I am comparing two json content or objects in ruby+cucumber like this
but when i compare, it does not ignores the order of content if it varies. I know this statement compares as two strings. So is there anyway i can compare two json objects by ignoring its order sequence?
expect(#act_resp_excl_key).to eq(exp_data_excl_key)
Adding little more information with above details. i have two json document like below.
json1 = {
"entries" = > [{
"doingBusinessAsName" = > "KROGER FOODS",
"legalName" = > "Kroger-Corps"
}
]
}
json2 = {
"entries" = > [{
"legalName" = > "Kroger-Corps"
"doingBusinessAsName" = > "KROGER FOODS",
}
]
}
When i compare these two json in ruby+cucumber, i get the result as failure. But logically it is same and i should get pass. I use the above comparison statement to validate two jsons.
#tgf,
I used the statement which you specified, but still my comparison fails. could you please help me what could be the issue?
expect(JSON.parse(#act_resp_excl_key)).to eq JSON.parse(exp_data_excl_key)
If the data is simply JSON in a string (please post example of data) you can just parse it to a ruby hash and compare that.
require 'json'
JSON.parse(#act_resp_excl_key).class => Hash
Then assert the two hashes are equal:
expect(JSON.parse(#act_resp_excl_key)).to eq JSON.parse(exp_data_excl_key)
This works even if the order is different.
Your commas are not in the correct locations for json2.
> json1 = { "entries" => [{ "doingBusinessAsName" => "KROGER FOODS", "legalName" => "Kroger-Corps" } ] }
=> {"entries"=>[{"doingBusinessAsName"=>"KROGER FOODS", "legalName"=>"Kroger-Corps"}]}
> json2 = { "entries" => [{ "legalName" => "Kroger-Corps", "doingBusinessAsName" => "KROGER FOODS" } ] }
=> {"entries"=>[{"legalName"=>"Kroger-Corps", "doingBusinessAsName"=>"KROGER FOODS"}]}
> json1==json2
=> true
Related
I have a JSONB payload in my database. This payload is from a GraphQL query of the shopify_api.
For the shop_order below, I am trying to query for the name of the fourth order in the node.
shop_order = {"data":{"orders":{"edges":[{"node":{"id":"gid://shopify/Order/2228134674512","name":"#1001","createdAt":"2020-05-01T18:46:04Z","shippingAddress":{"address1":"1234 Long Avenue, 2N","address2":"","city":"Chicago","province":"Illinois","provinceCode":"IL","zip":"55555"}}},{"node":{"id":"gid://shopify/Order/2239643451472","name":"#1002","createdAt":"2020-05-05T14:40:36Z","shippingAddress":{"address1":"1234 Long Avenue","address2":"2N","city":"Chicago","province":"Illinois","provinceCode":"IL","zip":"55555"}}},{"node":{"id":"gid://shopify/Order/2239950323792","name":"#1003","createdAt":"2020-05-05T16:35:38Z","shippingAddress":{"address1":"1234 Long Avenue","address2":"2N","city":"Chicago","province":"Illinois","provinceCode":"IL","zip":"55555"}}},{"node":{"id":"gid://shopify/Order/2239959105616","name":"#1004","createdAt":"2020-05-05T16:38:27Z","shippingAddress":{"address1":"1234 Long Avenue","address2":"2N","city":"Chicago","province":"Illinois","provinceCode":"IL","zip":"55555"}}}]}},"casted_data":{},"errors":[]}
order = shop_order[:data][:orders][:edges][3]
puts order
response > {:node=>{:id=>"gid://shopify/Order/2239959105616", :name=>"#1004", :createdAt=>"2020-05-05T16:38:27Z", :shippingAddress=>{:address1=>"1234 Long Avenue", :address2=>"2N", :city=>"Chicago", :province=>"Illinois", :provinceCode=>"IL", :zip=>"55555"}}}
order_to_a = shop_order[:data][:orders][:edges][3].to_a
puts order_to_a
response > node
{:id=>"gid://shopify/Order/2239959105616", :name=>"#1004", :createdAt=>"2020-05-05T16:38:27Z", :shippingAddress=>{:address1=>"1234 Long Avenue", :address2=>"2N", :city=>"Chicago", :province=>"Illinois", :provinceCode=>"IL", :zip=>"55555"}}
How do I query and display a specific value from a key that is inside a node?
