In go image package, i don't see any methods which can be used to compare two images? Is it possible to do image comparison in go similar to ImageMagick?
If you are trying to compare two images and just need to boil it down to a single number, the following will work. This is useful in (for example) genetic algorithms, where you want to compare a set of candidates and choose the one that differs the least from a reference image:
Visit every pixel, break it down into its parts: R, G, B, & A (in go: image.At(x,y).RGBA())
Subtract the RGBA vals from their corresponding pixel vals in the reference image.
Square the differences, add them up.
Take the square root of the total sum.
This number will give you a rough idea of how much the images differ.
If you know that the two images are both instances of image.RGBA (or you can convert them), then you can do something even faster: just grab the bytes directly from RGBA.Pix. That's what I do here, and it's roughly 10x faster than doing img.At(x,y).RGBA() for every pixel pair:
func FastCompare(img1, img2 *image.RGBA) (int64, error) {
if img1.Bounds() != img2.Bounds() {
return 0, fmt.Errorf("image bounds not equal: %+v, %+v", img1.Bounds(), img2.Bounds())
}
accumError := int64(0)
for i := 0; i < len(img1.Pix); i++ {
accumError += int64(sqDiffUInt8(img1.Pix[i], img2.Pix[i]))
}
return int64(math.Sqrt(float64(accumError))), nil
}
func sqDiffUInt8(x, y uint8) uint64 {
d := uint64(x) - uint64(y)
return d * d
}
Try https://github.com/vitali-fedulov/images3. I wrote
this package to be able to find near duplicates. There is a live web-demo with the same algorithm, so you can get an idea how well the package suites your needs.
Inspired by George's answer.
The function below is not so fast, but it allows you to visually assess the difference in images.
func ImgCompare(img1, img2 image.Image) (int64, image.Image, error) {
bounds1 := img1.Bounds()
bounds2 := img2.Bounds()
if bounds1 != bounds2 {
return math.MaxInt64, nil, fmt.Errorf("image bounds not equal: %+v, %+v", img1.Bounds(), img2.Bounds())
}
accumError := int64(0)
resultImg := image.NewRGBA(image.Rect(
bounds1.Min.X,
bounds1.Min.Y,
bounds1.Max.X,
bounds1.Max.Y,
))
draw.Draw(resultImg, resultImg.Bounds(), img1, image.Point{0, 0}, draw.Src)
for x := bounds1.Min.X; x < bounds1.Max.X; x++ {
for y := bounds1.Min.Y; y < bounds1.Max.Y; y++ {
r1, g1, b1, a1 := img1.At(x, y).RGBA()
r2, g2, b2, a2 := img2.At(x, y).RGBA()
diff := int64(sqDiffUInt32(r1, r2))
diff += int64(sqDiffUInt32(g1, g2))
diff += int64(sqDiffUInt32(b1, b2))
diff += int64(sqDiffUInt32(a1, a2))
if diff > 0 {
accumError += diff
resultImg.Set(
bounds1.Min.X+x,
bounds1.Min.Y+y,
color.RGBA{R: 255, A: 255})
}
}
}
return int64(math.Sqrt(float64(accumError))), resultImg, nil
}
func sqDiffUInt32(x, y uint32) uint64 {
d := uint64(x) - uint64(y)
return d * d
}
With two of the current answers here, the images need to be the same size, or the comparison fails. A third answer here uses vitali-fedulov/images, which doesn't have any method to get the
difference between two images, only a Similar function that returns a bool determining if two images are similar. Further, the answer at Rosetta Code also fails if the images are different sizes.
So if I was to implement my own solution, first I would need to scale down the larger image. I found x/image/draw and nfnt/resize for that purpose, but I thought maybe I could find something, to kill two birds with one stone. To that end, I did find some packages that scale the images as needed, take a hash of each, and get the difference of the hashes. Here is corona10/goimagehash:
package main
import (
"github.com/corona10/goimagehash"
"image/jpeg"
"os"
)
func hash(name string) (*goimagehash.ImageHash, error) {
f, err := os.Open(name)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
defer f.Close()
i, err := jpeg.Decode(f)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
return goimagehash.AverageHash(i)
}
Example:
package main
func main() {
a, err := hash("mb.jpg")
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
b, err := hash("hqdefault.jpg")
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
d, err := a.Distance(b)
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
println(d)
}
Related
Used a decimal point of 200 as the precision, I need to calculate a number from atto to decimal number similar screenshot.
