I have configured Local STS with my web application (which is hosted in IIS 7 and has the host name as www.abc.com) and it can receive the claims from the STS and it can login. Now I have added another host name (www.xyz.com) to my web application. If user a login to a page in the application using www.abc.com/page1 and it redirects to local STS and it authenticates the user and adds the security token. Now if the user visits www.xyz.com/page2 it also redirects to the STS for authentication.
If a user either logged in www.abc.com or www.xyz.com they need to access the other domain page with out login. Is it possible? How do we achieve this?
In broad strokes, if you have two different relying parties, each needs to route the user to the IDP. If the IDP is configured for single sign on, the user will only notice the routing to the IDP the first time. On the second routing, (assuming same browser session and that the routing is within the lifetime supported by the IDP) the user will be authenticated without seeing a page at the IDP and being required to present credentials.
So, part of your answer hinges around what you mean by login: if you mean "experience a challenge and enter credentials" by log in, you should be able to enable this by simply ensuring that the IDP is configured for single sign on.
On the other hand, if by login you mean the redirect to the IDP, then you need to make sure the application is able to share state across the different page names. Note that usual management of state is via cookies, and note that a cookie for abc.com will not be returned to a web page named xyz.com. There are a number of clever ways to resolve this, although i am not aware of any simple application configuration solutions. One example is to have some part of both the abc.com page and the xyz.com page accessed by the url shared.com. State cookies can then be set by the shared.com transaction when logging into abc.com and read by the shared.com transaction when subsequently accessing xyz.com.
I've never had to implement such a cross domain cookie solution and have only had off-hand conversations with colleagues about it: we've always found the silent redirect of single sign on to meet our requirements. Careful research into the privacy impact of such a solution and the likelihood that such cookies might be blocked should be considered before development.
Related
currently, I'm working on an application in which we want to offer a single sign-on experience, but let me put you in the context:
We have two different Cognito clients created for the same Cognito pool, both are configured to allow the users to login into two different applications:
App A: mydomain.com
App B: appb.mydomain.com
well, the thing is that when a user uses the hosted UI to log in to the first application, I noticed that the Cognito server creates a cookie called "Cognito" as can see in the image:
Cookie set by the auth server
Then, when a user tries to access the other application appb.mydomain.com, and the application, instead of showing the hosted UI, the user automatically enters the application without going to all the login process again, and this is possible because of the cookie I mentioned (when I delete that cookie, then the user is requested to login again using its credentials).
So, that's nice because the user doesn't need to go through all the login process again. But my situation is the following:
I want to create a login page in mydomain.com with my own customized form and using the Cognito SDK. I already have the backend working, also the frontend. The backend can authenticate users to get the JWT tokens (IDtoken, refresh token, etc.) as you can see in the next image:
Tokens I get when I authenticate a user
But at this point I'm not able to redirect the user to appb.mydomain.com with a valid session, I mean, I have the JWT tokens, and I tried to do the same thing that the hosted UI clients are doing, that is setting a cookie somehow containing the JWT session. But I don't know how to make the application appb.mydomain.com to be able to detect this cookie. But the most important problem is that I really don't know how to construct a valid cookie (like Cognito's) to be detected by mydomain.auth.eu-west-1.amazoncognito.com (this domain is shared for both Hosted UI clients).
I don't know if this approach is feasible, or if there is another approach to send a JWT token to the auth server with a callback to redirect the user to the appb.mydomain.com
without going to all the login process again or something like that.
Do you have any advice on how to implement this kind of SSO Experience? I'm using .Net Core in the backend.
I have configured WSO2 Identity Server as IDP and have two applications configured as SP. All working fine, except few things:
when I logged out from one application, another application don't see, that I was logged out
when I login into one application, another application don't see, that I was logged in
IMHO, there is main principles of SSO and SLO.
When I check SecurityContextHolder.getContext().getAuthentication() there is no changes after logout or login in another app.
Maybe I should call WSO2 page /samlsso before every load url?
What can I do wrong? How to retrieve from another app, that user logged out/logged in?
EDIT:
For example, WSO2 API Manager Store have such mechanism:
when I logged out from my application and reload Store page, then going redirection to main not logged page in Store. Same with login.
