I have the following structure:
{
"id": "3065e957-56e9-4084-8e32-bb4de8d9265a",
"id_service": "570b4abe-70fe-44e0-845e-74eb60081fc4",
"tweets": [
{
"created_at": "2013-10-13 00:58:11",
"id_tweet": "389193311908413440",
"id_user": 12375562,
"name": "elgabo1",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1827710728/45d1be6d2e0f1c710814e098d6f56c12_normal.png",
"screen_name": "elgabo1",
"status_tweet": 0,
"text": "#profeco Deurope Gran Sur tapa los sellos de suspensión con propaganda"
},
{
"created_at": "2013-10-02 06:50:01",
"id_tweet": "385295588377387008",
"id_user": 12375562,
"name": "elgabo1",
"photo": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1827710728/45d1be6d2e0f1c710814e098d6f56c12_normal.png",
"screen_name": "elgabo1",
"status_tweet": 1,
"text": "#caspoliciadf Delegacion coyoacan"
}
]
}
I want to set the status_tweet:1 from id_tweet:"389193311908413440"
I can get the element of the array with the id_tweet:"389193311908413440"
r.db('twitter_settings').table('tweets_service').filter({id:'3065e957-56e9-4084-8e32-bb4de8d9265a'})
.map(function(d){
return {
"tweets": d("tweets").filter({'id_tweet':'665305939294056448'})
}
}
)
But when i try to update the field I get an error:
r.db('twitter_settings').table('tweets_service').filter({id:'3065e957-56e9-4084-8e32-bb4de8d9265a'})
.map(function(d){
return {
"tweets": d("tweets").filter({'id_tweet':'665305939294056448'})
}
}
)
.update({"status_tweet": 1})
e: Expected type SELECTION but found SEQUENCE:
VALUE SEQUENCE in:
r.db("twitter_settings").table("tweets_service").filter({id: "3065e957-56e9-4084-8e32-bb4de8d9265a"}).map(function(var_341) { return {tweets: var_341("tweets").filter({id_tweet: "665305939294056448"})}; }).update({status_tweet: 1})
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Thanks in advance
We cannot update/delete after using map.
So change your function to run map inside the update function. Something like this will work.
r.db('twitter_settings').table('tweets_service')
.filter({id:'3065e957-56e9-4084-8e32-bb4de8d9265a'})
.update(function(doc) {
return {
tweets: doc('tweets').map(function(tweet) {
return r.branch(
tweet('id_tweet').eq('389193311908413440'),
tweet.merge({status_tweet:1}),
tweet)
})
}
})
Related
I have a problem. I do not want a "break" down in my GraphQL output. I have a GraphQL schema with a person. That person can have one or more interests. But unfortunately I only get a breakdown
What I mean by breakdown is the second curly brackets.
{
...
{
...
}
}
Is there an option to get the id of the person plus the id of the interests and the status without the second curly bracket?
