In my spring boot application i configure two different instances of MQQueueConnectionFactory (different id) as it is a need of the application. For that i have added ibm client jars.
I have also added spring-jms dependency in my code as i wanted JmsTemplate etc classes. After adding this dependency, JmsAutoConfiguration finds JmsTemplate in classpath and tries to configure beans. In this process, it tries to inject bean of type ConnectionFactory and this is where the code fails and i start getting the error. Below is the code from JmsAutoConfiguration
#Configuration
#ConditionalOnClass(JmsTemplate.class)
#ConditionalOnBean(ConnectionFactory.class)
#EnableConfigurationProperties(JmsProperties.class)
#Import(JmsAnnotationDrivenConfiguration.class)
public class JmsAutoConfiguration {
#Autowired
private JmsProperties properties;
#Autowired
private ConnectionFactory connectionFactory;
#Autowired(required = false)
private DestinationResolver destinationResolver;
Do i have a facility to switch off JmsAutoconfiguration feature of spring boot by any chance? If not then what is the alternative solution for this?
You can add the auto configurations, which you want to disable, to the SpringBootApplication annotation:
#SpringBootApplication(exclude = JmsAutoConfiguration.class)
FYI, use this to disable ActiveMQ
#SpringBootApplication(exclude = ActiveMQAutoConfiguration.class)
if want to control it via the properties (in this case a application.yml) then you can do something like this.
spring:
autoconfigure:
exclude: org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.jms.JmsAutoConfiguration
In my case it worked after excluding both classes :
#EnableAutoConfiguration(exclude={JmsAutoConfiguration.class, ActiveMQAutoConfiguration.class})
Related
I have seen many great workarounds to create Flyway JavaMigrations and injecting Spring Beans using #DependsOn and ApplicationContextAware (e.g. https://stackoverflow.com/a/48242865/5244937).
However a part of the Flyway 6 documentation claims Dependency Injection would be possible natively for Spring Beans:
https://flywaydb.org/documentation/api/hooks#java-based-migrations-as-spring-beans
https://github.com/flyway/flyway/issues/1062
Is is true? How would this work?
Mark your migrations as #Component and put them in a folder that is scanned by spring (e.g. within your application package and not in db.migrations). This will ensure #Autowired can be used because the bean is instantiated by spring. (The migrations in db.migrations will be scanned by flyway automatically and are not instantiated by spring.)
Then implement a FlywayConfigurationCustomizer to add the migrations by loading them from the spring context:
#Configuration
class FlywayConfiguration implements FlywayConfigurationCustomizer {
#Autowired
private ApplicationContext applicationContext;
#Override
public void customize(FluentConfiguration configuration) {
JavaMigration[] migrationBeans = applicationContext
.getBeansOfType(JavaMigration.class)
.values().toArray(new JavaMigration[0]);
configuration.javaMigrations(migrationBeans);
}
}
I've got a spring-boot web application that's mostly working; my DataSource is properly configured by an external application.properties file.
Now I want to add properties to that file to help me instantiate and configure two instances of a class in my app. I have a APNsFactory that I currently instantiate manually and configure using JNDI, but I want to get away from JNDI calls:
#Bean
public
APNsFactory
apnsFactory()
throws
javax.naming.NamingException
{
sLogger.info("Configuring APNsFactory");
InitialContext ctx = new InitialContext();
APNsFactory f = new APNsFactory();
f.setProductionKeystorePath((String) ctx.lookup("java:comp/env/apns/prod/keystorePath"));
f.setProductionKeystorePassword((String) ctx.lookup("java:comp/env/apns/prod/keystorePassword"));
f.setDevelopmentKeystorePath((String) ctx.lookup("java:comp/env/apns/dev/keystorePath"));
f.setDevelopmentKeystorePassword((String) ctx.lookup("java:comp/env/apns/dev/keystorePassword"));
return f;
}
When running before in a standalone webapp container, Spring properly called that method and the JNDI context from the container’s <env-entry> tags was available.
