This question might seem to be duplicated with this and this that are similar. But it is not! First- I am getting this error from the setup file and not from the program that I am distributing Second -the version is different, the directories in Installshield 2009 an 10.5 differ. .
I'm trying to fix an error caused by Windows compatibility mode in my setup, which is built with Installshield 10.5. So far my research led me to a conclusion that i need to add [this][3] to my manifest file. I saw that Microsoft's tool mt.exe could extract a manifest file from a dll, however I did not see anywhere that it can extract it from an executable file.
So my questions are the following:
Is there any way to view the manifest file of a Setup.exe built with Installshield?
Is there any way to configure this manifest file for the certain project in Installshield?
[3]Can one edit an InstallShield setup.exe's manifest file?
As far as I know, mt.exe will work fine on EXE files; both EXE and DLL files are Portable Executable (PE) files, and PE files use the exact same structure for resources such as the manifest. Visual Studio, CFF explorer, and countless other tools (including raw resource APIs) will also work to view and possibly update manifests in general.
However for a built InstallShield setup.exe, there is a twist. InstallShield uses areas in the file to store information that are not described in the PE format. Tools that update the resources on an EXE can inadvertently destroy this data as they do not expect it to be there, nor do they know how to detect or adjust it.
InstallShield 12 or so and later allow you to specify a manifest, and it selects the manifest from files it ships that you can update before it adds them to the setup.exe. In addition, there is a tool called ISReMan that is aware of the extra information and can update the manifest correctly when that data is present.
By the way, it's generally helpful to mention the actual problem you're trying to solve, in case the method you've chosen (in this case updating the manifest) is not the correct solution. Note as well that InstallShield 10.5 is over 10 years old, and knows nothing about UAC, PCA, and other Vista and later technologies; adjusting the manifest may not help fix, say, an elevation-related problem.
Note as well that I am paid to work on InstallShield, so I may be biased when I recommend things like upgrading. :)
Related
Just out of curiosity, I would like to understand the behaviors of those self contained installer programs and try to write a simple installer myself.
I did some search on Google and did not really find a useful article explaining it. However AFAIK, an installer should have a small chunk of code residing in the top of the executable. It pulls data out from the rear of the executable and interprets them as files according to an inventory file (probably xml?). Other operations such as writing register entries can also be specified in the inventory file.
Now is my guess of the file structure true? If so I think I just need to read about the PE format and then it would be conceptually easy for me to implement it. If my guess is wrong, I would love to know how exactly it works.
Thanks for your time!
Normally installer packages are self-contained compressed executables (SFX) that contains:
A small installer executable
A compressed file structure with files to extract
Some configuration files (xml, ini, json, properties) to define file destinations, registry entries, desktop/start menu shortcuts, instalation modes
Extra files (dll, icon/image resources) to make the installer work.
For MSI packages, it's a bit more complex. It's a propietary format packaged as a SQL database in a COM structured storage file. It contains also a virtual file system inside the installation package (file access using file streams).
You can review some free tools and check many typical features to make installer executables like:
Wix (For MSI installers) http://wixtoolset.org/
Nullsoft Installer (NSIS) http://nsis.sourceforge.net/Main_Page
Inno Setup http://www.jrsoftware.org/isinfo.php
For Windows it's pretty much
Declarative: MSI, AppX, ClickOnce
Imperative: any number of third party tools, scripts and home grown EXEs
MSI is typically your best choice. The runtime is already part of windows so when you double click the MSI database MSIEXEC takes over. The point of the declarative models is to separate what needs to be done from how you do it. The imperative models are basically some simple to complex framework to write procedural code to do the actual installation work.
It's far to broad of a question to ask in detail how any of these work at a low level. For MSI it's all in the Windows Platform SDK documentation on MSDN.
We have a couple of dlls we like to install using an msi.
In our test environment, we are using regasm -codebase to register the dlls.
