I'm used to Spring with xml configuration. With xml, I can have one main implementation and one test implementation for a class, so that the test implementation will be used for JUnit tests, how can I do this with annotations ? Cause it looks like the implementation is already chosen in the "#qualifier" annotation ?
Let's take an example :
<bean id="myService" class="example.Service" />
<bean id="myHibernateDao" class="example.HibernateDao" />
<bean id="myStubDao" class="example.StubDao" />
In xml config, I can have this in src/main/resources :
<bean id="myService" class="example.Service">
<ref="myHibernateDao" />
</bean>
And this in src/test/resources :
<bean id="myService" class="example.Service">
<ref="myStubDao" />
</bean>
How can I do this with annotations, if I have already declared #Qualifier("myHibernateDao") into my service class ?
As explained in the comment above and in spring blog, you can do this via #Profile annotation.
Please find a sample config from the example below,
DataConfig.java
interface DataConfig {
DataSource dataSource();
}
StandaloneDataConfig .java
#Configuration
#Profile("dev")
public class StandaloneDataConfig implements DataConfig {
#Bean
public DataSource dataSource() {
return new EmbeddedDatabaseBuilder().setType(EmbeddedDatabaseType.HSQL)
.addScript("classpath:com/bank/config/sql/schema.sql")
.addScript("classpath:com/bank/config/sql/test-data.sql")
.build();
}
}
JndiDataConfig.java
#Configuration
#Profile("production")
public class JndiDataConfig implements DataConfig {
#Bean
public DataSource dataSource() {
try {
Context ctx = new InitialContext();
return (DataSource) ctx.lookup("java:comp/env/jdbc/datasource");
} catch (NamingException ex) {
throw new RuntimeException(ex);
}
}
}
TransferServiceConfig.java
#Configuration
public class TransferServiceConfig {
#Autowired
DataConfig dataConfig;
#Bean
public TransferService transferService() {
return new DefaultTransferService(accountRepository(), feePolicy());
}
#Bean
public AccountRepository accountRepository() {
return new JdbcAccountRepository(dataConfig.dataSource());
}
#Bean
public FeePolicy feePolicy() {
return new ZeroFeePolicy();
}
}
Setting bean profile to an application context
AnnotationConfigApplicationContext ctx = new AnnotationConfigApplicationContext();
ctx.getEnvironment().setDefaultProfiles("dev");
ctx.register(TransferServiceConfig.class, StandaloneDataConfig.class,
JndiDataConfig.class);
ctx.refresh();
Since the bean profile has been set to Dev, The TransferServiceConfigwill be injected with StandaloneDataConfig
You can basically do the same thing with #Configuration classes.
Production Setup
Let's assume you have many different DAO implementations that might or might not implement a common interface (it doesn't matter). Let's further assume that MyServiceDao is the concrete implementation that your Service class needs.
Write the following configuration classes:
#Configuration
public class MyServiceConfiguration {
#Bean
public Service myService(MyServiceDao dao) {
return new Service(dao);
}
}
-
#Configuration
public class MyProductionServiceDaoConfiguration {
#Bean
public MyServiceDao myServiceDao() {
return new MyServiceDao();
}
}
Methods in #Configuration classes that are annotated with #Bean are eligible for Spring's auto-wiring. In the MyServiceConfiguration above, Spring will use the type of the method parameter to find a matching bean. If you include MyProductionServiceDaoConfiguration when creating the Spring context, this will be the instance of MyServiceDao that myServiceDao() created.
Test Setup
In your tests, you want to replace MyServiceDao with a stub. The stub needs to extend MyServiceDao so that Spring can find the right bean based on types. Let's call the stub MyServiceDaoStub. Whether you create it using a library like Mockito (which can also create stubs, not just mocks) or actually write an extension of MyServiceDao is up to you.
Instead of including MyProductionServiceDaoConfiguration in your Spring configuration, use the following class:
#Configuration
public class MyTestServiceDaoConfiguration {
#Bean
public MyServiceDao myServiceDao() {
return new MyServiceDaoStub();
}
}
In your test use #ContextConfiguration to load the test setup:
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#ContextConfiguration(classes = { MyServiceConfiguration.class, MyTestServiceDaoConfiguration.classs })
public class MyServiceTest {
// your tests
}
Using #Autowired
Spring will also process #Autowired annotations in objects returned from #Bean annotated methods. If your Service looks like this:
public class Service {
#Autowired
private MyServiceDao dao;
// more code
}
you can change the myService() method to:
#Bean
public Service myService() {
return new Service();
}
Related
In xml defined beans you can define two classes like this
<bean id="classA" class="ex.ClassA"/>
<bean id="classB" class="ex.classB"/>
Then in your java implementation you can autowire the constructor of one of the classes in example
public class ClassA {
#autowired
public(ClassB classB){
this.classB = classB;
}
Now how does one do that with java config beans since in example
#Bean
public ClassA classA(){
return new ClassB();
}
#Bean
public ClassB classB(){
return new ClassB()
}
the compiler would warn that Class a does not have any such constructor, how does one do that in java, with autowiring?
