This question already has answers here:
Why a variable assignment replaces tabs with spaces
(2 answers)
Closed 7 years ago.
I'm having some troubles with the printf function in bash.
I wrote a little script on which I pass a name and two letters (such as "sh", "py", "ht") and it creates a file in the current working directory named "name.extension".
For instance, if I execute seed test py a file named test.py is created in the current working dir with the shebang #!/usr/bin/python3.
So far, so good, nothing fancy: I'm learning shell scripting and I thought this could be a simple exercise to test the knowledge gained so far.
The problem is when I want to create an HTML file. This is the function that I use:
creaHtml(){
head='<!--DOCTYPE html-->\n<html>\n\t<head>\n\t\t<meta charset=\"UTF-8\">\n\t</head>\n\t<body>\n\t</body>\n</html>'
percorso=$CARTELLA_CORRENTE/$NOME_FILE.html
printf $head>>$percorso
chmod 755 $percorso
}
If I run, for instance, seed test ht the correct function (creaHtml) is called, test.html is created but if I try to look into it I only see:
<!--DOCTYPE
And nothing else.
This is the trace for that function:
[sviluppo:~/bin]$ seed test ht
+ creaHtml
+ head='<!--DOCTYPE html-->\n<html>\n\t<head>\n\t\t<meta charset=\"UTF-8\">\n\t</head>\n\t<body>\n\t</body>\n</html>'
+ percorso=/home/sviluppo/bin/test.html
+ printf '<!--DOCTYPE' 'html-->\n<html>\n\t<head>\n\t\t<meta' 'charset=\"UTF-8\">\n\t</head>\n\t<body>\n\t</body>\n</html>'
+ chmod 755 /home/sviluppo/bin/test.html
+ set +x
However, if I try to run printf '<!--DOCTYPE html-->\n<html>\n\t<head>\n\t\t<meta charset=\"UTF-8\">\n\t</head>\n\t<body>\n\t</body>\n</html>' from the terminal, I see the correct output: the "skeleton" of an HTML file neatly displayed with indentation and everything. What am I missing here?
Try echo -e instead of printf. printf is for printing formatted strings. Since you didn't protect $head with quotes, bash splits the string to form the command. The first word (before first white space) forms the format string. The rest are just arguments for things you didn't specify to print.
echo -e "$head" > "$percorso"
The -e evaluates your \n into newlines. I changed your >> to > since it looks like you want this to be the whole file, rather than append to any existing file you might have.
You have to be careful with quotes in bash. One thing can become many things. This actually makes it more powerful, but it can be confusing for people learning. Notice that I also put the file name "$percorso" in double quotes too. This evaluates the variable and makes sure that it ends up as one thing. If you use single quotes, it will be one word, but not evaluated. Unlike Python, there is a big difference between single and double quotes.
If you want to use printf for compatibility as #chepner pointed out, just be sure to quote it:
printf "$head" > "$percorso"
Actually that is much simpler anyway.
Related
The goal is to get rid of (by changing) filenames that give headaches for scripting by translating them to something else. The reason is that in this nearly 30 year Unix / Linux environment, with a lot of existing scripts that may not be "written correctly", a new, large and important cache of files arrived that have to be managed, and so, a colleague has asked me to write a script to help with "problematic filenames" and translate them. They've got a list of chars to turn into dots, such as the comma, and another list to turn into underscores, such as whitespace, as but two examples and ran into problems which I asked about over here.
I was using tr to do it, but commenters to it said I should perhaps ask just about this instead of how to get tr to work. So, I have!
Parameter expansion can do this for you.
Note that unlike when using tr (as requested on your other question), when using parameter expansion you don't need to use backslashes inside your character class definitions: put the expansion in double quotes and bash will treat the results of that expansion as literal.
#!/usr/bin/env bash
toDots='\,;:|+##$%^&*~'
toUnderscores='}{]['"'"'="()`!'
# requires bash 5+: if debug=1, then print what we would do instead of doing it
runOrDebug() {
if (( debug )); then
printf '%s\n' "${*#Q}"
else
"$#"
fi
}
renameFiles() {
local name subDots subBoth
for name; do
subDots=${name//["$toDots"]/.}
subBoth=${subDots//["$toUnderscores"]/_}
if [[ $subBoth != "$name" ]]; then
runOrDebug mv -- "$name" "$subBoth"
fi
done
}
debug=1 renameFiles '[/a],/;[p:r|o\b+lem#a#t$i%c]/#(%$^!/(e^n&t*ry)~='
Note that toUnderscores is (except for the single quote in the middle) in single quotes, so all the backslashes in it are part of the variable's data rather than being syntax; because globs use character class syntax from REs, they're parsed as POSIX regular expression character class syntax.
See a demonstration of the technique running at https://ideone.com/kKE7IJ
I need to rename the files inside the folder that has a space in it eg(Deco/main library/file1.txt )
code:
while IFS="," read orig new pat
do
mv -v $pat$new $pat$orig
done < new.csv
csv file:
newname,file1.txt,Deco/main\\\ library/
error:
mv: invalid option -- '\'
Welcome to Stackoverflow!
