I want to match dynamicCast(header.get_0('(0008,0020)'), Q$String_$1):
header.containsKey('(0008,0020)')?(dateString = dynamicCast(header.get_0('(0008,0020)'), Q$String_$1)[0]):header.containsKey('(0008,0022)')?(dateString = dynamicCast(header.get_0('(0008,0022)'), Q$String_$1)[0]):header.containsKey('(0008,0021)')?(dateString = dynamicCast(header.get_0('(0008,0021)'), Q$String_$1)[0]):header.containsKey('(0008,0023)') && (dateString = dynamicCast(header.get_0('(0008,0023)'), Q$String_$1)[0]);
I managed to make it work with this regex
dynamicCast\(header.get.*, Q\$(String_|int_)\$1\)
The problem is, it matches the whole block. What is the proper regex magic spell to get the four matches I want?
I'm currently rewriting auto-generated JavaScript using a regex using Ruby. I'm then replacing each match with
header.get_0('(0008,0020)')
One a problem is I have to match some different flavors, inside the method get_0 there are many different possibilities. I might need to match every single possibility, and then, why use regex?
dynamicCast(header.get_0('(0028,' + element + ')'), Q$String_$1)
You can use the following to match:
dynamicCast\(header\.get_0\('\([^)]+\)'\), Q\$(?:String_|int_)\$1\)
See DEMO
Related
I need to evaluate the output to see if it starts with a specific sequence.
For example if Cat1 = (A)
I want to verify that the entry begins with the value of Cat1 and can contain any text after it. If so then to output that entry.
I don't exactly know how to use wildcards in conjunction with the variable to allow entries such as
(A) First assignment
(A) Second assignment
to be selected and then to be transferred.
The portion that is in question is the following in my code:
if(assign.title == ){
SpreadsheetApp.openByUrl(url).getSheetByName(shet).appendRow([assign.title, marks.assignedGrade,
assign.maxPoints]);}
}
Your issue can be solved by using Regular Expressions which essentially are special text strings used to describe a search pattern.
Therefore, if you want to search for the entries which begin with (A) and appendRow() like you mentioned above, you should use the following code snippet:
function theFunction() {
var ss = SpreadsheetApp.openByUrl("YOUR_URL").getSheetByName("YOUR_SHEET_NAME");
var regEx = /((A)).*/;
//Getting the assign & marks variables
if (assign.title.match(regEx))
appendRow([assign.title, marks.assignedGrade, assign.maxPoints]);
}
The regular expression here is represented by the var regEx = /((A)).*/; which searches for a string to see if it starts with the (A) string.
Furthermore, I suggest you take a look at these links since they might be of help:
Syntax for Regular Expressions;
Regular Expressions Tester.
I am looking to build a ruby regex to match multiple occurrences of a pattern and return them in an array. The pattern is simply: [[.+]]. That is, two left brackets, one or more characters, followed by two right brackets.
This is what I have done:
str = "Some random text[[lead:first_name]] and more stuff [[client:last_name]]"
str.match(/\[\[(.+)\]\]/).captures
The regex above doesn't work because it returns this:
["lead:first_name]] and another [[client:last_name"]
When what I wanted was this:
["lead:first_name", "client:last_name"]
I thought if I used a noncapturing group that for sure it should solve the issue:
str.match(/(?:\[\[(.+)\]\])+/).captures
But the noncapturing group returns the same exact wrong output. Any idea on how I can resolve my issue?
The problem with your regex is that the .+ part is "greedy", meaning that if the regex matches both a smaller and larger part of the string, it will capture the larger part (more about greedy regexes).
In Ruby (and most regex syntaxes), you can qualify your + quantifier with a ? to make it non-greedy. So your regex would become /(?:\[\[(.+?)\]\])+/.
However, you'll notice this still doesn't work for what you want to do. The Ruby capture groups just don't work inside a repeating group. For your problem, you'll need to use scan:
"[[a]][[ab]][[abc]]".scan(/\[\[(.+?)\]\]/).flatten
=> ["a", "ab", "abc"]
Try this:
=> str.match(/\[\[(.*)\]\].*\[\[(.*)\]\]/).captures
=> ["lead:first_name", "client:last_name"]
With many occurrences:
=> str
=> "Some [[lead:first_name]] random text[[lead:first_name]] and more [[lead:first_name]] stuff [[client:last_name]]"
=> str.scan(/\[(\w+:\w+)\]/)
=> [["lead:first_name"], ["lead:first_name"], ["lead:first_name"], ["client:last_name"]]
I have the following string:
nothing to match
<-
this rocks should match as should this still and this rocks and still
->
should not match still or rocks
<- no matches here ->
And i want to find all matches of 'rocks' and 'still', but only when they are within <- ->
The purpose is to markup glossary words but be able to only mark them up in areas of text that are defined by the editor.