UPDATE:
I found problem in class org.springframework.security.saml.websso.SingleLogoutProfileImpl. When logout request is coming from WSO2 IS, than objects Authentication and SAMLCredential are nulls and error No user is logged in is occured, but for real user still logged in in Spring SAML application.
Same discussion was here, but with no effect :\
You have to verify whether both apps are calling Identity Server (IS) using the same host name. E.g. https://is.blahblah.com/samlsso.
IS session is based on cookies ('commonAuthId' and 'samlssoTokenId' cookies to be specific). If apps are calling IS using two different host names, there will be two different sessions created at the IS side. For SSO and SLO to happen both apps must share a single IS session.
We are using travelocity.com and avis.com web app for test SAML2 sso. You can found the more details here[1]. Further you can checked this documentation[2] Registering the two service providers in the Identity Server and followed the 1 to 8 steps.
[1] https://docs.wso2.com/display/IS500/Configuring+Single+Sign-On+with+SAML+2.0
[2] https://docs.wso2.com/display/IS500/Customizing+Login+Pages
Background: I have a javaee webapp deployed on tomcat which uses form based authentication. When the web server receives a login request, it sends the request to a dedicated authentication service which validates user login (User id and password). After successful authentication user's session is maintained in the web server.
Problem: I have written a simple webpp source code here, to simulate the scenario. On successful login the current HttpSession instance is invalidated and new instance is created. For each request for a post login page, the session is validated. A new JSESSIONID cookie is set which is used to identify the user during the session until session is expired or user logs out. This cookie can easily viewed in browser's dev tools. If I copy the cookie and set this in a different browser via JavaScript (document.cookie="JSESSIONID=xyzz") and then try to access a post login page, the server identifies it as a valid request and session is validated successfully. The post login page is served without user being challenged for user Id and password.
POC: User opens chrome and enter the URL http://localhost:8080/mywebapp/ and logs in with admin and pass1234. On successful log in the home page http://localhost:8080/mywebapp/home is shown. Now the JSESSIONID cookie is copied and set in FireFox. User enters http://localhost:8080/mywebapp/home in Firefox and is shown the home page without being challenged for userId and password.
Question: How can this be prevented wherein same session is getting replicated over multiple browsers?
You can't prevent this specific case of simply copying the cookie from your own browser (or by copying the cookie value from a HTTP payload copypaste/screenshot posted by an ignorant somewhere on the Internet). You can at most prevent the cookie getting hijacked by XSS or man-in-middle attacks.
This all is elaborated in Wikipedia page on the subject Session Hijacking of which I snipped away irrelevant parts (either already enforced by Servlet API, or are simply not applicable here).
Prevention
Methods to prevent session hijacking include:
Encryption of the data traffic passed between the parties by using SSL/TLS; in particular the session key (though ideally all traffic for the entire session[11]). This technique is widely relied-upon by web-based banks and other e-commerce services, because it completely prevents sniffing-style attacks. However, it could still be possible to perform some other kind of session hijack. In response, scientists from the Radboud University Nijmegen proposed in 2013 a way to prevent session hijacking by correlating the application session with the SSL/TLS credentials[12]
(snip, not relevant)
(snip, not relevant)
Some services make secondary checks against the identity of the user. For example, a web server could check with each request made that the IP address of the user matched the one last used during that session. This does not prevent attacks by somebody who shares the same IP address, however, and could be frustrating for users whose IP address is liable to change during a browsing session.
Alternatively, some services will change the value of the cookie with each and every request. This dramatically reduces the window in which an attacker can operate and makes it easy to identify whether an attack has taken place, but can cause other technical problems (for example, two legitimate, closely timed requests from the same client can lead to a token check error on the server).
(snip, not relevant)
In other words:
Use HTTPS instead of HTTP to prevent man-in-middle attacks.
Add a checkbox "Lock my IP" to login form and reject requests from different IP associated with same session in a servlet filter. This only works on users who know themselves they have a fixed IP.
Change session cookie on every request. Interesting at first sight, but breaks when user has same website open in multiple browser tabs/windows in same "session".
