This is my current code for ircd configuration file generator,
I'm trying to be able to use answer_or_default for this, and figure out the use of HighLine::Question#gather
Here's the answer_or_default
a = HighLine.new($stdin, $stderr)
connect_pingfreq = a.ask("? ", Integer) do |q|
q.default = 240
q.in = 0..300
# q.answer_or_default
# gives
# /var/lib/gems/2.0.0/gems/highline
# -1.7.8/lib/highline/question.rb:217:in
# `answer_or_default': wrong number of arguments (0 for 1) (ArgumentError)
end
# I've used it here as
# connect_pingfreq.answer_or_default
# But then gives the error shown
# ?
# /home/ken/git/shell-scripts/inspigen/generator.rb:48:in `conf':
# undefined method `answer_or_default' for 240:Fixnum (NoMethodError)
When using answer_or_default inside, I'm not too sure on how to give it its 'answer_string' the documentation says it wants.
And then 240 is the answer given but I can't exactly do anything with.
I'd also like to learn the use of HighLine::Question#gather using this piece of code. Considering I can't quite understand the documentation for it
a = HighLine.new($stdin, $stderr)
a.say "Your <admin> lines.."
admin_name = a.ask "Admin Real Name? "
admin_nick = a.ask "Admin Nick? "
admin_email = a.ask("Admin Email? ") do |q|
q.validate = /\A([\w+\-].?)+#[a-z\d\-]+(\.[a-z]+)*\.[a-z]+\z/
end
#gather should ask me for 3 lines, name, nick, and email
Either in a hash or array, but I believe a hash would be more easily read.
For your first question, you can just get the answer (or default) from the connect_pingfreq variable. No need to call answer_or_default. Like this:
a = HighLine.new($stdin, $stderr)
connect_pingfreq = a.ask("? ", Integer) do |q|
q.default = 240
q.in = 0..300
end
puts connect_pingfreq
This will output either the answer the user entered or the default of 240.
Related
What is the best way to write a function (or something DSLish) that will allow me to write this code in Ruby. How would I construct the function write_pair?
username = "tyndall"
write_pair username
# where write_pair username outputs
username: tyndall
Is it possible to do? Looking for the most simple way to do this.
Sure it is possible!
My solution tests the var by Object#object_id identity: http://codepad.org/V7TXRxmL
It's crippled in the binding passing style ...
Although it works just for local vars yet, it can be easily be made "universal" adding use of the other scope-variable-listing methods like instance_variables etc.
# the function must be defined in such a place
# ... so as to "catch" the binding of the vars ... cheesy
# otherwise we're kinda stuck with the extra param on the caller
#_binding = binding
def write_pair(p, b = #_binding)
eval("
local_variables.each do |v|
if eval(v.to_s + \".object_id\") == " + p.object_id.to_s + "
puts v.to_s + ': ' + \"" + p.to_s + "\"
end
end
" , b)
end
# if the binding is an issue just do here:
# write_pair = lambda { |p| write_pair(p, binding) }
# just some test vars to make sure it works
username1 = "tyndall"
username = "tyndall"
username3 = "tyndall"
# the result:
write_pair(username)
# username: tyndall
If it's possible for you to use a symbol instead of the variable name, you could do something like this:
def wp (s, &b)
puts "#{s} = #{eval(s.to_s, b.binding)}"
end
In use:
irb(main):001:0> def wp (s, &b)
irb(main):002:1> puts "#{s} = #{eval(s.to_s, b.binding)}"
irb(main):003:1> end
=> nil
irb(main):004:0> var = 3
=> 3
irb(main):005:0> wp(:var) {}
var = 3
Note that you must pass the empty block {} to the method or it cannot get the binding to evaluate the symbol.
You can't actually get a variable's name in Ruby. But you could do something like this:
data = {"username" => "tyndall"}
Or even,
username = "tyndall"
data = {"username", "password", "favorite_color"}
data.each { |param|
value = eval(param)
puts "#{param}: #{value}"
}
I made a vim macro for this:
" Inspect the variable on the current line (in Ruby)
autocmd FileType ruby nmap ,i ^"oy$Iputs "<esc>A: #{(<esc>"opA).inspect}"<esc>
Put the variable you'd like to inspect on a line by itself, then type ,i (comma then i) in normal mode. It turns this:
foo
into this:
puts "foo: #{(foo).inspect}"
This is nice because it doesn't have any external dependencies (e.g. you don't have to have a library loaded up to use it).
