I am working on some project where I need to communicate between two processors (hardware), ATxMEGA128A1 AVR Controller and Blackfin BF522 Digital Signal Processor. Someone help me.
Here, to communicate between a DSP and a UController you can use asynchronous serial link USART that's called as Inter-Processor Communication(IPC).
You can code for GPIO pins if you know how to write code for USART,that's available on almost any UController.
In-short you need USART channel to communicate between DSP and UController(IPC).That's the one possible way I don't know about others.
Related
My team has been struggling with a pretty strange issue while using the WinRT/C++ APIs for Windows to connect to both a MIDI port and receive BLE notifications through a proprietary service on the same device.
The WinRT/C++ library itself is really nice and provides easy and modern C++ interfaces to access the managed Windows runtime classes.
I've pushed a sample repo to Github where we've replicated the issue with a minimal example.
The repo's readme goes over the problem in detail, but I'll post the relevant bits here for completeness.
The sample program is performing roughly these steps:
Check for available MIDI devices using a DeviceWatcher.
Check for available Bluetooth LE devices using another instance of a DeviceWatcher.
Match discovered MIDI and BluetoothLE devices on their ContainerId property (see DeviceInfo for details). This is the method JUCE employs in the native WinRT code for their library, and works as expected.
Open the MIDI port and attach a handler to the MessageReceived event (see the code).
This causes the system to create a connection to the Bluetooth LE device. The program detects this state change, creates a BluetoothLEDevice, we perform GATT service discovery and attach a handler to the ValueChanged event for the characteristic we're interested in notifications from (see the code).
The program then counts how many MIDI messages are received on each port and how many BLE notifications are received from the corresponding device.
The behaviour we notice is that data from the most recently connected device streams just fine, while the throughput for the others is severly limited. We are at quite a standstill regarding this issue, and are not sure where the problem may lie.
We are at quite a standstill here. I'd be more willing to accept it if all the devices would exhibit this behaviour, but that's not the case. Is there any reason that creating both a MidiInPort and an BluetoothLEDevice from the same peripheral should cause this issue?
A BLE radio can only receive or send at any given time. And therefore only communicate with one device at any given time. It uses a scheduler to allocate radio time for every device when you have many devices. That way a second connection can "interrupt" a connection event from another device, decreasing the throughput for that device. See https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/sds_s132/SDS/s1xx/multilink_scheduling/central_connection_timing.html
I am writing a serial driver for UART in windows just for learning purpose. More specifically in WDM.
I will write both the bus driver and function driver.
Currently i am writing the bus driver. So my question is from where i can come to know in my driver that how many serial ports i have in my system, so that i can expose that number of PDO's from my bus driver?? And resources allocated to each port. Do i have to check some kind of registry or windows will provide some kind of structure.
Please help me!! Thanks in advance
Assuming your UARTs are part of the PC, there's already a bus driver which will enumerate them. ACPI.SYS gets information from the platform BIOS, which includes the number and resource assignments for built-in components like UARTs.
If you're writing your driver for an add-in multi-port serial board, then you would need to look at the documentation for the board to determine how you find the number of UARTs. It might be as simple as looking at the PCI Product ID and having a hard-coded count for the type of board you have.
When ACPI enumerates the device, your driver's AddDevice routine will be called to load on it, and you'll receive the assigned resources when handling the PNP START message.
I have a Windows XP application that is using a driver called TVicHW32 which allows me to create an interrupt handler for OS interrupts. Currently I am using a custom ISA card in an industrial chassis with IRQ 5
The interrupt handler code is working and I can see a variable being incremented so the code that sets up and handles the interrupt is working.
The issue I have is that an IO access call fails to generate any IO activity on the ISA bus. I have an address at 0x308 that is used to trigger a start pulse on the ISA bus interface board.
If I trigger this pulse from the main code, for example, from a timer, the pulse is detected on the ISA bus and the card responds.
If I call the exact same function call to access that IO address from within the interrupt handler, nothing appears on the ISA bus. A logic analyser confirms this.
I have emailed the supplier of the driver but that can't help so I was wondering if anyone here has come across this situation and can offer a solution. This is critical to getting this project working and the only solution I can think of is to develop a custom driver with the DDK but as this requires a steep learning curve, I would hope to find an alternative solution.
Thanks
Dave...
Hello Linux Kernel Driver Gurus!
I'm writing a v4l2 driver for a camera that uses a serial interface for configuration. I'd like the driver to configure the camera, as it keeps the client code consistent across camera models. The question is: what's the best way to access the camera's serial interface from the driver module?
From what I hear, accessing files from a kernel driver is a big no-no, but it can be done. As such, I'm currently using the following code snippet, but it feels like a hack.
oldfs = get_fs();
set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
fd->f_pos=0;
fd->f_op->write(fd, data, data_len, &fd->f_pos);
set_fs(oldfs);
My question is really: what's the right way to do this?
I presume that since a serial port is involved, this must be some kind of embedded system. After all, not many PCs even have serial ports. I also assume that the serial port can be considered a permanent connection, at least from the user's perspective. If that is all true, then you don't really want a TTY device. You want to access the device as a private UART.
If you have a look at the Wolfson audio codecs (sound/soc/wm*.c) you will see an example of devices that primarily communicate over I2S but have an auxiliary I2C interface for configuration. This is conceptually what you want, I believe. The driver presents a unified interface to software, and issues commands to whatever hardware is appropriate. Obviously this is much cleaner than having to expose hardware implementation details to userspace.
I couldn't find a good example of a UART driver in the kernel that works this way, but hopefully I've described what to look for. From a practical rather than technical purity point of view, it might just be better to do file I/O from the kernel.
First I would advise you to find a way to do this from the userspace if possible: what you try to achieve here really is userspace code in kernel code.
But if you don't find a way to do it, this article shows you how to do userspace calls in kernelspace.
Since you want to access a serial port, you should have calls that tty oriented, for instance for open:
serial_fd = sys_open("/dev/ttyS0", O_RDWR | O_NOCTTY | O_NONBLOCK))
I am currenlty trying to monitor my battery status through SMBus.
I have a battery along with a control board that constantly outputs the battery status.
This control board is then connected to my mother board through a I2C-USB module.
I need to write a program to recognize the SMBus connection and transmit the battery status to the user.
I'm a beginner when it comes to dealing with smart batteries and I2C/SMBus, and I'm somewhat lost with how to approach this problem.
Any help of suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks.
Your question is a bit lacking. What kind of I2C-USB module? Or rather does it come with a Linux driver? If it does you probably won't need to write one. An application will do. You can read more about I2C and SMBus here.
Basically what you need is the I2C address of the control board (a single byte). When you have the address you (as the master) issue read commands over the I2C bus to the control board using its address and reads the response. If there's a driver for the I2C-USB module this should be straightforward enough. Plug in the device and open() the device (/dev/[i2c-usb-name] where [i2c-usb-name] is the name of the device). Then follow the driver implementer's guide how to setup and send data over that device (typically using read()/write() or ioctl()). Here are some additional information on working with I2C from user space: http://www.mjmwired.net/kernel/Documentation/i2c (select topics in the menu on the left hand side).
If you must write the driver yourself, the first stop for a Linux device driver beginner is the LDD3. Read it, it's quite a pleasant read.