Not mentioned, but make sure you don't have a XSS hole anywhere, else it's very easy stealing cookies.
Last but not least, I'd like to make clear that this problem is absolutely not specifically related to Servlet API and the JSESSIONID cookie. All other stateful server side languages/frameworks such as PHP (PHPSESSID) and ASP (ASPSESSIONID) also expose exactly the same security problem. The JSESSIONID was previously (decade ago orso) only a bit more in news because by default it was possible to pass the session identifier along in the URL (which was done to support HTTP session in clients who have cookies disabled). Trouble started when ignorant endusers copypasted the full URL with JSESSIONID inside to share links with others. Since Servlet 3.0 you can turn off JSESSIONID in URLs by enforcing a cookie-only policy.
<session-config>
<tracking-mode>COOKIE</tracking-mode>
</session-config>
See also:
How do servlets work? Instantiation, sessions, shared variables and multithreading
How to prevent adding jsessionid at the end of redirected url
remove jsessionid in url rewrite in spring mvc
What you have stated is called session hijacking. There are many good answers on how to prevent it.
Using same Jsession ID to login into other machine
we can use Encryption or hide JSESSIONID using Browser control.
Thanks
Can login page (where we need to enter the credentials) be tested?
And URL of that website after login page can be tested without login?
JMeter is able to simulate login event and represent authenticated user. See i.e. ASP.NET Login Testing with JMeter guide for example configuration and associated correlations.
If you need to simulate N authenticated users and X unauthenticated ones you could use Throughput Controller for scenario distribution.
Answer is Yes and To a Large extent Yes.
Yes, Because it can be done for Web Page Logins and as Dmitiri said ASP.Net logins also.
Why i am Saying "to a Large Extent" is NTLM and Kerberos Authentication for Logins can be a bit troublesome. Where you need to be sure about the Domain names, the exact details.
Now, it depends where you are being asked for the User's Credentials . Normally for a Simple Web Page login - You Would get the URL from the address bar and you need to pass that.
For NTLM and Kerberos ones, you need to do some research so as to where you are getting authenticated and grab hold of that page.
We did for NTLM one and the login and authentication pages were different.
I've got an internal web app for my company that uses a login with google authentication system. It's working well for the most part, they can authenticate with google, give consent for my app to access basic user details, and then when they are returned to my app, I can indeed get their user details.
The issue is that I thought once they give consent they wouldn't have to do it each time. Is this an incorrect assumption? As it is now, each time they click the "login with google" they must give consent rather than being redirected back to my app.
I'm using PHP (codeigniter) and a pretty good Oauth lib found on github (fork of phil sturgeon's library). Is there some param I should be passing so the user doesn't have to give consent every time, after the first time?
Google login does not require user consent every time. If you're using OAuth2 Login procedure, you should be able to login a second time w/o re-approvals: https://developers.google.com/accounts/docs/OAuth2Login
In some contexts, however, it is possible for auto-approval to become disabled, with the subsequent requirement of user consent on every login.
The first and most common case is if your application explicitly requests Google to prompt for consent everytime. Check if your authorization request (which you may have copied from an example or sample code) includes 'prompt=consent' or the older, non-standard form 'approval_prompt=force'. Removing these parameters (if present), will likely cause auto-approval to start working.
Another situation is if your redirect URL is based on 'localhost' or some other URL that does not belong to the global DNS namespace. In this case, for security reasons, Google sets a cookie on the user's computer, in the accounts.google.com domain, to signal that the user authorized _this_device_ to login to 'foo' on localhost (or local domain); Google will only auto-approve w/o consent a 2nd request if it finds the cookie. The reason is that the meaning of 'localhost' (or local domain, or other URL not built on global DNS namespace) is device-dependent, and allowing the authorization to apply across devices could introduce security risks. So if your company has configured browsers to clear all cookies on exit, and you use a non-absolute URL, you could see your users having to consent everytime. The solution is either to host your endpoint on an Internet-valid hostname (the host doesn't need to be accessible from outside the Intranet, just the hostname needs to be globally valid), or you need to exempt accounts.google.com from the cookie clearing policy.