I'm evaluating TFS Build 2013 for use in a corporate environment.
TFs itself has been running fine for ages, and today I setup the Build components. No problem so far.
I grabbed a fairly simple project from source and created a manually triggered build definition, using the standard defaults.
I ran a test build and hit an issue straight away with a primary reference. The error in the logs is:
C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\12.0\bin\amd64\Microsoft.Common.CurrentVersion.targets(1697,5): warning MSB3245: Could not resolve this reference. Could not locate the assembly "XYZ.dll".
So a bit of back of background on how we store and use references:
We create a root folder for the solution, inside this goes the .sln file and sub directories for the projects as normal. We then add a "References" folder at this level, which holds all of the DLLs required for the project. These are generally DLLs from other in house code libraries, but also certain 3rd party ones (such as the old Enterprise Library DLLs, and anything else we don't get from NuGet).
Each of the projects that require these DLLs reference this folder (and from inspecting the .proj files I can see the link is stored as "..\References\XYZ.dll" etc. This works fine for local builds and nobody has ever had an issue. The reference folder gets checked into TFS and everybody gets a copy. From what I've read through trying to diagnose our issue, this is a fairly common and accepted way to manage references.
So, the build error that I receive is as above. Basically saying the build target can't find the DLL from the References folder. The log goes on to list all of the places it's tried to find it.
Crucially (it would seem) the first line reads:
For SearchPath "{HintPathFromItem}".
Considered "..\References\XYZ.dll", but it didn't exist.
Furthermore it looks in the Framework folder, various default assembly folders, the GAC and so on, none of which (of course) contains it.
So I'm wondering where I've gone wrong. Have I misconfigured one of the build/drop locations? Is there some other convention for referencing required DLLs (bearing in mind our entire company uses the "..\References" folder setup, or is there something else?
I'm fairly new to TFS Build, but I'm by no means new to TFS or Visual Studio
itself. I've spent about an hour or so Googling without finding anyone experiencing the same issue as me, so any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
UPDATE:
The build agent is configured as follows:
Build Agent- working directory:
D:\BuildAgent\$(BuildAgentId)\$(BuildDefinitionPath)
The build definition "Source Settings" have the (I assume) default values of:
Status: Active | Source Control Folder: $/ProjectRoot | Build Agent Folder: $(SourceDir)
Status: Cloaked | Source Control Folder: $/ProjectRoot/Drops | Build Agent Folder:
The references folder is not explicitly configured here, but when I look in the Build Agent's working directory I can see it:
D:\BuildAgent\1\ClientName\SolutionName\src\Dev\Evolution\Source\SolutionName.Solution\References
If I open VS2013 Command Prompt, navigate to the folder that contains the .sln file (and also the References folder) and run "msbuild d:\path\to\Solution.sln" then it builds successfully with no warnings or errors.
Well it turns out this wasn't a fault with TFS at all...
The problematic DLL, although present in the References folder, was not actually checked into TFS.
Right clicking the References folder in VS (added as a "Solution Folder") and selecting to Add Existing Item, then a check in fixed the issue.
So the References folder was being used as you would expect, in the same way that VS uses it. MSBuild worked locally because I had the file in my local folder, but because it wasn't part of the solution it wasn't with the rest of the source.
We have recently taken over a project from an outsourcing company. This project uses Moles and Pex for unit testing, but since we have not had the project for long, I am not very familiar with the frameworks.
That being said, we are busy upgrading this project to run in .Net 4. I have resolved most of the issues that have jumped out, but there is one that I cannot get a handle on. Some of the unit tests cannot compile because of the error:
Could not load file or assembly 'Example.Assembly, Version=0.0.0.0,
Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null' or one of its dependencies. The
system cannot find the file specified.
The part that baffles me is that it is a project reference and the assembly is being copied to the output directory of the unit test. Most of the other project references are found and I cannot spot any difference between the ones that work and the ones that do not. I am not sure if this problem has to do with the pex/moles frameworks, but I thought I would mention it.
I have tried the usual things of removing and adding all the references and regenerating the moles assemblies.
Has anyone else run into this problem? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
EDIT1: Ok, after some more investigation into the build output, it appears as if it is not moles, but the .accessor files that are not generated correctly. I get the exact same problem as asked in Unit test project cannot find assembly under test (or dependencies), but unlike his problem, mine does not go away after deleting the accessor.
EDIT2: Turns out is is a program called Publicize.exe which falls over with that error. Still no idea why though. Looking at Fusion logs is looks like it does not search under the working directory for the dll that it is trying to generate the accessors for. Running it manually on a bunch of assemblies from our solution, I find it works on some, but not on others. I have not been able to identify a difference between the ones that work and the ones that don't, though.
Thanks
Ah, yes. I have read this story many times, and have the tee shirt. I run through my usual Moles first-aid kit, when encountering any issue, including this one.
Perhaps, this question will provide some help: Am I the only one getting "Assembly Not Available in the Currently Targeted Framework"?