First: Use quotes around the use of variables. That means except in very rare occasions, you always should use "$foo" instead of $foo because if you are using the latter, the shell is supposed (and will) interpret spaces in the variables as word delimiters which you rarely want. Especially in your case you do not want it.
Second: Your CSV file seems to contain backslashes to quote the spaces. And some additional step seems to have added another level of quotation so than now you end up with three backslashes and a space for each original space. If this really is the case (please double check if what you wrote in your question is correct, otherwise my answer doesn't fit), you need to unquote this before you can use it.
There are security issues involved in using eval, so do not use it lightly (this disclaimer is necessary whenever proposing to use eval), but if you have trust in the input you are handling to not contain any nastinesses, then you can do this using this code:
while IFS="," read orig new pat
do
eval eval mv -v "$pat$new" "$pat$orig"
done < new.csv
Using this, two levels of quotation are evaluated (that's what eval does) before the mv command is executed.
I strongly suggest to do a dry run by adding echo before the mv first. Then instead of executing your commands they are merely printed first.
I've written a bunch of environment variables in Docker format, but now I want to use them outside of that context. How can I source them with one line of bash?
Details
Docker run and compose have a convenient facility for importing a set of environment variables from a file. That file has a very literal format.
The value is used as is and not modified at all. For example if the value is surrounded by quotes (as is often the case of shell variables), the quotes are included in the value passed
Lines beginning with # are treated as comments and are ignored
Blank lines are also ignored.
"If no = is provided and that variable is…exported in your local environment," docker "passes it to the container"
Thankfully, whitespace before the = will cause the run to fail
so, for example, this env-file:
# This is a comment, with an = sign, just to mess with us
VAR1=value1
VAR2=value2
USER
VAR3=is going to = trouble
VAR4=this $sign will mess with things
VAR5=var # with what looks like a comment
#VAR7 =would fail
VAR8= but what about this?
VAR9="and this?"
results in these env variables in the container:
user=ubuntu
VAR1=value1
VAR2=value2
VAR3=is going to = trouble
VAR4=this $sign will mess with things
VAR5=var # with what looks like a comment
VAR8= but what about this?
VAR9="and this?"
The bright side is that once I know what I'm working with, it's pretty easy to predict the effect. What I see is what I get. But I don't think bash would be able to interpret this in the same way without a lot of changes. How can I put this square Docker peg into a round Bash hole?
tl;dr:
source <(sed -E -e "s/^([^#])/export \1/" -e "s/=/='/" -e "s/(=.*)$/\1'/" env.list)
You're probably going to want to source a file, whose contents
are executed as if they were printed at the command line.
But what file? The raw docker env-file is inappropriate, because it won't export the assigned variables such that they can be used by child processes, and any of the input lines with spaces, quotes, and other special characters will have undesirable results.
Since you don't want to hand edit the file, you can use a stream editor to transform the lines to something more bash-friendly. I started out trying to solve this with one or two complex Perl 5 regular expressions, or some combination of tools, but I eventually settled on one sed command with one simple and two extended regular expressions:
sed -E -e "s/^([^#])/export \1/" -e "s/=/='/" -e "s/(=.*)$/\1'/" env.list
This does a lot.
The first expression prepends export to any line whose first character is anything but #.
As discussed, this makes the variables available to anything else you run in this session, your whole point of being here.
The second expression simply inserts a single-quote after the first = in a line, if applicable.
This will always enclose the whole value, whereas a greedy match could lop off some of (e.g.) VAR3, for example
The third expression appends a second quote to any line that has at least one =.
it's important here to match on the = again so we don't create an unmatched quotation mark
Results:
# This is a comment, with an =' sign, just to mess with us'
export VAR1='value1'
export VAR2='value2'
export USER
export VAR3='is going to = trouble'
export VAR4='this $sign will mess with things'
export VAR5='var # with what looks like a comment'
#VAR7 ='would fail'
export VAR8=' but what about this?'
export VAR9='"and this?"'
Some more details:
By wrapping the values in single-quotes, you've
prevented bash from assuming that the words after the space are a command
appropriately brought the # and all succeeding characters into the VAR5
prevented the evaluation of $sign, which, if wrapped in double-quotes, bash would have interpreted as a variable
Finally, we'll take advantage of process substitution to pass this stream as a file to source, bring all of this down to one line of bash.
source <(sed -E -e "s/^([^#])/export \1/" -e "s/=/='/" -e "s/(=.*)$/\1'/" env.list)
Et voilà!
This question already has answers here:
When to wrap quotes around a shell variable?
(5 answers)
Closed 7 years ago.
I want to create some scripts for filling some templates and inserting them into my project folder. I want to use a shell script for this, and the templates are very small so I want to embed them in the shell script. The problem is that echo seems to ignore the line breaks in my string. Either that, or the string doesn't contain line breaks to begin with. Here is an example:
MY_STRING="
Hello, world! This
Is
A
Multi lined
String."
echo -e $MY_STRING
This outputs:
Hello, world! This Is A Multi lined String.
