Camel #Header annotation not working when using spring ProxyFactory - spring

When I use the camel #Header annotation in an interface, and call the bean (that implements it) directly, the Header value is filled. But when I proxy it with the spring ProxyFactoryBean then the #Header annotated parameter is empty. Probably I'm doing something wrong or am missing part of the configuration.
public interface Foo {
public void execute(#Header("FooHeader") String headerValue);
}
public class FooImpl implements Foo {
public void execute(String headerValue) {
System.out.println(headerValue);
}
}
public class FooInterceptor implements org.aopalliance.intercept.MethodInterceptor {
public Object invoke(final MethodInvocation invocation) throws Throwable {
return invocation.proceed();
}
}
spring context:
<bean id="foo" class="FooImpl"/>
<bean id="fooInterceptor" class="FooInterceptor"/>
<bean id="fooProxy" class="org.springframework.aop.framework.ProxyFactoryBean">
<property name="target" ref="foo"/>
<property name="interfaces">
<list>
<value>Foo</value>
</list>
</property>
<property name="interceptorNames">
<list>
<value>fooInterceptor</value>
</list>
</property>
</bean>
The camel route DSL:
from("foo-queue").to("bean:foo?method=execute");
prints the value of the header, but the route:
from("foo-queue").to("bean:fooProxy?method=execute");
prints null. Seems that in my setup, camel does not "see" the header annotation that's on the interface, that the proxy implements.
So, how can I make camel see the annotation and inject the value of the header as an argument to the method?

ProxyFactoryBean is a spring and not Camel, and as such it does not know about those Camel annotations.
Instead see here how to use Camel Proxy in Spring XML files: http://camel.apache.org/using-camelproxy.html

Related

Accessing a Spring Bean from a Servlet

I have a Spring Bean defined in my applicationContext like:
<bean id="spaceReader" class="com.company.SpaceReader">
</bean>
I would like to be able to access this bean in my Application Servlet without having to use:
ApplicationContext context = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext(CONTEXT_LOCATION);
context.getBean("SpaceReader");
I've tried exporting it using the following:
<bean id="ContextExporter" class="org.springframework.web.context.support.ServletContextAttributeExporter">
<property name="contextExporterAttributes">
<map>
<entry key="SpaceReaderKey">
<ref local="spaceReader" />
</entry>
</map>
</property>
</bean>
but when i inject it into the Servlet, it returns a Null value. Just wondering if there's something i'm missing when i export the Bean or when i try to access it in the Servlet?
You can inject dependencies using annotations even in servlet (there is a special SpringBeanAutowiringSupport helper class for this pourpose):
public class CustomServlet extends HttpServlet {
#Autowired
private ProductService productService;
#Override
public void init(ServletConfig config) throws ServletException {
super.init(config);
// inject productService dependency
SpringBeanAutowiringSupport.processInjectionBasedOnCurrentContext(this);
}
....
}

