According to Apples Class Reference CKQuery, the operator CONTAINS is one of the supported operators. However, that doesn't seem to work. I have a RecordType called myRecord, and a record with field name name type String. I try to fetch the record with two different predicates, one with "==" operator, and one with CONTAINS operator.
func getRecords() {
let name = "John"
let Predicate1 = NSPredicate(format: "name == %#",name)
let Predicate2 = NSPredicate(format: "name CONTAINS %#",name)
let sort = NSSortDescriptor(key: "Date", ascending: false)
let query = CKQuery(recordType: "myRecord", predicate: Predicate1)
// let query = CKQuery(recordType: "myRecord", predicate: Predicate2)
query.sortDescriptors = [sort]
let operation = CKQueryOperation(query: query)
operation.desiredKeys = ["name", "Date"]
operation.recordFetchedBlock = { (record) in
print(record["name"])
operation.queryCompletionBlock = { [unowned self] (cursor, error) in
dispatch_async(dispatch_get_main_queue()) {
if error == nil {
print ("sucess")
} else {
print("couldn't fetch record error:\(error?.localizedDescription)")
}
}
}
CKContainer.defaultContainer().publicCloudDatabase.addOperation(operation)
}
Using Predicate1, output is:
Optional(John)
sucess
Using Predicate2, output is:
couldn't fetch record error:Optional("Field \'name\' has a value type of STRING and cannot be queried using filter type LIST_CONTAINS")
Also using [c] to ignore casings gives a server issue.
How do I use the operator CONTAINS correctly?
EDIT:
I have now looked closer at the documentation, and seen that CONTAINS can only be used with SELF. Meaning that all String fields will be used for searching. Isn't there a better way?
It's an exception mentioned as below:
With one exception, the CONTAINS operator can be used only to test
list membership. The exception is when you use it to perform full-text
searches in conjunction with the self key path. The self key path
causes the server to look in searchable string-based fields for the
specified token string. For example, a predicate string of #"self
contains 'blue'" searches for the word “blue” in all fields marked for
inclusion in full-text searches. You cannot use the self key path to
search in fields whose type is not a string.
So, you can use 'self' instead of '%K' in order to search sub-text of string field.
For the full document written by Apple
Related
I have some errors using Linq on DataTable and I couldn't figure it out how to solve it. I have to admit that i am pretty new to Linq and I searched the forum and Internet and couldn't figure it out. hope you can help.
I have a DataTable called campaign with three columns: ID (int), Product (string), Channel (string). The DataTable is already filled with data. I am trying to select a subset of the campaign records which satisfied the conditions selected by the end user. For example, the user want to list only if the Product is either 'EWH' or 'HEC'. The selection criteria is dynaically determined by the end user.
I have the following C# code:
private void btnClick()
{
IEnumerable<DataRow> query =
from zz in campaign.AsEnumerable()
orderby zz.Field<string>("ID")
select zz;
string whereClause = "zz.Field<string>(\"Product\") in ('EWH','HEC')";
query = query.Where(whereClause);
DataTable sublist = query.CopyToDataTable<DataRow>();
}
But it gives me an error on line: query = query.Where(whereClause), saying
No property or field 'zz' exists in type 'DataRow'".
If I changed to:
string whereClause = "Product in ('EWH','HEC')"; it will say:
No property or field 'Product' exists in type 'DataRow'
Can anyone help me on how to solve this problem? I feel it could be a pretty simple syntax change, but I just don't know at this time.
First, this line has an error
orderby zz.Field<string>("ID")
because as you said, your ID column is of type int.
Second, you need to learn LINQ query syntax. Forget about strings, the same way you used from, orderby, select in the query, you can also use where and many other operators. Also you'll need to learn the equivalent LINQ constructs for SQL-ish things, like for instance IN (...) is mapped to Enumerable.Contains etc.