It's not entirely clear what your intent is, but your access of elements in a hash can be streamlined using dig:
shop_order = {
"data": {
"orders": {
"edges": [
{}, {}, {}, {
"node": {
"name": '#1004',
"shippingAddress": {
"zip": '55555'
}
}
}
]
}
}
}
Access data using:
order = shop_order.dig(:data, :orders, :edges)[3]
# => {:node=>{:name=>"#1004", :shippingAddress=>{:zip=>"55555"}}}
or:
order = shop_order.dig(:data, :orders, :edges, 3)
# => {:node=>{:name=>"#1004", :shippingAddress=>{:zip=>"55555"}}}
How do I query and display a specific value from a key that is inside a node?
Huh? If you want information inside order, do the same sort of thing:
order.dig(:node, :name) # => "#1004"
order.dig(:node, :shippingAddress, :zip) # => "55555"
or:
shop_order.dig(:data, :orders, :edges, 3, :node, :name) # => "#1004"
shop_order.dig(:data, :orders, :edges, 3, :node, :shippingAddress, :zip) # => "55555"
Many times when we're walking through a complex hash of arrays we point to the array in a variable and then work from that point. It's similar to putting your finger on a page in a recipe, so we can go back to it quickly. We do the same when parsing HTML/XML, parsed JSON and YAML, etc.
I'm trying to make a classified text, and I'm having problem turning
(class1 (subclass1) (subclass2 item1 item2))
To
(class1 (subclass1 item1) (subclass2 item1 item2))
I have no idea to turn text above to below one, without caching subclass1 in memory. I'm using Perl on Linux, so any solution using shell script or Perl is welcome.
Edit: I've tried using grep, saving whole subclass1 in a variable, then modify and exporting it to the list; but the list may get larger and that way will use a lot of memory.
I have no idea to turn text above to below one
The general approach:
Parse the text.
You appear to have lists of space-separated lists and atoms. If so, the result could look like the following:
{
type => 'list',
value => [
{
type => 'atom',
value => 'class1',
},
{
type => 'list',
value => [
{
type => 'atom',
value => 'subclass1',
},
]
},
{
type => 'list',
value => [
{
type => 'atom',
value => 'subclass2',
},
{
type => 'atom',
value => 'item1',
},
{
type => 'atom',
value => 'item2',
},
],
}
],
}
It's possible that something far simpler could be generated, but you were light on details about the format.
Extract the necessary information from the tree.
You were light on details about the data format, but it could be as simple as the following if the above data structure was created by the parser:
my $item = $tree->{value}[2]{value}[1]{value};
Perform the required modifications.
You were light on details about the data format, but it could be as simple as the following if the above data structure was created by the parser:
my $new_atom = { type => 'atom', value => $item };
push #{ $tree->{value}[1]{value} }, $new_atom;
Serialize the data structure.
For the above data structure, you could use the following:
sub serialize {
my ($node) = #_;
return $node->{type} eq 'list'
? "(".join(" ", map { serialize($_) } #{ $node->{value} }).")"
: $node->{value};
}
Other approaches could be available depending on the specifics.
I'm receving events in Logstash containing measurement, values and tags. I do not know ahead of time what field there are and what tags. So i wanted to do something like this:
input {
http {}
}
filter {
ruby {
code => '
tags = event.get("stats_tags").split(",")
samples = event.get("stats_samples").split(" ")
datapoints = {}
samples.each {|s|
splat = s.split(" ")
datapoints[splat[0]] = splat[1]
}
event.set("[#metadata][stats-send-as-tags]", tags)
event.set("[#metadata][stats-datapoints]", datapoints)
'
}
}
output {
influxdb {
host => "influxdb"
db => "events_db"
measurement => measurement
send_as_tags => [#metadata][stats-send-as-tags]
data_points => [#metadata][stats-datapoints]
}
}
But this produce error. After much googling to no avail i'm starting to think this is imposible.
Is there a way to pass hash and array from event field to output/filter configuration?
EDIT: If i doublequote it, the error i'm getting is
output {
influxdb {
# This setting must be a hash
# This field must contain an even number of items, got 1
data_points => "[#metadata][stats-datapoints]"
...