Spring MVC #PathVariable with dot (.) is getting truncated

This is continuation of question
Spring MVC #PathVariable getting truncated
Spring forum states that it has fixed(3.2 version) as part of ContentNegotiationManager. see the below link.
https://jira.springsource.org/browse/SPR-6164
https://jira.springsource.org/browse/SPR-7632
In my application requestParameter with .com is truncated.
Could anyone explain me how to use this new feature? how is it configurable at xml?
Note: spring forum- #1
Spring MVC #PathVariable with dot (.) is getting truncated
As far as i know this issue appears only for the pathvariable at the end of the requestmapping.
We were able to solve that by defining the regex addon in the requestmapping.
/somepath/{variable:.+}
Spring considers that anything behind the last dot is a file extension such as .jsonor .xml and trucate it to retrieve your parameter.
So if you have /somepath/{variable} :
/somepath/param, /somepath/param.json, /somepath/param.xml or /somepath/param.anything will result in a param with value param
/somepath/param.value.json, /somepath/param.value.xml or /somepath/param.value.anything will result in a param with value param.value
if you change your mapping to /somepath/{variable:.+} as suggested, any dot, including the last one will be consider as part of your parameter :
/somepath/param will result in a param with value param
/somepath/param.json will result in a param with value param.json
/somepath/param.xml will result in a param with value param.xml
/somepath/param.anything will result in a param with value param.anything
/somepath/param.value.json will result in a param with value param.value.json
...
If you don't care of extension recognition, you can disable it by overriding mvc:annotation-driven automagic :
<bean id="handlerMapping"
class="org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.method.annotation.RequestMappingHandlerMapping">
<property name="contentNegotiationManager" ref="contentNegotiationManager"/>
<property name="useSuffixPatternMatch" value="false"/>
</bean>
So, again, if you have /somepath/{variable} :
/somepath/param, /somepath/param.json, /somepath/param.xml or /somepath/param.anything will result in a param with value param
/somepath/param.value.json, /somepath/param.value.xml or /somepath/param.value.anything will result in a param with value param.value
note : the difference from the default config is visible only if you have a mapping like somepath/something.{variable}. see Resthub project issue
if you want to keep extension management, since Spring 3.2 you can also set the useRegisteredSuffixPatternMatch property of RequestMappingHandlerMapping bean in order to keep suffixPattern recognition activated but limited to registered extension.
Here you define only json and xml extensions :
<bean id="handlerMapping"
class="org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.method.annotation.RequestMappingHandlerMapping">
<property name="contentNegotiationManager" ref="contentNegotiationManager"/>
<property name="useRegisteredSuffixPatternMatch" value="true"/>
</bean>
<bean id="contentNegotiationManager" class="org.springframework.web.accept.ContentNegotiationManagerFactoryBean">
<property name="favorPathExtension" value="false"/>
<property name="favorParameter" value="true"/>
<property name="mediaTypes">
<value>
json=application/json
xml=application/xml
</value>
</property>
</bean>
Note that mvc:annotation-driven accepts now a contentNegotiation option to provide a custom bean but the property of RequestMappingHandlerMapping has to be changed to true (default false) (cf. https://jira.springsource.org/browse/SPR-7632).
For that reason, you still have to override the all mvc:annotation-driven configuration. I opened a ticket to Spring to ask for a custom RequestMappingHandlerMapping : https://jira.springsource.org/browse/SPR-11253. Please vote if you are intereted in.
While overriding, be carreful to consider also custom Execution management overriding. Otherwise, all your custom Exception mappings will fail. You will have to reuse messageCoverters with a list bean :
<bean id="validator" class="org.springframework.validation.beanvalidation.LocalValidatorFactoryBean" />
<bean id="conversionService" class="org.springframework.format.support.FormattingConversionServiceFactoryBean" />
<util:list id="messageConverters">
<bean class="your.custom.message.converter.IfAny"></bean>
<bean class="org.springframework.http.converter.ByteArrayHttpMessageConverter"></bean>
<bean class="org.springframework.http.converter.StringHttpMessageConverter"></bean>
<bean class="org.springframework.http.converter.ResourceHttpMessageConverter"></bean>
<bean class="org.springframework.http.converter.xml.SourceHttpMessageConverter"></bean>
<bean class="org.springframework.http.converter.xml.XmlAwareFormHttpMessageConverter"></bean>