Ensure the Moles framework is properly installed on the workstation and/or build server
Ensure the Moles assemblies are being built (see the excluded "Moles Assemblies" directory)
Check your build profile -- it may need to be set to full framework profile
Triple check your output destinations and post-build commands -- I have seems some solutions that copy the output to another location
Try using the Visual Studio Pex/Moles extension, if you are not already doing so
An invasive fix-all process is to simply create an all-new solution, projects, and test projects, and then copy the existing code files into them. It's surprising how many issues can be resolved for various project-related errors. Basically, a hard reboot for the entire solution.
Since you are updating to .NET 4, you may as well go to 4.5, and used the productized version of Moles, called "Fakes". You'll find Fakes in the Visual Studio 2012 release candidate. This significant feature hasn't received much attention.
I opened up VS today to find this error waiting for me when I built my project. I hadn't changed anything since yesterday, when it was working just fine.
Unable to load arguments for the XmlPeek task. One of XmlContent or XmlInputPath arguments must be set.
Of course this error has no line associated with it or anything else that may be helpful...
The project is in the .NET 4 Framework with Console Output.
Any ideas as to what is going on? I tried googling this of course but the few answered I found had to do with a content pipeline (which this project does not use).
Thanks!
I received this error in case, when I have deleted Content Project of my game. It has been solved by adding correct content reference into the Content References directory.
I had two projects (proj1 and proj2) and each of them had their own content projects (proj1_content and proj2_content). I wanted to have one common content project for both projects, so I had deleted both proj1_content and proj2_content and created new content project called common_content. After that, mentioned error appeared. Solution was to go to Content References directory at each project and Add Content Reference pointing to common_content.
Due to a hardware problem I had to put in a new SSD and re-installed VS. All my projects worked except my XNA in Winforms project. Being rather large (12,000 hand-written lines of code) really didn't want to try the "copy it all in to a new project" solution above. Thought I'd try to see what versions worked. All versions prior to me adding an installer project worked. In fact, the version where I had added, then deleted the installer was broken. So I'm not sure how (or if) the installer broke it but I found one section of the main project file that had a missing entry and it did reference XNA also (all my non-XNA projects build just fine). Note that I have substituted my project's name with a reference to YOUR projects name by using <YourMainProjectName>. If your project is joesgreatproject then use that text in place of <YourMainProjectName> (don't include the <> symbols). I think this was only because the XNA didn't have a content directory and needed a reference to one.
File: <YourMainProjectName>.csproj
<ItemGroup>
<ProjectReference Include="..\< YourMainProjectName>Content\<YourMainProjectName>Content.contentproj">
<Name><YourMainProjectName>Content</Name>
<XnaReferenceType>Content</XnaReferenceType>
</ProjectReference>
</ItemGroup>
I have a visual studio 2010 solution that contains 72 projects and most of them need to link with other projects. The projects contain references to the other projects in properties->Common Properties-> Framework and References. These references are dlls output from the other projects within this solution.
I have been tasked with adding a "d" to the end of each output to differentiate them from other configurations to avoid linker errors when switching between configurations.
So I've renamed all of the output files to projectd.dll, project2d.dll, etc. I have done the same with the import libraries, projectd.lib, project2d.lib etc.
I do a clean rebuild and get an error that says using failed on project.dll. I see that it isn't projectd.dll like I expected it to be. I check properties->Common Properties->Framework and References. All of the references still reference the original dlls, without the "d" extension. The references are common to each configuration, so adding and removing would probably be a bad idea. What is the correct way to go about this task?
Any help is greatly appreciated.
I went with #armel's comment:
I suspect that you changed output file name directly in the linker or librerian, this is not the thing to do, you must change the "Target Name" in General panel.
Thank you armel.
I have a C# project which includes one exe and 11 library files. The exe references all the libraries, and lib1 may reference lib2, lib3, lib4, etc.
If I make a change to a class in lib1 and built the solution, I assumed that only lib1 and the exe would need to be changed. However, all dll's and the exe are being built if I want to run the solution.
Is there a way that I can stop the dependencies from being built if they have not been changed?
Is the key this phrase? "However, all dll's and the exe are being built if I want to run the solution"
Visual Studio will always try to build everything when you run a single project, even if that project doesn't depend on everything. This choice can be changed, however. Go to Tools|Options|Projects and Solutions|Build and Run and check the box "Only build startup projects and dependencies on Run". Then when you hit F5, VS will only build your startup project and the DLLs it depends on.
I just "fixed" the same problem with my VS project. Visual Studio did always a rebuild, even if didn't change anything. My Solution: One cs-File had a future timestamp (Year 2015, this was my fault). I opened the file, saved it and my problem was solved!!!
I am not sure if there is a way to avoid dependencies from being built. You can find some info here like setting copylocal to false and putting the dlls in a common directory.
Optimizing Visual Studio solution build - where to put DLL files?
