I'm facing a weird problem with Google search , when I search for my website using these keywords "dardasha newspaper" ... I got the expected correct result. my site comes first with site-links included.
https://www.google.com/search?q=dardasha+newspaper&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
But when I search for my website using these keywords "جريدة دردشة", I got the correct result but with no site-links
https://www.google.com/search?q=dardasha+newspaper&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8#q=%D8%AC%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%AF%D8%A9+%D8%AF%D8%B1%D8%AF%D8%B4%D8%A9
Even my website's language is "Arabic" - the second one used for the search. ... Why are the search results different based on used keywords?
The results are expanded to site-links in Google results when you search by website domain or very close.
Your website is www.dardashanewspaper.com and you searched by dardasha newspaper which is the domain name.
Another problem is that Google thinks that dardasha in Arabic is : درداشا not دردشة.
Related
I'm creating an app in javascript in which I need some total number of google results. I tried using Google custom search api but it does not show all the results and the number of results are less than the number of results on google search.
Many people are facing this problem, I have tried some solutions but didn't work for me. I wonder how some sites are able to get exact results for a keyword on google.
me too.
The result is 0 when searchType = image.
enter image description here
I'm curious to know how Market Samurai, Long Tail Pro and other software handle retrieving the top 10 Google search results and not running into limits. It appears that these software packages use the users own Google account. Google Custom Search limits users to 100 queries per day (the free limit) but people tend to do keyword research on hundreds or even thousands of keywords per day and don't pay any additional amounts to Google.
Are they paying extra for this service, are they using a different API (perhaps the Adwords API?) or are they scraping the Google search results page (violation of TOS)? Really would like to know! Thanks.
i have done this in one of my project (in java).
this is very simple, in java there is one library call JSoup by using this library you can send get request to google, for example:
https://www.google.co.in/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=<your url encoded search term>
this will return you an HTML code of google search result with your own term.
using Jsoup u can find specific HTML tag with specific class or id. this concept helps you to extract url link, title and description from google search result.
for working example check here, in that example you can extract google serach result links with custom search term.
i hope this will help you.
I am trying to download google images for a particular search.
Currently, if i have the url, my code will download the first 10 images.
However, my question is: How would i get the url for a particular search on google?
When i look at the url for any search on google, it looks very complicated and it seems hard to understand how the url was created
http://www.google.com/m/search?q=hello&site=images
This URL pulls up the mobile website, which is static and is easier to harvest images off of. All parts of the query are self-explanatory
The &q= part of the url is the actual search string. Note that some characters are converted such as space becoming plus etc.
Easy enough to fake by doing https://www.google.com/search?q=a+search
For image search https://www.google.com/search?q=a+search&tbm=isch
"Sounds like" based on Soundex or Metaphone is not uncommon option for proprietary full text search in databases ( Oracle, MS SQL Server ) or open source search engines such as Lucene.
I have a difficulty using Google :) to find out whether anything similar does exist for advanced Google search. Regarding wildcard search it seems to be implied only ( by stemming which doesn't always produce everything we want as if it were a wildcard ) , but what about "sounds like". Is anything similar available only at Google App level , but not at Google website itself ?
Google has a spell-checking algorithm, which includes sounds-like, typos, and common misspellings. It usually shows the corrected spelling as the "Did You Mean" link at the top of the results page, and sometimes it automatically shows the search results of the suggested spelling as well, as in: http://www.google.com/search?q=haskel+programing+language.
I've been using usenet searches since about 1995 to get programming information, mostly for microsoft APIs. First searching via dejanews, and now google "groups" which bought out dejanews. Over the last few years I've noticed a steady decline in the quantity of search results for usenet from google, and today I find I'm completely unable to get a working usenet search on their advanced group search page. I'm used to searching on "microsoft.*" sometimes suplemented with "microsoft" or "microsoft*". Just try to find a post from 1996-1998 time period on "database" in either the comp.* or microsoft.* hierarchies, and if you can do it, please show your search expression. There should be thousands of results.
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?safe=off&q=database+group%3Amicrosoft*&btnG=Rechercher&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1996&as_maxd=1&as_maxm=1&as_maxy=1999&as_drrb=b&sitesearch=
seems to work nicely... 994 results (no thousands but still...)
It appears to be problem with the advanced search form. I can't get the one at
http://groups.google.fr/advanced_search?hl=fr&q=&hl=fr&
to work either. But I can use the basic form with "database group:microsoft*" and I get many results as expected.
http://www.google.ca/groups/search?safe=off&q=database+group%3Acomp.*&btnG=Search&sitesearch=
returns 3,000 results
The advanced search isn't working for me either:
Broken advanced search results URL
However, removing lr=selected from the query string in that URL makes it work, for some reason:
Working advanced search results URL
In fact, hitting the search button again on the broken advanced search results page will return those results as well for me.
Or actually, it's only partly working, since entering multiple comma-separated groups in the advanced search form (or using the group: search operator) doesn't quite work as expected and ends up adding all the words in the additional group names as search keywords too.
You could try learning Julian dates and use the daterange search operator:
Search results using daterange: