Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers.
Edit the question to include desired behavior, a specific problem or error, and the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem. This will help others answer the question.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I want to remove this border inside image with css anyone can help me to solve this.
the image border is object.
example given below:
Thanks..!
you can use clip-path on modern browsers so you wouldn't need to add a wrapper and set the size of the image
Example: http://codepen.io/anon/pen/Gpoamy
img {
-webkit-clip-path: inset(1px 1px 1px 1px);
clip-path: inset(1px 1px 1px 1px)
}
On older browsers (and IE) you could just use clip (although this requires to specify the size of the rectangle and an absolute position)
Otherwise another approach, with a wider support across browsers, might uses an outline (with the same colour of the background) and a negative outline-offset — actually you're overlapping the black border with another one. (tested both on Chrome and Firefox).
Example: http://codepen.io/anon/pen/PPZvKe
img {
outline: 1px #fff solid;
outline-offset: -1px;
}
Of course these examples work when the border width included inside the image is exactly 1px. If your image has a thicker border then change all the values according to the thickness
Although I recommend using an image editor to remove the borders, there is a CSS hack for this:
Negative margins:
Wrap the image inside a container and set overflow: hidden after
defining the dimensions(width and height). Make sure the dimensions are slightly less than the image dimensions.
Set negative margins for the image inside. The margin value is relative to the size of the border.
.borderless-img {
width: 118px;
height: 58px;
overflow: hidden;
}
.borderless-img img {
margin: -1px 0 0 -1px;
}
<div class="borderless-img">
<img src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/dcnpS.jpg" />
</div>
Scaling image:
This method will increase the size of the image, might distort it to a very little extent. It works well for your solution since it would remove the small border.
Cons: Not recommended to hide big part of images.
.borderless-img {
width: 118px;
height: 58px;
overflow: hidden;
}
.borderless-img img {
transform: scale(1.055);
}
<div class="borderless-img">
<img src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/dcnpS.jpg" />
</div>
Related
MAJOR EDIT: Okay I just realize there are a hundred different cases where you'd want to do what I want but using different rules, so I will have to describe my specific case. Basically I am using this image popup (code here)
If you squeeze down the size of the window when a popup is on, you will notice the popup does not shrink to fit the window, which gives a poor user experience notably on landscape mode on your smartphone
I want my popup to shrink according to the two dimensions of the screen, without changing the aspect ratio of the image. (keeping it squared)
So far I have made these changes:
.focus {
z-index: 10;
max-width: 500px;
max-height: 500px;
display: none;
}
.focus.enabled .container {
max-width: 500px;
max-height: 500px;
}
If you try there using firebug, it makes the image responsive when shrinking width, but not when shrinking height of the window... how do I make both dimensions responsive, while keeping a good aspect ratio for the image?
----------- Previous question (for historic purpose only): ----------------
I want to keep an element (in that case, a picture) with a max-size of 500x500 strictly within my browser window, all that while keeping its aspect ratio. Here's some html:
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body>
<img src="myimage.png" class="image" />
</body>
</html>
And some css:
.image {
max-height: 500px;
max-width: 500px;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
Now with this css, the image stays within the window, but gets distorted when one of the dimensions of the window gets smaller than 500px. To fix the ratio, I can get rid of one of the two 100% rules:
.image {
max-height: 500px;
max-width: 500px;
height: 100%;
/*width: 100%;*/
}
But then, the ratio is kept indeed, but the image gets cropped when window width gets smaller than 500px! What is a pure and simple css solution to this seemingly basic issue?
This is a good use case for vmin units :
1/100th of the minimum value between the height and the width of the
viewport. (source : MDN)
DEMO
Relevant CSS :
img {
width: 70vmin;
height: 70vmin;
max-width: 500px;
max-height: 500px;
}
The drawback for using these units is browsers support, they are not supported by IE8- (see canIuse for more info)
For IE9 support you need to specify vm instead of vmin example :
width:70vm;
width: 70vmin;
height:70vm;
height: 70vmin;
If you can't use these units, there is no way I am aware of to maintain the aspect ratio of a div with CSS according to height. You can maintaint the aspect ratio of a div according to width using the padding technique described in many post on SO like this one.
For the image, you can use the CSS rules I described in my previous answer but you won't be able to limit the size of the image to an arbitrary amount of pixels.
------PREVIOUS ANSWER------------------
If the natural size of the image is 500x500px, you don't need to specify the 500px max-width/height.
You can use that property for the 100% max-width/height and give width/height the auto attribute to keep the aspect ratio of image and never exceed 100% or 500px width/height :
DEMO
HTML :
<img src="http://lorempixel.com/output/nature-q-c-500-500-5.jpg" alt="" />
CSS :
img {
max-width:100%;
max-height:100%;
width:auto;
height:auto;
}
I was actually wondering if it was possible to mask an image to a circular shape with the use of a single pseudo element, which is the image itself? Let's say it's a rectangle image (not square) and you want to have it masked to a circular shape, without the image being squeezed?
So you'd have:
HTML
<img src="#" class="mask">
CSS
.mask {
A lot of CSS possibilities, up to you
}
I know, with a parent div and using overflow:hidden & border-radius:50% it's possible, but can you do it without the use of a second pseudo element?
Update!
I've noticed that many users seem to think I'm only looking for the CSS code border-radius:50% to create circular shapes, but that's not it. The image should become a circular, not elliptical shape. You can simply use a width and height equal to each other, but then the image becomes squeezed. The answer should contain a none-squeezed image result
The requirement of the solution
- The image should be be a perfect circle, not elliptical
- The image should not be squeezed, no matter the original aspect ratio. Even if you'd use a panorama picture, you'd only see the middle part as an circular shape and the rest hidden.
If you can only use the img tag to produce a mask over itself, then the only work around i can think of is : DEMO
.mask {
width: 0px;
height: 0px;
border-radius: 100%;
background:url(http://placehold.it/300x400) center;/* define position to choose clipped area */
padding:50px;/* this makes a 100px square, so a perfect circle can be made with border-radius */
}
If you can use a wrapper, it can keep the original space used by image and mask can be settled anywhere on top of it via coordonates. DEMO
Markup:
<div class="mask r150 top100 left150">
<img src="http://placehold.it/300x400" />
</div>
CSS:
.mask {
position:relative;
overflow:hidden;
display:inline-block;/* preserve display behavior of initila image to mask*/
box-shadow:0 0 0 1px;/* show where i stands */
}
.mask img {
display:block;/* a way to remove bottom gap*/
}
.mask:before {
content:'';
position:absolute;
border-radius:100%;
box-shadow:0 0 0 2000px white;
}
.r150:before {
height:150px;
width:150px;
}
.top100:before {
top:100px;
}
.left150:before {
left:150px;
}
The use of extra classes can help you to tune different size and mask position.
Here Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/8CuXQ/
Something like this:
.mask {
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
border-radius: 150px;
-webkit-border-radius: 150px;
-moz-border-radius: 150px;
}
I am a novice html/CSS programmer who needs to satisfy a very specific set of circumstances.
I have 2 images, both must be aligned vertically by the center of the image. One image must be left aligned and the other must be right aligned. They will be in a max width div but I don't think that should be an issue. As the webpage is shrunk down below the width of the two pictures together, the images then need to be horizontally centered with one image on top of the other. I have added pictures to clarfiy (sorry I would have added as pictures but I have zero rep). The div container and images will all be variable so positioning based upon pixels is out of the question.
So I researched this a ton, but all answers I've found have been partial; not able to do everything I'm looking for. Any ideas?
(http://imageshack.us/a/img819/9515/3zt.gif)
(http://imageshack.us/a/img14/853/qp8.gif)
Research:
I notice my question was -1'd. I guess not providing my research was the fault? Here's some of the methods I tried to fix this issue:
Vertical alignment of elements in a div
How to vertically align an image inside div
How to vertically middle-align floating elements of unknown heights?
Wrap long HTML tables to next line
Edit #2
Another version, I think this is the cleanest I can think of
live view
edit view
Use a css table and vertical-align:middle for the wide screen view, then collapse the table for narrow viewports. The code is clean and it's completely independant of image heights.
================
Edit
As #user2748350 correctly pointed out, my original suggestion below didn't align images vertically on a wide screen if they were different heights.
Here's a variation which is an improvement using vertical-align: middle and inline images. The only requirement is that you set a line height larger than the tallest image:
live view
edit view
===============================================
Original
See if this helps you:
live view
edit view
HTML
<div class="container">
<img src="http://placehold.it/300x150" class="left">
<img src="http://placehold.it/250x150" class="right">
</div>
CSS
.container{
margin: 0 auto;
max-width:1000px;
}
img.left{
display:block;
float:left;
}
img.right{
display:block;
float:right;
}
#media (max-width: 570px) {
img.left{
float:none;
margin: 0 auto;
}
img.right{
display:block;
float:none;
margin: 0 auto;
}
}
In the head of your page, you also want to add
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
for good display on mobile devices.
Hope this helps!
Here is quick solution
img {
max-height: 100%;
max-width: 90%;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
margin: auto;
}
I'm having trouble trying to get a radius on images. I've simplified my problem and exaggerated the variables for demonstration purposes.
CSS:
div.wrap img {
-moz-border-radius: 50px;
border-radius: 50px;
}
img.pic {
padding: 15px 25px 35px 45px;
}
HTML:
<div class="wrap">
<img class="pic" src="http://i.imgur.com/UAef0.jpg"
width="300" height="300" />
</div>
If I remove the padding, poof, pretty corners.
If it helps, there's a reason why they're in two different classes. "wrap" can have more than one "pic" in it. Sometimes they'll be of the same class, other times they wont, sort like this:
img.left_pic { float:left; padding:5px 10px 5px 5px; }
img.right_pic { float:right; padding:5px 5px 5px 10px; }
Any help or insight would be appreciated.
jsFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/NwfW6/
Edited for a solution:
This was more or less what I basically was trying to do. I think I was having a 'duh' moment. I'm sure now the declaration I needed to used was margin not padding. Another Thanx to GGJ for reminding me how to go about it the right way. And what Jan said about adding padding to an 'img' tag making no sense, It doesn't. My bad.
