Wikipedia has lately installed a very aesthetic mainstream Urdu font called Jameel Noori Nastaleeq.
I wanted to learn about the #font-face declarations for this font, but failed to located them in the referenced stylesheets.
Can somebody help me in locating the font face declarations for Jameel Noori Nastaleeq on Wikipedia? One page where the font has been used is This Page. The font in discussion is used on the first line under From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
It's right in page source:
<span lang="ur" dir="rtl"><span class="Nastaliq" title="Urdu Nastaliq" style="font-size: 125%; font-family: 'Jameel Noori Nastaleeq', 'Urdu Typesetting', 'Noto Nastaliq Urdu', 'Noto Nastaliq Urdu Draft', 'Hussaini Nastaleeq', 'AlQalam Taj Nastaleeq', IranNastaliq, 'Nafees Nastaleeq', 'Nafees Nastaleeq v1.01', Nafees, 'Pak Nastaleeq', 'PDMS_Jauhar', 'Alvi Lahori Nastaleeq';">مستنصر حسين تارڑ</span></span>
Looking at page wikitext, the inner span that has the list of fonts comes from Template:Script/Nastaliq (view source).
Related
I have created a Login page using Oracle Apex 5.1 where the region template is "Login". I want my region title to be bold and also want to increase the size of the title text. How can I achieve this?
I am sorry if this question is very noob level question. I am new to Oracle Apex and have spent several hours to achieve this. Could anyone help me solve this problem?
You can use HTML in any text fields like titels, headers, region text etc.
<p><font size="20" face="verdana" color="green"><b>This is some text!</b></font></p>
Also you can put region static ID and make custom styling with CSS (in page Inline CSS or in ThemeRoller)
Edit:
Just simple example:
I have Colapsible region with static id: reg
Region title is h2 elemnt in the Div so in inline CSS section put something like this:
#reg h2{
color:red;
font-style: bold;
font-size: 24px;
}
Change color, size, style or delete some lines until you are happy with the result.
You can use many style properties like drop shadows, font type, margins, paddings etc.
Use google search for more about CSS styling.
All my site WC3 happy - except one page with three small notes ...
On this page I embedded Slider that somehow causes this message:
Line 149, Column 31: there is no attribute "WIDTH"
<a href="images2/1.jpg" width="1280" height="960" border="0">
Maybe it is because the slide is not supported fully on my site?
In addition, even though I gave height/width settings to all photos,
I got a note (website load time testing) give all these settings pictures ...?
this is a simple validation message. Cause DOCTYPE (HTML 4.01 Transitional) you are using deprecates visual formating html attributes like width, height, border etc. You can use CSS-properties instead or ignore this if it these attributes are set by a some <script>, e.g. your slider, there will be nothing dangerous. CSS is:
img {
width: 1280px;
height: 960px;
border: none;
}
website load time testing is, as I can suppose, a message from your developing tool. I think it is normal. Except one point: your site for some reason is very slow to load, so the message refers to that issue. When a page loads fast you simply do not have time to spot it.
I'm moving from FCK editor to CK editor 3.6.3 and the site has a background image, which is appearing in the CK editor. I need to remove this while using the same CSS file for both the general site and the CK editor (to pick up on CSS for the styles dropdown).
I tried setting config.BodyClass to a style with no image - this works on FCK2.x but not the CK3. I also found via google a config.extraCss setting but I don't see it in the docs, and it does not appear to do anything anyway.
Fullpage is off (i.e. editor is not producing <body><head> etc tags))
I've got a workaround by having two CSS files, one for the site and one for CK with a different body style, but there must be a better way?
Thanks,
Kevin
Config section:
config.stylesSet = 'my_styles:/admin/ckeditor/styles_dropdown.js';
config.contentsCss = '/newdesign/style.css';
//config.extraCss = 'body {background: none;background-image: none;}';
config.BodyClass = 'fckbody' ;
CSS section (of the 'main' css file)
body{
margin:0px; padding:0px; background-image:url(/newdesign/site_bg19.jpg); repeat; font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size:11px; color:#393939;
}
.fckbody {
background-color: white;
background: none;
background-image: none;
text-align:left;
}
The correct name in CKEditor is bodyClass with an initial lower case.
Thought I should post my insight here for my findings. I came across this page while looking for a reason why my CKEditor was showing a background image of my site.
If you CKEditor is showing a background image on the Make a Comment section of a node :
1 - Head to "admin/config/content/wysiwyg"
2 - click edit to the text format for which text format is showing the background image
3 - click the CSS tab drop down
4 - change the Editor CSS to "Editor Default CSS".
