I have to mock jerseyclient which is being created in Constructor of subjected service. Subjected service is System under test injected via Spring's #Autowired.
In constructor of the service client=client.create() method is written. We can't change this code(Although this is a code smell). I want to mock the jersey client but it is in constructor of the service. I am not able to mock this
sooo... long story short.. admitting you use mockito, in your src for test you should have an applicationcontext for your test.. usually we define one programmatically so, something along those lines..
import the .xml file you use for test purpose (in my case i imported the one for the mailserver, for the connection and for the authentication) instead of the one i use for the "local" environmnet. After then define a method to setup each and every of your service.
You might need to add a mock for your template resolver as well, but ultimately this all depends on your stack...
So based on your approach the final thing might be a bit different, but ultimately you're gonna do something along the lines of what i outline below:
#Configuration
#ImportResource(value = {
"classpath:applicationContext-jdbc-test.xml",
"classpath:applicationContext-ldap-test.xml",
"classpath:applicationContext-mail-test.xml"})
public class ApplicationTestContext {
#Bean
public ObjectMapperWrapper objectMapperWrapper() {
return Mockito.mock(ObjectMapperWrapper.class);
}
#Bean
public YourService yourService() {
return new YourServiceImpl();
}
}
Related
TLDR: I need an interface/abstract class and all classes implementing it to have access to a Spring managed bean. Can Spring inject a bean into an interface/abstract-class and its subclasses simply via #Autowired ?
I am working on an API built with Spring Webflux + Cloud Gateway that depending on the cookie JWT authorized party, identifies the User's policy group and assign an Attribute ENUM "InterfaceID" to the ServerWebExchange via exchange.getAttribute().put("InterfaceID",InterfaceID.A) after the JWT is validated, and currently uses "InterfaceID" to represent the different groups of users/different interface the user entered from.
JWTValidationFilter.java [Current]
switch(JWTValidator.validate(jwt).get("AZP")){
//if user is from company A or its partners
case "a":
case "aa":
exchange.getAttribute().put(InterfaceID.COMPANY_A_ACCESS);
break;
case "b":
exchange.getAttribute().put(InterfaceID.NORMAL_ACCESS);
...
}
For certain API endpoints (say /api/getSessionDocument), different "InterfaceID" fetches data from different DB/apis, as well as have different permission checking on top of that.
RequestController.java [Current]
#Autowired
APICallerUtil apiCallerUtil;
switch(exchange.getAttribute.get(InterfaceID)){
case "NORMAL_ACCESS":
apiCallerUtil.getDataFromApiA();
break;
case "COMPANY_A_ACCESS":
// call api B but check for permission from api D first
...
}
The endpoint's controller now has another switch statement, and to many code analyzers this have been a code smell. I have been trying to refactor this entire bit of code to use polymorphism to handle the different "getSessionDocument" flows, but i run into issues regarding the injection of util classes that calls specific APIs.
APICallerUtil.java class, exisiting class from the project, would prefer not to refactor this.
#Component
public class APICallerUtil{
#Value("${some uri to some API}") //different by environment and therefore cant be static final
private String uri1;
#Value("${some auth to some API}") //confidential
private String uri1AuthHeader;
//...
public JSONObject getDataFromApiA(String somekey){ //cant be static since uri1 is not static
//Some code that uses uri1 and apache httpclient
return data;
}
...
}
IBaseAccess.java
interface IBaseAccess{
default Mono<JSONObject> getSesssionDocument(ServerWebExchange e){return Mono.error("not implemented");}
}
RequestController.java [new]
#Autowired
APICallerUtil apiCallerUtil;
return exchange.getAttribute.get(InterfaceID).getSessionDocument(exchange);
NormalAccess.java
public class NormalAccess implements IBaseAccess{
//can i autowire APICallerUtil here?
//use constructor to pass the Util class reference here?
Mono<JSONObject> getSesssionDocument(ServerWebExchange e){
//need to call ApiA here
//need to call ApiC here
}
}
NormalAccess needs to call APICaller.getDataFromApiA(), but it needs a reference to the Spring managed instance of APICaller. What would be the "correct" way to pass the reference/autowire API caller into NormalAccess, or even better IBaseAccess (so that the implementing classes can use the Util bean)?