I currently have:
<-.*?(rocks|still).*?->
This unfortunately only matches the first 'rocks' and ignores all subsequent instances and all the 'still's
I have this in a Rubular
The usage of this will be somthing like
Regexp.new( '<-.*?(' + self.all.map{ |gt| gt.name }.join("|") + ').*?->', Regexp::IGNORECASE, Regexp::MULTILINE )
Thanks in advance for any help
There may be a way to do this with a single regex, but it will probably be simpler to just do it in two steps. First match all of the markups, and then search the markups for the glossary words:
text = <<END
nothing to match
<-
this rocks should match as should this still and this rocks and still
->
should not match still or rocks
<- no matches here ->
END
text.scan(/<-.*?->/m).each do |match|
print match.scan(/rocks|still/), "\n"
end
Also, you should probably note that regex is only a good solution here if there is never any nested markup (<-...<-...->...->) and no escaped <- or -> whether it is inside or outside of a markup.
Don't forget your Ruby string methods. Use them first before considering regular expressions
$ ruby -0777 -ne '$_.split("->").each{|x| x.split("<-").each{|y| puts "#{y}" if (y[/rocks.*still/]) } }' file
In Ruby, it depends on what you want to do with the regexp. You're matching a regular expression against a string, so you'll be using String methods. Certain of these will have an effect on all matches (e.g. gsub or rpartition); others will have an effect on only the first match (e.g. rindex, =~).
If you're working with any of the latter (that return only the first match), you'll want to make use of a loop that calls the method again, starting from a certain offset. For example:
# A method to print the indices of all matches
def print_match_indices(string, regex)
i = string.rindex(regex, 0)
while !i.nil? do
puts i
i = string.rindex(regex, i+1)
end
end
(Yes, you can use split first, but I expect that a regex loop like the foregoing would require fewer system resources.)
I'm new to Rails, and furthermore to regex. Been looking around, but I'm blocked...
I have a string like this :
Current: http://zs.domain.com/user_images/123456789/imageName_size.ext
Wanted: http://zs.domain.com/user_images/123456789/imageName.ext
I've managed to get to this :
http://a0.twimg.com/profile/1240267050/logo1.png
=> losing all occurrences with
picture.gsub!(/_([a-z0-9-]+)/, '')
or this :
http://a0.twimg.com/profile_images/1240267050/logo1
=> changing only the last occurrence, but losing the extension with
picture.gsub!(/_([a-z0-9-]+)**.(png|gif|jpg|jpeg)**/, '')
You're almost there. The second parameter is the string with which the match will be replaced, and you can re-use matched groups from the match. This will do the trick:
picture.gsub!(/_([a-z0-9-]+).(png|gif|jpg|jpeg)/, '.\2')
To accomodate for the additional conditions, as posed in the comment:
picture.gsub!(/_([^\/]+).(png|gif|jpg|jpeg)/, '.\2')
markijbema's answer will change the string
.../xxx_yyygifzzz/...,
into
.../xxxgifzzz/....
In order to avoid that, you can do this:
picture.gsub!(/_[^\/]+(?=\.[^\.]+\z)/, '')
(?=...) is understood as a context that follows the string, and will not be included in the match.
\z describes the end of the string, so this regexp is safe to use when some intermediate directory includes a string like above.
Ruby 1.9.1, OSX 10.5.8
I'm trying to write a simple app that parses through of bunch of java based html template files to replace a period (.) with an underscore if it's contained within a specific tag. I use ruby all the time for these types of utility apps, and thought it would be no problem to whip up something using ruby's regex support. So, I create a Regexp.new... object, open a file, read it in line by line, then match each line against the pattern, if I get a match, I create a new string using replaceString = currentMatch.gsub(/./, '_'), then create another replacement as whole string by newReplaceRegex = Regexp.escape(currentMatch) and finally replace back into the current line with line.gsub(newReplaceRegex, replaceString) Code below, of course, but first...
