Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm currently doing a research on developing a web based ontology editor. I need to validate that the ontology edited by my tool is consistent and infer knowledge properly. Also, I would like to get some general statistics regarding the ontology. Is there an ontology validator tool available online which I can use for this requirement? OWL 2 Validator and OWL Metrics don't seem to be working anymore.
http://mowl-power.cs.man.ac.uk:8080/validator
http://mowl-power.cs.man.ac.uk:8080/metrics
Both those tools are just simple web apps using OWLAPI code to carry out the validation. See Profiles in OWLAPI for how to validate an ontology against a profile, and OWLReasoner for ways to test that an ontology is consistent. The second step will also require an OWLReasoner implementation to provide the reasoning services. There are numerous Open Source reasoners, e.g., FaCT++, Pellet, Hermit, Konclude, JFact, and various others that can interface with OWLAPI. See ORE for the most recent competition comparing these reasoners for performance.
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 28 days ago.
Improve this question
Ruby has types through RBS or Sorbet. What's the best way to autogenerate/sync Typescript Types with Ruby Types?
The pain point that I am trying to solve is avoiding bugs caused by misalignments between Front-End (Typescript) and Back-End (Ruby) types.
The ideal workflow is something like this (but does not have to be exactly the same):
I write Ruby back-end code with types.
I run a command to generate corresponding Typescript Types.
I write Typescript front-end code with these generated types.
Note: I'm looking for a solution that is easy to apply to a non-Rails application.
The best that I could find is this https://github.com/mugi-uno/rbs2ts. What are other alternative solutions?
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I am looking for library which can auto tag persons on a photo. The features is similar to Facebook, Picasa or iPhoto tagging function. Preferably it's able to run on Linux server, callable through PHP and Python. Any recommendation? Thanks.
With regard to what you're looking for, you probably aren't going to find anything that you can host on your own server. Rather, most companies will offer an API to which you can send requests, and you will be charged base don how much you use the API. In no particular order, here are several resources you might consider using.
https://lambdal.com/face-recognition-api - They have low priced entry options, and they are well-suited to detecting and recognizing new faces.
http://www.alchemyapi.com/products/alchemyvision/face-detection - This is more geared to recognizing famous or well-know people.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I am looking for a documentation generator that does not require using comments and/or annotations to the code. Ideally, it would just outline all classes methods, functions, etc... in a manner similar to what is available in the Object Browser.
Every .NET documentation generator that I'm aware of works fine even without any comments in code. You didn't specify the language. If it's C# or VB .NET, you can try our VSdocman (I'm one of its developers). It can generate documentation for every code element. It doesn't matter if it has a comment or not.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
After searching here, there (Google,...) and everywhere and not finding anything even close I decided to post my question here.
Is there any (online) tool to test (simple(r)) Freemarker templates so as front-end developer I could use it without needing some large (resource hungry and slow) IDE and server (Tomcat) just to see HTML/CSS/JS generated at the end?
For example:
define back-end data (strings, arrays, objects,...),
write freemarker logic (syntax checked automatically),
run and see final results
Or everybody just loves deployment (or buys JRebel...)?
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
I have spent most of my development career writing backend code, or front-end apps for used as daily business tools, by at least semi-skilled staff, e.g. order-tracking, sales capture, etc. That those I helped build peformed their tasks well is comfort enough, but I am still seeking excellence in the building of these kind of apps, versus the trendy emphasis on more personal relationships with the UI.
Can anyone recommend reading on this type of application (LOB?) on the web today? Any available examples to study?
I suggest that you read Don't Make me Think. Don't think that engaging UIs are not efficient. I would suggest the opposite.
Actually this answer has many useful links.