JWTValidationFilter.java [new]
switch(JWTValidator.validate(jwt).get("AZP")){
//if user is from company A or its partners
case "a":
case "aa":
exchange.getAttribute().put("InterfaceID",new CompanyAAccess(/*pass the util class here?*/));
break;
case "b":
exchange.getAttribute().put("InterfaceID",new NormalAccess(/*pass the util class here?*/));
...
}
I have tried several methods, but either I lack the knowledge on the specific Spring feature, or that method is deeemed a bad design choice by some, including:
Making the methods and fields in APICallerUtil static, via suggestions from Spring: How to inject a value to static field? and Assigning private static final field member using spring injection , then the Access classes can call the static methods.
Creating a contructor for IBaseAccess that consumes the APICallerUtil reference and store it inside. The JWTfilter would hold an autowired APICallerUtil and pass it in when the attribute is assigned.
Create a static class that provides the application context and Access classes use applicationContext.getBean("APICallerUtil"); to obtain the bean.
Use the #Configurable annotation? I could not find much documentation on how this works for interfaces/abstract-class.
I understand that there might not exist an absolute answer for this question, but regardless I'd like suggestion/feedback on which of these approaches are viable/good. Especailly concerning whether the APIUtil class should be static or not.
Say I have a repository interface looks like this,
#Repository
interface MyRepository {
Optional<My> findByOtherId(long otherId);
default Optional<My> findByOther(Other other) {
return findByOtherId(other.getId());
}
}
I'm trying to invoke findByOther and verifies that the call invokes findByOtherId method.
#DataJpaTest
class MyRepositoryTest {
#Test
void test() {
Other other = new Other(0L);
repository.findByOther(other);
verify(other, times(1)).getId(); // verified
verify(repository, times(1)).findByOtherId(other.getId()); // called, yet not verified!
}
#SpyBean
private MyRepository repository;
}
When I debug, the findByOtherId method is called. But mockito complains it doesn't.
How can I do this?
As far as I understand you are trying to mock a methodCall that is done from inside the SpyBean. You are essentially trying to verify a private method call (even though findByOtherId can have the public modifier). That is why Mockito complains. As far as I know, mockito creates proxys around its spies. Similar to how spring proxies its beans. I don´t think what you are trying to achieve is solved that way.
For a solution, I would suggest looking into PowerMock. There might be a solution in there. https://www.baeldung.com/powermock-private-method
verifyPrivate(mock).invoke("saveIntoDatabase", ArgumentMatchers.anyString());
I am having two implementations of my component.
public interface MyComponent {
}
imple1
#Component("impCompf")
#Lazy
#RequestScope
public class ImpComp1 implements MyComponent {
}
imple2
#Component("impComps")
#Lazy
#RequestScope
public class ImpComp2 implements MyComponent {
}
What I did so far is to create two conditions like so:
imple1
public class FirstCondition implements Condition {
#Override
public boolean matches(ConditionContext arg0, AnnotatedTypeMetadata arg1) {
return staticVariable.contains("impCompf");
}
}
Same goes for imple2
and define a configuration class
#Configuration
public class MyConfiguration {
#Bean
#Conditional(FirstCondition .class)
#Primary
public MyComponent getComp1() {
return new ImpComp1();
}
public static String staticVariable= "impCompf";
and in My main controller:
#RequestMapping(value="api/{co}", method=RequestMethod.POST)
public ResponseEntity<Modelx> postSe(#PathVariable("co") String co) {
if(co.contains("impCompf"))
staticVariable = "impCompf";
else (co.contains("impComps"))
staticVariable = "impComps";
What I want: for every http request I want to load proper implementation
But however what I am getting is the implementation defined first in the static variable.
If is there another elegant and better way, i'd like to know about it.
I think there is some confusion here about the purpose of the conditions. These aren't being used at the time your requests arrive to autowire the candidate bean into your controller. These are being used when the application is started to configure the application context based on the environment and classpath etc...