I'm trying to update my APNsFactory to be a proper Spring FactoryBean<>, and I’ve given it a couple of #Autowire String variables that I want to be set by Spring Boot from the application.properties file.
For bonus points, I want this to be usable both in Spring Boot and in a standalone container like Tomcat or Resin.
For the life of me, I can't figure out how to get Spring to do this. There are dozens of examples for DataSources and other Beans already implemented by Spring, but none for a completely custom one, using application.properties, in a Spring Boot web environment.
I've seen some examples that use an XML config file, but I'm not sure how to do that with Spring Boot.
I don't think you need a factory bean here.
You already have spring boot that can read application.properties out-of-the-box:
So try the following:
Create key/values in the application.properties file:
myapp.keystore.path=...
myapp.keystore.passwd=...
// the same for other properties
Create ConfigurationProperties class
#ConfigurationProperties(prefix="myapp.keystore")
public class MyAppKeyStoreConfigProperties {
private String path; // the names must match to those defined in the properties file
private String passwd;
... getters, setters
}
In the class marked with #Configuration (the one where you create #Bean public APNsFactory apnsFactory()) do the following:
#Configuration
// Note the following annotation:
#EnableConfigurationProperties(MyAppKeyStoreConfigProperties.class)
public class MyConfiguration {
// Note the injected configuration parameter
#Bean public APNsFactory apnsFactory(MyAppKeyStoreConfigProperties config) {
APNsFactory f = new APNsFactory();
f.setProductionKeystorePath(config.getKeyPath());
and so on
}
}
I've intentionally didn't show the separation between production/dev stuff.
In spring boot you have profiles so that the same artifact (WAR, JAR whatever) can be configured to run with different profile and depending on that the corresponding properties will be read.
Example:
If you're running with prod profile, then in addition to application.properties that will be loaded anyway, you can put these keystore related definitions to application-prod.properties (the suffix matches the profile name) - spring boot will load those automatically. The same goes for dev profile of course.
Now I haven't totally understand the "bonus points" task :) This mechanism is spring boot proprietary way of dealing with configuration. In "standalone" server it should still have a WAR with spring boot inside so it will use this mechanism anyway. Maybe you can clarify more, so that I / our colleagues could provide a better answer
I'm using Spring Boot 2.2.5.RELEASE and would like to split my application.properties into separate files. There are already similar questions on StackOverflow but none of them seem to work for configuring Jackson.
My current non working solution is the following:
root/
- application.properties (without Jackson configuration)
- jackson-configuration.properties (includes Jackson configuration)
Jackson configuration class:
#Configuration
#PropertySource("/jackson-configuration.properties")
public class JacksonConfiguration {
}
Please note, I've tried different ways to specify the path including:
"/jackson-configuration.properties"
"jackson-configuration.properties"
"classpath:/jackson-configuration.properties"
"classpath:jackson-configuration.properties"
Spring Boot does not seem to use the configuration. If I copy it over into the application.properties - it works.
Content of jackson-configuration.properties:
spring.jackson.property-naming-strategy=SNAKE_CASE
spring.jackson.mapper.sort-properties-alphabetically=true
spring.jackson.deserialization.fail-on-unknown-properties=true
spring.jackson.parser.strict-duplicate-detection=true
spring.jackson.time-zone=Europe/Zurich
My application is annotated with #SpringBootApplication , so it should scan for additional properties.
/edit
I just realized the problem is the testing, not the productive code itself. If I start the application it works. What doess not work is testing with #JsonTest. I can fix this problem by adding the following line to my tests #ContextConfiguration(classes = {JacksonConfiguration.class}). But in turn, this causes the annotation #JsonComponent to stop working but only for the #JsonTest annotated classes.
See the documentation here. Here is an excerpt from the documentation
In order to resolve ${...} placeholders in definitions or
#Value annotations using properties from a PropertySource, you must
ensure that an appropriate embedded value resolver is registered in
the BeanFactory used by the ApplicationContext. This happens
automatically when using in XML. When
using #Configuration classes this can be achieved by explicitly
registering a PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer via a static #Bean
method.
