I have a project composed of several modules that uses maven and is automatically uploaded and deployed to a Jenkins application that runs the build and its tests.
There is for example an API module, a server and a client.
Both client and server use the API as dependency to be able to work correctly.
The client connects to the server's web-services through HTTP(s) in normal use.
To be able to function, the server needs to be run on Jetty.
I have unit testing that works and test the client by calling the server's functionality with mocked HTTP requests.
I would like to be able to do some integration testing, to test for example the HTTP (and HTTPS) connection between the 2 entities, testing for timeouts and such, and reproducing the unit testing without resorting to mocked request, to be closer to real use cases.
It seems like such a thing should be easy to do, but I can't find a way to do it simply and in a way that could be automated.
For example, testing manually in my IDE is done by clicking on "run war" on the server project, and "run tests" on my application.
Is there a way to reproduce this simple process in Jenkins so it is done automatically, by Maven configuration or even a Jenkins plugin ?
UPDATE :
I'm trying to make another module that would use the war resulting from the packaging of my server, and run it with Jetty.
Since my server's Jetty configuration is quite complicated, using Spring and https configuration filtered by Maven, I've some problems making it work in my new module because of missing classes and relative paths not working in that context.
Is it possible to run that war like it would have been started in the other module without jumping through hoops of duplicating resources and other dirty tricks ?
For information, the specific Jetty war part of my pom.xml is :
<configuration>
<contextHandlers>
<contextHandler implementation="org.eclipse.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext">
<war>${project.parent.basedir}/cmp-service/cmp-webapp/target/cmp-webapp-1.0-SNAPSHOT.war</war>
<contextPath>/cmp</contextPath>
<persistTempDirectory>true</persistTempDirectory>
<allowDuplicateFragmentNames>true</allowDuplicateFragmentNames>
</contextHandler>
</contextHandlers>
</configuration>
UPDATE 2 :
I managed to build a functioning module that starts jetty and run my integration test with this pom.xml.
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd">
<parent>
<artifactId>parent</artifactId>
<groupId>com.project.test</groupId>
<version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
</parent>
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
<groupId>com.project.test.integration-testing</groupId>
<artifactId>integration-testing</artifactId>
<packaging>jar</packaging>
<name>integration-testing</name>
<properties>
<project.build.sourceEncoding>UTF-8</project.build.sourceEncoding>
</properties>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.eclipse.jetty</groupId>
<artifactId>jetty-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>9.3.0.M2</version>
<configuration>
<contextHandlers>
<contextHandler implementation="org.eclipse.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext">
<war>
${project.parent.basedir}/myserver/myservice/target/myservice-${project.parent.version}.war
</war>
<contextPath>/cmp</contextPath>
<persistTempDirectory>true</persistTempDirectory>
<allowDuplicateFragmentNames>true</allowDuplicateFragmentNames>
</contextHandler>
</contextHandlers>
<contextXml>
${project.parent.basedir}/myserver/myservice/src/test/resources/jetty/jetty-context.xml
</contextXml>
<jettyXml>
${project.parent.basedir}/myserver/myservice/src/test/resources/jetty/jetty.xml,${project.parent.basedir}/myserver/myservice/src/test/resources/jetty/jetty-ssl.xml,${project.parent.basedir}/myserver/myservice/src/test/resources/jetty/jetty-http.xml,${project.parent.basedir}/myserver/myservice/src/test/resources/jetty/jetty-https.xml
</jettyXml>
<systemProperties>
<systemProperty>
<name>scsf.configuration.file</name>
<value>
${project.parent.basedir}/myserver/myservice/src/main/resources/config/cmpserver.properties
</value>
</systemProperty>
<systemProperty>
<name>org.eclipse.jetty.annotations.maxWait</name>
<value>180</value>
</systemProperty>
</systemProperties>
<systemPropertiesFile>
${project.parent.basedir}/myserver/myservice/src/main/resources/config/cmpserver.properties
</systemPropertiesFile>
<daemon>true</daemon>
<stopKey>STOP</stopKey>
<stopPort>10001</stopPort>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>start-jetty</id>
<phase>pre-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>start</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<scanIntervalSeconds>0</scanIntervalSeconds>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>stop-jetty</id>
<phase>post-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>stop</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<skipTests>true</skipTests>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-failsafe-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.18.1</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<goals>
<goal>integration-test</goal>
<goal>verify</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
<dependencies>
...
