Given the following code:
module Backup
module Destination
class Base
def initialize
puts 'Base'
end
end
end
end
module Backup
module Destination
class Test < Base
def initialize
puts 'Test'
super
end
end
end
end
Backup::Destination::Test.new
This works as expected, outputting:
Test
Base
However if I split things up like this:
# lib/backup.rb
require_relative 'backup/destination/base'
module Backup; end
# lib/backup/destination/base.rb
require_relative 'test'
module Backup
module Destination
class Base
def initialize
puts 'Base'
end
end
end
end
# lib/backup/destination/test.rb
module Backup
module Destination
class Test < Base
def initialize
puts 'Test'
super
end
end
end
end
And execute with the following (from irb):
require_relative 'lib/backup'
I get this error:
NameError: uninitialized constant Backup::Destination::Base
from /lib/backup/destination/test.rb:3:in `<module:Destination>'
from /lib/backup/destination/test.rb:2:in `<module:Backup>'
from /lib/backup/destination/test.rb:1:in `<top (required)>'
from /lib/backup/destination/base.rb:1:in `require_relative'
from /lib/backup/destination/base.rb:1:in `<top (required)>'
from /lib/backup.rb:1:in `require_relative'
from /lib/backup.rb:1:in `<top (required)>'
from (irb):1:in `require_relative'
What am I missing?
Note: I couldn't post the above without adding more details. Stupid feature because in this case code is worth a thousand words. (this text allowed the question to be posted)
The problem is that you are requiring test.rb before your Base class is defined. One possible solution is to move your require to the bottom of base.rb.
Another possible solution is to remove your require from base and require both files in the correct order from backup.
Made the following changes to fix the problem:
# lib/backup.rb
require_relative 'backup/destination/base'
require_relative 'backup/destination/test'
module Backup; end
And removed the require_relative statement from lib/backup/destination/base.rb. This fixed the order of the require_relative statements. I mistakenly thought the files were required before anything was executed.
Related
I have a directory /lib where I store *.rb files. Each one of them contains a class with a single class method remove_user().
How can I make the main script automatically go over those files and call the same method on all of them? I want to just drop-in files in that directory in the future without modifying the main script in any way.
I do know how to require all the files from a directory based on "Best way to require all files from a directory in ruby?", but I'm not very sure how to invoke the classes "in a loop" from here.
Update
I've tried a the code suggested in "How do I create automatically a instance of every class in a directory?"
files = Dir.glob("lib/*.rb")
def load_modules(class_files)
puts class_files
before = ObjectSpace.each_object(Class).to_a
class_files.each {|file| require_relative file }
after = ObjectSpace.each_object(Class).to_a
(after - before).each {|klass| klass.new.delete_user('myemail#mail.com', 'Audit', 'Test')}
load_modules(files)
end
It produces an error:
/Users/apinchuk/RubymineProjects/autoaudit/init.rb:16:in `new': can't create instance of singleton class (TypeError)
from /Users/RubymineProjects/autoaudit/init.rb:16:in `block in load_modules'
from /Users/RubymineProjects/autoaudit/init.rb:16:in `each'
from /Users/RubymineProjects/autoaudit/init.rb:16:in `load_modules'
from /Users/RubymineProjects/autoaudit/init.rb:20:in `<top (required)>'
from -e:1:in `load'
from -e:1:in `<main>'
And there is nothing I could find about this error.
The create_uat_robot.rb has a structure like this:
class CreateUatRobot
def self.delete_user(email, first_name, last_name)
...
end
end
The name of the file is create_uat_robot.rb
Trying #moveson suggestion as follows:
files = Dir.glob("lib/*.rb")
files.each {|file| require_relative file }
klasses = Dir["lib/*.rb"].map {|file| File.basename(file, '.rb').camelize.constantize}
klasses.each { |klass| klass.delete_user(arguments) }
worked for me.
First you need to create an array of class names:
>> klasses = Dir["lib/*.rb"].map {|file| File.basename(file, '.rb').camelize.constantize }
Then you can call your method on each of them in turn:
>> klasses.each { |klass| klass.remove_user }
If you are not using Rails, you can require ActiveSupport's String extension methods (require 'active_support/core_ext/string'), which will give you the camelize and constantize methods.
I'm trying to understand why I'm getting this error and I suspect it's because I have my Controller class and View class in two separate Ruby files. I was told that using require_relative 'filename' should reference all the code from one file into another, but I seem to be missing something. Okay here goes,
In controller.rb file, I have
require_relative 'view'
require_relative 'deck_model'
require_relative 'flashcard_model'
class Controller
def initialize
#deckofcards = Deck.new
#welcome = View.new.welcome
#player_guess = View.new.get_user_guess
#success_view = View.new.success
#failure_view = View.new.failure
end
def run
#Logic to run the game
# #current_card
# #user_guess
puts "Let's see if this prints"
# pull_card_from_deck
end
end
In my view.rb file, I have,
require_relative 'controller'
class View
attr_accessor :userguess
def initialize (userguess = " ")
#userguess = userguess
end
def welcome
system ("clear")
puts "Welcome! Let's play a game."
puts "I'll give you a definition and you have to give me the term"
puts "Ready..."
end
def get_user_guess
#userguess = gets.chomp.downcase
end
def success
puts "Excellent! You got it."
end
def failure
puts "No, that's not quite right."
end
end
However when I run controller.rb, I get the following error,
/Users/sean/Projects/flash/source/controller.rb:11:in `initialize': uninitialized constant Controller::View (NameError)
from /Users/sean/Projects/flash/source/controller.rb:51:in `new'
from /Users/sean/Projects/flash/source/controller.rb:51:in `<top (required)>'
from /Users/sean/Projects/flash/source/view.rb:1:in `require_relative'
from /Users/sean/Projects/flash/source/view.rb:1:in `<top (required)>'
from controller.rb:1:in `require_relative'
from controller.rb:1:in `<main>'
Can anyone please help me figure this out.