Your border radius will be outside of the padding, try setting margins instead which will space outside of the border.
Set the padding on "wrap" not on the image (setting paddings on images does not make much sense :)), that should fix your problem.
This is a byproduct of applying both padding and a border-radius to the same element in some browsers (mostly IE and safari). The border-radius changes the curvature of the border component of the box model, which surrounds the padding component.
In addition to the other answers, another interesting thing that seems to fix the issue is adding a border line. If you don't want to see the border, you could use border: 1px solid transparent, like this:
.invisible-border {
border: 1px solid transparent;
}
Demo in jsFiddle
Had the same problem with a span instead of an img. Not exactly the same scenario since both tags have different display values (see this SO thread).
In my case, setting display:inline-block to the span fixed everything.
Late but somehow found the solution for it. you cannot make a circle using it but you can make use of it by making a slight radius below is an example of my solution.
I need 10px padding and 5px radius for my image, added together border-radius:15px worked fine for me
I Hope the explanation was a bit better.
Does anyone know a way to get Firefox to crop the corners if the border radius of an image is set? It's containing element will work fine but I get ugly corners sticking out.
Any way to fix this without setting the image as a background image or processing it before I put it on my site?
Workaround: Set the image as the background of a container element, then add border radius on that element.
Does it not crop if you apply the border radius directly to the img element? There are known issues with -moz-border-radius as far as contained content is concerned.
--edit
OK, it doesn't crop img either. If your image is some sort of png/gif on a solid background you may be able to do something like this:
img {
border: 10px solid white;
-moz-border-radius: 10px;
}
But if you're trying to get rounded corners on a photo then it's not going to work in 3.5.
I think to have the answer but sorry for my english...
I resolved the question putting another div with border and no background color over the image.
#imageContainer {
-webkit-border-radius:10px
-moz-border-radius:10px;
z-index:1;
}
#borderContainer {
position:absolute;
border:1px solid #FFFFFF;
-webkit-border-radius:10px
-moz-border-radius:10px;
z-index:10;
}
Workaround: Set the image as the
background of a container element,
then add border radius on that
element.
This won't work unless the image is exactly the same size of the div. Unless you use the new css property in firefox 3.6 which allows for background image sizing, but hardly anyone is on 3.6 already.
So I agree with Alex, that is if you make the image the size of the div/other elm.
I don't think there is a way to use -moz-border-radius to directly round an image in FireFox. But you can simulate the rounded corners the old fashioned way, with extra markup.
So that looks like this:
<div id="container">
<img src="images/fubar.jpg" alt="situation normal" />
<div class="rounded lt"></div>
<div class="rounded rt"></div>
<div class="rounded lb"></div>
<div class="rounded rb"></div>
</div>
Then the CSS:
#container {position:relative;}
#container img {z-index:0;}
.rounded {position:absolute; z-index:1; width:20px; height:20px;}
.lt {background:url('images/rounded_LT.png') left top no-repeat;}
.rt {background:url('images/rounded_RT.png') right top no-repeat;}
.lb {background:url('images/rounded_LB.png') left bottom no-repeat;}
.rb {background:url('images/rounded_RB.png') right bottom no-repeat;}
The background images of the corners look sort of like a crescent moon, with transparency. This is a negative space technique, where you are allowing the image to show through where the corners have their transparency.
Div corners with PNG-24 backgrounds will work very nicely. If you can deal with the jagginess, you can use GIF backgrounds for IE6, or just remove background image entirely for square corners. Use conditional comments to serve the CSS to IE6.
.round_image_borders {
position:relative; // fix for IE8(others not tested)
z-index:1; // fix for IE8(others not tested)
width:114px;
height:114px;
-moz-border-radius: 15px;
-webkit-border-radius: 15px;
border-radius: 15px;
behavior:url(border-radius.htc); // fix for IE8(others not tested)
}
I got the "border-radius.htc" script from this link:
http://code.google.com/p/curved-corner/
What it does it adds support for round corners for IE8. I also had to set position:relative and z-index, because otherwise the div(and the background image) would show under the desired div container in which the container(round_image_borders) div was put.
This works for:
FF 3.6.16
IE 8
Chrome 12.0
And yes, the image must have the same size as the div with the class round_image_borders. But this workaround is intended to be used with images that all have the same size.
If you use overflow: hidden it won't display the image corners sticking out.
Who knows, they still might be there, just hidden.
img {
overflow: hidden;
-webkit-border-radius: 10px;
-moz-border-radius: 10px;
-o-border-radius: 10px;
-ms-border-radius: 10px;
border-radius: 10px;
}
Firefox does seem to clip a background image, so if you set an h1 background image and apply border-radius to that it will clip. (just verified in FF 3.6.12)