I have a winforms project, which I want to change very few stuff, and compile as a different exe (for example the icon, title, and disable/enable some features).
How can I do that? I'd rather not create a second project, since I want changes to files of one, to be mirrored in the other.
The best way that I have figured, is to create a branch with some version control system, and selectively merge classes. This way you can integrate code changes from one project to the other.
Related
I have created three different solutions for three different clients, but those solutions are for an app that have the same features, classes, methods, resolution, except for the images, XML resource files, and a web service reference, that are specific for each one.
I would like to have just one solution for all those apps, that I could open in VS2010 IDE for edition, without errors. So, when I need to build or publish an specific app, I just set the client which one I need to, and go ahead to building or publishing.
It is important to consider that XML file names will be the same, as classes and images names too. The difference will be the content, but the name will always be the same.
My intention is to reduce my effort to maintain many solutions, having just one solution to work with.
In my company, we will have more than those three clients soon, so I am worried about how to maintain that. The best way will be have just one solution and when I need to generate a new app for a new client, I have just to change/include a few things (like some resources and images) and compile to a new client folder.
Is it possible? If so how?
One option would be to have a master solution which had the following
A "Template" project that contained your actual application and all of the shared code
Projects for all of your clients
In the projects for your clients, you could have links to the files in your files that come from your shared project. Then, in each of those projects, you could add the files that are only specific to them.
With this kind of structure, whenever you made a change to your Template project, all of the client projects would be updated as well because they just have pointers back to the Template project.
A good reference for this kind of setup would be the Json.Net Code Base. There he has a solution and project for all of the different configurations, but they all share the same files.
In terms of ensuring that the xml files are named properly, you might just want to put some checks into your main application to ensure that it has all of the files needed or potentially add a check into your build process.
There are many ways you could look to tackle this.
My favorite would be to run some sort of pre-build step - probably outside of Visual Studio - which simply replaces the files with the correct ones before you do a build. This would be easy to automate and easy to scale.
If you are going to be building for many more than three customers, then I think you should look to switch from Visual Studio building to some other automated build system - e.g. MSBuild from the command line or from something like TeamCity or CruiseControl. You'll find it much easier to scale if your build is automated (and robust)
If you don't like the file idea, then there are plenty of other things you could try:
You could try doing a similar step to above, but could do it inside VS using a pre-Build step.
You could use Conditional nodes within the .csproj file to switch files via a project configuration
You could look to shift the client-specific resources into another assembly - and then use GetResourceStream (or similar) at runtime to extract the resources.
But none of these feel as nice to me!
We have a VS2010 Solution which contains one windows form application and 4 Class Library (DLL) projects. (The class libraries are things like BusinessTier, DataTier, CommonCode, ControlLibrary) The whole thing is targeted for framework 2.0. Its been like this for three years.
Ok
So our application has grown to the point where we want to add a large new feature and marketing wants to deploy it as a separate product. Our product is used to fill in tax forms and the second product will fill in other tax forms.
We want to end up with two exe's (two install MSIs) which will be sold/installed/updated independently and could both be run at the same time on the same computer. Most of the code is in common between the two apps.
I am trying to figure out the best way to structure the solution to create the desired outcome.
1) Option one could be to create a new EXE project and several new DLL projects in the same original solution (Say in a solution folder) which have unique names,versions, guids, etc. with most of the code files as links back to the code files in the original similar DLLS. This allows us to have two completly separate systems with unique names for all the files, version numbers, etc., but allow any customization to be made to each project/dll. Is this a good idea or overkill?
2) Option two would be to create a new exe project in the solution and link to the same dlls as the first exe project. This seems simple enough, but i do not know if it is a good idea to have two projects which use the same DLLs. I do not really want to use the GAC. If we have two exe's which use the same Dll's ( even though they will be in separate application folders) with there be a problem if the DLLS have the same/different version numbers, name or GUID?
What are your ideas?
How should i restructure the solution to accommodate the new product?
Go for Option 2
There is no problem with the same Dlls with the same names. If you deploy the exes to separate folders or keep them in separate folders it will work either way.
I would even go further and look how you can break the application up further into more assemblies/dlls as it will give you even more flexibility. I would also have a single File for AssemblyInfo, and Add it as a linked file to all your projects. This means you have have a single version across all your dlls/exes.
http://vsh.infozerk.net/options/add-an-existing-file-to-a-project-without-copying-it/
I have a solution file that has the following example projects:
SharedLibrary
NonSharedLibrary
WebProject
WebProject.Install
Then another solution file that has the following example projects:
SharedLibrary
WindowsServiceProject
WindowsServiceProject.Install
Currently I open both in two separate instances of VS2010. The share library is the same in both but shared through my source control.
Is there an easy way to create another Solution file that when opened, opens all necessary projects for both. Then when testing, etc. you just change your startup project.
All the while maintaining the ability to open the old solutions if you want to just work on one of them.
Has any one does this before and/or know of a good methodology?
Visual Studio solutions are basically containers that group projects together. You can reuse the same projects in multiple solutions. A common way of handling this is to have one solution that contains all of your projects. Then create additional solutions that only load some of the projects. For example, you might make one solution for UI developers that only loads the projects they need while other developers might not care about the UI but need the windows service.
Each developer can set their own startup project which is stored in their local .suo file.
If you have multiple solutions open simultaneously and you change one project then you'll get the reload message in the other instance since they are shared.