Building on previous answers relating to symbols & bindings ... if passing in the variable name as a symbol works for you (who doesn't love cutting out extra keystrokes?!), try this:
def wp(var_name_as_sym)
# gets caller binding, which contains caller's execution environment
parent_binding = RubyVM::DebugInspector.open{|i| i.frame_binding(2) }
# now puts the symbol as string + the symbol executed as a variable in the caller's binding
puts %Q~#{var_name_as_sym.to_s} = #{eval("#{var_name_as_sym.to_s}.inspect", parent_binding)}~
end
aa=1
bb='some bb string'
os = OpenStruct.new(z:26, y:25)
Console output:
> wp :aa
aa = 1
=> nil
> wp :bb
bb = "some bb string"
=> nil
> wp :os
os = #<OpenStruct z=26, y=25>
=> nil
Using ruby 2.2.2p95
(Credit to banister for getting binding of calling context)
This is a simple solution:
def write_pair(variable)
puts variable + eval(variable)
end
This is more readable:
def write_pair(variable)
puts 'A' * 100
puts variable + ': ' + eval(variable).inspect
puts 'Z' * 100
end
Invocation:
write_pair "variable"
def write_pair var, binding
puts "#{ var } = #{ eval(var, binding)}"
end
username = "tyndall"
write_pair "username", binding
This seems weird because binding is never defined, but it works. From Ruby: getting variable name:
The binding() method gives a Binding object which remembers the
context at the point the method was called. You then pass a binding
into eval(), and it evaluates the variable in that context.
Be sure to pass a string, not the variable.
# make use of dynamic scoping via methods and instance vars
#_binding = binding
def eval_debug(expr, binding = #_binding)
"#{expr} => #{eval(expr, binding)}"
end
# sample invocation:
x = 10
puts eval_debug "x"
puts eval_debug "x**x"
I'm trying to generate Bitcoin addresses in ruby by using this guide:
https://bhelx.simst.im/articles/generating-bitcoin-keys-from-scratch-with-ruby/
But something isn't quite right, because the addresses being generated aren't coming out quite right.
Here's the class I'm using:
require 'openssl'
require 'ecdsa'
require 'securerandom'
require 'base58'
class BitcoinAddressGenerator
ADDRESS_VERSION = '00'
def self.generate_address
# Bitcoin uses the secp256k1 curve
curve = OpenSSL::PKey::EC.new('secp256k1')
# Now we generate the public and private key together
curve.generate_key
private_key_hex = curve.private_key.to_s(16)
puts "private_key_hex: #{private_key_hex}"
public_key_hex = curve.public_key.to_bn.to_s(16)
puts "public_key_hex: #{public_key_hex}"
pub_key_hash = public_key_hash(public_key_hex)
puts "pub_key_hash: #{pub_key_hash}"
address = generate_address_from_public_key_hash(public_key_hash(public_key_hex))
puts "address: #{address}"
end
def self.generate_address_from_public_key_hash(pub_key_hash)
pk = ADDRESS_VERSION + pub_key_hash
encode_base58(pub_key_hash + checksum(pub_key_hash))
end
def self.int_to_base58(int_val, leading_zero_bytes=0)
alpha = "123456789ABCDEFGHJKLMNPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijkmnopqrstuvwxyz"
base58_val, base = '', alpha.size
while int_val > 0
int_val, remainder = int_val.divmod(base)
base58_val = alpha[remainder] + base58_val
end
base58_val
end
def self.encode_base58(hex)
leading_zero_bytes = (hex.match(/^([0]+)/) ? $1 : '').size / 2
("1"*leading_zero_bytes) + int_to_base58( hex.to_i(16) )
end
def self.checksum(hex)
sha256(sha256(hex))[0...8]
end
# RIPEMD-160 (160 bit) hash
def self.rmd160(hex)
Digest::RMD160.hexdigest([hex].pack("H*"))
end
def self.sha256(hex)
Digest::SHA256.hexdigest([hex].pack("H*"))
end
# Turns public key into the 160 bit public key hash
def self.public_key_hash(hex)
rmd160(sha256(hex))
end
end
It outputs something like:
private_key_hex: C96DE079BAE4877E086288DEDD6F9F70B671862B7E6E4FC0EC401CADB81EDF45
public_key_hex: 0422435DF80F62E643D3CFBA66194052EC9ED0DFB47A1B26A4731079A5FF84FBF98FF0A540B6981D75BA789E6192F3B38BABEF6B0286CAEB4CAFCB51BB96D97B46
public_key_hash: db34927cc5ec0066411f366d9a95f9c6369c6e1d
address: Lz3xnxx6Uh79PEzPpWSMMZJVWR36hJgVL
If I plug this address into blockchain.info and similar tools it says that it's an invalid address.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
In your generate_address_from_public_key_hash method, the checksum should be over the hash including the address prefix. You’re not actually using the pk variable at all at the moment after you assign it. The code should look something like:
def self.generate_address_from_public_key_hash(pub_key_hash)
pk = ADDRESS_VERSION + pub_key_hash
encode_base58(pk + checksum(pk)) # Using pk here, not pub_key_hash
end
The mistake seems to also be on the page you link to, I guess the author must have made a copy/paste error.