</dependencies>
</project>
You need to add the dependency to your war as provided too.
But (there's always a but) there is a problem when running the verify goal.
When I run verify in my integration-test module, it kind of works.
But when I run the verify goal in the parent, which is supposed to call that exact same verify goal of my integration-test module (if I understand correctly how it works), some paths are treated differently and are resolved as, for example, parent/src/... instead of parent/integration-test/src...
It seems that when running my goal from the parent, the context of the execution changes and causes my application to break when looking for resources and such.
Is there something I didn't understand about how the whole process works and is there a way to make it work ?
UPDATE 3
I've resolved to hack my way into making all my paths into absolute paths, it works, but it doesn't explain that behavior.
You already figured out the basic steps yourself:
create a separate module for integration tests
start an application- or web-server (e.g.jetty) via a suitable maven-plugin (e.g. cargo, wildfly-maven-plugin, etc.) in the pre-integration-test phase
run tests via the maven-failsafe-plugin:integration-test mojo
verify results via the maven-failsafe-plugin:verify mojo
Stephen Connolly, a maven developer, already wrote a great answer about this topic on stackoverflow.
I don't know the jetty-maven-plugin very well, but it seems it doesn't support deploying an existing artifact. Specifying relative or absolute path is definitively not the way to go here. You should probably use cargo instead to deploy to jetty. The cargo configuration could look like this:
<configuration>
<configuration>
<type>runtime</type>
<properties>
<cargo.hostname>testserver</cargo.hostname>
<cargo.servlet.port>8080</cargo.servlet.port>
</properties>
</configuration>
<container>
<containerId>jetty9x</containerId>
</container>
<deployables>
<deployable>
<groupId>your.group.id</groupId>
<artifactId>your-war</artifactId>
<type>war</type>
<properties>
<context>/cmp</context>
</properties>
</deployable>
</deployables>
<deployer>
<type>remote</type>
</deployer>
</configuration>
The cargo documentation has more details.
hth,
- martin
Hello Jay,
Would really like to simplify things in here, why don't you run these jobs in succession? First would be your compile, unit-tests and deploy tasks using Maven. For your integration testing, create another job that would use of plugins like Selenium ( for your web application) and JMeter (for your web services). You can also try other license testing suite like Openscript.
The web service testing will be tricky, since your web service consumer runs on another client. Do you have any slave agents running on the client application? If you have one, run those jobs inside the slave.
Related
I'm trying to build a pom.xml to handle the deployment and undeployment to a remote TomEE (PluME 7.0.3) server. However, I cannot figure out the correct value to use in the path configuration tag. Here's a working plugin configuration for deploying my application (full-blown EAR, for educational purposes) to the remote TomEE:
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.tomee.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>tomee-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>7.0.3</version>
<configuration>
<context>someear</context>
<tomeeClassifier>plus</tomeeClassifier>
<tomeeHost>192.168.100.100</tomeeHost>
<debugPort>8000</debugPort>
<tomeeAjpPort>8009</tomeeAjpPort>
<tomeeHttpPort>8080</tomeeHttpPort>
<tomeeShutdownPort>8005</tomeeShutdownPort>
<path>target/someear-1.0-SNAPSHOT.ear</path>
<useBinaries>true</useBinaries>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
Whereas to undeploy, I would have to configure the plugin like this:
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.tomee.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>tomee-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>7.0.3</version>
<configuration>
<context>someear</context>
<tomeeClassifier>plus</tomeeClassifier>
<tomeeHost>192.168.100.100</tomeeHost>
<debugPort>8000</debugPort>
<tomeeAjpPort>8009</tomeeAjpPort>
<tomeeHttpPort>8080</tomeeHttpPort>
<tomeeShutdownPort>8005</tomeeShutdownPort>
<path>someear-1.0-SNAPSHOT</path>
<useBinaries>true</useBinaries>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
Notice the difference in the path configuration. From the command line, this behaves similarly; when the path tag in the pom.xml is omitted, I can deploy and undeploy like this:
mvn tomee:deploy -Dtomee-plugin.archive=target/someear-1.0-SNAPSHOT.ear
mvn tomee:undeploy -Dtomee-plugin.archive=someear-1.0-SNAPSHOT
Has anybody experienced the same behaviour, and found a way to mitigate this? I'd like to have both deploy and undeploy configured completely in the pom.xml without specifying additional parameters when calling mvn. But, as of now, I cannot do that, since tomee:deploy seems to expect a different path than tomee:undeploy.