As I understand from googling, this is accompliched in an msi project by setting the register property to vsdraCOM.
The problem is that when we run the installer and checks the registry, the codebase path is set to the path the file were in when building the msi.
I'm going to expand on Hans' answer and that link info, and it may be more than a comment can hold.
That reg file will contain the path to the file and the link article recommends using [TARGETDIR], which is basically wrong if the file is not being installed to the application folder. The path to your file should be written as [#file-key] in the reg file that you import. In a VS setup project the file-key will be (just an example) something like _B049230C37DE4B6787C578DCEE30252A. Open your MSI file with Orca, go to the File Table and use the file key in the File column that corresponds to your file name.
That comes from here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa368609%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
the 7th bullet point. It resolves to the file path wherever it is installed to.
The other thing that can be done is to let Visual Studio do its incorrect thing, then go to the Registry table with Orca, find the path and put that [#file key] in it such as [#_B049230C37DE4B6787C578DCEE30252A] and people sometimes do those kinds of updates with a post build script to update the MSI.
None of these are great, but they should work and get you out of using the GAC. VS setup projects really should be using that [#file key] syntax, and it's just a silly bug I assume.
Speaking as someone who's made a full time living writing installs for 18 years, my first suggestion would be to switch to Windows Installer XML. If you insist on using .VDPROJ, I would suggest reading: Redemption of Visual Studio Deployment Projects.
The concept is you use Windows Installer XML to create a merge module and then consume that merge module with .VDPROJ. In Wix, you use Heat to harvest the DLL. It will extract the COM / Regasm metadata and author it as Registry table entries. This provides a nice clean encapsulation using authoring best practices and avoids the need to do any post build hacking of the built MSI database.
I notice that every time I rebuild my InstallShield project the file PROJECT_ASSISTANT\Interm\ISSetup.dll is updated. As described in the documentation, it executes InstallScript custom actions.
I always deliver a single exe PROJECT_ASSISTANT\SINGLE_EXE_IMAGE\DiskImages\DISK1\Setup.exe to my customers, and the installation runs smoothly without this ISSetup.dll.
So is this ISSetup.dll packed into the single setup.exe somehow? If not, how the Installscripts are executed on client machine?
I would like to tell you the project type (be a Basic MSI, InstallScript, or InstallScript MSI), but since I build my project from command-line (InstallShield 2012 SpringSP1 SAB) and am not able to open the project in GUI mode to view the properties pane, I don't know how to get this information from an .ism (XML format) file.
I forget the exact mechanics of where the file is included in each project type that may use it (sometimes it's directly in setup.exe, sometimes it's indirect). Regardless, ISSetup.dll is always the compiled InstallScript engine (the C++ part), and often has the compiled setup.inx (InstallScript part) "streamed" onto it. Something (perhaps setup.exe, perhaps a Windows Installer custom action) calls into it to run InstallScript code that we provided, or that you wrote.
So the short answer to the original question is: yes.
To answer the unasked questions, the Interm folder is an intermediate folder used for staging some of the files that get built into setup.exe or into the .msi file, and ISSetup.dll definitely receives updated compiled script code for each build of a Basic MSI or InstallScript MSI that includes custom actions.
I believe the ISSetup.dll is compiled into the MSI's binary table and extracted as part of the launching of the msi via msiexec.exe - at least for Basic MSI files.
The setup.exe wrapper probably contains the whole ISSetup.dll - perhaps statically linked or embedded somehow. Michael Uhrman (Installshield developer) will probably comment if he sees this question.
UPDATE:
I found a version of this ISSetup.dll file, see a screen shot from Dependency Walker below. In addition to the exported functions seen, there are also COM register and unregister methods exported (DllRegisterServer, DllUnregisterServer, DllCanUnloadNow, DllGetClassObject). The f-functions must be the various Installscript functions. The first 5 functions must be related to Installscript MSI.