As an aside, keeping everything in hex strings and decoding back and forth seems an odd way of doing this. I would have thought it would be easier to use raw binary strings, and only encode to hex when printing out values.
i am new to programming in ruby, and i am trying to get the value of json['earning_rate_hr'] but i get an error, in '[]': no implicit conversion of String into Integer (TypeError)
i know and i understand the error, however this is not my main question here is my file :
checkingchecker.rb :
#require_relative '../lib/hackex/net/typhoeus'
require_relative '../lib/hackex'
require 'rubygems'
require 'json'
file = 'accounts1.txt'
f = File.open file, 'r'
puts "MADE BY THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE #madebylorax"
puts ""
puts "--------------------------------------------------------"
puts ""
while line = f.gets
line = line.chomp.split(';')
email, password = line
puts "logging in as " + email
HackEx.LoginDo(email, password) do |http, auth_token, user|
puts "getting info..."
user = HackEx::Request.Do(http, HackEx::Request.UserInfo(auth_token))['user']
puts "receieved user info!"
bank = HackEx::Request.Do(http, HackEx::Request.UserBank(auth_token))['user_bank']
puts "recieved bank info!"
json = HackEx::Request.Do(http, HackEx::Request.UserSpam(auth_token))['spam']
puts "recieved spam info!"
puts json['earning_rate_hr'] #error line, the error is because this is an array, and it cant be turned into integer, i was wondering if there is a way to use puts on it without trying to make it an integer
userchecking = bank["checking"]
checking = userchecking.scan(/.{1,3}/).join(',')
puts email + " has in Checking: BTC #{checking}"
puts ""
puts "--------------------------------------------------------"
puts ""
end
end
i tried to do puts json, it puts items like this one :
{"id"=>"9867351", "user_id"=>"289108", "victim_user_id"=>"1512021",
"victim_ip"=
"86.60.226.175", "spam_level"=>"50", "earning_rate_hr"=>"24300", "total_earning s"=>"13267800", "started_at"=>"2015-11-01 07:46:59",
"last_collected_at"=>"2015- 11-24 01:46:59"}
what i want to do is select the earning_rate_hr for each one of them and add them together, however i do not have a clue on how to do that, since the error is not fixed and i cant get the value of it
ps : i tried turning it into a Hash, and i also tried using .first, but .first only shows the firs one, i want to show all of them, thank you
I know you from line messenger, I haven't used ruby codes in a long time and this one keeps giving me cloudflare errors, I'm not sure if its because of server downtime/maintainance or whatever but yeah anyway heres your script, enjoy farming ;) -LineOne
PS, I changed a few strings to make it look a lil cleaner so you can see the spam income easier, and added the sleep (1) because sleeping for one second before reconnecting helps to prevent cloudflare errors
also you don't need to require json or rubygems in your hackex scripts because its required in the library so its all covered pre-user-input/script
require_relative 'libv5/lib/hackex'
while 1<2
begin
print'Filename: '
fn=gets.chomp
file = fn+'.txt'
f = File.open file, 'r'
puts "MADE BY THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE #madebylorax" #helped by lineone
puts ""
puts "--------------------------------------------------------"
puts ""
while line = f.gets
line = line.chomp.split(';')
email, password = line
HackEx.LoginDo(email, password) do |http, auth_token, user|
puts "Retrieving Info..."