I'm assuming echo is the culprit here. How can I get it to acknowledge the line breaks?
You need double quotes around the variable interpolation.
echo -e "$MY_STRING"
This is an all-too common error. You should get into the habit of always quoting strings, unless you specifically need to split into whitespace-separated tokens or have wildcards expanded.
So to be explicit, the shell will normalize whitespace when it parses your command line. You can see this if you write a simple C program which prints out its argv array.
argv[0]='Hello,'
argv[1]='world!'
argv[2]='This'
argv[3]='Is'
argv[4]='A'
argv[5]='Multi'
argv[6]='lined'
argv[7]='String.'
By contrast, with quoting, the whole string is in argv[0], newlines and all.
For what it's worth, also consider here documents (with cat, not echo):
cat <<"HERE"
foo
Bar
HERE
You can also interpolate a variable in a here document.
cat <<HERE
$MY_STRING
HERE
... although in this particular case, it's hardly what you want.
echo is so nineties. The new (POSIX) kid on the block is printf.
printf '%s\n' "$MY_STRING"
No -e or SYSV vs BSD echo madness and full control over what gets printed where and how wide, escape sequences like in C. Everybody please start using printf now and never look back.
Try this :
echo "$MY_STRING"
I know this question has been asked, but I can't find more than one solution, and it does not work for me. Essentially, I'm looking for a bash script that will take a file list that looks like this:
image1.jpg
image2.jpg
image3.jpg
And then make a copy of each one, but number it sequentially backwards. So, the sequence would have three new files created, being:
image4.jpg
image5.jpg
image6.jpg
And yet, image4.jpg would have been an untouched copy of image3.jpg, and image5.jpg an untouched copy of image2.jpg, and so on. I have already tried the solution outlined in this stackoverflow question with no luck. I am admittedly not very far down the bash scripting path, and if I take the chunk of code in the first listed answer and make a script, I always get "2: Syntax error: "(" unexpected" over and over. I've tried changing the syntax with the ( around a bit, but no success ever. So, either I am doing something wrong or there's a better script around.
Sorry for not posting this earlier, but the code I'm using is:
image=( image*.jpg )
MAX=${#image[*]}
for i in ${image[*]}
do
num=${i:5:3} # grab the digits
compliment=$(printf '%03d' $(echo $MAX-$num | bc))
ln $i copy_of_image$compliment.jpg
done
And I'm taking this code and pasting it into a file with nano, and adding !#/bin/bash as the first line, then chmod +x script and executing in bash via sh script. Of course, in my test runs, I'm using files appropriately titled image1.jpg - but I was also wondering about a way to apply this script to a directory of jpegs, not necessarily titled image(integer).jpg - in my file keeping structure, most of these are a single word, followed by a number, then .jpg, and it would be nice to not have to rewrite the script for each use.
Perhaps something like this. It will work well for something like script image*.jpg where the wildcard matches a set of files which match a regular pattern with monotonously increasing numbers of the same length, and less ideally with a less regular subset of the files in the current directory. It simply assumes that the last file's digit index plus one through the total number of file names is the range of digits to loop over.
#!/bin/sh
# Extract number from final file name
eval lastidx=\$$#
tmp=${lastidx#*[!0-9][0-9]}
lastidx=${lastidx#${lastidx%[0-9]$tmp}}
tmp=${lastidx%[0-9][!0-9]*}
lastidx=${lastidx%${lastidx#$tmp[0-9]}}
num=$(expr $lastidx + $#)
width=${#lastidx}
for f; do
pref=${f%%[0-9]*}
suff=${f##*[0-9]}
# Maybe show a warning if pref, suff, or width changed since the previous file
printf "cp '$f' '$pref%0${width}i$suff'\\n" $num
num=$(expr $num - 1)
done |
sh
This is sh-compatible; the expr stuff and the substring extraction up front is ugly but Bourne-compatible. If you are fine with the built-in arithmetic and string manipulation constructs of Bash, converting to that form should be trivial.
(To be explicit, ${var%foo} returns the value of $var with foo trimmed off the end, and ${var#foo} does similar trimming from the beginning of the value. Regular shell wildcard matching operators are available in the expression for what to trim. ${#var} returns the length of the value of $var.)
Maybe your real test data runs from 001 to 300, but here you have image1 2 3, and therefore you extract one, not three digits from the filename. num=${i:5:1}
Integer arithmetic can be done in the bash without calling bc
${#image[#]} is more robust than ${#image[*]}, but shouldn't be a difference here.
I didn't consult a dictionary, but isn't compliment something for your girl friend? The opposite is complement, isn't it? :)
the other command made links - to make copies, call cp.
Code:
#!/bin/bash
image=( image*.jpg )
MAX=${#image[#]}
for i in ${image[#]}
do
num=${i:5:1}
complement=$((2*$MAX-$num+1))
cp $i image$complement.jpg
done
Most important: If it is bash, call it with bash. Best: do a shebang (as you did), make it executable and call it by ./name . Calling it with sh name will force the wrong interpreter. If you don't make it executable, call it bash name.