<bean class="org.springframework.http.converter.xml.Jaxb2RootElementHttpMessageConverter"></bean>
<bean class="org.springframework.http.converter.json.MappingJacksonHttpMessageConverter"></bean>
</util:list>
<bean name="exceptionHandlerExceptionResolver"
class="org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.method.annotation.ExceptionHandlerExceptionResolver">
<property name="order" value="0"/>
<property name="messageConverters" ref="messageConverters"/>
</bean>
<bean name="handlerAdapter"
class="org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.method.annotation.RequestMappingHandlerAdapter">
<property name="webBindingInitializer">
<bean class="org.springframework.web.bind.support.ConfigurableWebBindingInitializer">
<property name="conversionService" ref="conversionService" />
<property name="validator" ref="validator" />
</bean>
</property>
<property name="messageConverters" ref="messageConverters"/>
</bean>
<bean id="handlerMapping"
class="org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.method.annotation.RequestMappingHandlerMapping">
</bean>
I implemented, in the open source project Resthub that I am part of, a set of tests on these subjects : see https://github.com/resthub/resthub-spring-stack/pull/219/files & https://github.com/resthub/resthub-spring-stack/issues/217
Update for Spring 4: since 4.0.1 you can use PathMatchConfigurer (via your WebMvcConfigurer), e.g.
#Configuration
protected static class AllResources extends WebMvcConfigurerAdapter {
#Override
public void configurePathMatch(PathMatchConfigurer matcher) {
matcher.setUseRegisteredSuffixPatternMatch(true);
}
}
#Configuration
public class WebConfig implements WebMvcConfigurer {
#Override
public void configurePathMatch(PathMatchConfigurer configurer) {
configurer.setUseSuffixPatternMatch(false);
}
}
In xml, it would be (https://jira.spring.io/browse/SPR-10163):
<mvc:annotation-driven>
[...]
<mvc:path-matching registered-suffixes-only="true"/>
</mvc:annotation-driven>
In addition to Martin Frey's answer, this can also be fixed by adding a trailing slash in the RequestMapping value:
/path/{variable}/
Keep in mind that this fix does not support maintainability. It now requires all URI's to have a trailing slash - something that may not be apparent to API users / new developers. Because it's likely not all parameters may have a . in them, it may also create intermittent bugs
In Spring Boot Rest Controller, I have resolved these by following Steps:
RestController :
#GetMapping("/statusByEmail/{email:.+}/")
public String statusByEmail(#PathVariable(value = "email") String email){
//code
}
And From Rest Client:
Get http://mywebhook.com/statusByEmail/abc.test#gmail.com/
adding the ":.+" worked for me, but not until I removed outer curly brackets.
value = {"/username/{id:.+}"} didn't work
value = "/username/{id:.+}" works
Hope I helped someone :)
/somepath/{variable:.+} works in Java requestMapping tag.
Here's an approach that relies purely on java configuration:
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Bean;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Configuration;
import org.springframework.web.servlet.config.annotation.WebMvcConfigurationSupport;
import org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.method.annotation.RequestMappingHandlerMapping;
#Configuration
public class MvcConfig extends WebMvcConfigurationSupport{
#Bean
public RequestMappingHandlerMapping requestMappingHandlerMapping() {
RequestMappingHandlerMapping handlerMapping = super.requestMappingHandlerMapping();
handlerMapping.setUseSuffixPatternMatch(false);
handlerMapping.setUseTrailingSlashMatch(false);
return handlerMapping;
}
}
One pretty easy way to work around this issue is to append a trailing slash ...
e.g.:
use :
/somepath/filename.jpg/
instead of:
/somepath/filename.jpg
In Spring Boot, The Regular expression solve the problem like
#GetMapping("/path/{param1:.+}")
The complete solution including email addresses in path names for spring 4.2 is
<bean id="contentNegotiationManager"
class="org.springframework.web.accept.ContentNegotiationManagerFactoryBean">
<property name="favorPathExtension" value="false" />
<property name="favorParameter" value="true" />
<property name="mediaTypes">
<value>
json=application/json
xml=application/xml
</value>
</property>
</bean>
<mvc:annotation-driven
content-negotiation-manager="contentNegotiationManager">
<mvc:path-matching suffix-pattern="false" registered-suffixes-only="true" />
</mvc:annotation-driven>
Add this to the application-xml
If you are using Spring 3.2.x and <mvc:annotation-driven />, create this little BeanPostProcessor:
package spring;
public final class DoNotTruncateMyUrls implements BeanPostProcessor {
#Override
public Object postProcessBeforeInitialization(Object bean, String beanName) throws BeansException {
