How to add margin right to this overflowed div (or table). All other margins are fine except right one. Thank you. Table should be 100% width. If I remove that margin right is not visible again. Margin right is visible only if parent div is large enough.
JsFiddle demo
Use padding-right: 10px in your TABLE (not div)
JsFiddle Answer
Related
I have the following fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/VyXWp/1/
#wizard li {
display: inline;
min-width:100px;
float:left;
}
The second divs width should be calculated based on the text width.
In IE7 and IE8 it is messed up.
For some reason the 'a' element gets the width of the span2 div instead of the text.
Edit:
After more digging i noticed that the problem was not width but float. If i set no width, the float doesn't work. It doesn't limit the width to that of the text.
Edit 2:
Couldn't find any pure css solution that worked and kept the width auto, so in the end i calculate the width with javascript.
The CSS width property takes a fixed parameter when passing precise values, but in terms of percentage, if you set the width of an element to 50% or 100% it will take the percentage of the width its parent element is.
so if you have a div with a width of 500px and p tag inside with a width at 50% the p tag would be 250px, vice versa with a 100%.
i short my suggestion is to make sure that the parent element either has a fixed width or percentage
you might also find this helpful
http://learnlayout.com/percent.html
Couldn't find any pure css solution that worked and kept the width auto, so in the end i calculate the width with javascript for old browsers.
I am allowing users to edit their profile icon,so that the users can adjust their icon to what part of the image to display.
I have a fixed <div> with width 50px and height 50px; .This size will be used when users are editing icon.The image will be larger and users can drag and set what to show.In coding part i had taken width,height,top,left.Top and left is used to determine what to show.Hope you understand that.
My problem arises when the edited icon is shown in the top bar. I had set the width of the div as 30px X 30px. When converting 50px size to 30px i had subtracted 20px from the obtained width so that it fits inside the 30px div as expected by the user.The actual part where what part of the image is to be displayed causes problems, the top and left obtained is for 50px div using the top and left for 30px div the expected part is not displayed as you can guess that.
I want to show the part that is selected by the user.Check this jsfiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/4mDQf/
How can i do that?
Thanks!
I had figured out a solution:
Cut the part to be displayed in 50px and shrink the cut image to 30px using php.
I want to accomplish a preview of an image gallery that is wider than the screen, using overflow: scroll (or auto).
To the right, a shadow that overlaps the last visible image should indicate that more images are visible to the right.
Here is a Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/SBdLg/
First, I thought: Easy, give that image gallery a box-shadow: inset. But that will be shown behind the images.
Now, with an overlapping div that has position: absolute, I reach the desired effect BUT the box-shadow also moves when scrolling to the right.
IMHO, this problem would also occur when using an image containing the shadow instead of the div on top.
Is the desired effect possible by CSS at all?
Removing position: relative from the outer DIV and positioning the shadow precisely where you need it (this is the ugly bit) will help you achieve this.
Check the demo: http://jsfiddle.net/SBdLg/11/
I have a div class set up with the following CSS style:
div.multiple_choice{
border: 1px solid black;
max-width: 300px;
max-height: 200px;
overflow: auto;
}
The problem is, when the text inside doesn't force the DIV to reach the maximum height of 200px, the vertical scroll bar still shows up. I can click on the up and down arrows but it only moves the contents up and down by about a pixel or two.
This is occuring in Google Chrome (version 18.0) and Iceweasel 11.
As it turns out, another CSS style was causing the issue:
body{
line-height: 1;
}
Anyone interested in learning about how and why this would cause an issue, can read about the line-height property here
I was having an issue with this, and I found that having position: relative on the child elements was causing the problem. Obviously this can't be the solution for everyone, especially if position: absolute is being used, but for me it worked.
Just to put in evidence the #Kuba Orlik's solution (he posted as comment on the accepted answer) that's the only one that worked for me.
Add this on inside elements:
line-height: normal;
Note: Explicitly normal not 1 because it's different
I have encounter this problem.But I solved this use the following css style:
div.yourcontainer{overflow-y:auto;}
If the container was higher than max-height,the vertical scrollbar will show.
I had this problem when trying to wrap a list (flex column) of react components in a div, I resolved it by changing margin of elements within each list item to be 0.
The approach to troubleshoot this for me was to inspect the list items (perhaps each <li> in OP) and see what styles were making the div think each list item was larger than what was visible to the human eye.
