I have an embedded project which runs on a 68332 processor target (68k family). There is no OS on the target. We have a custom simulator that will allow our code to execute within Windows. The simulator is completely without our control to modify. Basically the simulator is executing the machine code which isn't very good when you need to debug. What I would really like to do is interface a debugger to allow us to debug at the source level rather than at the machine/assembly level. Has anyone ever done such a thing? Is there a spec that debuggers support? Perhaps would something like gdb work for this? Any advice is appreciated.
This is not necessarily an answer to your question - I'm not familiar with hooking up an existing 3rd-party debugger to a program executing inside a VM so I can't advise about that.
However, you control the source of your simulator so you can try implementing an interface (maybe a local socket, etc.) where your simulator keeps reporting status information about the code that's executing and links it up with source files by reading debug information from some generated debugging database. You'd likely have to support reading the debugging format of the compiler that compiles your 68k code and then use that information to link back assembly instructions to source code lines.
This way you're effectively implementing a debugger, but since you already have the simulator (a VM really), that's probably not too much of extra work - the simulator already has all state information about the executing 68k code, you just need a way to temporarily pause execution and extract state information during pause. Stepping through code after that is probably a trivial repeat of these steps.
Related
I've just started on a project and I'm stuck. The projects goal is to trace the execution of a program. I've looked at Capstone engine, but as far as I can tell it doesn't allow live code execution and stepping. I want something that is able to trace execution, step, convert to assembly, and has an api or other way of other programming with it. GDB is perfect except for the very last part. It has an api for python, but gdb executes it rather than the other way around. So far, the only way I can see of meeting my goal is to write bindings for gdb to another language. Is this possible(seeing as it's a shell and all), or are there any other possible solutions that I'm missing?
To Clarify: Is there a library or framework that is similar to gdb in its functionality?
Is there a library or framework that is similar to gdb in its functionality?
You are looking for libgdb, but that project is dead.
However, lldb may be the answer. From linked page:
The LLDB debugger APIs are exposed as a C++ object oriented
interface in a shared library.
Your question is rather general but I can point to a few examples.
You can set your own breakpoints and then Next Until Breakpoint. The python can tell gdb to next/step/cont in the target via the gdb.execute method. I think this will meet your goal with some python enhancements.
Based on the same idea, you can look at the stack and do check for a particular function. This example shows the general way to feedback information to gdb through the python interface. You can set variables with the python code then use the gdb if/else functionality to make decisions.
I am developing an algorithm that uses ARM Neon instructions. I am writing the code using assembler file (.S and no inline asm).
My question is that what is the best way for debugging purpose i.e. viewing registers, memory, etc.
Currently, I am using Android NDK to compile and my Android phone to run the algorithm.
Poor man's debug solutions...
You can use gdb / gdbserver to remotely control execution of applications on an Android phone. I'm not giving full details here because they change all the time but for example you can start with this answer or make a quick search on Internet. Learning to use GDB might seem to have a high steep curve however material on web is exhaustive. You can easily find something to your taste.
Single-stepping an ARM core via software tools is hard that's why ARM ecosystem is full of expensive tools and extra HW equipment.
Trick I use is to insert BRK instructions manually in assembly code. BRK is Self-hosted debug breakpoint. When core sees this instruction it stops and informs OS about situation. OS then notifies debugger about the situation and passes control to it. When debugger gets control you can check contents of registers and probably even make changes to them. Last part of the operation is to make your process continue. Since PC is still at our break point instruction what you must do is to increase PC, set it to instruction after BRK.
Since you mentioned you use .S files instead of .s files you can utilize gcc to do preprocessing / macro work. This way enabling, disabling BRK might become less of an issue.
Big down side of this way of working is turnaround time. If there is a certain point that you want to investigate with gdb you must make sure there is a BRK instruction there and this will probably require another build/push/debug cycle.
I want to write a GUI based debugger wrapped over GDB. Because, I dont want the program to stop after watch points or break points. Instead, it should redirect the details like filename, line number, new value and stuffs to a file and continue execution.
I am pretty bad at scripting. So, I want some starting point to start developing front end for GDB. As far as I googled, this link http://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/Manuals/gdb-5.1.1/html_node/gdb_211.html is not much understandable for a beginner in this activity?
Hopefully, I will get help on development in C/C++.
For writing a GDB frontend, you indeed want to use the GDB/MI protocol but perhaps read this up-to-date copy instead of the older one you linked to.