if (bean instanceof RequestMappingHandlerMapping) {
((RequestMappingHandlerMapping)bean).setUseSuffixPatternMatch(false);
}
return bean;
}
#Override
public Object postProcessAfterInitialization(Object bean, String beanName) throws BeansException {
return bean;
}
}
Then put this in your MVC config xml:
<bean class="spring.DoNotTruncateMyUrls" />
Finally I found solution in Spring Docs:
To completely disable the use of file extensions, you must set both of the following:
useSuffixPatternMatching(false), see PathMatchConfigurer
favorPathExtension(false), see ContentNegotiationConfigurer
Adding this to my WebMvcConfigurerAdapter implementation solved the problem:
#Override
public void configureContentNegotiation(ContentNegotiationConfigurer configurer) {
configurer.favorPathExtension(false);
}
#Override
public void configurePathMatch(PathMatchConfigurer matcher) {
matcher.setUseSuffixPatternMatch(false);
}
For me the
#GetMapping(path = "/a/{variableName:.+}")
does work but only if you also encode the "dot" in your request url as "%2E" then it works. But requires URL's to all be that...which is not a "standard" encoding, though valid. Feels like something of a bug :|
The other work around, similar to the "trailing slash" way is to move the variable that will have the dot "inline" ex:
#GetMapping(path = "/{variableName}/a")
now all dots will be preserved, no modifications needed.
If you write both back and frontend, another simple solution is to attach a "/" at the end of the URL at front. If so, you don't need to change your backend...
somepath/myemail#gmail.com/
Be happy!
As of Spring 5.2.4 (Spring Boot v2.2.6.RELEASE)
PathMatchConfigurer.setUseSuffixPatternMatch and ContentNegotiationConfigurer.favorPathExtension have been deprecated ( https://spring.io/blog/2020/03/24/spring-framework-5-2-5-available-now and https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/24179).
The real problem is that the client requests a specific media type (like .com) and Spring added all those media types by default. In most cases your REST controller will only produce JSON so it will not support the requested output format (.com).
To overcome this issue you should be all good by updating your rest controller (or specific method) to support the 'ouput' format (#RequestMapping(produces = MediaType.ALL_VALUE)) and of course allow characters like a dot ({username:.+}).
Example:
#RequestMapping(value = USERNAME, consumes = MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_VALUE, produces = MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_VALUE)
public class UsernameAPI {
private final UsernameService service;
#GetMapping(value = "/{username:.+}", consumes = MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_VALUE, produces = MediaType.ALL_VALUE)
public ResponseEntity isUsernameAlreadyInUse(#PathVariable(value = "username") #Valid #Size(max = 255) String username) {
log.debug("Check if username already exists");
if (service.doesUsernameExist(username)) {
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.NO_CONTENT).build();
}
return ResponseEntity.notFound().build();
}
}
Spring 5.3 and above will only match registered suffixes (media types).
If you are using Spring 3.2+ then below solution will help. This will handle all urls so definitely better than applying regex pattern in the request URI mapping to allow . like /somepath/{variable:.+}
Define a bean in the xml file
<bean class="org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.method.annotation.RequestMappingHandlerMapping">
<property name="useSuffixPatternMatch" value="false"/>
<property name="useRegisteredSuffixPatternMatch" value="true"/>
</bean>
The flags usage can be found on the documentation. I am putting snipped to explain
exlanation of useRegisteredSuffixPatternMatch is said to be resolving the issue. From the java doc in the class
If enabled, a controller method mapped to "/users" also matches to
"/users.json" assuming ".json" is a file extension registered with the
provided {#link #setContentNegotiationManager(ContentNegotiationManager)
contentNegotiationManager}. This can be useful for allowing only specific
URL extensions to be used as well as in cases where a "." in the URL path
can lead to ambiguous interpretation of path variable content, (e.g. given
"/users/{user}" and incoming URLs such as "/users/john.j.joe" and
"/users/john.j.joe.json").
Simple Solution Fix: adding a regex {q:.+} in the #RequestMapping
#RequestMapping("medici/james/Site")
public class WebSiteController {
#RequestMapping(value = "/{site:.+}", method = RequestMethod.GET)
public ModelAndView display(#PathVariable("site") String site) {
return getModelAndView(site, "web site");
}
}
Now, for input /site/jamesmedice.com, “site” will display the correct james'site

