Most of the online material has initialization like this:
class MyClass
attr_accessors :a, :b, :c
def initialize(a,b,c)
#a = a
#b = b
#c = c
end
end
with or without defaults. Creating a new instance is:
n = MyClass.new(1,2,3)
n.a # => 1
n.b # => 2
n.c # => 3
I would like to know how to initialize the instance with hash syntax, like:
n = MyClass.new(:a => 1, :b => 2, :c => 3)
which should be equivalent to:
n = MyClass.new(:b => 2, :a => 1, :c => 3)
Is this difficult to implement?
Use ruby keyword arguments, available in Ruby 2.0 and above
Format in initializer arguments is variable:
class MyClass
attr_accessors :a, :b, :c
def initialize(a:, b:, c: )
#a = a
#b = b
#c = c
end
end
Are you looking for the following?
class MyClass
attr_accessor :hash
def initialize(hash)
#hash = hash
end
end
e1 = MyClass.new(:a => 1, :b => 2, :c => 3)
#=> #<MyClass:0x007f88240d66b0 #hash={:a=>1, :b=>2, :c=>3}>
e1.hash
#=> {:a=>1, :b=>2, :c=>3}
e2 = MyClass.new( { :a => 1, :b => 2, :c => 3 } )
#=> #<MyClass:0x007f882281d678 #hash={:c=>3, :b=>2, :a=>1}>
e2.hash
#=> {:a=>1, :b=>2, :c=>3}
e3 = MyClass.new(:b => 2, :a => 1, :c => 3)
#=> #<MyClass:0x007f88240bd408 #hash={:b=>2, :a=>1, :c=>3}>
e3.hash
#=> {:b=>2, :a=>1, :c=>3}
Are e1, e2 and e3 "equivalent"?
e1 == e2
#=> false
e1 == e3
#=> false
e1.hash == e2.hash
#=> true
e1.hash == e3.hash
#=> true
Another way of looking at this is as follows:
class MyClass
attr_accessor :args
def initialize(*args)
#args = args
end
end
e1 = MyClass.new(:a => 1, :b => 2, :c => 3)
#=> #<MyClass:0x007f88240d66b0 #hash={:a=>1, :b=>2, :c=>3}>
e1.args
#=> [{:a=>1, :b=>2, :c=>3}]
which shows that only a single argument (a hash) is being passed to new.
It can be as simple as:
require 'ostruct'
class MyClass < OpenStruct
end
n = MyClass.new(:a => 1, :b => 2, :c => 3)
n.a
# => 1
Related
This question is the inverse of this question.
Given a nested hash like
{
:a => {
:b => {:c => 1, :d => 2},
:e => 3,
},
:f => 4,
}
what is the best way to convert it into a flat hash like
{
[:a, :b, :c] => 1,
[:a, :b, :d] => 2,
[:a, :e] => 3,
[:f] => 4,
}
Another way:
def flat_hash(h,f=[],g={})
return g.update({ f=>h }) unless h.is_a? Hash
h.each { |k,r| flat_hash(r,f+[k],g) }
g
end
h = { :a => { :b => { :c => 1,
:d => 2 },
:e => 3 },
:f => 4 }
flat_hash(h) #=> {[:a, :b, :c]=>1, [:a, :b, :d]=>2, [:a, :e]=>3, [:f]=>4}
Very similar to Adiel Mittmann's solution
def flat_hash(h, k = [])
new_hash = {}
h.each_pair do |key, val|
if val.is_a?(Hash)
new_hash.merge!(flat_hash(val, k + [key]))
else
new_hash[k + [key]] = val
end
end
new_hash
end
Edit: Refactored for elegance. Should be almost as fast.
def flat_hash(hash, k = [])
return {k => hash} unless hash.is_a?(Hash)
hash.inject({}){ |h, v| h.merge! flat_hash(v[-1], k + [v[0]]) }
end
My attempt:
def flatten_hash(h)
return { [] => h } unless h.is_a?(Hash)
Hash[h.map { |a,v1| flatten_hash(v1).map { |b,v2| [[a] + b, v2] } }.flatten(1)]
end
Sorry for the bad variables names, had to fit it in one line.