}
}
I am doing an mongodb aggregation using mongoid, using ModleName.collection.aggregate(pipeline) . The value returned is an array and not a Mongoid::Criteria, so if a do a first on the array, I get the first element which is of the type BSON::Document instead of ModelName. As a result, I am unable to use it as a model.
Is there a method to return a criteria instead of an array from the aggregation, or convert a bson document to a model instance?
Using mongoid (4.0.0)
I've been struggling with this on my own too. I'm afraid you have to build your "models" on your own. Let's take an example from my code:
class Searcher
# ...
def results(page: 1, per_page: 50)
pipeline = []
pipeline <<
"$match" => {
title: /#{#params['query']}/i
}
}
geoNear = {
"near" => coordinates,
"distanceField" => "distance",
"distanceMultiplier" => 3959,
"num" => 500,
"spherical" => true,
}
pipeline << {
"$geoNear" => geoNear
}
count = aggregate(pipeline).count
pipeline << { "$skip" => ((page.to_i - 1) * per_page) }
pipeline << { "$limit" => per_page }
places_hash = aggregate(pipeline)
places = places_hash.map { |attrs| Offer.new(attrs) { |o| o.new_record = false } }
# ...
places
end
def aggregate(pipeline)
Offer.collection.aggregate(pipeline)
end
end
I've omitted a lot of code from original project, just to present the way what I've been doing.
The most important thing here was the line:
places_hash.map { |attrs| Offer.new(attrs) { |o| o.new_record = false } }
Where both I'm creating an array of Offers, but additionally, manually I'm setting their new_record attribute to false, so they behave like any other documents get by simple Offer.where(...).
It's not beautiful, but it worked for me, and I could take the best of whole Aggregation Framework!
Hope that helps!
I have a model with several embedded models. I need to query for a record to see if it exists. the issue is that I will have to include reference to multiple embedded documents my query would have to include the following params:
{
"first_name"=>"Steve",
"last_name"=>"Grove",
"email_addresses"=>[
{"type"=>"other", "value"=>"steve#stevegrove.com", "primary"=>"true"}
],
"phone_numbers"=>[
{"type"=>"work_fax", "value"=>"(720) 555-0631"},
{"type"=>"home", "value"=>"(303) 555-1978"}
],
"addresses"=>[
{"type"=>"work", "street_address"=>"6390 N Main Street", "city"=>"Elbert", "state"=>"CO"}
],
}
How can I query for all the embedded docs even though some fields are missing such as _id and associations?
A few things to think about.
Are you sure the query HAS to contain all these parameters? Is there not a subset of this information that uniquely identifies the record? Say (first_name, last_name, and an email_addresses.value). It would be silly to query all the conditions if you could accomplish the same thing in less work.
In Mongoid the where criteria allows you to use straight javascript, so if you know how to write the javascript criteria you could just pass a string of javascript to where.
Else you're left writing a really awkward where criteria statement, thankfully you can use the dot notation.
Something like:
UserProfile.where(first_name: "Steve",
last_name: "Grove",
:email_addresses.matches => {type: "other",
value: "steve#stevegrove.com",
primary: "true"},
..., ...)
in response to the request for embedded js:
query = %{
function () {
var email_match = false;
for(var i = 0; i < this.email_addresses.length && !email_match; i++){
email_match = this.email_addresses[i].value === "steve#stevegrove.com";
}
return this.first_name === "Steve" &&
this.last_name === "Grove" &&
email_match;
}
}
UserProfile.where(query).first
It's not pretty, but it works
With Mongoid 3 you could use elem_match http://mongoid.org/en/origin/docs/selection.html#symbol
UserProfile.where(:email_addresses.elem_match => {value: 'steve#stevegrove.com', primary: true})
This assumes
class UserProfile
include Mongoid::Document
embeds_many :email_addresses
end
Now if you needed to include every one of these fields, I would recommend using the UserProfile.collection.aggregate(query). In this case you could build a giant hash with all the fields.
query = { '$match' => {
'$or' => [
{:email_addresses.elem_match => {value: 'steve#stevegrove.com', primary: true}}
]
} }
it starts to get a little crazy, but hopefully that will give you some insight into what your options might be. https://coderwall.com/p/dtvvha for another example.