Spring Instantiation using a none-static factory method

I have got a situation where I would like to create bean2 in Spring config:
beans.xml:
<bean id="bean1" class="...">
<property name="..." ref="..." />
</bean>
bean2 = bean1.foo()
Would appreciate any help,
Thanks,
Behzad
You can use instance factory method. See corresponding chapter in Spring documentation.
<bean id="bean2" factory-bean="bean1" factory-method="foo"/>
If you are using annotations you can use:
#Configuration
public class AppConfig {
#Bean
#Lazy
public Bean1 getBean1(){
return Bean1.getInstance();
}
#Bean
public Bean2 getBean2() {
return this.getBean1().newBean2(); //in your example is this.getBean1().foo();
}
}

Inject a file resource into Spring bean

What is a good way to inject some file resource into Spring bean ?
Now i autowire ServletContext and use like below. Is more elegant way to do that in Spring MVC ?
#Controller
public class SomeController {
#Autowired
private ServletContext servletContext;
#RequestMapping("/texts")
public ModelAndView texts() {
InputStream in = servletContext.getResourceAsStream("/WEB-INF/file.txt");
// ...
}
}
Something like this:
#Controller
public class SomeController {
private Resource resource;
public void setResource(Resource resource) {
this.resource = resource;
}
#RequestMapping("/texts")
public ModelAndView texts() {
InputStream in = resource.getInputStream();
// ...
in.close();
}
}
In your bean definition:
<bean id="..." class="x.y.SomeController">
<property name="resource" value="/WEB-INF/file.txt"/>
</bean>
This will create a ServletContextResource using the /WEB-INF/file.txt path, and inject that into your controller.
Note you can't use component-scanning to detect your controller using this technique, you need an explicit bean definition.
Or just use the #Value annotation.
For single file:
#Value("classpath:conf/about.xml")
private Resource about;
For multiple files:
#Value("classpath*:conf/about.*")
private Resource[] abouts;
What do you intend to use the resource for? In you example you don't do anything with it.
From it's name, however, it looks like you are trying to load internationalisation / localisation messages - for which you can you a MessageSource.
If you define some beans (possibly in a separate messages-context.xml) similar to this:
<bean id="messageSource"
class="org.springframework.context.support.ReloadableResourceBundleMessageSource">
<property name="basenames">
<list>
<value>WEB-INF/messages/messages</value>
</list>
</property>
</bean>
<bean id="localeChangeInterceptor"
class="org.springframework.web.servlet.i18n.LocaleChangeInterceptor">
<property name="paramName" value="lang" />
</bean>
<bean id="localeResolver"
class="org.springframework.web.servlet.i18n.CookieLocaleResolver">
<property name="defaultLocale" value="en_GB" />
</bean>
Spring will load your resource bundle when you application starts. You can then autowire the MessageSource into your controller and use it to get localised messages:
#Controller
public class SomeController {
#Autowired
private MessageSource messageSource;
#RequestMapping("/texts")
public ModelAndView texts(Locale locale) {
String localisedMessage = messageSource.getMessage("my.message.key", new Object[]{}, locale)
/* do something with localised message here */
return new ModelAndView("texts");
}
}
NB. adding Locale as a parameter to your controller method will cause Spring to magically wire it in - that's all you need to do.
You can also then access the messages in your resource bundle in your JSPs using:
<spring:message code="my.message.key" />
Which is my preferred way to do it - just seems cleaner.

Does Spring framework makes possible to inject a collection in annotation-driven fashion?

Is it possible to do the same using annotation-driven injection:
<beans>
...
<bean id="interceptorsList" class="com.mytest.AnyAction">
<property name="interceptors">
<list>
<ref bean="validatorInteceptor"/>
<ref bean="profilingInterceptor"/>
</list>
</property>
</bean>
</beans>
Is it possible to do the same using annotation-driven injection?
Good question - I don't think so (assuming that by "annotation-driven injection" you're referring to annotations on AnyAction).
It's possible that the following might work, but I don't think Spring recognises the #Resources annotation:
#Resources({
#Resource(name="validatorInteceptor"),
#Resource(name="profilingInterceptor")
})
private List interceptors;
Give it a try anyway, you never know.
Other than, you can use #Configuration-style configuration instead of XML:
#Configuration
public class MyConfig {
private #Resource Interceptor profilingInterceptor;
private #Resource Interceptor validatorInteceptor;
#Bean
public AnyAction anyAction() {
AnyAction anyAction = new AnyAction();
anyAction.setInterceptors(Arrays.asList(
profilingInterceptor, validatorInteceptor
));
return anyAction;
}
}
Yes, Spring will happily inject all configured interceptors if you use this pattern:
#Autowired
public void setInterceptors(List<Interceptor> interceptors){
this.interceptors = interceptors;
}
private List<Interceptor> interceptors;
Note that you will probably have to configure default-autowire=byType on your context.xml. I don't know if there's an alternative to this in plain annotation configuration.

Resources