Here is an example of inspecting a rogue margin on an icon within a list item in my project:
Solution is to set the style of that icon to have a vertical margin of 0, though in my application I just made all the margin 0 and added some padding-right.
I also had this problem using Bootstrap and nav. It occurred because bootstrap definds the li in nav-tabs as: .nav-tabs > li { margin-bottom:-1px; }. To counteract this, you must also do:
.nav-tabs > li:last-child {
margin-bottom:0;
}
Without setting the last-child, the following example would always show scroll, no matter how much content is in the list:
<ul class="navs nav-tabs nav-stacked" style="max-height:80px;overflow:auto;">
<li></li>
...
</ul>
I came across this bug earlier today. In my case a list of child elements had display: inline-block instead of display: block. Switching to display: block for my list of child elements in the truncated div fixed the issue for me.
In my case, the problem was with the font. We use font-family: Galano Grotesque. Apparently, this font is rendered higher than the computed height.
<div>
<p>some text</p>
</div>
So even without max-height, when the inner p and the outer div were both computed as 20px height, there was still a scroll bar (with overflow: auto) because the font was about 1px higher than expected.
So the solution can be any one of:
Use a different font.
Add padding to the outer div. This way it will be large enough to cover the extra pixel that comes from the font. In my case, adding one pixel of padding to the bottom and one to the top solved the problem.
Set line-height to a bit larger value (in my case, from 1.25 to 1.4), so it won't interfere with the font.
Set line-height to normal because then the actual value will be influenced by the font. However, according to Mozilla, this is not the preferred way.
The reason for the vertical scroll is obvious: the scrolled content is higher than scrolling area. But when you observe their heights, they are equal!
The causes are multiple but all come down to a common one: an element inside the scrolled content overflows it and makes the result taller.
How to fix this?
find the guilty element by looking near the bottom edge of the scrolled element (or to the right if you're scrolling horizontally), because they are the most likely to overflow. You should observe a height larger that their parent's.
see what makes them overflow, be larger than their container. As other answers suggest, it can be line-height, some margin, etc. Change those properties to make them fit, or as an alternative, set overflow-y: hidden to their immediate parent.
On this page (http://www.bonniesphere.com/blog/elsewhere/) the "li" items have an image instead of a bullet. But the image is centered vertically, and in multi-line entries it doesn't look good. Can anyone tell me if there is something in the CSS that should be changed?
Here's the relative code:
.entry ul {list-style-type:none;}
.entry ul li{padding: 0 0 0 15px;background: url(img/ol.gif) no-repeat left center;margin-left:10px;}
Many thanks for your help...
replace center with top:
background: transparent url(img/ol.gif) no-repeat scroll left top;
.entry ul {list-style-type:none;}
.entry ul li{padding: 0 0 0 15px;
background: url(img/ol.gif) no-repeat left top center;
margin-left:10px;}
Just typed that out of the top of my head, but the "top" attribute might do it.
You could try and replace the left or center with the top tag, can't check for you as my webdeveloper addon is playing tricks on me. :(
I checked locally, it's the center tag. But there's still an extra bit of whitespace needed.
.entry ul li{padding: 0 0 0 15px;background: url(img/ol.gif) no-repeat left 4pt;margin-left:10px;}
Basically you need to specify the offset from the top. You had center which obviously centered the image vertically.
As a rough guess, I used 4pt but it depends on exactly where you want to position the image. With 4pt it roughly aligns it to the first line, but any change in font-size will screw up the positioning.
Personally, using top for the vertical position is a little too high for my likings.
This is very odd... I tried all three suggestions above, and none of them changed anything. A little more info, if it helps: it's a Wordpress blog (on my server) and I'm editing style.css through the theme editor. (That shouldn't make any difference...)
Do you suppose there's something elsewhere in the CSS that's making the image stay aligned at the center, over-riding this code??
Thanks for your suggestions... I had Firebug but had never used it - so with a combination of Firebug and the "compare" feature of BBEdit, I was finally able to figure it out! The template author had supplied a fix for the bullet points, but when I uploaded the most recent version of the theme, the problem occurred again. I found it, and voilà...
Thanks to the two programs, I was also able to find a fix for something else that wasn't working.
I'm a happy camper! At least... until the next time I run into something I can't fix...
:-)