I'm currently trying to make a download/install file for a CD, and I've never done this or written any type of coding before so I'm somewhat at a loss. When we last created an installer package (I wasn't employed yet) we used InstalShield, but that was decades ago, and we can't afford the 500$+ price to get it again.
Currently I'm trying to work off the old download package we have. There is the Windows Installer Package (made by InstalShield) called CD Cat v6.msi, and then another file called CDcatv6.exe (which launches a window for the customer to browse options) and then a file called Data.cab which has all the files for the entire catalog in it.
I was thinking perhaps I can just replace a lot of those files with the current information. Replace the CDcatv6.exe file with my v7.exe file (but change the name so its CDcatv6.exe) and then replace all the files in the Data.cab file with the current ones. But that's turning out to be a huge issue.
I did a bit of searching to learn what a .cab file was, and downloaded the Cab File Maker 2.0 (after quite a bit of searching!). I'm having a difficult time using it though, as it wants all the files that I put in it to make the .cab to be in .ddf format. I have no idea what that is, much less how to make it. I tried using 'save as' to do it, but since all the files I need are PDF's there's no option for it and I cant export the files to it either.
I tried looking at other ways that people made Cab files, but I don't know many of the file types or programs their talking about. I'm not a programmer by any means, but I have to learn quick I guess, so any information on how to do this will help greatly. Is it even possible to replace all the files seamlessly and have it work properly? Or is there an easier way to create a fill that the customer can click on and have it download to their desktop?
I don't think simple editing of Data.cab will work. There is installer logic stored in other InstallShield files. It could work if and only if the file set is the same, I mean no files changed its names, no new files added, no new registry entries required etc.
To create a CAB file, use cabarc.exe from Microsoft Windows SDK.
Creating a brand new installer may be a better option. Look at this tools for creating installers:
Advanced Installer
NSIS
WiX toolset (with tutorial)
You best solution is to use dark.exe (part of the WiX toolset).
This will enable to you decompile the MSI and CAB files, edit the installer source as XML and then recompile this into a new executable. Unfortunately this route is not for the faint of heart and what you save on price will cost you in time.
I'm curious how your company created an MSI decades ago, but Sasha is right about time and money trade-offs. However if you're working with Visual Studio, you might try the InstallShield Limited Edition for Visual Studio. It may have enough capabilities to suit your needs.
Thanks for pointing to CABARC, that looks exactly what i was looking for, due to information on:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/bb417343(v=msdn.10)?redirectedfrom=MSDN#top
That make me look how to download it, but i found this post:
Where can I get the cabarc utility?
Where it explains CABARC may be obsolete and there is another utility called MAKECAB that cames with Windows 11, i had try it at command line and it is there.
Thanks a lot.
I'm looking for general advice. I created a Visual Studio 2010 project that outputs an ocx file that is used on XP and Vista machines. The DLL on which it depends has been updated on our Win7 machines. I simply needed to rebuild for Win7 using the exact same code with an updated .lib file. I created a second project configuration (ReleaseW7) and it only differs from the original project config (Release) in that it points to the new .lib.
So now I have 2 files both named xx.ocx. Besides looking at the name of the folder each file resides in (or looking at the creation time of each) there is no way to determine which is which. I thought of using different file version numbers but as far as I can tell (and I'm relatively new to this so I could certainly be wrong) that would require two separate projects each with a slightly modified resource (.rc) file, instead of simply having two configurations within the same project. If nothing more, that seems like a waste of hard drive space. It also feels like the "wrong" way of using file version numbers
Is there a cleaner or more "standard" way of handling this? All I really want is a way for the folks who install the ocx and support the end user to know for certain that they are working with the correct file.
Long story short, I decided to use different version numbers. I was able to setup a preprocessor definition for the resource compiler and use that to handle different versions of VS_VERSION_INFO in my .rc file.
In case anyone is interested, this is the resource I found:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winformssetup/thread/605275c0-3001-45d2-b6c1-652326ca5340/