Thanks all
See http://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/current/spring-framework-reference/htmlsingle/#beans-java-injecting-dependencies
Note that the ClassB bean is implicitly a singleton. The use of the annotation #Configuration on the Config class ensures that Spring returns the singleton instance of the ClassB bean in the classB() call.
#Configuration
public class Config {
#Bean
public ClassA classA(){
return new ClassA( classB() );
}
#Bean
public ClassB classB(){
return new ClassB();
}
}
Or you may prefer this approach (Spring 4.2.1+ required)
#Configuration
#Import(ClassA.class)
public class Config {
#Bean
public ClassB classB(){
return new ClassB();
}
}
#Component
public class ClassA {
#Autowired
public ClassA(ClassB classB) {
...
}
}
Pass the beans you want as parameters to the #Bean method, or use component scanning to create the dependent bean implicitly.
In Spring XML, I can define a bean that instantiates a class annotated with #Configuration. When I do, that bean is post-processed. Any methods inside that class with #Bean are also added to the container. How do I perform a similar post-processing in JavaConfig?
Here's the XML version:
<bean id="test" class="com.so.Test">
<property name="prop" value="set before instantiating #Beans defined in Test"/>
</bean>
The associated Test class:
#Configuration
class Test {
private String prop;
void setProp(final String prop) {
this.prop = prop;
}
#Bean
NeedThisBean needThisBeanToo() {
return new NeedThisBean(prop);
}
}
If I use Spring XML Config, both test and needThisBeanToo are available in the container. needThisBeanToo is added via a BeanPostProcessor, though I can't recall which one. If I use JavaConfig, only test is available in the container. How do I make needThisBeanToo available to the container? #Import would work, except that prop being set is required for needThisBeanToo to be initialized correctly.
The part that makes all of this complicated is that Test is vended from a library I'm consuming. I don't control Test, nor can I change it. If I drive it from JavaConfig, it would look like this:
#Configuration
class MyConfiguration
{
#Bean
Test test() {
Test test = new Test();
test.setProp("needed to init `needThisBeanToo` and others");
return test;
}
}
The JavaConfig example does not instantiate needThisBeanToo despite it being defined in Test. I need to get needThisBeanToo defined, preferably without doing it myself, since I don't want to copy code I don't own. Delegation isn't attractive, since there are a number of subsequent annotations/scopes defined on needThisBeanToo (and others defined inside Test).
Your problem is is that you're ignoring the #Configuration annotation completely. Why is that?
When code reaches this line Test test = new Test(); it just doesn't do anything with #Configuration. Why? Because annotation is not something that a constructor is aware of. Annotation only marks some meta-data for the class. When spring loads classes it searches for annotations, when you call a constructor of a class, you don't. So the #Configuration is just ignored because you instantiate Test with new Test() and not through spring.
What you need to do is to import Test as a spring bean. Either via XML as you showed in your question OR using #Import. You problem with prop is that the setter isn't called because that's just not the way to do it. What you need to be doing is either do something like that:
#Configuration
class Test {
private String prop = "set before instantiating #Beans defined in Test";
#Bean
NeedThisBean needThisBeanToo() {
return new NeedThisBean(prop);
}
}
Or to create a property in spring (this is a different subject) and inject the value:
#Configuration
class Test {
#Autowired
#Value("${some.property.to.inject}") // You can also use SPeL syntax with #{... expression ...}
private String prop;
#Bean
NeedThisBean needThisBeanToo() {
return new NeedThisBean(prop);
}
}
You can also create a bean of type String and inject it as follows:
#Configuration
class Test {
#Autowired
#Qualifer("nameOfBeanToInject")
private String prop;
#Bean
NeedThisBean needThisBeanToo() {
return new NeedThisBean(prop);
}
}
In the last case you can define your original MyConfiguration with this bean:
#Configuration
#Import(Test.class)
class MyConfiguration
{
#Bean(name = "nameOfBeanToInject")
String test() {
return "needed to init `needThisBeanToo` and others";
}
}
In any case you have to import Test either using #Import or as a normal XML bean. It won't work by calling the constructor explicitly.