GraphQL schema
Person
└── Interest
Query
query {
model {
allPersons{
id
name
interest {
id
status
}
}
}
}
[OUT]
{
"data": {
"model": {
"allPersons": [
{
"id": "01",
"name": "Max",
"interest ": {
"id": 4488448
"status": "active"
}
},
{
"id": "02",
"name": "Sophie",
"interest ": {
"id": 15445
"status": "deactivated"
}
},
What I want
{
{
"id": "01",
"id-interest": 4488448
"status": "active"
},
{
"id": "02",
"name": "Sophie",
"id-interest": 15445
"status": "deactivated"
},
}
What I tried but that deliver me the same result
fragment InterestTask on Interest {
id
status
}
query {
model {
allPersons{
id
interest {
...InterestTask
}
}
}
}
I have a Lambda hooked up to my DynamoDB stream. It is configured to trigger if both criteria are met:
eventName = "MODIFY"
status > 10
My filter looks as follows:
{"eventName": ["MODIFY"], "dynamodb": {"NewImage": {"status": [{"numeric": [">", 10]}]}}}
If the filter is configured to only trigger if the event name is MODIFY it works, however anything more complicated than that does not trigger my Lambda. The event looks as follows:
{
"eventID": "ba1cff0bb53fbd7605b7773fdb4320a8",
"eventName": "MODIFY",
"eventVersion": "1.1",
"eventSource": "aws:dynamodb",
"awsRegion": "us-east-1",
"dynamodb":
{
"ApproximateCreationDateTime": 1643637766,
"Keys":
{
"org":
{
"S": "test"
},
"id":
{
"S": "61f7ebff17afad170f98e046"
}
},
"NewImage":
{
"status":
{
"N": "20"
}
}
}
}
When using the test_event_pattern endpoint it confirms the filter is valid:
filter = {
"eventName": ["MODIFY"],
"dynamodb": {
"NewImage": {
"status": [ { "numeric": [ ">", 10 ] } ]
}
}
}
response = client.test_event_pattern(
EventPattern=json.dumps(filter),
Event="{\"id\": \"e00c66cb-fe7a-4fcc-81ad-58eb60f5d96b\", \"eventName\": \"MODIFY\", \"dynamodb\": {\"NewImage\":{\"status\": 20}}, \"detail-type\": \"myDetailType\", \"source\": \"com.mycompany.myapp\", \"account\": \"123456789012\", \"time\": \"2016-01-10T01:29:23Z\", \"region\": \"us-east-1\"}"
)
print(response) >> {'Result': True, 'ResponseMetadata': {'RequestId':...}
Is there something that I'm overlooking? Do DynamoDB filters not work on the actual new image?
probably already found out yourself but for anyone else
its missing the dynamodb json specific numeric field leaf:
{
"eventName": ["MODIFY"],
"dynamodb": {
"NewImage": {
"status": { "N": [{ "numeric": [">", 10] }] }
}
}
}
I cannot mutate a list of objects completely, because only the last element of the array will be mutated.
What already works perfectly is, if I put each element ({play_positions_id: ...}) in the array manually like here:
mutation CreateProfile {
__typename
create_profiles_item(data: {status: "draft", play_positions: [{play_positions_id: {id: "1"}}, {play_positions_id: {id: "2"}}]}) {
id
status
play_positions {
play_positions_id {
abbreviation
name
}
}
}
}
Output:
{
"data": {
"__typename": "Mutation",
"create_profiles_item": {
"id": "1337",
"status": "draft",
"play_positions": [
{
"play_positions_id": {
"id": "1",
"abbreviation": "RWB",
"name": "Right Wingback"
}
},
{
"play_positions_id": {
"id": "2",
"abbreviation": "CAM",
"name": "Central Attacking Midfielder"
}
}
],
}
}
}
Since you can add many of those elements, I defined a variable/argument like here
mutation CreateProfile2($cpppi: [create_profiles_play_positions_input]) {
__typename
create_profiles_item(data: {status: "draft", play_positions: $cpppi}) {
id
status
play_positions {
play_positions_id {
id
abbreviation
name
}
}
}
}
Variable object for above:
"cpppi": {
"play_positions_id": {
"id": "1"
},
"play_positions_id": {
"id": "2
}
}
Output:
{
"data": {
"__typename": "Mutation",
"create_profiles_item": {
"id": "1338",
"play_positions": [
{
"play_positions_id": {
"id": "2",
"abbreviation": "CAM",
"name": "Central Attacking Midfielder"
}
}
],
}
}
}
Schema:
input create_profiles_input {
id: ID
status: String!
play_positions: [create_profiles_play_positions_input]
}
input create_profiles_play_positions_input {
id: ID
play_positions_id: create_play_positions_input
}
input create_play_positions_input {
id: ID
abbreviation: String
name: String
}
At the last both snippets, only the last object with the id "2" will be mutated. I need these to use the defined input type from my backend.