There is no need for the conditional classes that you have created. This is defining the configuration of the beans when the context starts and not on a per request basis at runtime.
The use of the static variable is also problematic is a scenario with one or more concurrent requests or in a case where multiple threads may observe different values unless some other mechanism in the java memory model is being used (such as volatile or establishing a happens before relationship, e.g. with sychnronized)
There are a number of ways to do what you appear to be trying to achieve. Since ultimately, you appear to be using a path parameter supplied by a client to determine which service you want to invoke you could use a classic factory pattern to return the correct interface implementation based on the string input programmatically.
Alternatively you could create two distinct controller methods which are distinguished by a query parameter or endpoint name or path match etc. You could then have the appropriate service injected by a qualified bean name
Although perhaps generally recommended, you could also inject an application context instance and search the it looking for the relevant bean by name or class: https://brunozambiazi.wordpress.com/2016/01/16/getting-spring-beans-programmatically/ - although This is more cumbersome and you'd need to handle things like org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException or casting in some cases - best avoided in favour of one of the other methods.
I have a straightforward test case. I have a controller which has a parameter of a type Spring doesn't support by default, so I wrote a custom resolver.
I create the mock mvc instance I'm using like so:
mvc = MockMvcBuilders.standaloneSetup(controller).setCustomArgumentResolvers(new GoogleOAuthUserResolver()).build();
However, Spring is also registering almost 30 other argument resolvers, one of which is general enough that it is getting used to resolve the argument before mine. How can I set or sort the resolvers so that mine is invoked first?
This worked for me without reflection:
#RequiredArgsConstructor
#Configuration
public class CustomerNumberArgumentResolverRegistration {
private final RequestMappingHandlerAdapter requestMappingHandlerAdapter;
#PostConstruct
public void prioritizeCustomArgumentResolver () {
final List<HandlerMethodArgumentResolver> argumentResolvers = new ArrayList<>(Objects.requireNonNull(requestMappingHandlerAdapter.getArgumentResolvers()));
argumentResolvers.add(0, new CustomerNumberArgumentResolver());
requestMappingHandlerAdapter.setArgumentResolvers(argumentResolvers);
}
}
The issue was that the People class the Google OAuth library I am using extends Map and the mock servlet API provides no way to manipulate the order in which the handlers are registered.
I ended up using reflection to reach into the mocks guts and remove the offending handler.
I would like to build a Spring application, where new components can be added easily and without much configuration. For example: You have different kinds of documents. These documents should be able to get exported into different fileformats.
To make this functionality easy to maintain, it should (basically) work the following way:
Someone programs the file format exporter
He/ She writes a component, which checks if the file format exporter is licensed (based on Spring Conditions). If the exporter is licensed a specialized Bean is injected in the application context.
The "whole rest" works dynamically based on the injected beans. Nothing needs to be touched in order to display it on the GUI, etc.
I pictured it the following way:
#Component
public class ExcelExporter implements Condition {
#PostConstruct
public void init() {
excelExporter();
}
#Bean
public Exporter excelExporter(){
Exporter exporter= new ExcelExporter();
return exporter;
}
#Override
public boolean matches(ConditionContext context, AnnotatedTypeMetadata metadata) {
return true;
}
}
In order to work with those exporters (display them, etc.) I need to get all of them. I tried this:
Map<String, Exporter> exporter =BeanFactoryUtils.beansOfTypeIncludingAncestors(appContext, Exporter.class, true, true);
Unfortunate this does not work (0 beans returned). I am fairly new to this, would anyone mind to tell me how this is properly done in Spring? Maybe there is a better solution for my problem than my approach?
You can get all instances of a given type of bean in a Map effortlessly, since it's a built in Spring feature.
Simply autowire your map, and all those beans will be injected, using as a key the ID of the bean.
#Autowired
Map<String,Exporter> exportersMap;
If you need something more sophisticated, such as a specific Map implementation or a custom key. Consider defining your custom ExporterMap, as follows
#Component
class ExporterMap implements Map{
#Autowired
private Set<Exporter> availableExporters;
//your stuff here, including init if required with #PostConstruct
}