Sample GDB/MI session
(Lightly edited version of this section from the GDB manual)
Launching GDB with the MI Command Interpreter
$ gdb -q --interpreter=mi2
=thread-group-added,id="i1"
(gdb)
File /bin/true
-file-exec-and-symbols /bin/true
^done
(gdb)
Break main
-break-insert main
^done,bkpt={number="1",type="breakpoint",disp="keep",enabled="y",addr="0x00000000004014c0",func="main",file="true.c",fullname="/usr/src/debug/coreutils-8.17/src/true.c",line="59",times="0",original-location="main"}
(gdb)
Run and Breakpoint Hit
-exec-run
=thread-group-started,id="i1",pid="2275"
=thread-created,id="1",group-id="i1"
^running
*running,thread-id="all"
(gdb)
=library-loaded,id="/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2",target-name="/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2",host-name="/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2",symbols-loaded="0",thread-group="i1"
=library-loaded,id="/lib64/libc.so.6",target-name="/lib64/libc.so.6",host-name="/lib64/libc.so.6",symbols-loaded="0",thread-group="i1"
=breakpoint-modified,bkpt={number="1",type="breakpoint",disp="keep",enabled="y",addr="0x00000000004014c0",func="main",file="true.c",fullname="/usr/src/debug/coreutils-8.17/src/true.c",line="59",times="1",original-location="main"}
*stopped,reason="breakpoint-hit",disp="keep",bkptno="1",frame={addr="0x00000000004014c0",func="main",args=[{name="argc",value="1"},{name="argv",value="0x7fffffffde98"}],file="true.c",fullname="/usr/src/debug/coreutils-8.17/src/true.c",line="59"},thread-id="1",stopped-threads="all",core="1"
(gdb)
Continue
-exec-continue
^running
*running,thread-id="1"
(gdb)
=thread-exited,id="1",group-id="i1"
=thread-group-exited,id="i1",exit-code="0"
*stopped,reason="exited-normally"
Quitting GDB
(gdb)
-gdb-exit
^exit
Existing GDB/MI Clients
There are several GDB/MI client implementations in C, C++, Java, Python. I'll list a few that I find easy to read:
The inactive libmigdb project (sample program, public interfaces) -- The good news is that it's an attempt at creating a reusable C library. The bad news is that it's not well maintained, e.g. I think it's missing GDB non-stop mode and catchpoint commands support, features that your use case would likely need.
python-gdb-mi -- Quite readable if you know Python
The C++ GDB/MI client code in QtCreator -- Also quite readable though it's written as part of an abstraction layer to support multiple debugger engines.
You might want to also browse this list of GDB frontends.
Since you already pointed out the gdb/mi interface maybe an existing solution might give you an idea on how to address your needs. Here is a list of existing interfaces. Look at their approaches and how they address the different issues.
Another approach that might be helpful could be automated sessions. Not to discourage you from writing a gdb gui, but such an automation could be a good start to get a feeling for the steps needed and could maybe also used as a start. Maybe generating a session script and starting gdb with it. gdb -x to load a command file.
Here a link concerning automating:
What are the best ways to automate a GDB debugging session?
I hope it helps. Good luck!
Though writing new GUI tools gives you more knowledge, I suggest you to take up eclipe and modify according to your needs. It saves lot of your time as well as more flexible.
Programming a gdb wrapper to achieve your goal is way to much work.
See how you can execute script on breakpoint hits: gdb scripting: execute commands at selected breakpoint
Also take a look a gdb tracepoints: http://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Tracepoints.html
How are operating systems typically debugged? They cannot be stepped through with a debugger like simple console programs, and the build times are too large to repeatedly make small changes and recompile the whole thing.
They aren't debugged as a multi-gigabyte programs! :)
If you mean the individual user-mode components, they can mainly be debugged just like normal programs and libraries (because they are normal programs/libraries!).
For kernel-mode components, though, each OS has its own mechanism; here is some information regarding the way that we do kernel debugging in Windows. It can be done using the help of another machine connected to the machine you're debugging, via a serial port or something. I'm not familiar with the process itself, but that's the gist of how they work. (You need to set some boot loader options so that the system is ready for the debugger to be connected as early as possible.)
It depends on which part of the operating system you're talking about. When I worked at MSFT, I worked on the IE team. We debugged IE and the shell (Windows Explorer) in Visual Studio and stepped through them line by line all day long. Though, sometimes, it's easier to debug using a command line tool such as NTSD.
If, however, you want to debug anything in Kernel land such as the OS kernel or device drivers, which I suspect is really what you're asking, then you must use the Kernel debugger. For Windows that is a command line tool called kd, and generally you run the debugger on one machine and remotely debug the target.
There are a whole set of techniques throughout history from flashing lights on the console, to the use of hardware devices like an ICE, to more modern techniques utilizing fairly standard debuggers. One technique that is more common among OS developers then application developers is the analysis of a core dump. Look at something like mdb on solaris for ideas about how Solaris kernel developers do some of their debugging. Also tracing technologies are used. Anywhere from fairly straightforward logging packages to more modern techniques like dtrace.
Also note that the techniques used depend on the layer of software. Initial boot tends to be a fairly hard place to get your fingers into. But after that the environment of modern operation systems looks more and more like the application setting you are use to. In the end, it is all code :)
I'm in an Assembly class focusing on the intel 8086 architecture (all compiling / linking / execution comes from running DOS on win7 via DOS-Box).
I've finished programming the latest assignment, but as I have yet to program any program successfully the first time through, I am now stuck trying to debug my code.
I have visual studio 2010 and was wondering if there was some built in feature that would help me debug my assembly code, specifically, I'm looking to track the value of a variable.
Failing that, instructions pointing to a DOS-Box debugger (and instructions!) would be much appreciated. (I think I've been able to run codeview debug, but I couldn't figure out how to do what I was looking for).
You are generating 16-bit code, you have to break into a museum to find better tooling. Try Borland's, maybe the debugger included with Turbo C.
Yes, indeed, you can use the debugger in VS to examine pretty much everything. Irvine's site has a section specifically on using the debugger here. You can examine registers, use the watch window, etc. He also has a guide for highlighting asm keywords if you need that.
Edit: as Hans pointed out, if you are using 16-bit instead of 32-bit protected, you'll need different tools. There are several choices, listed here.
Borland's tools for DOS were called tasm, tlink, and tdebug.