We had a similar problem at work. In post-build events we were manually embedding manifests into the outputs in the bin directory. Visual Studio was copying project references from the obj dir (which weren't modified). The timestamp difference triggered unnecessary rebuilds.
If your post-build events modify project outputs then either modify the outputs in the bin and obj dir OR copy the modified outputs in the bin dir on top of those in the obj dir.
You can uncheck the build option for specified projects in your Solution configuration:
(source: microsoft.com)
You can can create your own solution configurations to build specific project configurations...
(source: microsoft.com)
We actually had this problem on my current project, in our scenario even running unit tests (without any code changes) was causing a recompile. Check your build configuration's "Platform".
If you are using "Any CPU" then for some reason it rebuilds all projects regardless of changes. Try using processor specific builds, i.e. x86 or x64 (use the platform which is specific to the machine architecture of your machine). Worked for us for x86 builds.
(source: episerver.com)
Now, after I say this, some propeller-head is going to come along and contradict me, but there is no way to do what you want to do from Visual Studio. There is a way of doing it outside of VS, but first, I have a question:
Why on earth would you want to do this? Maybe you're trying to save CPU cycles, or save compile time, but if you do what you're suggesting you will suddenly find yourself in a marvelous position to shoot yourself in the foot. If you have a library 1 that depends upon library 2, and only library 2 changes, you may think you're OK to only build the changed library, but one of these days you are going to make a change to library 2 that will break library 1, and without a build of library 2 you will not catch it in the compilation. So in my humble opinion, DON'T DO IT.
The reason this won't work in VS2005 and 2008 is because VS uses MSBuild. MSBuild runs against project files, and it will examine the project's references and build all referenced projects first, if their source has changed, before building the target project. You can test this yourself by running MSBuild from the command line against one project that has not changed but with a referenced project that has changed. Example:
msbuild ClassLibrary4.csproj
where ClassLibrary4 has not changed, but it references ClassLibrary5, which has changed. MSBuild will build lib 5 first, before it builds 4, even though you didn't mention 5.
The only way to get around all these failsafes is to use the compiler directly instead of going through MSBuild. Ugly, ugly, but that's it. You will basically be reduced to re-implementing MSBuild in some form in order to do what you want to do.
It isn't worth it.
Check out the following site for more detailed information on when a project is built as well as the differences between build and rebuild.
I had this problem too, and noticed these warning messages when building on Windows 7 x64, VS2008 SP1:
cl : Command line warning D9038 : /ZI is not supported on this platform; enabling /Zi instead
cl : Command line warning D9007 : '/Gm' requires '/Zi'; option ignored
I changed my project properties to:
C/C++ -> General -> Debug Information Format = /Zi
C/C++ -> Code Generation -> Enable Minimal Build = No
After rebuilding I switched them both back and dependencies work fine again. But prior to that no amount of cleaning, rebuilding, or completely deleting the output directory would fix it.
I don't think there's away for you to do it out of the box in VS. You need this add-in
http://workspacewhiz.com/
It's not free but you can evaluate it before you buy.
Yes, exclude the non-changing bits from the solution. I say this with a caveat, as you can compile in a way where a change in build number for the changed lib can cause the non built pieces to break. This should not be the case, as long as you do not break interface, but it is quite common because most devs do not understand interface in the .NET world. It comes from not having to write IDL. :-)
As for X projcts in a solution, NO, you can't stop them from building, as the system sees a dependency has changed.
BTW, you should look at your project and figure out why your UI project (assume it is UI) references the same library as everything else. A good Dependency Model will show the class(es) that should be broken out as data objects or domain objects (I have made an assumption that the common dependency is some sort of data object or domain object, of course, but that is quite common). If the common dependency is not a domain/data object, then I would rethink my architecture in most cases. In general, you should be able to create a path from UI to data without common dependencies other than non-behavioral objects.
Not sure of an awesome way to handle this, but in the past if I had a project or two that kept getting rebuilt, and assuming I wouldn't be working in them, I would turn the build process off for them.
Right click on the sln, select configuration manager and uncheck the check boxes. Not perfect, but works when Visual Studio isn't behaving.
If you continue to experience this problem, it may be due to a missing or out of date calculated dependency (like a header) that is listed in your project, but does not exist.
This happens to me especially common after migrating to a new version (for example: from 2012 to 2013) because VS may have recalculated dependencies in the conversion, or you are migrating to a new location.
A quick check is to double-click every file in offending project from solution explorer. If you discover a file does not exist, that is your problem.
Failing a simple missing file: You may have a more complicated build date relationship between source and target. You can use a utility to find out what front-end test is triggering the build. To get that information you can enable verbose CPS logging. See: Andrew Arnott - Enable C++ and Javascript project system tracing (http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vsproject/archive/2009/07/21/enable-c-project-system-logging.aspx). I use the DebugView option. Invaluable tool when you need it.
(this is a C# specific question, but a different post was merged as identical)