We're having a problem with polymorphism & STI in Ruby
Our database has two tables: 'account' and 'list'. 'list' has columns 'account_id', 'type', 'description'.
Our classes look like so:
class Account < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :lists
has_many :subscription_lists
has_many :email_lists
end
class List < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :account
end
class SubscriptionList < List
end
class EmailList < List
end
Inside Account, methods email_lists and subscription_lists work exactly as expected. Our goal is we want to be able to call lists which will return an array of all lists. Currently, that doesn't work, nor does self.lists
Oddly, Account.find(self.id).lists DOES give us an array of all the lists associated.
What gives? How do we fix this?
You can use List.all which will return an ActiveRecord::Relation of all List objects, regardless of type.
Additionally, you can use #instance_variable.lists on any instance variable of Account
What's more, you could use a query on a class method to accomplish the job, like so, which will also return an ActiveRecord::Relation:
List.where('account_id = ?', id)
Lastly, your Account association with List should not include the children of List:
class Account < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :lists, inverse_of: :account, dependent: :destroy
end
Related
I have a problem or dilemma after implementing polymorphic association following this: All the code is located here,
I have implemented this model:
Let's suppose that I also need the subscription to magazines. It will also be something similar to the other two
class Magazines < ApplicationRecord
has_many :subscriptions, as: :subscribable
end
class User < ApplicationRecord
has_many :subscriptions
has_many :podcasts, through: :subscriptions, source: :subscribable, source_type: 'Podcast'
has_many :newspapers, through: :subscriptions, source: :subscribable, source_type: 'Newspaper'
has_many :magazines, through: :subscriptions, source: :subscribable, source_type: 'Newspaper'
end
class Subscription < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :subscribable, polymorphic: true
belongs_to :user
end
It works well, the problem now is ok I can handle like three types of subscription
MagazineSubscription, PodcastSubscription and NewspaperSubscription. The three have the same attributes and same behaviour, but belongs to different model. What happens If after doing that I need some kind of MTI or STI with the subscription classes. i.e. the MagazineSubscription have different behaviour and maybe other attributes. There is an easy way on this to accomplish this new requirement like creating a Subscription class that handles all that the polymorphic association and the other models:
class Subscription < ActiveRecord::Base
self.inheritance_column = :sti_subscription
belongs_to :subscribable, polymorphic: true
belongs_to :user
def _type=(sType)
sti_subscrition = sType.to_s.classify.constantize.base_class.to_s + "Subscription"
super(sType.to_s.classify.constantize.base_class.to_s)
end
end
class MagazineSubscription < Subscription
# new behaviour here
end
or I must follow something similar to this with the Subscription class handling two polymorphic relations, with the subscribable and his descendants
So my question is when I have used polymorphic association is an easy way to use that to set STI or MTI, or I need to make a new approach
I have two ActiveRecord models:
class Class < ActiveRecord::Base
(...)
has_many :class_to_teacher, dependent: :destroy
end
class Teacher < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :classes,
through: :class_to_teacher
end
class ClassToTeacher < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :klass
belongs_to :teacher
end
When I remove Class I don't remove it completly only I remove record from ClassToTeacher record. I need to keep this data:
def leave(class, teacher)
teacher.klasses.delete(class)
end
Now I have to get all associated classes (classes which contains record in ClassToTeacher). How to do this the best? Thanks for all answers.
You should try something like that:
Class.includes(:class_to_teacher).where('class_to_teacher.id is not null').references(:class_to_teacher).all
Assuming that you have an 'id' field in your database for the ClassToTeacher
I guess there's a lot of ways to get there but the simplest one is probably this:
Klass.where(id: KlassToTeacher.select(:klass_id))
This will result in a single query with a sub-query. Note that I changed the names of the models because Class is already defined in Ruby and you're just asking for trouble.
Is it possible to access objects more than one model away?
For example let's say I have
class Contact <ActiveRecord:Base
has_many :interactions
end
class Interaction <ActiveRecord:Base
belongs_to :contact
belongs_to :course_presentation
end
class CoursePresentation <ActiveRecord:Base
has_many: interactions
belongs_to :course
end
class Course <ActiveRecord:Base
has_many :course_presentations
end
Right now I know I could write a through relationship via contacts to course presentations and then get all the course related to all the course presentations or I could do
contact.interactions.map{ |i| i.course_presentation.course }
I would like to be able to pull courses related to a contact directly so ... e.g.
contact.courses
Is this possible?
Yes, I believe so. Just add the following:
class Contact < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :interactions
has_many :course_presentations, through: :interactions
has_many :courses, through: :course_presentations
end
I have two simple models:
class Push < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :opened_pushes
end
class OpenedPush < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :push, :counter_cache => true
end
However, if I do
a_push.opened_pushes.count
It queries the db, rather than using opened_push_count column present in Push. I thought it was smart enought to do that...is this how it's suppose to be?
Needed to call size, as opposed to length or count which will generate a query.
I'm trying to figure out the best way to setup my database and models for the following scenario.
A user can like an infinite number of songs.
A song can be liked once by an infinite number of users.
I have these tables:
songs, users, likes etc... Following RoR conventions.
The table named likes has these foreign keys: user_id, song_id. And also a field named 'time' to save a timestamp when the song was liked.
I'm not sure of how to do this, I would like to be able to use code like this in my controllers:
User.find(1).likes.all
This should not return from the likes table, but join the songs table and output all the songs that the user likes.
What are the best practises to achieve this in Ruby on Rails following their conventions?
Unless you need to act specifically on the likes table data, the model itself is probably not necessary. The relationship is easy:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :songs
end
class Song < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :users
end
This will join through the currently non-existent song_users table. But since you want it to join through likes you can change each one to this:
has_and_belongs_to_many :songs, :join_table => 'likes'
If you want to be able to call User.find(1).likes and get songs, then change the user's version to this:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :likes, :join_table => 'likes', :class_name => 'Song'
end
And you could change the songs version to something like this:
class Song < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :liked_by, :join_table => 'likes', :class_name => 'User'
end
This will give you Song.find(1).liked_by.all and give you the users (You could keep it to users if you wanted using the first version)
More details on habtm relationships can be found here: http://apidock.com/rails/ActiveRecord/Associations/ClassMethods/has_and_belongs_to_many
Edit to add
If you want to act on the join table for whatever reason (you find yourself needing methods specifically on the join), you can include the model by doing it this way:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :songs, :through => :likes
has_many :likes
end
class Like < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :song
end
class Song < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :users, :through => :likes
has_many :likes
end
This will let you do User.find(1).songs.all, but User.find(1).likes.all will give you the join data