according ScopedProxyMode enum documentation
value
DEFAULT
Default typically equals NO, unless a different default has been configured at the component-scan instruction level.
I use spring boot and I have not ideas how can I understand which ScopedProxyMode uses
Is where way to know this information?
If you take a look at the #SpringBootApplication annotation, you will find that it is internally referencing a #ComponentScan annotation.
Which in turn controls the ScopedProxyMode setting. If left unspecified (like in our case), it defers the decision to the ClassPathBeanDefinitionScanner class.
Which ClassPathBeanDefinitionScanner finally contains a real default: ScopedProxyMode=no. So to answer your question: if you have not explicitly change it, the default Spring Boot setting for scopedProxyMode will be false.
Related
How to read a value from application.yml in my Micronaut project? I can clearly see annotation is resolved to proper value (true in this case), but it is not applied to the variable (stays as default false). I've tried using #Value and #ConfigurationProperties
In a comment the OP has indicated that they are doing new FeatureToggleService(). Creating your own instance of the object is the problem. Instead of using new, let the DI container create and manage the instance. If you do, then #Value will be relevant.
See https://github.com/jeffbrown/filiard/blob/f6f704fb95d7821919748bb41968f87d11cee07b/src/main/java/filiard/DemoController.java and https://github.com/jeffbrown/filiard/blob/f6f704fb95d7821919748bb41968f87d11cee07b/src/main/java/filiard/FlagHelper.java for a working example.
UPDATE:
Based on additional information this is not the correct answer!!!
As pointed out, #Value can be private, but Micronaut advices against it.
Short answer, it is because it is private. Wrong
From the documentation:
The #Value annotation accepts a string that can have embedded placeholder values (the default value can be provided by specifying a
value after the colon : character). Also try to avoid setting the
member visibility to private, since this requires Micronaut Framework
to use reflection. Prefer to use protected.
Also, consider using #Property instead of #Value. Still valid
https://docs.micronaut.io/latest/guide/#valueAnnotation
NOTE:
The Micronaut framework does not inspect a manually created instance, even if it is instantiated in a #Factory, unlike other frameworks.
I'm trying to register an autoconfiguration with #ConditionalOnProperty. This configuration should be created when there is any property with a predefined prefix.
For example, this configuration should be created when there is one of the properties listed below
test.property.any-text-goes-here.some-nested-property=test
test.property.nested.nested-two=another
I've tried to use #ConditionalOnProperty with name=test.property, but it doesn't seem to be working. Maybe this can be sorted out using #ConditionalOnExpression, but I have no idea how SpEL expression should look like.
I'm wondering if there a way to achieve this without the need of implementing custom Condition.
Thanks for your help!
Unfortunately, it is not possible. #ConditionalOnProperty evaluates and compares only final property values in flat structure. It does not work on objects :(
I am facing a situation in which a bean should be created by the application context only if the property contains any other value than a specific value.
i.e... one property file.path= /specific/path, If the value is other than this then bean should be loaded.
I can see that there is #ConditionalOnProperty (name="file.path", havingValue="....") out of the box but in my case, I am looking a property like havingValueOtherThan="..." or similar kind of property or annotation if it is there out of the box in the spring.
There are many possible options, besides profiles that were stated in comments, here are 2 options:
Option 1
Use #ConditionalOnExpression with any SPeL expression you wish
Option 2
You can always create your own conditional annotation with any logic:
Create an annotation that will depict your own business case with a #Conditional on it.
Then Implement the conditional logic of your choice. Here is an example of achieving this.
BTW, the profiles that mentioned in comments are using Conditionals engine under the hood (The #Profile annotation has a #Conditional({ProfileCondition.class}) in its definition since Spring 4.x)
I have some code to load a value as such in my Spring application:
#Component
public class MyElasticRestService {
#Value("${elasticApi.baseURL}")
private String elasticApiBaseUrl;
According to the Spring docs, I should be able to use a relaxed binding that comes from an uppercase environment variable such as ELASTIC_API_BASE_URL or ELASTICAPI_BASEURL. But I'm confused which is correct. Both don't seem to work so I am wondering how to debug what is actually picked up.
I've loaded Spring Boot Actuator to view the configprops endpoint. But it doesn't have anything on the elasticApi prefix.
What should the correct environment variable be and how can I see how it gets translated and picked up by the application?
The #Value annotation doesn't support relaxed bindings. Therefore you could use a class annotated with #ConfigurationProperties or you use a RelaxedPropertyResolver to get the value from the environment.
According to https://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/current/reference/html/spring-boot-features.html#boot-features-external-config-vs-value, it is now very possible simply with #Value as long as you use kebab-case (all lower case with dash) for the name e.g. #Value("config.refresh-rate")
Instead of trying to make it an UPPER_SNAKE_CASE, you can put it in your application.yaml file, this way:
elasticApi.baseURL: ${ELASTIC_API_BASE_URL:defaultvalue}
or this way doesn't really matter:
elasticApi:
baseURL: ${ELASTIC_API_BASE_URL:defaultvalue}
I have converted a simple Spring project made with pure aop namespace xml coding to the same project but using annotations this time.
I've noticed that now the before-part of the around advice comes out before the before advice, which is the exact opposite behavior of the project's result when I was using aop namespace xml coding.
Is it the default behavior of the annotation style?
See Advice ordering:
When two pieces of advice defined in different aspects both need to run at the same join point, unless you specify otherwise the order of execution is undefined. You can control the order of execution by specifying precedence. This is done in the normal Spring way by either implementing the org.springframework.core.Ordered interface in the aspect class or annotating it with the Order annotation. Given two aspects, the aspect returning the lower value from Ordered.getValue() (or the annotation value) has the higher precedence.
Since the ordering is undefined, it could possibly vary even between multiple executions (having the same xml config).