With all that being said, here is your query
var productFilter = new[] { "EWH", "HEC" };
var query =
from zz in campaign.AsEnumerable()
where productFilter.Contains(zz.Field<string>("Product"))
orderby zz.Field<int>("ID")
select zz;
Update As per your comment, if you want to make this dynamic, then you need to switch to lambda syntax. Multiple and criteria can be composed by chaining multiple Where clauses like this
List<string> productFilter = ...; // coming from outside
List<string> channelFilter = ...; // coming from outside
var query = campaign.AsEnumerable();
// Apply filters if needed
if (productFilter != null && productFilter.Count > 0)
query = query.Where(zz => productFilter.Contains(zz.Field<string>("Product")));
if (channelFilter != null && channelFilter.Count > 0)
query = query.Where(zz => channelFilter.Contains(zz.Field<string>("Channel")));
// Once finished with filtering, do the ordering
query = query.OrderBy(zz => zz.Field<int>("ID"));
I am using jqgrid in MVC 4. I have written a method for getting a list in linq.
In my function I am getting all values of jqgrid with search criteria i.e. Operator AND/OR
, operations Equals to, not equals to etc. Here I am also getting the column name like Name, City, State etc.
My problem is I can't pass the column name directly in linq query i.e. I have to use the column name as x => x.Name
switch (rule.field)
{
case "Name":
query = query.Where(x => x.Name.StartsWith(rule.data, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase));
break;
case "Course":
query = query.Where(x => x.Course.StartsWith(rule.data, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase));
break;
}
In rule.field I am getting column Name i.e. Name, city, state etc. I want to pass the column name which I am getting in rule.filed in LINQ query instead of x =>x.Name.
Is there any way to do it so I can avoid writing switch cases?
You can use System.Linq.Dynamic, which can be installed as a Nuget package along with string.Format. The syntax would then look something like..
var newquery = query.AsQueryable()
.Where(
string.Format("{0}.ToUpper().StartsWith(#0)", rule.field)
,rule.data.ToUpper());
You could always use reflection:
query = query.ToList().Where(p => {
var field = p.GetType().GetProperty(rule.field);
var value = (String) field.GetValue(p);
return value.StartsWith(rule.data, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase);
});
Warning: Reflection is slow. Only use this for short lists. Since you're dealing with UI rendering, I'm assuming this won't be a problem.
edit: My example is assuming all properties are indeed properties (and not fields), and that all properties are Strings. You may need to alter the code for your specific case.
Basically all I'm looking to do is something like the following:
string EntityFrameworkType = "Product";
string searchField = "ProductName";
string searchValue = "My Product";
using( var context = new entitycontext())
{
var result = (from x in context.EntityFrameworkType.Where(l=>l.searchField == searchValue) select x).FirstOrDefault();
}
of course this syntax won't work because context does not contain an entity called "EntityFrameworkType"...
Is it possible to do this another way??? What I'm looking to do in generalize my database duplicate check. In this example, I'm searching for any Product with the Name "My Product". But I'd like to be able to pass in these string for say, ProductCategory with ProductCategoryId = 1.... etc...
you can have a look here to get the idea of how it is done.
You'll need to learn about Expression
I have seen some questions related to this Exception here but none made me understand the root cause of the problem. So here we have one more...
var testquery =
((from le in context.LoanEMIs.Include("LoanPmnt")
join lp in context.LoanPmnts on le.Id equals lp.LoanEMIId
where lp.PmntDtTm < date && lp.IsPaid == false
&& le.IsActive == true && lp.Amount > 0
select new ObjGetAllPendingPmntDetails
{
Id = lp.Id,
Table = "LoanEMI",
loanEMIId = lp.LoanEMIId,
Name = le.AcHead,
Ref = SqlFunctions.StringConvert((double)le.FreqId),
PmntDtTm = lp.PmntDtTm,
Amount = lp.Amount,
IsDiscard = lp.IsDiscarded,
DiscardRemarks = lp.DiscardRemarks
}).DefaultIfEmpty(ObjNull));
List<ObjGetAllPendingPmntDetails> test = testquery.ToList();
This query gives the following Exception Message -
Unable to create a constant value of type CashVitae.ObjGetAllPendingPmntDetails. Only primitive types or enumeration types are supported in this context.