puts''
user = HackEx::Request.Do(http, HackEx::Request.UserInfo(auth_token))['user']
bank = HackEx::Request.Do(http, HackEx::Request.UserBank(auth_token))['user_bank']
json = HackEx::Request.Do(http, HackEx::Request.UserSpam(auth_token))['spam']
cash_count=0
tot_count=0
json.each do |j|
earn_rate = j['earning_rate_hr']
total= j['total_earnings']
cash_count+=earn_rate.to_i
tot_count+=total.to_i
end
print "#{email}: current earnings: #{cash_count} per hour, Total earnings #{tot_count},"
userchecking = bank["checking"]
checking = userchecking.scan(/.{1,3}/).join(',')
puts " #{checking} BTC in Checking"
puts ""
puts "--------------------------------------------------------"
puts ""
sleep 1
end
end
rescue
puts"#{$!}"
end
end
Thats fine you can also calculate the total income of your farms by adding new variables at the top example a=0 then adding the number at the end a+=tot_count
This should help:
earning_rates = json.map{|e| e["earning_rate_hr"]}
puts "Earning rates per hour: #{earning_rates.join(" ")}"
puts "Sum of earning rates: #{earning_rates.map{|e| e.to_i}.inject{|sum, x| sum + x}}"
I am trying to iterate over a JSON parsed hash table (that has nested Array's of hashes) and insert into a Text Table . The JSON parsed code that I am trying to iterate over is:
{"server"=>{"security_groups"=>[{"name"=>"default"}], "adminPass"=>"LhXEPMkYmqF7", "id"=>"82b7e32b-f62b-4106-b499-e0046250229f", "links"=>[{"href"=>"http://10.30.1.49:8774/v2/89fc0b9d984d49fba5328766e923958f/servers/82b7e32b-f62b-4106-b499-e0046250229f", "rel"=>"self"}, {"href"=>"http://10.30.1.49:8774/89fc0b9d984d49fba5328766e923958f/servers/82b7e32b-f62b-4106-b499-e0046250229f", "rel"=>"bookmark"}], "OS-DCF:diskConfig"=>"MANUAL"}}
The code I am using to iterate over the top is:
server_table = Text::Table.new do | t |
t.head = ['Server ID', 'Server URL', 'Admin Password']
end
response = JSON.parse(r)
response['server'].each do | serv_info |
server_table.rows << [["#{serv_info['id']}", "#{serv_info['links'][0]['href']}", "#{serv_info['adminPass']}"]]
end
puts server_table
I am getting the error:
/lib/get_token.rb:166:in `[]': can't convert String into Integer (TypeError)
from ./lib/get_token.rb:166:in `create_server'
from ./lib/get_token.rb:165:in `each'
from ./lib/get_token.rb:165:in `create_server'
If I individually use puts to print out each command they work fine, but the iteration does not. The commands that pull the correct info are:
puts response['server']['links'][0]['href']
puts response['server']['id']
puts response['server']['adminPass']
All 3 of those work, but if I try and iterate over them I get the string error. I know it has something to do with .each returning an Array of hashes but I do not fully understand why the PUTS command is working without issue in the script and also in IRB.
Any thoughts?
Each serv_info is a pair of a map represented as an array of 2 elements. Therefore everything after << in your code is just wrong.
The secret to avoid such mistakes is to stop trying to obfuscate your own code.
server_table.rows should contain all possible triples of server ID, link and a password.
response = # { "server" => ...}
server = response['server']
server_id = server['id']
link_infos = server['links']
admin_pass = server['adminPass']
link_infos.each do |link_info|
link = link_info['href']
server_table.rows << [server_id, link, admin_pass]
end
Update
We can easily use this code to process multiple servers
response = # [ {"server" => ...}, ...]
response.each do |server|
... # above code snippet goes here
# or you may extract it into a method and call it here
end
Also I want to mention that irb is really great for dealing with this kind of problems. It is a command line Ruby interpreter and it's great for prototyping. It prints out result of each statement you type and has an autocompletion to help you find required classes/methods. Instead of waiting several hours to get an SO answer to simple question you will get it using irb in a couple of minutes.