You need to create a bean like this
#Bean
public static PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer devPropertyPlaceholderConfigurer() throws IOException {
PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer configurer = new PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer();
configurer.setLocations(new PathMatchingResourcePatternResolver().getResources("file:pathtToFile"));
configurer.setIgnoreUnresolvablePlaceholders(true);
return configurer;
}
with #PostConstruct and autowiring a MessageChannel problem, I found a solution SmartLifecycle.start()
can one also use CommandLineRunner?
what is the best way to start work with MessageChannel rabbitMQ after a full initialization of the context?
Spring Boot's CommandLineRunner (or ApplicationRunner) is fine.
SmartLifecycle is available for any Spring application, not just Boot applications.
Is #EnableTransactionManagement required in Spring Boot?
I did some research. Some folks say you don't need it, as Spring Boot has it already enabled, others say you do have to use it explicitly. So how is it?
Probably you're also using Spring Data. Calls on Spring Data repositories are by default surrounded by a transaction, even without #EnableTransactionManagement. If Spring Data finds an existing transaction, the existing transaction will be re-used, otherwise a new transaction is created.
#Transactional annotations within your own code, however, are only evaluated when you have #EnableTransactionManagement activated (or configured transaction handling some other way).
You can easily trace transaction behavior by adding the following property to your application.properties:
logging.level.org.springframework.transaction.interceptor=TRACE
(see Showing a Spring transaction in log)
According to > https://spring.io/guides/gs/managing-transactions/
Spring Boot will detect spring-jdbc on the classpath and h2 and will create a DataSource and a JdbcTemplate for you automatically. Because such infrastructure is now available and you have no dedicated configuration, a DataSourceTransactionManager will also be created for you: this is the component that intercepts the #Transactional annotated method.
You can also use spring-boot-starter-actuator to list your beans created in your context and you will find it
bean": "transactionManager"
Little old post but the answers given previously were not straight forward when I was searching for it.
#EnableTransactionManagement is optional in Spring boot, provided that spring-data* or spring-tx are found in classpath. How it works? As below:
Spring boot adds a spring-boot-autoconfigure.jar in the classpath. Go to the META-INF's spring.factories file and you can see org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.transaction.TransactionAutoConfiguration entry there. This initializes the transaction auto configuration for you.
Note that the class has following lines: (snippet)
#Configuration
#ConditionalOnClass({PlatformTransactionManager.class})
#AutoConfigureAfter({JtaAutoConfiguration.class, HibernateJpaAutoConfiguration.class, DataSourceTransactionManagerAutoConfiguration.class, Neo4jDataAutoConfiguration.class})
#EnableConfigurationProperties({TransactionProperties.class})
public class TransactionAutoConfiguration {
..
}
Have a look at TransactionAutoConfiguration to see that it enables transaction support if the PlatformTransactionManager is available in classpath. EnableTransactionManagementConfiguration is also configured there.
No. #EnableTransactionManagement is on by default, see that: https://github.com/jkubrynski/spring-boot/commit/9d219ef7a004c58a88bbbef82a520a22961c9402
#EnableTransactionManagement is conditionally turned on/off based of the dependency jars we add in the classpath. If we use spring data jpa starter it is turned on.
In the class org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.transaction.TransactionAutoConfiguration, there is such code(Spring Boot 1.5+):
#Configuration
#EnableTransactionManagement(proxyTargetClass = false)
#ConditionalOnProperty(prefix = "spring.aop", name = "proxy-target-class", havingValue = "false", matchIfMissing = false)
public static class JdkDynamicAutoProxyConfiguration {
}
#Configuration
#EnableTransactionManagement(proxyTargetClass = true)
#ConditionalOnProperty(prefix = "spring.aop", name = "proxy-target-class", havingValue = "true", matchIfMissing = true)
public static class CglibAutoProxyConfiguration {
}
The default is spring.aop.proxy-target-class=true, enabling CGLIB proxy by default.
If you want to use JDK proxy, set spring.aop.proxy-target-class=false instead.