To get the values at precision of nano and atto you can use %.9f and %.18f in fmt.Printf() respectively,I created a small program to get your value of 0.000000000000099707 as follows:
package main
import (
"fmt"
"math"
)
func main() {
powr := math.Pow(10, -18)
numb := 99707 * powr
fmt.Println("number", numb)
fmt.Printf("\nthe value in atto %.18f\n", numb)
}
Output:
number 9.970700000000001e-14
the value in atto 0.000000000000099707
You can use the github.com/shopspring/decimal package for this as well. This library can represents numbers up to 2^31 (2147483648) digits. Here is a simple code to do the calculation:
d := decimal.NewFromInt(99707)
d10 := decimal.NewFromInt(10)
dpow := decimal.NewFromInt(-18)
d10pow := d10.Pow(dpow)
dmul := d.Mul(d10pow)
fmt.Println(dmul)
This can simplified to:
d := decimal.NewFromInt(99707).Mul(decimal.NewFromInt(10).Pow(decimal.NewFromInt(-18)))
fmt.Println(d)
Output: 0.000000000000099707
See playground
I was interested in how to do this so I found the apd package from cockroach that handles arbitrary precision calculations. You can use it like this:
import (
"fmt"
"github.com/cockroachdb/apd"
)
func main() {
// 99707 * 10^(-18)
n1 := apd.New(99707, 0)
n2 := apd.New(10, 0)
n3 := apd.New(-18, 0)
c := apd.BaseContext.WithPrecision(200)
res := apd.New(0,0)
ctx, err := c.Pow(res, n2, n3)
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
ctx, err = c.Mul(res, res, n1)
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
fmt.Println(ctx.Inexact(), res.Text('f'))
}
And it will output:
false 0.000000000000099707
You will have to be careful with the loss of precision that may happen and look at the inexact field.
I'm having an issue. Here is my code:
package main
import (
"math/rand"
"image/draw"
"image/png"
"image/color"
"strconv"
"os"
"time"
"fmt"
)
func genSites(width, height int) ([][]int) {
rand.Seed(time.Now().Unix())
l, err := strconv.Atoi(os.Args[len(os.Args)-2])
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
sites := make([][]int, l)
for i := range sites {
sites[i] = make([]int, 2)
sites[i][0] = rand.Intn(width)
sites[i][1] = rand.Intn(height)
}
return sites
}
func main() {
inputF, err := os.Open(os.Args[len(os.Args)-3])
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
defer inputF.Close()
inputR, err := png.Decode(inputF)
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
input := inputR.(draw.Image)
minx, miny := input.Bounds().Min.X, input.Bounds().Min.Y
maxx, maxy := input.Bounds().Max.X-1, input.Bounds().Max.Y-1
sites := genSites(maxx-minx, maxy-miny)
siteColors := make([][]color.Color, len(sites))
//todo: figure out something better than this
for i := range siteColors {
siteColors[i] = make([]color.Color, (maxx-minx)*(maxy-miny))
}
siteBelongs := make([][]int, maxx - minx)
for x := range siteBelongs {
siteBelongs[x] = make([]int, maxy - miny)
for y := range siteBelongs[x] {
dmin := (maxx-minx)*(maxx-minx) + (maxy-miny)*(maxy-miny)
var smin int
for i, s := range sites {
d := (s[0]-x)*(s[0]-x) + (s[1]-y)*(s[1]-y)
if d > dmin {
smin = i
dmin = d
}
}
siteBelongs[x][y] = smin
siteColors[smin] = append(siteColors[smin], input.At(x+minx, y+miny))
}
}
siteAvgColors := make([]color.Color, len(sites))
for i := range siteAvgColors {
var sR, sG, sB, sA int
for _, val := range siteColors[i] {
fmt.Println(val)
r, g, b, a := val.RGBA()
sR += int(r)
sG += int(g)
sB += int(b)
sA += int(a)
}
siteAvgColors[i] = color.RGBA{
uint8(sR/len(siteColors[i])),
uint8(sG/len(siteColors[i])),
uint8(sB/len(siteColors[i])),
uint8(sA/len(siteColors[i]))}
}
for x := range siteBelongs {
for y := range siteBelongs[x] {
input.Set(minx + x, miny + y, siteAvgColors[siteBelongs[x][y]])
}
}
output, err := os.Create(os.Args[len(os.Args)-1])
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
defer output.Close()
err = png.Encode(output, input)
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
}
The error is this:
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x18 pc=0x4b46e1]
goroutine 1 [running]:
main.main()
/home/victor/programs/goprograms/src/v/imagerandvornoi/main.go:71 +0x7a1
Line 71 is the one that says r, g, b, a := val.RGBA(). That val is inserted at line 63, or siteColors[smin] = append(siteColors[smin], input.At(x+minx, y+miny)), which means that input.At is returning nil. Why? How can I fix this?
This has to do with the semantics of the make() builtin within Go. make is special in that it can take two or three arguments:
make(Type, length) or make(Type, length, capacity). For the former, the length and capacity are set to the same value. If you're going to be assigning values to the slice using append, you're going to want to use the latter form. This is because the two argument form (make(Type, 10)) builds a slice with 10 elements in it already with the zero value, when you use append() it becomes the 11th item.