This is not an attempt to give you the best way to do it, but it is a way :P
def flatten(hash)
return {[] => hash} if !hash.is_a?(Hash)
map = {}
hash.each_pair do |key1, value1|
flatten(value1).each_pair do |key2, value2|
map[[key1] + key2] = value2
end
end
return map
end
It works for your example, producing this result:
{[:a, :b, :c]=>1, [:a, :b, :d]=>2, [:a, :e]=>3, [:f]=>4}
It may not produce the result you expect if there are empty hashes.
A functional approach (see the history for an alternative implementations):
def recursive_flatten(hash)
hash.flat_map do |key, value|
if value.is_a?(Hash)
recursive_flatten(value).map { |ks, v| [[key] + ks, v] }
else
[[[key], value]]
end
end.to_h
end
Inspired by #cary-swoveland way, but in Hash class :
class Hash
def deep_flatten(previous_key=[])
flat_hash = {}
self.each do |key, value|
next_key = previous_key+[key]
flat_hash.update(value.is_a?(Hash) ? value.deep_flatten(next_key) : {next_key=>value})
end
return flat_hash
end
end
h = { :a => { :b => { :c => 1, :d => 2 }, :e => 3 }, :f => 4 }
h.deep_flatten #=> {[:a, :b, :c]=>1, [:a, :b, :d]=>2, [:a, :e]=>3, [:f]=>4}
A declarative solution using DeepEnumerable:
require 'deep_enumerable'
h = { :a => { :b => { :c => 1, :d => 2 }, :e => 3 }, :f => 4 }
h.deep_each.map do |k, v|
[DeepEnumerable.deep_key_to_array(k), v]
end.to_h
or, for those who prefer point-free style
h.deep_each.to_h.shallow_map_keys(&DeepEnumerable.method(:deep_key_to_array))
Array support / readable names / no update for speed / stringified results keys
def flat_hash(input, base = nil, all = {})
if input.is_a?(Array)
input = input.each_with_index.to_a.each(&:reverse!)
end
if input.is_a?(Hash) || input.is_a?(Array)
input.each do |k, v|
flat_hash(v, base ? "#{base}.#{k}" : k, all)
end
else
all[base] = input
end
all
end
Given a hash
z = [{'a' => 1, 'b' => 2}, {'a' => 3, 'b' => 4}, {'a' => 1, 'b' => 4}]
How do I search if the search parameter itself is a hash e.g.
{'a' => 3}
so that I can do something like z.find_by_hash({'a' => 3}) for it to return
{'a' => 3, 'b' => 4}
and also to get a collection of arrays like z.find_by_hash({'a' => 1}) for it to return
[{'a' => 1, 'b' => 2}, {'a' => 1, 'b => 4}]
Thanks
You can do this:
class Array
def find_by_hash(hash)
self.select { |h| h.includes_hash?(hash) }
end
end
class Hash
def includes_hash?(other)
included = true
other.each do |key, value|
included &= self[key] == other[key]
end
included
end
end
This extends Hash by a method to find out if a Hash includes another (with multiple keys and values). Array is extended with the method you wanted, but it's a more generic approach since you can do this:
ary = [ {:a => 1, :b => 3, :c => 5}, {:a => 5, :b => 2, :c => 8} ]
ary.find_by_hash( { :a => 1, :c => 5 } )
Note: You should also consider using Symbols for Hash keys since it is a common practice in Ruby, but my approach does also work with your keys.
z = [{'a' => 1, 'b' => 2}, {'a' => 3, 'b' => 4}, {'a' => 1, 'b' => 4}]
class Array
def search_hash(hash)
key = hash.keys.first
value = hash.values.first
select { |h| h[key] == value }
end
end
z.search_hash({'a' => 3}) #=> [{"a"=>3, "b"=>4}]
or you can type it without curly brackets
z.search_hash('a' => 3)
Basically what you need is something like this:
class Array
def find_by_hash(h)
h.collect_concat do |key, value|
self.select{|h| h[key] == value}
end
end
end
I didn't find an approach in API, so I think we have to implement it of our own.