The problem I'm having is that when accessing the indexes within the returned MatchData object, I'm getting the first result twice, and it's missing the second sub string it should otherwise be finding. More strange, is that when testing this same pattern and same test text using rubular.com, it works as expected. See results here
My pattern:
(<(?:WEBOBJECT|webobject) (?:NAME|name)=(?:[a-zA-Z0-9]+.)+(?:[a-zA-Z0-9]+)(?:>))
Text text:
<WEBOBJECT NAME=admin.normalMode.someOtherPatternWeDontWant.moreThatWeDontWant>moreNonMatchingText<WEBOBJECT NAME=admin.SecondLineMatch>AndEvenMoreNonMatchingText
Here's the relevant code:
tagRegex = Regexp.new('(<(?:WEBOBJECT|webobject) (?:NAME|name)=(?:[a-zA-Z0-9]+\.)+(?:[a-zA-Z0-9]+)(?:>))+')
testFile = File.open('RegexTestingCompFix.txt', "r+")
lineCount=0
testFile.each{|htmlLine|
lineCount += 1
puts ("Current line: #{htmlLine} at line num: #{lineCount}")
tagMatch = tagRegex.match(htmlLine)
if(tagMatch)
matchesArray = tagMatch.to_a
firstMatch = matchesArray[0]
secondMatch = matchesArray[1]
puts "First match: #{firstMatch} and second match #{secondMatch}"
tagMatch.captures.each {|lineMatchCapture|
puts "Current capture for tagMatches: #{lineMatchCapture} of total match count #{matchesArray.size}"
#create a new regex using the match results; make sure to use auto escape method
originalPatternString = Regexp.escape(lineMatchCapture)
replacementRegex = Regexp.new(originalPatternString)
#replace any periods with underscores in a copy of lineMatchCapture
periodToUnderscoreCorrection = lineMatchCapture.gsub(/\./, '_')
#replace original match with underscore replaced copy within line
htmlLine.gsub!(replacementRegex, periodToUnderscoreCorrection)
puts "The modified htmlLine is now: #{htmlLine}"
}
end
}
I would think that I should get the first tag in matchData[0] then the second tag in matchData1, or, what I'm really doing because I don't know how many matches I'll get within any given line is matchData.to_a.each. And in this case, matchData has two captures, but they're both the first tag match
which is: <WEBOBJECT NAME=admin.normalMode.someOtherPatternWeDontWant.moreThatWeDontWant>
So, what the heck am I doing wrong, why does rubular test give me the expected results?
You want to use the on String#scan instead of the Regexp#match:
tag_regex = /<(?:WEBOBJECT|webobject) (?:NAME|name)=(?:[a-zA-Z0-9]+\.)+(?:[a-zA-Z0-9]+)(?:>)/
lines = "<WEBOBJECT NAME=admin.normalMode.someOtherPatternWeDontWant.moreThatWeDontWant>moreNonMatchingText\
<WEBOBJECT NAME=admin.SecondLineMatch>AndEvenMoreNonMatchingText"
lines.scan(tag_regex)
# => ["<WEBOBJECT NAME=admin.normalMode.someOtherPatternWeDontWant.moreThatWeDontWant>", "<WEBOBJECT NAME=admin.SecondLineMatch>"]
A few recommendations for next ruby questions:
newlines and spaces are your friends, you don't loose points for using more lines on your code ;-)
use do-end on blocks instead of {}, improves readability a lot
declare variables in snake case (hello_world) instead of camel case (helloWorld)
Hope this helps
I ended up using the String.scan approach, the only tricky point there was figuring out that this returns an array of arrays, not a MatchData object, so there was some initial confusion on my part, mostly due to my ruby green-ness, but it's working as expected now. Also, I trimmed the regex per Trevoke's suggestion. But snake case? Never...;-) Anyway, here goes:
tagRegex = /(<(?:webobject) (?:name)=(?:\w+\.)+(?:\w+)(?:>))/i
testFile = File.open('RegexTestingCompFix.txt', "r+")
lineCount=0
testFile.each do |htmlLine|
lineCount += 1
puts ("Current line: #{htmlLine} at line num: #{lineCount}")
oldMatches = htmlLine.scan(tagRegex) #oldMatches thusly named due to not explicitly using Regexp or MatchData, as in "the old way..."
if(oldMatches.size > 0)
oldMatches.each_index do |index|
arrayMatch = oldMatches[index]
aMatch = arrayMatch[0]
#create a new regex using the match results; make sure to use auto escape method
replacementRegex = Regexp.new(Regexp.escape(aMatch))
#replace any periods with underscores in a copy of lineMatchCapture
periodToUnderscoreCorrection = aMatch.gsub(/\./, '_')
#replace original match with underscore replaced copy within line, matching against the new escaped literal regex
htmlLine.gsub!(replacementRegex, periodToUnderscoreCorrection)
puts "The modified htmlLine is now: #{htmlLine}"
end # I kind of still prefer the brackets...;-)
end
end
Now, why does MatchData work the way it does? It seems like it's behavior is a bug really, and certainly not very useful in general if you can't get it provide a simple means of accessing all the matches. Just my $.02
Small bits:
This regexp helps you get "normalMode" .. But not "secondLineMatch":
<webobject name=\w+\.((?:\w+)).+> (with option 'i', for "case insensitive")
This regexp helps you get "secondLineMatch" ... But not "normalMode":
<webobject name=\w+\.((?:\w+))> (with option 'i', for "case insensitive").
I'm not really good at regexpt but I'll keep toiling at it.. :)
And I don't know if this helps you at all, but here's a way to get both:
<webobject name=admin.(\w+) (with option 'i').