Sure. Just create a new (or several) empty solutions right next to your existing one and then just add to it the projects you want to see there (Add Existing project)
Currently I have 4 solutions that are independent projects, however there is quite a bit of duplicated code when it comes to a few areas of the applications.
At the moment it is simply a few forms and their associated code.
When I want to change or improve something, I have to copy and paste to all relevant projects.
I looked at creating a new project within one of the solutions for the .dll/class library, but I felt that this was incorrect. (Please say if I am wrong).
As it is a component for all the applications, I decided to create a new solution for the .dll/class library and am looking at moving the shared code over to that - but, having never gone down this route before, what are my options from here?
Am I able to then include this solution within the others if I need to make a simple change and have it updated in all the projects or instead, should I always be working on the shared component in a separate instance of Visual Studio, outside of the applications using it?
That's exactly the right way to handle this situation.
You can include projects in multiple solutions by right-clicking the solution and selecting Add Existing Project...
Any changes you then make will appear in all solutions. The only problem this leads to is that it's possible to break one solution from another. This is where automated builds on commit to source control come into their own.
Put shared codes in separate Solution/Project as Class Library,
In post build event of shared projects copy dll's to a specific directory,
Add shared dll's from this directory to other projects/solutions
By doing this each time you build your consumer projects, they will use latest dll's automatically.
Moving the common code into a separate shared assembly is an excellent option.
One thing to think about is to keep your common business logic or business object type code separate from UI related code like custom controls - if you need to then have two common assemblies. This is more work initially, but makes things way easier further down the track when you need to make UI changes or change the control suite you are using.
Being new to VS, how may I think of these two concepts, what is the difference?
I find some missing information in the other answers (at least for people who come from other IDEs like, say, Eclipse) . To say that a solution is a container for projects is only part of the thing. The conceptual feature of a VS project (what determines its 'granularity') is that one project produces one output: typically an executable or a library (dll). So, if you are going to code three executables that uses related code, you'll create one solution and at least three projects - probably more.
A solution is a container for projects, and tracks dependencies between projects.
Just to come up with a metaphor..
A solution is like a house, a project like a room. Each room provides a piece of functionality whereas the house, a container of rooms, provides the means to link the rooms together and organize them appropriately.
Kind of corny but I made it up on the fly, so bear with me :)
It doesn't help that Visual Studio seems to make things more confusing. "New Project" actually creates a new SOLUTION containing a project. "Open Project" actually opens a solution containing one (or many) project. (The file menu says "Open Project/Solution" but it really is opening solutions. There is no "Close Project" only "Close Solution" which is accurate.
So, in VS you are always working within a solution. Many solutions contain only one project and newer developers are likely to think of them as the same thing. However you can add other projects into a solution.
In case anyone decides to scroll down this far... I thought the MS docs did a pretty good job at describing the differences. I've copy pasted (and rephrased) the relevant bits here:
When you create an app, application, website, Web App, script, plug-in, etc in Visual Studio, you start with a project. In a logical sense, a project contains of all the source code files, icons, images, data files and anything else that will be compiled into an executable program or web site, or else is needed in order to perform the compilation. A project also contains all the compiler settings and other configuration files that might be needed by various services or components that your program will communicate with.
You don't have to use solutions or projects if you don't want to. You can simply open the files in Visual Studio and start editing your code.
In a literal sense, a project is an XML file (.vbproj, .csproj, .vcxproj) that defines a virtual folder hierarchy along with paths to all the items it "contains" and all the build settings.
In Visual Studio, the project file is used by Solution Explorer to display the project contents and settings. When you compile your project, the MSBuild engine consumes the project file to create the executable. You can also customize projects to product other kinds of output.
A project is contained, in a logical sense and in the file system, within a solution, which may contain one or more projects, along with build information, Visual Studio window settings, and any miscellaneous files that aren't associated with any project. In a literal sense, the solution is a text file with its own unique format; it is generally not intended to be edited by hand.
A solution has an associated .suo file that stores settings, preferences and configuration information for each user that has worked on the project.
A Solution can have many Projects.
The Solution can also handle managing the dependencies between its different Projects...making sure that each Project gets Built in the appropriate order for the final Solution to work.
A project contains executable and library files that make up an application or component of an application.
A solution is a placeholder for logically related projects that make up an application. For example, you could have separate projects for your application's GUI, database access layer, and so on. The projects would be specific divisions for your program's functionality, and the solution would be the umbrella unifying all of them under one application.
A solution is a readable text file whose extension is .sln and having a structured content that describes the projects that it contains. A project is a readable XML formatted text file whose extension is .vcxproj and having a structured content according to its XML schema, and whose primary purpose is to contain the listing of source codes filenames and their dependencies or references to other project's source codes as well.
Solutions are containers for projects - you can also use them to organize items that are used across different related project (shared dll's and such).
Solutions are containers used by Visual Studio to organize one or more related projects. When you open a solution in Visual Studio, it will automatically load all the projects it contains.
When you create a new project in Visual Studio, it automatically creates a solution to house the project if there's not a solution already open.
You can set dependencies of projects on other projects in the solution. The dependent project is build after the project it is depending on is built.
For more details refer - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/visualstudio/ide/quickstart-projects-solutions
If you are from an Eclipse background you would probably go to build path of a project and add a dependency on other project or add an external jar. In VS you can do that in a single container called solution where all related projects are grouped together.
Eg. Let's say you are build and android and iOS app in xamrin, there would be some common code and resources that could go in a separate project and then your android and iOS projects can depend on this common code project. Also you could have projects to test these projects etc.