You're hitting a nil derefernece here because you're using the two-argument version of make with append, and so the first item in the slice is nil.
I'm trying to read input from stdin like
3 2 1<ENTER>
and save it in a list of ints. At the moment my code looks like this:
nums = make([]int, 0)
var i int
for {
_, err := fmt.Scan(&i)
if err != nil {
if err==io.EOF { break }
log.Fatal(err)
}
nums = append(nums, i)
}
at the moment the program never leaves the for-loop. I can't find an easy way to check for a newline character in the documentation. how would i do this?
Edit:
Since I know that there will almost certainly be four numbers, I tried the following:
var i0,i1,i2,i3 int
fmt.Scanf("%d %d %d %d\n", &i0, &i1, &i2, &i3)
but this only scanned the first number and then exited the program. I'm not sure if that's because of the z-shell I'm using.
Edit:
To clarify, the program will pause and ask for the user to input a list of n numbers separated by spaces and terminated with a newline. these numbers should be stored in an array.
Ok, I decided to bring out the large bufio hammer and solve it like this:
in := bufio.NewReader(os.Stdin)
line, err := in.ReadString('\n')
if err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
strs := strings.Split(line[0:len(line)-1], " ")
nums := make([]int, len(strs))
for i, str := range strs {
if nums[i], err = strconv.Atoi(str); err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
}
It does seem like an awful lot of code, but it works.
It seems that you want https://golang.org/pkg/fmt/#Fscanln
Something like
ok := func(err error) { if err != nil { panic(err) } }
for {
var i, j, k int
_, err := fmt.Fscanln(io.Stdin, &i, &j, &k)
ok(err)
fmt.Println(i, j, k)
}
I will suggest to use "bufio" package with the "scan()" method.
Following is the code where I'm reading two lines from "stdin" and storing the lines into an array.
Hope this helps you.
package main
import (
"fmt"
"bufio"
"os"
"strconv"
"strings"
)
func ReadInput() []string{
var lines []string
scanner := bufio.NewScanner(os.Stdin)
for scanner.Scan() {
lines = append(lines, scanner.Text())
//count, _ := strconv.Atoi(lines[0])
if len(lines) == 2 { break }
}
if err := scanner.Err(); err != nil {
fmt.Fprintln(os.Stderr, err)
}
return lines
}
func main(){
lines := ReadInput()
count ,_ := strconv.Atoi(lines[0])
num := strings.Fields(lines[1])
if count != len(num) { os.Exit(0) }
// Do whatever you want here
}
Two lines will be accepted. First line will have a count. Second line will have all the numbers. You can modify the same code as per your requirement.
Example:
3
1 5 10
I have a line containing 3 numbers that I want to read from stdin with fmt.Scanln() but this code won't work:
X := make([]int, 3)
fmt.Scanln(X...)
fmt.Printf("%v\n", X)
I get this error message:
cannot use X (type []int) as type []interface {} in function argument
I don't get it.
Idiomatic Go would be:
func read(n int) ([]int, error) {
in := make([]int, n)
for i := range in {
_, err := fmt.Scan(&in[i])
if err != nil {
return in[:i], err
}
}
return in, nil
}
interface{} means nothing. Please don't use it if you don't have to.
For example,
package main
import "fmt"
func intScanln(n int) ([]int, error) {
x := make([]int, n)
y := make([]interface{}, len(x))
for i := range x {
y[i] = &x[i]
}
n, err := fmt.Scanln(y...)
x = x[:n]
return x, err
}
func main() {
x, err := intScanln(3)
if err != nil {
fmt.Println(err)
return
}
fmt.Printf("%v\n", x)
}
Input:
1 2 3
Output:
[1 2 3]
I think the the correct version should be
X := make([]int, 3)
fmt.Scanln(&X[0], &X[1], &X[2])
fmt.Printf("%v\n", X)
This error message occurs b/c there's no reasonable way to convert []int to []interface{}. Note, this is in reference to a slice. So the syntax your using is correct, but fmt.Scanln expects []interface{}. This has implications outside of pkg fmt.
The reason I've seen given for this is due to Go giving you control over memory layout so it currently has no reasonable way to do the slice conversion. This means you'll need to do the conversion manually before passing it to a function expecting the slice of a given type. For example:
package main
import (
"fmt"
)
func main() {
x := make([]int, 3)
y := make([]interface{}, 3)
y[0] = x[0]
y[1] = x[1]
y[2] = x[2]
fmt.Println(y...)
}
Or something a little more general:
x := make([]int, 3)
y := make([]interface{}, len(x))
for i, v := range x {
y[i] = v
}
fmt.Println(y...)