Perhaps you mean just
serv_info = response['server']
server_table.rows << [["#{serv_info['id']}", "#{serv_info['links'][0]['href']}", "#{serv_info['adminPass']}"]]
Since response['server'] is a hash not an array.
Instead of using:
server_table.rows << [["#{serv_info['id']}", "#{serv_info['links'][0]['href']}", "#{serv_info['adminPass']}"]]
Try:
server_table.rows += [["#{serv_info['id']}", "#{serv_info['links'][0]['href']}", "#{serv_info['adminPass']}"]]
Or:
server_table.rows << ["#{serv_info['id']}", "#{serv_info['links'][0]['href']}", "#{serv_info['adminPass']}"]
This is a newbie question as I am attempting to learn Ruby by myself, so apologies if it sounds like a silly question!
I am reading through the examples of why's (poignant) guide to ruby and am in chapter 4. I typed the code_words Hash into a file called wordlist.rb
I opened another file and typed the first line as require 'wordlist.rb' and the rest of the code as below
#Get evil idea and swap in code
print "Enter your ideas "
idea = gets
code_words.each do |real, code|
idea.gsub!(real, code)
end
#Save the gibberish to a new file
print "File encoded, please enter a name to save the file"
ideas_name = gets.strip
File::open( 'idea-' + ideas_name + '.txt', 'w' ) do |f|
f << idea
end
When I execute this code, it fails with the following error message:
C:/MyCode/MyRubyCode/filecoder.rb:5: undefined local variable or method `code_words' for main:Object (NameError)
I use Windows XP and Ruby version ruby 1.8.6
I know I should be setting something like a ClassPath, but not sure where/how to do so!
Many thanks in advance!
While the top-level of all files are executed in the same context, each file has its own script context for local variables. In other words, each file has its own set of local variables that can be accessed throughout that file, but not in other files.
On the other hand, constants (CodeWords), globals ($code_words) and methods (def code_words) would be accessible across files.
Some solutions:
CodeWords = {:real => "code"}
$code_words = {:real => "code"}
def code_words
{:real => "code"}
end
An OO solution that is definitely too complex for this case:
# first file
class CodeWords
DEFAULT = {:real => "code"}
attr_reader :words
def initialize(words = nil)
#words = words || DEFAULT
end
end
# second file
print "Enter your ideas "
idea = gets
code_words = CodeWords.new
code_words.words.each do |real, code|
idea.gsub!(real, code)
end
#Save the gibberish to a new file
print "File encoded, please enter a name to save the file"
ideas_name = gets.strip
File::open( 'idea-' + ideas_name + '.txt', 'w' ) do |f|
f << idea
end
I think the problem might be that the require executes the code in another context, so the runtime variable is no longer available after the require.
What you could try is making it a constant:
CodeWords = { :real => 'code' }
That will be available everywhere.
Here is some background on variable scopes etc.
I was just looking at the same example and was having the same problem.
What I did was change the variable name in both files from code_words to $code_words .
This would make it a global variable and thus accesible by both files right?
My question is: wouldn't this be a simpler solution than making it a constant and having to write CodeWords = { :real => 'code' } or is there a reason not to do it ?
A simpler way would be to use the Marshal.dump feature to save the code words.
# Save to File
code_words = {
'starmonkeys' => 'Phil and Pete, those prickly chancellors of the New Reich',
'catapult' => 'chucky go-go', 'firebomb' => 'Heat-Assisted Living',
'Nigeria' => "Ny and Jerry's Dry Cleaning (with Donuts)",
'Put the kabosh on' => 'Put the cable box on'
}
# Serialize
f = File.open('codewords','w')
Marshal.dump(code_words, f)
f.close
Now at the beginning of your file you would put this:
# Load the Serialized Data
code_words = Marshal.load(File.open('codewords','r'))
Here's the easy way to make sure you can always include a file that's in the same directory as your app, put this before the require statement
$:.unshift File.dirname(__FILE__)
$: is the global variable representing the "CLASSPATH"