EDIT
Ok, based on #Old School's edited answer, I can do something like this:
<profiles>
<profile>
<id>deploy</id>
<activation>
<activeByDefault>true</activeByDefault>
</activation>
<properties>
<my-tomee-maven-plugin-path>target/someear-1.0-SNAPSHOT.ear</tomee-maven-plugin-path>
</properties>
</profile>
<profile>
<id>undeploy</id>
<properties>
<my-tomee-maven-plugin-path>someear-1.0-SNAPSHOT</tomee-maven-plugin-path>
</properties>
</profile>
</profiles>
Then, specify path in tomee-maven-plugin's configuration section like this:
...
<path>${my-tomee-maven-plugin-path}</path>
...
Then, execute maven like this:
mvn tomee:deploy
mvn tomee:undeploy -Pundeploy
Which I consider more convenient than specifying some -D parameters at execution time (YMMV).
However, the perfect solution in my opinion would be if you could configure path in tomee-maven-plugin's configuration such that both tomee:deploy and tomee:undeploy work without further ado.
EDIT2
I discovered another possibility without profiles which I was seemingly unable to find before (based on: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Deployment-to-TomEE-7-0-0-using-tomee-maven-plugin-error-Cannot-open-input-stream-to-server-tp4679142p4679282.html):
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.tomee.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>tomee-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>7.0.3</version>
<configuration>
<context>${project.artifactId}</context>
<tomeeClassifier>plus</tomeeClassifier>
<context>someear</context>
<tomeeClassifier>plus</tomeeClassifier>
<tomeeHost>192.168.100.100</tomeeHost>
<debugPort>8000</debugPort>
<tomeeAjpPort>8009</tomeeAjpPort>
<tomeeHttpPort>8080</tomeeHttpPort>
<tomeeShutdownPort>8005</tomeeShutdownPort>
<!-- no <path> tag -->
<useBinaries>true</useBinaries>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>deploy-it</id>
<phase>none</phase>
<goals>
<goal>deploy</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<path>target/someear-1.0-SNAPSHOT.ear</path>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>undeploy-it</id>
<phase>none</phase>
<goals>
<goal>undeploy</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<path>someear-1.0-SNAPSHOT</path>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
Usage:
mvn tomee:deploy#deploy-it
mvn tomee:undeploy#undeploy-it
I use glassfish, not tomcat, but I think the same principles apply here. In GF, deploy requires the full path and the undeploy requires only the package name. For example, glassfish goes something like:
asadmin deploy C:\Projects\Java\helloworld\helloworld.war
and
asadmin undeploy helloworld
There is no path required on undeploy because the file is on the server and once you name it, glassfish/tomcat knows where it is.
EDIT based off comments: My apologies for the glassfish stuff, I wasn't paying attention to you mentioning tomcat and I've edited a bit to reflect that somewhat.
I do understand now, I think, what you're looking for. Check out:
Maven Resource Filtering
It's another SO answer where he does a fantastic job of explaining exactly what you're looking for, I think. I hope that works.
I'm trying to use the cargo maven plugin just to start a JBoss AS 7 server from maven, without executing any deployments.
I'm able to start the server but as I can read in cargo pluging documentation the goals cargo:run and cargo:start will deploy automatically the current project if project's packaging is Java EE (WAR, EAR, etc.) and if I'm not using deployable sections in the plugin configuration.
