This question already has answers here:
What does ||= (or-equals) mean in Ruby?
(23 answers)
Closed 7 years ago.
I'm still pretty green when it comes to Ruby and am trying to figure out what this is doing:
command_windows.each {|window| window.hidden ||= window.open? }
The command_windows variable appears to be an array of objects. If someone could explain to me what this line of code means, particularly what the ||= symbol is I would appreciate it.
foo ||= "bar" is the equivalent of doing foo || foo = "bar".
As Mischa explained, it checks for a falsy value before assigning.
In your case, you could think of it as:
command_windows.each {|window| window.hidden || window.hidden = window.open? }
which is another way of saying
command_windows.each {|window| window.hidden = window.open? unless window.hidden }
The ||= operator is used to assign new value to variable. If something was assigned to it before it won't work. It is usually used in hashes, so you don't have to check, if something is already assigned.
Related
This question already has answers here:
What does ||= (or-equals) mean in Ruby?
(23 answers)
Closed 6 years ago.
While programming routes in Sinatra, I came across code listed as this:
before do
session[:lists] ||= []
end
What is this operation doing ||= []?
x ||= value is a way to say "if x contains a falsey value, including
nil, assign value to x"
That's setting session[:lists] equal to [] if session[:lists] is falsey.
Related to https://stackoverflow.com/a/6671466/4722305.
It sets [] to session[:lists] when it's nil or falsy
Read more here
;)
This question already has an answer here:
Ruby block and unparenthesized arguments
(1 answer)
Closed 7 years ago.
Jokes aside, I have a strange situation, I have some code:
def remotes(form,remotes)
personalised_form = form.dup
remotes.each do |ident,remote|
object = yield(ident)
result = remote.call(object)
insert_into_(personalised_form,ident,result)
end
personalised_form
end
And I'm seeing if it works like so:
pp remotes(forms,remotes) do |ident|
case(ident)
when :get_assets
'#Userobject'
end
end
The problem is that ruby seems to think I'm not passing a block to the remotes function.
Why is ruby insisting that I'm not passing a block? (it gives a no block given (yield) (LocalJumpError) specifically).
Thought it's not relevant, remotes is a hash containing key's and Procs, and form is just a specificly structured hash that has the result of the proc inserted into it using the ident to locate the correct insertion point
Ruby thinks you are passing the block to pp method, which simply ignores it. Try:
res = remotes(forms,remotes) do |ident|
case(ident)
when :get_assets
'#Userobject'
end
end
pp res
This question already has answers here:
'||=' operator in Ruby
(7 answers)
Closed 9 years ago.
I have a simple question about the meaning of a symbol (I think). What's the mean of ||= in ruby? I have a code snippet that say:
... ||= [nil]
Is as "<<" ? ordinary method?
x ||= y
means (almost) the same thing as
x = x || y
(it only evaluates x once, though.)
It is used mostly for checking if a variable is falsy (nil or false), and if so, setting it to a default value.
This question already has answers here:
How to avoid NoMethodError for missing elements in nested hashes, without repeated nil checks?
(16 answers)
Closed 7 years ago.
I find myself needing to put guards like this:
if hash[:foo] && hash[:foo][:bar] && hash[:foo][:bar][:baz]
puts hash[:foo][:bar][:baz]
end
I'd like to shorten this in some way; I know I can wrap in a begin/rescue block but that seems worse. Maybe something like:
ruby Hash include another hash, deep check
Something like:
def follow_hash(hash, path)
path.inject(hash) { |accum, el| accum && accum[el] }
end
value = follow_hash(hash, [:foo, :bar, :baz])
puts value if value
I found this article very informative: http://avdi.org/devblog/2011/06/28/do-or-do-not-there-is-no-try/
value = Maybe(params)[:foo][:bar][:baz][:buz]
This question already has answers here:
Closed 11 years ago.
Possible Duplicate:
What is the difference or value of these block coding styles in Ruby?
# This works
method :argument do
other_method
end
# This does not
method :argument {
other_method
}
Why?
It seems like the interpreter is confused and thinks that the { ... } is a hash.
I always get angry when an interpreter can't understand a code that is actually valid. It resembles PHP that had many problems of this kind.
It doesn't think it's a hash - it's a precedence issue. {} binds tighter than do end, so method :argument { other_method } is parsed as method(:argument {other_method}), which is not syntactically valid (but it would be if instead of a symbol the argument would be another method call).
If you add parentheses (method(:argument) { other_method }), it will work fine.
And no, the code is not actually valid. If it were, it would work.