I got this Exception after I added the SQL function statement to convert le.FreqId which is a byte to a string as ToString() is not recognized in the LINQ Expression Store.
ObjGetAllPendingPmntDetails is a partial class in my model which is added as it is used too many times in the code to bind data to tables.
It has both IDs as long, 'Amount' as decimal, PmntDtTm as Datetime,IsDiscard as bool and remaining all are string including 'Ref'.
I get no results as currently no data satisfies the condition. While trying to handle null, I added DefaultIfEmpty(ObjNull) and ObjNull has all properties initialized as follows.
ObjGetAllPendingPmntDetails ObjNull = new ObjGetAllPendingPmntDetails()
{ Id = 0, Table = "-", loanEMIId = 0, Name = "-", Ref = "-",
PmntDtTm = Convert.ToDateTime("01-01-1900"),
Amount = 0, IsDiscard = false, DiscardRemarks = "" };
I need this query to work fine as it has Union() called on it with 5 other queries. All returning the same ObjGetAllPendingPmntDetails columns. But there is some problem as this query has no data satisfying the conditions and the Exception Shared Above.
Any suggestions are appreciated as I am unable to understand the root cause of the problem.
#AndrewCoonce is right, the .DefaultIfEmpty(ObjNull) is the culprit here. Entity Framework turns DefaultIfEmpty into something like...
CASE WHEN ([Project1].[C1] IS NULL) THEN #param ELSE [Project1].[Value] END AS [C1]
...but there's no way to coerce an instance of ObjGetAllPendingPmntDetails into something that can take the place of #param, so you get an exception.
If you move the DefaultIfEmpty call to after the ToList it should work correctly (although you'll need to call ToList again after that if you really want a concrete list instance).
I've seen that every predicate that works in a query with a relationship contains at the start the words ANY or ALL (ie: ANY tags.name LIKE[c] "car"), the fact is, if I remove it (ie: tags.name LIKE[c] "car"), the result is wrong or I get a message like this one : Can't do regex matching on object.
Since i'm using an NSPredicateEditor their is no ANY or ALL that starts my query, so it always fail.
The Predicates returned is always like the second exemple (no ANY or ALL).
Do I have to subclass the NSPredicateRowTemplateEditor, in order to add myself the ANY or ALL in my predicate, or is their another way?
Same thing with the dates... my dates are saved in this format: YYYY-MM-DD HH:mm:ss, but the NSPredicateEditor use DD/MM/YYYY, so each time I try a date comparaison, it does not work. Do I also have to subclass the RowEditor, in order to change the date format?
Thank you.
Here you go:
class RowTemplateRelationshipAny: NSPredicateEditorRowTemplate {
override func predicate(withSubpredicates subpredicates: [NSPredicate]?) -> NSPredicate{
let predicate: NSComparisonPredicate = super.predicate(withSubpredicates: subpredicates) as! NSComparisonPredicate
let newPredicate = NSComparisonPredicate(leftExpression: predicate.leftExpression, rightExpression: predicate.rightExpression, modifier: .any, type: predicate.predicateOperatorType, options: predicate.options)
return newPredicate
}
}
class RowTemplateRelationshipAll: NSPredicateEditorRowTemplate {
override func predicate(withSubpredicates subpredicates: [NSPredicate]?) -> NSPredicate{
let predicate: NSComparisonPredicate = super.predicate(withSubpredicates: subpredicates) as! NSComparisonPredicate
let newPredicate = NSComparisonPredicate(leftExpression: predicate.leftExpression, rightExpression: predicate.rightExpression, modifier: .all, type: predicate.predicateOperatorType, options: predicate.options)
return newPredicate
}
}
Just change your row template class in IB to RowTemplateRelationshipAny or RowTemplateRelationshipAll.