This is my simple cargo plugin section in the pom file:
<plugins>
...
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.cargo</groupId>
<artifactId>cargo-maven2-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.4.13</version>
<configuration>
<!-- Container configuration -->
<container>
<containerId>jboss73x</containerId>
<home>${jboss-as.home}</home>
</container>
</configuration>
</plugin>
...
</plugins>
Since I'm not using deployables and the project packaging is war, cargo automatically deploys my project when the server starts.
I would like use the goal cargo:run just to start my local server without deploy any project artifacts.
Is it possible with the cargo maven plugin? Any idea or alternative?
I think that it might not be possible to ask the plugin not to deploy the project in which it is configured, when you are in the case of a deployable archive project.
But what you could do is creating a pom project, with no source in it just the pom.xml, and run your cargo plugin in that project.
My example below starts and stops the cargo plugin when I run the goal install on it :
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd">
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
<groupId>fr.fabien.perso</groupId>
<artifactId>pom-project-tests</artifactId>
<version>0.0.1-SNAPSHOT</version>
<packaging>pom</packaging>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.cargo</groupId>
<artifactId>cargo-maven2-plugin</artifactId>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>start-container</id>
<phase>pre-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>start</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>stop-container</id>
<phase>post-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>stop</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
<configuration>
<container>
<type>embedded</type>
</container>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
</project>
Yes Yersan, it is possible to start the server without self built artifact deployment. It can be achieved by adding an empty <deployer /> element on the <configuration> tag of the project.
I found the info at the cargo plugin reference site. In addition, I have tested the configuration in my local project to confirm it works.
I have webapp which provides web service. I want to perform JUnit tests with SoapUI to check if this service is working properly.
But to test web service application has to be deployed to my Tomcat 7 server.
I have no idea how to configure maven to build war, then deploy it to tomcat (ideally: to run separate tomcat instance for this) and then to run JUnit tests.
I will appreciate any help.
I am using maven 2.2.1
There are a number of schools of thought as to how to handle this type of integration test with Maven.
I should point out that when you are deploying an application to an application server, you are not in the realm of unit testing any more. Because the entire application is being deployed within a container, you are testing the integration of those two components.
Now there is nothing wrong with using JUnit for running integration tests (though there are some limitations that you may hit, for example unit tests should not care about the sequencing of individual tests - assuming you are writing them correctly - so JUnit enforces this by not guaranteeing any sequence of execution... prior to Java 1.7 the execution order was accidentally implied by the order of test methods within a class, but it was not part of the JUnit contract... Some people switch to other testing frameworks for their integration tests, e.g. TestNG, if they find the unit test focus of JUnit is getting in the way of their test development)
The key point to keep in mind is that the Maven lifecycle uses the test phase for the execution of unit tests.
When it comes to integration tests there are two (and a half) schools of thought as to the right way to handle the tests with Maven.
School 1 - Failsafe and integration-test/verify
This school of thought uses the phases after package to start up a container, run the integration tests, tear down the container, and finally check the test results and fail the build in the event of test failures.
NEVER EVER RUN mvn integration-test as that will not tear down the container correctly, any time you think you want to type mvn integration-test you actually want to type mvn verify (oh look, it's shorter and easier to type also... bonus)
So with this you do the following:
Bind tomcat7:run to the pre-integration-test phase with fork=true
Bind failsafe:integration-test to the integration-test phase
Bind tomcat7:shutdown to the post-integration-test phase
Bind failsafe:verify to the verify phase.
For extra brownie points you would use build-helper-maven-plugin:reserve-network-port bound to the validate phase to ensure that the test server is started on an unused network port and then either use resource filtering against the test resources to pass the port through to the tests or use a system property passed through systemPropertyVariables to make the port number available to the tests.
Advantages
Clean Maven build
If the tests fail, you cannot release the project
Can move the integration tests into a separate profile (by convention called run-its) if the tests are too slow to run every build.
Disadvantages
Hard to run the tests from an IDE. All the integration tests start/end in IT and while Maven knows to run tests starting/ending in Test with Surefire and run tests starting/ending in IT with Failsafe, your IDE probably doesn't. Additionally, your IDE is not going to start the container for you, so you have to do a lot of work by hand to actually run the tests manually.
Debugging the tests potentially requires attaching two debuggers, e.g. one to debug the application running in container and the other to debug the test cases.
mvnDebug -Dmaven.failsafe.debug=true verify
Couples your tests to the Maven build process.
School 2 - Separate module
This school of thought moves the integration tests into a separate module that depends on the war module and copies the war into the test resources using, e.g. dependency:copy-dependencies bound to the generate-test-resources phase coupled with a Tomcat7 dependency to test against.
The test cases themselves start up the Tomcat7 container using embedded mode
Advantages
Tests can run in IDE
Integration tests are separated from Unit tests, so asking the IDE to run all tests will not kick off the slower tests
Disadvantages
The war artifact is only rebuilt if you go past the package phase, consequently, you need to run at least mvn clean package periodically to refresh the code under test when using the IDE.
The failure of the integration tests does not break the build of the war module, so you can end up releasing a broken war artifact and then have the reactor build fail for the integration test module. Some people counteract this issue by having the integration test module within src/it and using Maven Invoker Plugin to run the tests... though that provides a poorer IDE integration, so I do not recommend that line.
Hard to get a consolidated test coverage report from Maven.
Have to code the container start/stop yourself from within your test cases.
School 2.5 - Failsafe with the test cases starting their own Tomcat7 server
This is a kind of hybrid of the two approaches.
You use Failsafe to execute the tests, but the tests themselves are responsible for starting and stopping the Tomcat7 container that you want to test in.
Advantages
Don't have to configure the server start/stop in Maven pom
IDE can safely run all tests (though the integration tests may be slower and you may want to not run them, but it's not like they will all fail unless there is a test failure)
Easier to debug the tests from your IDE (only one process to attach against, and the IDE usually makes it easy to debug tests by providing a special test runner)
Disadvantages
Have to code the container start/stop yourself from within your test cases
I hope the above helps you understand the options you have. There may be other tweaks but in general the above are considered the best practice(s) for integration testing with Maven at present.
#Stephen Connolly - your answer above was really good. I thought I'd kick in and show a full configuration for what you termed a School 1 response.
This configuration:
runs unit tests separately from integration tests. It uses the #Category annotation on the root classes that unit tests and integration tests extend.
before integration tests it starts the dependent application (loaded as a maven dependency at runtime) on the local machine, by finding an open port
after integration tests it tears down the dependent application
There's other stuff in there like how to set certain system properties on the dependent application only.
So far this configuration is working awesome..
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>build-helper-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.9.1</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>reserve-network-port</id>
<goals>
<goal>reserve-network-port</goal>
</goals>
<phase>pre-integration-test</phase>
<configuration>
<portNames>
<portName>tomcat.maven.http.port</portName>
</portNames>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>get-local-ip</id>
<goals>
<goal>local-ip</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<!-- if not given, 'local.ip' name is used -->
<localIpProperty>local.ip</localIpProperty>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.tomcat.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>tomcat7-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.2</version>
<configuration>
<!-- http port from reserve-network-port-plugin-->
<port>${tomcat.maven.http.port}</port>
<!-- application path always starts with /-->
<path>/</path>
<webapps>
<webapp>
<groupId>com.company.other.app</groupId>
<artifactId>web-rest</artifactId>
<version>1.0.1-SNAPSHOT</version>
<type>war</type>
<contextPath>/webapi-loopback</contextPath>
<asWebapp>true</asWebapp>
</webapp>
</webapps>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>start-server</id>
<configuration>
<fork>true</fork>
<skip>${skipTests}</skip>
<systemProperties>
<spring.profiles.active>test,h2</spring.profiles.active>
</systemProperties>
</configuration>
<phase>pre-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>run</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>stop-server</id>
<configuration>
<skip>${skipTests}</skip>
</configuration>
<phase>post-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>shutdown</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.19</version>
<configuration>