You did not post your full code, but it sounds like this is an error caused by the circular dependencies you specified in your project. You have view.rb depending on controller.rb and controller.rb depending on view.rb. The Ruby interpreter will not execute these files simultaneously; it has to execute one and then execute the other.
It looks like it is executing controller.rb first, but it sees that view.rb is required, so it starts executing that. Then in view.rb it sees that controller.rb is required, so it starts executing controller.rb again. Then at some point in controller.rb, you must be creating a new instance of the Controller class. But we aren't done defining the View class yet, so View is undefined and you get an exception while trying to create that controller.
To fix this, you should consider not creating any Controller or View objects until both of the classes are fully loaded.
+1 to #DavidGrayson comment.
If my assumption is correct, your issue is with require_relative 'controller' in your view.rb file.
If you see, it looks like View is requiring Controller then Controller gets loaded which seems to be sending new somewhere to Controller which then sends new to View but it hasn't been completely required.
so this is my first question on stack overflow and I am new to Ruby, so if this is a simple question, please be nice.
I am starting off in OOP and making a game. What I think is wrong is that Ruby is thinking that a different class is a constant in the current class.
Here is my code:
./a.rb
require "./b"
class A
class << self
def run
puts "A ran."
end
end
end
./b.rb
class B
require './a'
def test
A.run
end
end
b = B.new
b.test
When I run ruby b.rb, I get:
/Users/alexstriff/Dropbox/Code/ruby/ex45/b.rb:5:in `test': uninitialized constant B::A (NameError)
from /Users/alexstriff/Dropbox/Code/ruby/ex45/b.rb:11:in `<top (required)>'
from /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:45:in `require'
from /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:45:in `require'
from /Users/alexstriff/Dropbox/Code/ruby/ex45/a.rb:1:in `<top (required)>'
from /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:45:in `require'
from /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:45:in `require'
from b.rb:2:in `<class:B>'
from b.rb:1:in `<main>'
So why is A.run seen as a constant by class B, instead of as a class?
Edit:
Could it possibly be a problem with the 'circular require'? I ran this under ruby -w and that came up.
Yes, as you mentioned in your edit, I believe your issue is with a circular require. As you can see, when you run ruby b.rb, you require a.rb, which then requires b.rb again, etc. Instead, I would advise removing the require in a.rb, as it does not seem to depend on b.rb.
As a separate issue, I think the error you are getting is because you don't specify that A is a top-level class. Also, having the require inside of class B does not make A accessible inside B, so I would move it outside instead:
require './a'
class B
def test
::A.run
end
end
b = B.new
b.test
I have a module in app/misc/dsl/builder.rb that has this code
module Dsl
class Builder
def initialize(context, &block)
return if not block_given?
parent_context = block.binding.eval "self"
parent_context.extend Proxy
parent_context.object = context
parent_context.instance_eval &block
end
end
def self.set_context(context, &block)
Dsl::Builder.new(context, &block)
end
end
Note: this directory misc is preloaded in application.rb
config.autoload_paths += Dir[Rails.root.join('app', 'models', '{**/}'),
Rails.root.join('app', 'misc', '{**/}')
]
Then, somewhere in the text (lets say at foo.rb) I have this code:
Dsl.set_context(obj) do
#some code with obj receiving messages
end
The test stack we are using consists on Zeus+Guard+Rspec. Now, lets say I rewrite the code to something not working
Dsl.set_context(obj) do
asdqwe #this message does not exists
end
From times to times, I receive this baffling message
1) SomeOtherClass search_hash receiving keywords params should query for those keywords
Failure/Error: subject.search_hash
NoMethodError:
undefined method `set_context' for Dsl:Module
# ./app/misc/product_query.rb:116:in `base_search_hash'
# ./app/misc/product_query.rb:25:in `search_hash'
# ./spec/misc/product_query_spec.rb:78:in `block (4 levels) in <top (required)>'
# -e:1:in `<main>'
instead of the correct message that should be regarding undefined method asdqwe
Any clue about this?
Look here
it says:
Rails 3 has been updated such that classes/modules (henceforth, C/M)
are lazy loaded from the autoload paths as they are needed
so, you can do require_relative 'app/misc/dsl/builder.rb' in your rspec_helper.rb (can it be better with just require?) The problem must be that the loader doesn't know in advance where to find Dsl.set_context, but he will know once you have referenced Dsl::Builder
Hope it helps
I'm trying to spec a module by including it in a basic mock_model object. However, when I call the instance method defined in the module ActiveRecord tries to establish a connection with the database.
The module:
module Stuff
module SoftDelete
extend ActiveSupport::Concern
def soft_delete
puts "Called here"
end
end
end
The Spec:
describe Stuff::SoftDelete do
class Network < ActiveRecord::Base
include Stuff::SoftDelete
attr_accessor :deleted_at
end
before (:each) do
#network = mock_model(Network)
end
context "When a record is deleted" do
it "is marked as deleted" do
#network.soft_delete
end
end
end
When I run this Spec, the following error occurs:
1) Stuff::SoftDelete When a record is deleted is marked as deleted
Failure/Error: #network.soft_delete
ActiveRecord::ConnectionNotEstablished:
ActiveRecord::ConnectionNotEstablished
# ./spec/apoc/soft_delete_spec.rb:18:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
Note: If I include the SoftDelete module in a real ActiveRecord class, it will work. It just seems that mock_model isn't able to deal with the module.
Would love some help on this one.
Thanks!
Do you trust ActiveRecord? If so, don't inherit from it; test your module in isolation. If your module includes calls ActiveRecord methods, stub them and test only your code.