Regarding your specific issue, see the following:
x := make([]*int, 3)
for i := range x {
x[i] = new(int)
}
y := make([]interface{}, 3)
for i, v := range x {
y[i] = v
}
if _, err := fmt.Scanln(y...); err != nil {
fmt.Println("Scanln err: ", err)
}
for _, v := range y {
val := v.(*int)
fmt.Println(*val)
}
I saw in a comment you said the lines can have different lengths. In that case
you can implement your own fmt.Scanner:
package main
import (
"bytes"
"fmt"
)
type slice struct {
tok []int
}
func (s *slice) Scan(state fmt.ScanState, verb rune) error {
tok, err := state.Token(false, func(r rune) bool { return r != '\n' })
if err != nil { return err }
if _, _, err := state.ReadRune(); err != nil {
if len(tok) == 0 {
panic(err)
}
}
b := bytes.NewReader(tok)
for {
var d int
_, err := fmt.Fscan(b, &d)
if err != nil { break }
s.tok = append(s.tok, d)
}
return nil
}
func main() {
var s slice
fmt.Scan(&s)
fmt.Println(s.tok)
}
https://golang.org/pkg/fmt#Scanner
I'm trying to write a short one, which will read a PNG file, and swap one channel with the other (R,G,B) being the possible choices.
I can't find out however, how to extract the integer from the color.Color object returned by image.At(x,y) . Writing it back would probably easier with image.Set(x,y,color) once i can construct the new RGBA color with the swapped channels.
Here I am now (you can pretty much skip to the last loop):
package main
import (
"flag"
"fmt"
//"image"
"image/color"
"image/png"
"os"
)
type Choice struct {
value string
valid bool
}
func (c *Choice) validate() {
goodchoices := []string{"R", "G", "B"}
for _, v := range goodchoices {
if c.value == v {
c.valid = true
}
}
}
func main() {
var fname string
var c1 Choice
var c2 Choice
flag.StringVar(&c1.value, "c1", "", "The color channel to swap - R or G or B ")
flag.StringVar(&c2.value, "c2", "", "The color channel to swap with - R or G or B ")
flag.StringVar(&fname, "f", "", "A .png image (normal map)")
flag.Parse()
c1.validate()
c2.validate()
if c1.valid == true && c2.valid == true {
fmt.Println("We could proceed..")
fmt.Println("Swapping channels:", c1.value, "<->", c2.value, "In", fname) //for testing
} else {
fmt.Println("Invalid channel... Please use R, G or B.")
return
}
file, err := os.Open(fname)
if err != nil {
fmt.Println(err)
return
}
defer file.Close()
pic, err := png.Decode(file)
if err != nil {
fmt.Fprintf(os.Stderr, "%s: %v\n", fname, err)
return
}
b := pic.Bounds()
for y := b.Min.Y; y < b.Max.Y; y++ {
for x := b.Min.X; x < b.Max.X; x++ {
col := pic.At(x, y)
???? How do I swap the channels in col ????
}
}
}
I'm really new to Go and programming in general, so please consider it in your answer. Thank You.
Hmmm, that was harder than I thought it would be - I wonder if anyone can come up with a better idea!
The problem is that you don't know the concrete type that png.Decode returns - it may return any of the image types. You only have an image.Image interface which doesn't have a Set method.
To get round that, first define an interface which all the Image types which can set pixels satisfies
type ImageSet interface {
Set(x, y int, c color.Color)
}
Next see whether pic implements that interface (go will panic if it doesn't - use the picSet, ok form if that bothers you)
// Get an interface which can set pixels
picSet := pic.(ImageSet)
Now your loop looks like this - I only swapped red and green so you can see the idea.
for y := b.Min.Y; y < b.Max.Y; y++ {
for x := b.Min.X; x < b.Max.X; x++ {
col := pic.At(x, y)
r, g, b, a := col.RGBA()
// Swap green and red
newCol := color.RGBA{uint8(g>>8), uint8(r>>8), uint8(b>>8), uint8(a>>8)}
picSet.Set(x, y, newCol)
}
}
I suspect that a high performing version of this would have to use a type switch to determine which image type it was, then have a customized code for each one with uint8s for 24 bit images and uint16s for 48 bit images etc.
Here is the complete working example if you want to have a go. It doesn't work in the playground though - you'll have to download it.
Update: Just noticed your comment. If you know that you have an RGBA image, then you can use a type assertion to get the underlying image which makes things a whole lot easier.
// Get an image.RGBA if it is one
rgba, ok := pic.(*image.RGBA)
if !ok {
fmt.Println("That wasn't an RGBA!")
return
}
for y := b.Min.Y; y < b.Max.Y; y++ {
for x := b.Min.X; x < b.Max.X; x++ {
// Note type assertion to get a color.RGBA
col := rgba.At(x, y).(color.RGBA)
// Swap green and red
col.G, col.R = col.R, col.G
rgba.Set(x, y, col)
}
}