<excludedGroups>com.company.app.service.IntegrationTestRootClassAnnotatedWithAtCategory</excludedGroups>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>unit-test</id>
<phase>test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>test</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<argLine>-Xmx1024m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m #{jacocoArgLine}</argLine>
<excludedGroups> com.company.app.service.IntegrationTestRootClassAnnotatedWithAtCategory </excludedGroups>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-failsafe-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.18</version>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.surefire</groupId>
<artifactId>surefire-junit47</artifactId>
<version>2.18</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>start-integration-test</id>
<phase>integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>integration-test</goal>
<goal>verify</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<argLine>-Xmx1024m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m #{jacocoArgLine}</argLine>
<groups>com.company.app.IntegrationTestRootClassAnnotatedWithAtCategory</groups>
<includes>
<include>**/*.java</include>
</includes>
<systemPropertyVariables>
<program.service.url>
http://${local.ip}:${tomcat.maven.http.port}/webapi-loopback
</program.service.url>
</systemPropertyVariables>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
As Stephen Connolly explains there is no a direct way to configure this. I will explain how to solve this using failsafe plugin. In the maven lifecycle type of test can be tested. Unit testing one of them and another one is integrate testing. Unit testing can be run in the test stage of maven lifecycle. When you want to do integrate test it can be done in verify stage. If you want to know the difference between unit testing and integrate testing, this is a good one. By default unit test classes should be in ***/*Test.java, and **/*TestCase.java this format. The failsafe plugin will look for **/IT*.java, **/*IT.java, and **/*ITCase.java.
Here is an example.
Here I have one unit test class and one integrate test class. Now I will explain, how should be the looks like maven pom.xml. Build section of maven configuration should look like this.
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-war-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.3</version>
<configuration>
<webXml>src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/web.xml</webXml>
<warName>${name}</warName>
<outputDirectory>/home/jobs/wso2/wso2as-5.3.0/repository/deployment/server/webapps</outputDirectory>
<goal>
</goal>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<version>3.1</version>
<configuration>
<source>1.7</source>
<target>1.7</target>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-failsafe-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.12.4</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>integration-test</id>
<goals>
<goal>integration-test</goal>
<goal>verify</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
Unit tests are run before deploying the web app(war file). But integrate tests are run in verify stage. I hope your requirement is satisfied in this stage.
I´m trying to make a Maven Project from an existing web application using JSF. The Project
should be deployed on Web Sphere 8.5.
Since i'm new to Web Sphere, don´t know how to build the "ear" Module, in order to be deployable on Web Sphere 8.5.
Does anyone know, where i can find further Information about deploying a web application on Web Sphere 8.5 using Maven 3.0.3?
Thanking you in anticipation,
Mosen
I've never worked with WebSphere Application Server 8.5; but in the days I was playing with IBM WAS 6.1 the WAS6 Maven plugin worked pretty well (it seems it works with WAS7 too). Here's a POM fragment from the plugin site that allows automatic EAR deployment:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>was6-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.2</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>integration-test</id>
<phase>integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>installApp</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
<configuration>
<wasHome>${was61home}</wasHome>
<host>deploymentmanager.your.domain</host>
<username>admin</username>
<password>adminpassword</password>
<targetCluster>nameOfCluster</targetCluster>
<profileName>Dmgr01</profileName>
<conntype>SOAP</conntype>
<port>8879</port>
<verbose>true</verbose>
<updateExisting>false</updateExisting>
</configuration>
</plugin>
That plugin is for deployment and other administrative task, for EAR generation you can use the Maven EAR Plugin as described in 20InchMovement answer.
Hope this could helps:
<plugin>
<groupId>com.orctom.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>was-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.0.8</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>deploy</id>
<phase>install</phase>
<goals>
<goal>deploy</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<wasHome>${env.WAS_HOME}</wasHome>
<applicationName>${project.build.finalName}</applicationName>
<host>${local or remote address}</host>
<server>server01</server>
<node>node01</node>
<virtualHost>default_host</virtualHost>
<verbose>true</verbose>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
From https://github.com/orctom/was-maven-plugin
in order to package an *.ear, you don't need Websphere.