Here's a way to handle vended #Configuration classes that require some properties to be set prior to creating their #Beans:
Vended #Configuration class:
#Configuration
class Test {
private String property;
public setProperty(final String property) {
this.property = property;
}
#Bean
PropertyUser propertyUser() {
return new PropertyUser(property);
}
#Bean
SomeBean someBean() {
// other instantiation logic
return new SomeBeanImpl();
}
}
Here's the consuming #Configuration class:
#Configuration
class MyConfig {
#Bean
static String myProperty() {
// Create myProperty
}
/**
* Extending Test allows Spring JavaConfig to create
* the beans provided by Test. Declaring
* Test as a #Bean does not provide the #Beans defined
* within it.
*/
#Configuration
static class ModifiedTest extends Test {
ModifiedTest() {
this.setProperty(myProperty());
}
#Override
#Bean
SomeBean someBean() {
return new SomeBeanCustomImpl(this.propertyUser());
}
}
I'm using JavaConfig to manage and wire Spring beans into my Java app. The Java application is a main method - and basically runs as a batch job, invoked via a bash file. Is there a way that I can use a different (test) config in my main method?
public static void main(String[] args) {
final ApplicationContext context = new AnnotationConfigApplicationContext(ApplicationConfig.class);
// do Stuff
}
I have used the following annotations successfully before in my test classes:
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#ContextConfiguration(classes = { TestConfig.class })
, but this does not work for "main" applications. Short of passing in the Spring context to use as an argument, not sure what I can do here. Thanks
You should be able to use profiles in your actual config class to do what you want as well.
By setting the desired Profile you can "inject" the different beans you want.
Your ApplicationConfig might look like:
#Configuration
#Import({
JndiDataConfig.class,
TestDataConfig.class,
)
public class ApplicationConfig {
...
where TestDataConfig looks (in part) like:
#Configuration
#Profile("test")
public class TestDataConfig {
#Bean
public DataSource dataSource() {
return new EmbeddedDatabaseBuilder()
.setType(EmbeddedDatabaseType.HSQL)
.addScript("classpath:com/bank/config/sql/schema.sql")
.addScript("classpath:com/bank/config/sql/test-data.sql")
.build();
}
}
and where JndiDataConfig looks like:
#Configuration
#Profile("production")
public class JndiDataConfig {
#Bean
public DataSource dataSource() throws Exception {
Context ctx = new InitialContext();
return (DataSource) ctx.lookup("java:comp/env/jdbc/datasource");
}
}
I wonder if there is a way to get #Required working when doing the configuration by annotations. I turned my configuration up-and-down and back again but nothing seems to work for me. I'm using Spring 3.1
My basic configuration looks like this:
#Configuration
public class SpringConfig {
#Bean
public MailSender mailSender() {
MailSender MailSender = new MailSender();
// mailSender.setBean(dlMailSender);
return mailSender;
}
#Bean
public MyBean myBean() {
MyBean myBean = new MyBean();
// setting som props
return myBean;
}
}
MailSender is here:
#Configurable
public class MailSender {
private MyBean myBean;
#Required
public void setMyBean(MyBean myBean) {
this.myBean = myBean;
}
}
I'm testing it with this junit:
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#ContextConfiguration(classes = { SpringConfig.class }, loader = AnnotationConfigContextLoader.class)
public class MailSenderTest {
#Test
public void test_main_beans_exists() {
// when then given
}
}
Thanks for any help
Short answer - this is not even theoretically possible.
When using XML-based, bean definitions with their dependencies are completely managed by application context. Spring is able to check, what is being set and what is not being set.
When using annotation-based configuration, you are setting the dependencies yourself. There is no way how Spring can even know what you are doing with the bean before returning it from the factory method.
If you want to check whether the bean is correctly initialized, use InitializingBean or #PostConstruct and implement self-checking method. Spring is doing this regularly in its own beans.
I am trying to figure out how to get a hold of the OrderRepository so that I can pass it into the constructor of the OrderServiceImpl using Spring's java configuration (I already know how to do it with xml configuration).
#Configuration
#ComponentScan(basePackages = "com.sample.app")
#EnableJpaRepositories("com.sample.app")
#EnableTransactionManagement
public class AppConfig
{
#Bean
public OrderService orderService()
{
return new OrderServiceImpl(orderRepository());
}
#Bean
public OrderRepository orderRepository()
{
return ??? What goes here ???
}
...
}
#Configuration
#ComponentScan(basePackages = "com.sample.app")
#EnableJpaRepositories("com.sample.app")
#EnableTransactionManagement
public class AppConfig {
#Autowired
private OrderRepository orderRepository;
#Bean
public OrderService orderService() {
return new OrderServiceImpl(orderRepository);
}
}
Something like that should work. Or simply put a field inside your OrderServiceImpl which is annotated with #Autowired and remove the constructor which takes an orderRepository. Or rely on component-scanning and remove the #Bean methods all together.
You have a component-scan and #Bean method, you might run into duplicate instances of your service that way (if it is annotated with #Service).