I figured it out. I got it wrong with the brackets in the variable. Here the solution:
"cpppi": [
{
"play_positions_id": {
"id": "1"
}
},
{
"play_positions_id": {
"id": "2"
}
}
]
I need help to sort array by couple of logics
[
{
"id": 1,
"status": "pending",
"date": "2019-08-01"
},
{
"id": 2,
"status": "delivered",
"date": "2019-08-01"
},
{
"id": 3,
"status": "pending",
"date": "2019-08-03"
},
{
"id": 4,
"status": "delivered",
"date": "2019-08-03"
},
{
"id": 5,
"status": "delivered",
"date": "2019-08-02"
}
]
what I want to do is to sort the array to status pending show first, and then sort it by the date descending
I already test to using sortByDesc from laravel collection but the array looks like sorted it by just 1 function
$collection = $collection->sortByDesc('date')->sortByDesc(function ($row, $key) {
if($row['status'] == 'pending'){
return 1;
}else{
return 0;
}
});
My expected final result look like this :
[
{
"id": 3,
"status": "pending",
"date": "2019-08-03"
},
{
"id": 1,
"status": "pending",
"date": "2019-08-01"
},
{
"id": 4,
"status": "delivered",
"date": "2019-08-03"
},
{
"id": 5,
"status": "delivered",
"date": "2019-08-02"
},
{
"id": 2,
"status": "delivered",
"date": "2019-08-01"
}
]
Few solutions:
Use a custom callback and return an array source
$products->sortBy(function($product) {
return [$product->param1, $product->param2];
});
This will sort a collection by param2 first, and then by param1
Use a custom callback and return a composite property to sort on source
$posts = $posts->sortBy(function($post) {
return sprintf('%-12s%s', $post->column1, $post->column2);
});
Sort your array by column 1, then split it up by column 2 and then merge it again (untested).
$collection->sortByDesc('date');
$collection->groupBy('status');
$collection->keyBy('status');
EDIT: Also I'm not sure if sortByDesc('date') works with date strings.
Your expected result can be achieved like this.
$sorted = $collection
->sortByDesc('date')
->sortBy(function ($item) {
return 'pending' == $item['status'] ? 0 : 1;
})
->values();
To be more precise:
$collection= $collection->sort(
function ($a, $b) {
if(($a->status== $b->status) &&($a->status== 'pending')){
return ($a->date >= $b->date) ? -1 : 1;
}elseif($a->status== 'pending' && ($a->status!= $b->status)){
return 1;
}else{
return ($a->date <= $b->date) ? 1 : -1;
}
}
);
$collection= $collection->sortByDesc('status');
I'm using laravel-fractal to transform my data and here is a response
how can I delete data;
I made a search and I realized I need to use a Serializer;
But I just want to remove data for all includes(relations)
{
"data": [
{
"id": 1,
"name": "test name",
"status": null,
"tags": [
"first",
"second"
],
"created_at": "1396/9/3",
"contacts": {
"data": [
{
"value": "test#test.com",
"type": "email",
"icon": "fa fa-email"
}
]
}
},
{
"id": 2,
"name": "name test 2",
"status": null,
"tags": [],
"created_at": "1396/9/3",
"contact": {
"data": []
}
}
]
I found my answer at GitHub. The following answer is copied from thephpleague/fractal on GitHub:
You can write your own serializer for that.
class YourDataSerializer extends ArraySerializer
{
public function collection($resourceKey, array $data)
{
if ($resourceKey) {
return [$resourceKey => $data];
}
return $data;
}
public function item($resourceKey, array $data)
{
if ($resourceKey) {
return [$resourceKey => $data];
}
return $data;
}
}
Register your serializer with manager
$manager = new Manager();
$manager->setSerializer(new YourDataSerializer());
and when you want to have data or anything else you can pass in resourceKey to your Item or Collection as a third param.
$resource = new Collection($folders, new AccountFolderTransformer(), 'data');
use array serializer:
Fractal::create()
->item($item, new MyTransformer())
->serializeWith(new ArraySerializer())