This can be accomplished with maven itself.
pom.xml:
<project>
...
<artifactId>YourApp</
<packaging>ear</packaging>
...
<build>
<pluginManagement>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-ear-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<modules>
<jarModule>
<groupId>${project.parent.groupId}</groupId>
<artifactId>configurationApp</artifactId>
</jarModule>
<ejbModule>
<groupId>${project.parent.groupId}</groupId>
<artifactId>AnEjbModule</artifactId>
</ejbModule>
</modules>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</pluginManagement>
</build>
...
</project>
Then you add your dependencies.
On command line go to your project and run mvn package.
Because of the package defined in you pom.xml, the ear will be created and can be found in the YourApp/target directory.
On the websphere admin console you can simply install the ear.
After login, goto:
Applications->Websphere enterprise applications and install a new application.
Select your YourApp.ear and go for easiness through the fast path to install the app.
The port to check is probably
yourServerName:9080/YourApp.
Good luck.
See http://code.google.com/p/websphere-maven-plugin/
Websphere Maven Plugin provides goals to:
deploy ear on websphere 7
start application
stop application
uninstall
require websphere application client.
I have a maven (multi-module) project creating some WAR and EAR files for JBoss AS 7.1.x.
For one purpose, I need to deploy one generated EAR file of one module to a fresh JBoss instance and run it, call some REST web service calls against it and stop JBoss. Then I need to package the results of these calls that were written to the database.
Currently, I am trying to use CARGO and the maven ant run plugin to perform this task.
Unfortunately, I cannot get the three (maven, ant run and CARGO) to play together. I don't have the uberjar that is used in the ant examples of cargo. How can I configure the ant run task so that the cargo ant task can create, start, deploy my JBoss? Ideally the one unpacked and configured by the cargo-maven2-plugin in another phase?
Or, is there a better way to achieve my goal of creating the database?
I cannot really use the integration-test phase, as it is executed after the package phase. So, I plan to do it all in compile phase using ant run.
To clarify again:
I need to do the following: start JBoss; deploy a WAR; wait until the startup of the WAR is complete; deploy an EAR file; wait until the EAR has initialized it's database; Call some web services in the implemented by the EAR; stop JBoss; package the database.
All these steps need to be strictly sequential.
The following part gives you an impression how to do that. You must change the details. In the given case i use a Tomcat. This will download the Tomcat archive uncompress and install Tomcat locally...
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.cargo</groupId>
<artifactId>cargo-maven2-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<wait>false</wait>
<container>
<containerId>tomcat${tomcat.major}x</containerId>
<zipUrlInstaller>
<url>http://archive.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-${tomcat.major}/v${tomcat.version}/bin/apache-tomcat-${tomcat.version}.tar.gz</url>
<extractDir>${project.build.directory}/extract/</extractDir>
<downloadDir>${project.build.directory}/download/</downloadDir>
</zipUrlInstaller>
<output>${project.build.directory}/tomcat${tomcat.major}x.log</output>
<log>${project.build.directory}/cargo.log</log>
</container>
<configuration>
<home>${project.build.directory}/tomcat-${tomcat.version}/container</home>
<properties>
<cargo.logging>high</cargo.logging>
<cargo.servlet.port>9080</cargo.servlet.port>
<cargo.tomcat.ajp.port>9008</cargo.tomcat.ajp.port>
</properties>
</configuration>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>start-container</id>
<phase>pre-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>start</goal>
<goal>deploy</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<deployer>
<deployables>
<deployable>
<groupId>${project.groupId}</groupId>
<artifactId>mod-war</artifactId>
<type>war</type>
<pingURL>http://localhost:9080/mod-war</pingURL>
<pingTimeout>30000</pingTimeout>
<properties>
<context>mod-war</context>
</properties>
</deployable>
</deployables>
</deployer>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>stop-container</id>
<phase>post-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>stop</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>