(by the way, I think #megas' approach is better and more readable)
Code by TDD:
class SearchHashTest < Test::Unit::TestCase
def setup
#array_with_hash_elements = ArrayWithHashElements.new [{'a' => 1, 'b' => 2}, {'a' => 3, 'b' => 4}, {'a' => 1, 'b' => 4}]
end
def test_search_an_array_by_hash_parameter_and_return_single_hash
assert_equal( {'a' => 3, 'b' => 4}, #array_with_hash_elements.search({'a'=>3}) )
end
def test_search_an_array_by_hash_parameter_and_return_an_array
assert_equal( [{'a' => 1, 'b' => 2}, {'a'=> 1, 'b' => 4}], #array_with_hash_elements.search({'a'=>1}))
end
end
implemented code ( just for demo, not production)
class ArrayWithHashElements
def initialize some_array
#elements = some_array
end
def search( query_hash)
puts "search: #{query_hash.inspect}"
result = []
#elements.each do | array_element_in_hash_form|
query_hash.each_pair do | key, value |
if array_element_in_hash_form.has_key?(key) && array_element_in_hash_form[key] == value
puts "adding : #{array_element_in_hash_form.inspect} to result"
result << array_element_in_hash_form
end
end
result
end
return result.size != 1 ? result : result[0]
end
end
result:
sg552#siwei-moto:~/workspace/test$ ruby search_hash_test.rb
Loaded suite search_hash_test
Started
search: {"a"=>1}
adding : {"b"=>2, "a"=>1} to result
adding : {"b"=>4, "a"=>1} to result
.search: {"a"=>3}
adding : {"b"=>4, "a"=>3} to result
.
Finished in 0.000513 seconds.
2 tests, 2 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors
I have a hash like
h = {1 => {"inner" => 45}, 2 => {"inner" => 46}, "inner" => 47}
How do I delete every pair that contains the key "inner"?
You can see that some of the "inner" pairs appear directly in h while others appear in pairs in h
Note that I only want to delete the "inner" pairs, so if I call my mass delete method on the above hash, I should get
h = {1 => {}, 2 => {}}
Since these pairs don't have a key == "inner"
Really, this is what reject! is for:
def f! x
x.reject!{|k,v| 'inner' == k} if x.is_a? Hash
x.each{|k,v| f! x[k]}
end
def f x
x.inject({}) do |m, (k, v)|
v = f v if v.is_a? Hash # note, arbitrarily recursive
m[k] = v unless k == 'inner'
m
end
end
p f h
Update: slightly improved...
def f x
x.is_a?(Hash) ? x.inject({}) do |m, (k, v)|
m[k] = f v unless k == 'inner'
m
end : x
end
def except_nested(x,key)
case x
when Hash then x = x.inject({}) {|m, (k, v)| m[k] = except_nested(v,key) unless k == key ; m }
when Array then x.map! {|e| except_nested(e,key)}
end
x
end
Here is what I came up with:
class Hash
def deep_reject_key!(key)
keys.each {|k| delete(k) if k == key || self[k] == self[key] }
values.each {|v| v.deep_reject_key!(key) if v.is_a? Hash }
self
end
end
Works for a Hash or a HashWithIndifferentAccess
> x = {'1' => 'cat', '2' => { '1' => 'dog', '2' => 'elephant' }}
=> {"1"=>"cat", "2"=>{"1"=>"dog", "2"=>"elephant"}}
> y = x.with_indifferent_access
=> {"1"=>"cat", "2"=>{"1"=>"dog", "2"=>"elephant"}}
> x.deep_reject_key!(:"1")
=> {"1"=>"cat", "2"=>{"1"=>"dog", "2"=>"elephant"}}
> x.deep_reject_key!("1")
=> {"2"=>{"2"=>"elephant"}}
> y.deep_reject_key!(:"1")
=> {"2"=>{"2"=>"elephant"}}
Similar answer but it is a whitelist type approach. For ruby 1.9+
# recursive remove keys
def deep_simplify_record(hash, keep)
hash.keep_if do |key, value|
if keep.include?(key)
deep_simplify_record(value, keep) if value.is_a?(Hash)
true
end
end
end
hash = {:a => 1, :b => 2, :c => {:a => 1, :b => 2, :c => {:a => 1, :b => 2, :c => 4}} }
deep_simplify_record(hash, [:b, :c])
# => {:b=>2, :c=>{:b=>2, :c=>{:b=>2, :c=>4}}}
Also here are some other methods which I like to use for hashes.
https://gist.github.com/earlonrails/2048705
This question is the inverse of this question.