Hope this helps someone!
I'm programmatically sending HTML-formatted email, and setting the font as Arial throughout (font-family: Arial;). When the messages arrive in Outlook 2010, text in table elements is in Times New Roman. Text in div elements is fine in Arial. If I View Source, copy into an HTML file, and view in a browser, all fonts function as expected (it's all Arial).
Some Google results show that Outlook will fall back to its default font (Times New Roman) when none is specified, but that's not what's happening here.
Why is Outlook forcing my email to display in Times New Roman when specified otherwise?
Even if you set font-family: arial to table, it still wont work. You need to specifically set the font for each td inside your table to get it right.
<!--[if mso]>
<style> body,table tr,table td,a, span,table.MsoNormalTable { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif !important; }</style>
<!--<![endif]-->
The table in question was nested in a div that had font-family:Arial; in its style, but the table did not have a font set. So tables don't inherit fonts (and perhaps other things) from their containers in HTML emails in some clients.
This issue was happening from outlook 2007 and the previous solutions didn't work for me, the only solution that seems to work is wrapping the text with <font face="arial, sans-serif">My text with arial</font>
If you're working with Outlook 2007, you must define font-family on table . Otherwise it will set to default serif font.
The <font> tag is deprecated but since Outlook 2010 is removing (almost all) styles, this is the only way it works.
table.MsoNormalTable
{font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
Open your HTML with Text Pad, and change it to Arial.
None of above methods worked for me, using a custom font linked with #font-face. had to work with conditional tags for Outlook. Took me quite some time to figure out how exactly. So I've set up a code example: I was still having some troubles implementing this in my situation so I've shared a code example for this: https://stackoverflow.com/a/21626196/135654
You can put your style to "span" tag, It will works good.
<td>
<span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"></span>
</td>
I had the same problem....all text in the body of the email was Arial, but the table defaulted to word. I had to wrap the font in each each cell......time consuming..
I am trying to mask an element that has some images inside of it, using only css.
i have done this and it works fine in webkit using -webkit-mask-box-image and its doing just what i want, but im having trouble using other browsers.
gecko is supposed to work using mask, and that tag does show up in firebug, but it doesnt actually use the mask.. i've also tried converting the png im using to base64 data uri, but to no avail.
example: http://jsfiddle.net/nNLta/
does anyone know the correct way for doing this?
HTML
<div id='wrap'>
<div class='masked flashing-anim'>
<div class='the-mask' >
<ul>
<li class='blink_1'></li>
<li class='blink_2'></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<div class='the-outline'>
<img src='img/real-stuff.png' height=500 />
</div>
</div>
CSS
#wrap {
position: relative;
}
.the-outline, the-mask {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
}
.the-mask {
height: 500px;
width: 360px;
-webkit-mask-box-image: url(../img/the-mask.png);
-moz-mask-box-image: url(../img/the-mask.png);
-o-mask-box-image: url(../img/the-mask.png);
mask-box-image: url(../img/the-mask.png);
mask: url(data:lotsofchars);
}
example: http://jsfiddle.net/nNLta/
Part 1
mask is not the same as mask-box-image unfortunately. If you read the (rather sparse) docs you will see it is applicable to SVG only. More on this later.
Currently Gecko doesn't support 'mask-box-image' - if you search the MDN you'll see it applies to -webkit- only.
Additionally I don't think this is actually spec. Webkit has had this capability/concept for ages (in various forms like -webkit-box-reflect) and I think that it's just a hangover from those days. I'm not sure whether this will even be adopted by all browser vendors (although I hope, and it makes sense that, it will).
Part 2
To use the svg dependant mask: css property you need to create an SVG element and reference that. Here is a guide. I've not used this technique before so I'm afraid that's all the detail I'm going to go into right now.
An alternate option
If you don't need a clever repeating/growing mask why not create a large png and overlay the text/image you wish to hide. I'm not sure I understand what you are ultimately trying to do but this seems pretty simple to me. The obvious issue is when you need the stuff behind the mask to be selectable/interactable (err..interactive that is...); for instance when you wish to apply masking to text or links. A way around this is to use pointer-events:none which is supported in Gecko and Webkit (but nothing else...). Here's more from the MDN
Sorry I don't have better news - if none of the above is helpful please feel free to leave a comment with your specific requirement and we'll see if we can't work around the browser limitations.
Hope this is helpful!