the following syntax for setting a consumer to be retroactive works only with Openwire
topic = new ActiveMQTopic("TEST.Topic?consumer.retroactive=true");
In your case, what you can do is to configure all consumers to be retroactive in broker config with alwaysRetroactive="true". I tested that this works even for the AMQP protocol (library qpid-jms-client) and I suspect it will work for all protocols.
<destinationPolicy>
<policyMap>
<policyEntries>
<policyEntry topic="FOO.>" alwaysRetroactive="true">
<subscriptionRecoveryPolicy>
<lastImageSubscriptionRecoveryPolicy />
</subscriptionRecoveryPolicy>
</policyEntry>
The configuration example is taken from https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/master/activemq-unit-tests/src/test/resources/org/apache/activemq/test/retroactive/activemq-message-query.xml
Messaging providers (WebSphere MQ for example) have a feature called Retained Publication. With this feature the last published message on a topic is retained by the messaging provider and delivered to a new consumer who comes in after a message has been published on a given topic.
Retained Publication may be supported by Active MQ in it's native interface. This link talks about consumer.retroactive which is available for OpenWire only.
A publisher will tell the messaging provider to retain a publication by setting a property on the message before publishing. Below is how it is done using WebSphere MQ.
// set as a retained publication
msg.setIntProperty(JmsConstants.JMS_IBM_RETAIN, JmsConstants.RETAIN_PUBLICATION)
I have a single publisher application (PUB) which has N number of subscribers (SUB)
These subscribers need to be able to catch up if they are restarted, or fall down and miss messages.
We have implemented a simple event store that the publisher writes to.
We have implemented a CatchupService which can query the event store and send missed messages to the subscriber.
We have implemented in the subscriber a PUSH socket which sends a request for missed messages.
The subscriber also has a PULL socket which listens for missed messages on a seperate port.
The subscriber will:
Detect a gap
Send a request for missed messages to our CatchupService, the request also contains the address on which to send the results to.
The catchup service has a PULL socket on which it listens for requests
When the CatchupService receives a request it starts a worker thread which:
Gets the missed messages
Opens a PUSH socket connecting to the subscribers PULL socket
Sends the missed messages to the subscriber.
This seems to work quite well however we are unsure if we are using the right socket types for this sort of application. Are these correct or should be using a different pattern.
Sounds okay. Otherwise 0MQ is able to recovery from message loss when peers go offline for a short time. Take a look at the Socket Options and specifically option ZMQ_SNDHWM.
I don't know just how guaranteed the 0MQ recovery mechanisms are so maybe you're best to stay with what you've got, but it is something to be aware of.