Given a nested hash like
{
:a => {
:b => {:c => 1, :d => 2},
:e => 3,
},
:f => 4,
}
what is the best way to convert it into a flat hash like
{
[:a, :b, :c] => 1,
[:a, :b, :d] => 2,
[:a, :e] => 3,
[:f] => 4,
}
Another way:
def flat_hash(h,f=[],g={})
return g.update({ f=>h }) unless h.is_a? Hash
h.each { |k,r| flat_hash(r,f+[k],g) }
g
end
h = { :a => { :b => { :c => 1,
:d => 2 },
:e => 3 },
:f => 4 }
flat_hash(h) #=> {[:a, :b, :c]=>1, [:a, :b, :d]=>2, [:a, :e]=>3, [:f]=>4}
Very similar to Adiel Mittmann's solution
def flat_hash(h, k = [])
new_hash = {}
h.each_pair do |key, val|
if val.is_a?(Hash)
new_hash.merge!(flat_hash(val, k + [key]))
else
new_hash[k + [key]] = val
end
end
new_hash
end
Edit: Refactored for elegance. Should be almost as fast.
def flat_hash(hash, k = [])
return {k => hash} unless hash.is_a?(Hash)
hash.inject({}){ |h, v| h.merge! flat_hash(v[-1], k + [v[0]]) }
end
My attempt:
def flatten_hash(h)
return { [] => h } unless h.is_a?(Hash)
Hash[h.map { |a,v1| flatten_hash(v1).map { |b,v2| [[a] + b, v2] } }.flatten(1)]
end
Sorry for the bad variables names, had to fit it in one line.
This is not an attempt to give you the best way to do it, but it is a way :P
def flatten(hash)
return {[] => hash} if !hash.is_a?(Hash)
map = {}
hash.each_pair do |key1, value1|
flatten(value1).each_pair do |key2, value2|
map[[key1] + key2] = value2
end
end
return map
end
It works for your example, producing this result:
{[:a, :b, :c]=>1, [:a, :b, :d]=>2, [:a, :e]=>3, [:f]=>4}
It may not produce the result you expect if there are empty hashes.
A functional approach (see the history for an alternative implementations):
def recursive_flatten(hash)
hash.flat_map do |key, value|
if value.is_a?(Hash)
recursive_flatten(value).map { |ks, v| [[key] + ks, v] }
else
[[[key], value]]
end
end.to_h
end
Inspired by #cary-swoveland way, but in Hash class :
class Hash
def deep_flatten(previous_key=[])
flat_hash = {}
self.each do |key, value|
next_key = previous_key+[key]
flat_hash.update(value.is_a?(Hash) ? value.deep_flatten(next_key) : {next_key=>value})
end
return flat_hash
end
end
h = { :a => { :b => { :c => 1, :d => 2 }, :e => 3 }, :f => 4 }
h.deep_flatten #=> {[:a, :b, :c]=>1, [:a, :b, :d]=>2, [:a, :e]=>3, [:f]=>4}
A declarative solution using DeepEnumerable:
require 'deep_enumerable'
h = { :a => { :b => { :c => 1, :d => 2 }, :e => 3 }, :f => 4 }
h.deep_each.map do |k, v|
[DeepEnumerable.deep_key_to_array(k), v]
end.to_h
or, for those who prefer point-free style
h.deep_each.to_h.shallow_map_keys(&DeepEnumerable.method(:deep_key_to_array))
Array support / readable names / no update for speed / stringified results keys
def flat_hash(input, base = nil, all = {})
if input.is_a?(Array)
input = input.each_with_index.to_a.each(&:reverse!)
end
if input.is_a?(Hash) || input.is_a?(Array)
input.each do |k, v|
flat_hash(v, base ? "#{base}.#{k}" : k, all)
end
else
all[base] = input
end
all
end
This question is the inverse of this question.
Given a hash that has an array for each key like
{
[:a, :b, :c] => 1,
[:a, :b, :d] => 2,
[:a, :e] => 3,
[:f] => 4,
}
what is the best way to convert it into a nested hash like
{
:a => {
:b => {:c => 1, :d => 2},
:e => 3,
},
:f => 4,
}
Here's an iterative solution, a recursive one is left as an exercise to the reader:
def convert(h={})
ret = {}
h.each do |k,v|
node = ret
k[0..-2].each {|x| node[x]||={}; node=node[x]}
node[k[-1]] = v
end
ret
end
convert(your_hash) # => {:f=>4, :a=>{:b=>{:c=>1, :d=>2}, :e=>3}}
Functional recursive algorithm:
require 'facets'
class Hash
def nestify
map_by { |ks, v| [ks.first, [ks.drop(1), v]] }.mash do |key, pairs|
[key, pairs.first[0].empty? ? pairs.first[1] : Hash[pairs].nestify]
end
end
end
p {[:a, :b, :c]=>1, [:a, :b, :d]=>2, [:a, :e]=>3, [:f]=>4}.nestify
# {:a=>{:b=>{:c=>1, :d=>2}, :e=>3}, :f=>4}
There is already a good answer, but I worked on this recursive solution, so here it is:
def to_nest(hash)
{}.tap do |nest|
hash.each_pair do |key, value|
nodes = key.dup
node = nodes.shift
if nodes.empty?
nest[node] = value
else
nest[node] ||= {}
nest[node].merge!({nodes => value})
end
end
nest.each_pair do |key, value|
nest[key] = to_nest(value) if value.kind_of?(Hash)
end
end
end
Another way:
def convert(h)
h.each_with_object({}) { |(a,n),f| f.update({ a.first=>(a.size==1 ? n :
convert({ a[1..-1]=>n })) }) { |_,ov,nv| ov.merge(nv) } }
end
Try it:
h = {
[:a, :b, :c] => 1,
[:a, :b, :d] => 2,
[:a, :e] => 3,
[:f] => 4,
}
convert(h) #=> {:a=>{:b=>{:d=>2}, :e=>3},
# :f=>4}
For a mixed hash/array nested structure you can use this. (Modified for arrays as well)
def unflatten(h={})
ret = {}
h.each do |k,v|
node = ret
keys = k.split('.').collect { |x| x.to_i.to_s == x ? x.to_i : x }
keys.each_cons(2) do |x, next_d|
if(next_d.is_a? Fixnum)
node[x] ||= []
node=node[x]
else
node[x] ||={}
node=node[x]
end
end
node[keys[-1]] = v
end
ret
end
provided you used the below for flattening. ( dot separate string for key instead of array [split on . if you need] )
def flatten_hash(hash)
hash.each_with_object({}) do |(k, v), h|
if v.is_a? Hash
flatten_hash(v).map do |h_k, h_v|
h["#{k}.#{h_k}"] = h_v
end
elsif v.is_a? Array
flatten_array(v).map do |h_k,h_v|
h["#{k}.#{h_k}"] = h_v
end
else
h[k] = v
end
end
end
def flatten_array(array)
array.each_with_object({}).with_index do |(v,h),i|
pp v,h,i
if v.is_a? Hash
flatten_hash(v).map do |h_k, h_v|
h["#{i}.#{h_k}"] = h_v
end
elsif v.is_a? Array
flatten_array(v).map do |h_k,h_v|
h["#{i}.#{h_k}"] = h_v
end
end
end
end
Using DeepEnumerable:
require DeepEnumerable
h = {[:a, :b, :c]=>1, [:a, :b, :d]=>2, [:a, :e]=>3, [:f]=>4}
h.inject({}){|hash, kv| hash.deep_set(*kv)}